Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
RWLK Due Diligence Report, Brief, But To The Point
https://interactiveswingtrading.com/2019/05/30/rewalk-dd/
$ELKS Due Diligence
https://interactiveswingtrading.com/2019/05/29/3499/
Announced Jeuveau™ premium list price of $610 per 100-unit vial
WHy is Botox listed as cheaper on this website. They said their main competitive advantage was that JeuveuX is cheaper wtf....
https://www.truemedcost.com/botox-price/
The stock is also 100% pledged with a full lien outstanding. "DI" (no further explanation on that acronym in the filings from what I've seen) and Longitude hold the rights...
Technically, if Alphaeon violates the covenants of the loan agreement, the creditors can instantly sell it. Usually Stock based loans or "SBLOC's" are set up so the creditor can instantly sell. First the creditor notifies the debtor that they need to increase collateral, then if they don't, they have full rights to sell all of the collateral
How long do you have to hold a stock before you are forced to file a statement of beneficial ownership Like, if you buy, then sell the next day, do you still have to filed a 13-G?
Not sure if anybody borrowed the stock. All I know is that CIBC reported owning calls, and that BIMI went up like 600%. There is no insider selling reports, which seems strange since its a China stock with no material events, no news or promotion. I suspect the insiders found another to profit off the increase. One of the directors bought 500k shares in April 2018. I think they engaged CIBC in so0me kind of swap agreement so they could profit off the increase.
I think I've figured out what happened with NF Energy Savings. CIBC reports owning call options, but I think this is because there was an option swap agreement. On the date of the agreement, the insider (or an affiliate of the insider) bought put options, and CIBC went short. In order to hedge the short sale, CIBC purchased a call option from the insider to net any potential increase in the price. The insider intended to short, so when the price declined, they could (theoretically) sell the stock to CIBC then buy it back immediately and profit off the difference.
To avoid actually trading the stock, CIBC performs the trade, so when the price fell, CIBC just covers the short, then gives the insider the profit subtracting the strike premium the insider pays for the option.
This is all just speculation. It just seems very strange that CIBC World Markets owned 5 million NF Energy Call options between 6/30/18 and 12/30/18. The price fluctuations were very unusual considering there were no material events
Take a look at NFEC's option history (changed ticker to BIMI recently, company name is NF Energy Savings Corp, a China stock) . You can see that CIBC World Markets owned 5 millions call options in their 3rd quarter 13-F. There is only 8 million shares available and more then 1/2 is owned by the insiders. The stock went up 600% on no news or developments. I suspect the insiders loaned the stock to a non affiliate, who then engaged in some kind of derivative swap with CIBC to somehow profit on its increase without actually delivering the stock to CIBC. The 5 million call options also had no strike price. Out of the dozens of options CIBC had in their portfolio, NFEC was the only one without a strike. There is just a question mark where there should be a price
Question: Do insiders have to report if they loan their stock to somebody? Also, if the borrower sells the stock, isn't that an insider sell?
world is a crazy place, truth stranger then fiction, but you guys are probably right
Yeah you're probably right
Question? Have you read the articles?
The articles weren't just innocent tabloid, they were VICIOUS ATTACKS, slanderous rumors, at very prominent well known people who are quick to sue at even the slightest chance. Why didn't they sue deepcapture?
Then why, out of the hundreds of articles they wrote, were they only sued once. Most of those articles contained what could be construed as VICIOUS unsubstantiated slander, so why only one successful lawsuit?
The Fed and DTCC can't be audited. I'm sure they are all just good nice people though.
I find it EXTREMELY ironic, and very puzzling, that Janice Shell, the queen of exposing penny stock Frauds online, would use the word conspiracy with the typical mainstream media connotations. Its like you're implying that conspiracies don't exist, and that any conversation of them should be immediately disregarded.
We read about massive conspiracies on the stock market AT LEAST once a fort night, and that is being conservative ..To imply that deep capture is discredited because it is a "conspiracy website" is naive at best. Patrick Byrne is no conspiracy nut to just dismiss. He runs a multi billion dollar company, and is highly educated. Also, to give him credit, I don't think he has ever went on the Alex Jones show
That chart pattern was a textbook short. I remember seeing it and thinking to myself that it looked very unusual. just flat lining like that. Stock always moves conspicuously, and the momentum is always weak. It always struggles to go up when it does
I finally got around to reading their filings. Going to be analyzing GGB today. Its beyond unethical I think. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that the goodwill is fake. What worse is that fairness of opinion. Its stuff like this that makes me question our entire system. If this can happen, such outrageously blatant fraud, what else is happening. Vic Neufield stepped down right after it happened yet you have all these trolls and and shareholders in denial touting the stock online
Green Growth Brands? Its a reverse merger essentially, yet GGB is not even worth the price they are offering APHA. This is such a blatant fraud in my opinion
deepcapture nough said. Notice how OSTK's lawyer John O'Quinn suddenly died in a car accident while he was trying to expose this problem. Its wall streets little secret. Imagine, the ability to create fake shares at will, with no oversight. DTCC and Federal Reserver are SRO's that can't be audited. Show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome
MARKET REVERSING SOON BY THE WAY! TAKE THOSE PROFITS!
I'm outa here this place is creeping me out.
Under the right circumstance it can indicate there was increased short volume. Of course you can never be 100% certain.
sometimes it can show you something though. Depending on the circumstances, deviation from the mean daily short volume can indicate that there were true bears
Complicated Spbc. Tried reading through the details but realized it would take hours to fully digest the whole thing. I'm sure some people could figure it out faster but not me. I've only just started reading them recently. Can't seem to find how many people redeemed their shares
2018
The Dow chart pattern is the same as EOLS, RGSE, both stocks with phony shares in circulation. There is a big sell off, then brokers buy all phony shares back and the stock goes back to its original position. The fed just printed a bunch of money, gave it to the PPT, PPT directs the banks to buy up stock with fake money, then once all the phony shares are cleaned up, the price of the stock goes back to where it was before because all the fake shares are gone
RGSE, a stock that was frequently on the threshold list, announced they were going to be delisted
Friday, 2/8/19, at 4:16pm ET
"On February 6, 2019, Real Goods Solar, Inc. (the “Company”) received a written notification from The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) that its Class A common stock will be suspended from trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market effective as the open of business on Friday, February 15, 2019 as a result of failing to regain compliance with the $1.00 per share minimum bid price requirement for continued inclusion on Nasdaq based on Listing Rule 5550(a)(2)".
The stock gapped down 40%, then immediately reverted back to its original position. All the fake shares were bought up. Naked shorts need to cover their positions before the stock gets delisted because OTC markets has no liquidity, no market makers and hft's. The same thing happened to Root9b. When news came that the stock was going to be delisted, it exploded 130% intraday as all the fake shares were bought back, then the nasdaq halted it indefinitely until it was removed from the exchange. EOLS same story. Fake shares get inserted into the market, then when the squeeze occurs, all the fake shares get bought back and the stock goes back to its original position
ROOT9HB
On November 9, 2017, the Company informed the Panel that it would not attend the November 16, 2017 hearing and would not be able to cure the compliance issues previously reported. The Company is working with Nasdaq to begin the process of delisting the Company from the Nasdaq.
look at the chart, 200% increase on nov.9
- Dec.23 Mnuchin calls heads of largest banks to see if they are liquid
-Dec.24, Trump convenes the Plunge Protection Team, Dow officially reaches bear market territory going down 20%
-Dec.26, Dow breaks the record for point increase intraday, going up 1086
-Dec.27 all major financial regulators shutdown, with skeleton crew for emergencies
-market rallies at the highest pace in recent memory.
Conclusion, entire market is rigged.
The SEC oversees FINRA. End of story lol...
1manband
"The SEC does not oversee the day to day operations of FINRA or the Exchanges. They are more than capable of doing fine by themselves. That includes market surveillance, which was unchanged during the government shutdown".
The market didn't decline because of the shutdown, it declined because of the fed raising rates and the yield curve. The shutdown was just icing on the cake. The market rallied in historic fashion during the shutdown. You clearly haven't been paying attention, and yes, the SEC does oversee FINRA, or else who else would. They are a self regulatory organization. In fact, if you google "who oversees FINRA", you get in big bold letters "The Securities and Exchange Commission".
"The SEC divisions involved with market surveillance and enforcement were still on the job as "essential" employees".
CFTF 61 of 673 employees (9.1%)
Sec 4436 to 300 employees (6%)
I don't think 300 employees is enough to oversea the entire market. To say that 61 employees can oversee the CFTC is laughable
"Also, the primary regulators tasked with those segments of the market regulations are the exchanges and FINRA, and since they are not government employees, they were fully staffed and working normally".
Who's job is it to oversee FINRA? They are an SRO, and created the NASDAQ. Its run for the brokers, by the brokers. Massive conflict of interest. SEC can't oversee all activities with 300 employees, and only 110 of those 300 employees were for law enforcement -- the rest were for for protecting life and property.
The system is a complete scam, and something fishy happened during that shutdown. For all these regulatory bodies to be shutdown 4 days before the turn of the new year, while the market was in freefall. Something doesn't add up. The day of the shutdown, the DOW had its biggest single day percent increase ever....lol hilarious.
CFTF 61 of 673 employees (9.1%)
Sec 4436 to 300 employees 6%
40% of FinCEN
IRS 9946 out of 79868 (12.5%)
Office of Inspector General 25 out of 169 (14%)
Yeah for average trader its usually nothing nefarious, but I think once you get high up, it's wall streets dirty little secret. The ability to create fake shares is akin to having a money tree. As Charlie Munger says, show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome. When there is a will, there is a way. It's funny that during the gov shutdown, the IRS, SEC, CFTC, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, TARP were all shutdown with minimal employees working right as the market was crashing. I suspect the banks were over margined, so the fed justified pumping the market by buying up all the fake shares floating in the system. The whole market is rigged by the fed and the brokers. Its FUBU (for us by us) lol
C&O%D*X /see,oh,dee,ex/ is another securities lending scheme (in my opinion). Check out the 8-K’ for 1/18/19. Securities were lent to a firm that calls themselves
Be-n-t-l-y ro-th-^_ch_ild. Hilarious. Shows how little regard they have for the laws if they would use that ridiculous name
Actually I just reread my notes. I don't think it says they have to report that they loaned the stock to somebody. It does say that they can't use the stock registered in the s-3 for the payment of the convertible note to cover short sales executed prior to the registration of the shares listed in the s -3.
Recently, they requested an amendment to the terms of the notes, asking for the floor price of the note conversion to be lowered from $2.5 to $1
Yeah check out PIXY. They registered stock for payment on a convertible note worth 10 million. Alpha Capital, CVI investments, Dominion Capital
(a company that reports address on 15th floor of a building that doesn't have a 15th floor) were the creditors.
The S-3 took effect october.29th, then on november 21, the stock ran up 33% over a 4 day period leading up to the 10k, then suddenly the stock crashed from 4.60 to 1.15 a month later. No filings showing the creditors sold their stock. They pledged it to somebody who sold I think. I'm just uncertain as to the mechanics of this. Not sure how they can accomplish this because it says in the filings that they have to disclose if they pledge or loan the stock out. If you look at Patrick Byrne, he discloses that he pledged his stock to a bank for a loan in his form 4. Seems highly illegal, and most likely the heart of the corruption on the capital markets. To be able to sell stock without reporting or create counterfeit stock out of thin air is a theft
Wow, that's amazing! What's an IOI?
Draper Oakwood, Roth, Sir Marin Sorrell of S4 Capital (former CEO of WPP) and a 500% pump intraday, and Asia. All the recipes for another pump. I was watching it for a few weeks. Its an SPBC. Got in at 11ish, sold 8. Only bought half though. The mistake was not waiting for the full retracement. I find with these stocks, if you see it go right back to where it started, the risk reward is excellent. They are trying to sell shares, and the underwriters will manipulate the price ahead of a sale to attract buyers. Show the incentive and I'll show you the outcome
First day it was on the threshold list was Monday the 8th of this month.
-Short interest as of march.15 was 2,974,956 25% of the float
-Short interest as of march.29 was 3,522,297 31% of the float
-Robert E Grant through https://strathspeycrown.com is the majority share holder of Alphaeon, the 50% share holder of Evolus. They just filed a shelf registration, currently awaiting sec approval. Alphaeon is looking to register 15 million shares if I remember correctly.
I've got a question about rbz though. Why did it drop 50% in the premarket , then explode 300% in the morning. CRAZY!
I don't this has anything to do with market making, I think there was a hedge fund that shorted the stock without delivering, then it backfired on them and they can't locate shares at the price they shorted anymore because they are margined out. Someone has been shorting this stock vigorously for the past few months