Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Are we looking at the same stock? This stock is a dump with an absentee CEO and they've deleted all their Twitter posts to cover their tails. But hey, you're welcome to help alleviate some of the other guys gains and buy their shares at the new cheap price.
Can you post a link to that Twitter feed? I was under the impression that they deleted the Twitter account and disappeared.
I would say that it casts doubt that he indeed has a LinkedIn profile that doesn't mention the company that he's interim CEO of.
The word on the forum is that he was a bouncer at a strip joint before this. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt since that is also not mentioned on the LinkedIn. But what a great resume-enhancer being CEO of a publicly traded company would make. You'd think that would be on there if this were legit, wouldn't you?
Son, I was a conspiracy theorist back in March when you first started posting and I was starting to wonder if I had been scammed by LEAS. Now, the truth is that they really exist and they're really coming to take this thing back to the world of no bid.
Look up CTLE. A couple months ago someone "supposedly" used the interim CEO of LEAS's name and reactivated a dead shell. Twitter and Investorhub are now completely dormant. Even if it was an imposter, it demonstrates how easy it is to front-load and resurrect a dormant stock. Patience gives the front-loader time to escape with the bags of money, nothing more.
Usually the CEO of a company will at least mention the fact they're CEO on their LinkedIn profile. The CEO of Strategic Asset Leasing has never mentioned the company on his LinkedIn. Of course this is a scam.
Nobody is selling because nobody is buying... I've feel like I've been raped in stock price.
And once again, Friday's movement was ONLY because of a tweet, and a seemingly unimpressive one at that. Trump tweets and knocks $1.5 trillion off the market. IR tweets and brings LEAS from .0015 to .0030. Until there are actual filings, there are nothing more than the same blow-sunshine-up-everyones-butt tweets we've seen for months.
So I'm taking it that this "sure thing" did not work out well. It got quiet over here.
It's only a tweet, nothing more...
I've been on vacation... Weren't we supposed to go current this week? What'd I miss?
The Pawn abides...
Can he change his name to Prawn Ballerson and sprinkle a little hope over on the SHMP forum? :) That stock has let down more people than this one.
As a former ADGI/GlobeTel/Sanswire shareholder, I will agree. Janice, those tickers ought to dredge up some memories :)
Sounds like an old frat brother of mine. Was Pawn a Pike by chance?
The next step is definitely the attorney letter. Has anyone heard who the next brave attorney might be?
And did Pawn tell us it's a scam and all hope of getting our money back is gone?
This board has gotten a lot quieter lately. I don't see as many posts about people gobbling up the cheap shares.
We've had two attorney letters from two different attorneys already. We've been seeing posts from people on this board promising that it'll go current any day now since January. Unless a unicorn farts an OTC current status, what can we expect to change?
Attorneys so far: Leinwand... nope... Paradiso... nope... I would guess Bill Clinton, but he's been disbarred.
I'm in this with everyone else, since at this point my share value has diminished too much to get out. If it turns around, I will be the first person to come on here and admit that I was wrong. I've had that speech typed up and sitting in notepad for a month :)
Ummm. So do you really believe that or are you just trying to keep this monstrosity from heading back to 0.0001? At this point I'm convinced these guys could screw up an anvil.
The volume is up since yesterday. Over 20 million shares moved so far.
The good news is that any movement here equals at least 100% profit.
I've been skeptical of LEAS for a while, but the fact they broke silence and released a tweet directly addressing the CTLE issue leaves me some hope that there is a silver lining here (as opposed to CTLE and BBDA) since they do have posting privileges to OTC, and therefore control over the company. I still own my shares and would love to see a return on them. Their silence scared me the most, and now that I see there is still a "man behind the curtain" I'll ride this out a little longer. Their handling of the paperwork has been sub-par in my opinion, but if they get the ball across the goal line, it's still a touchdown.
Here's the playbook for what happened to us.
https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/7402-2/
The only difference between LEAS and the other mentioned stocks is that LEAS ran higher before it started sinking back to its true value.
Or the answer may be that... 1) Bolbat and his puppet-handler snuck one past the OTC guys and he was able to post crap under LEAS, 2) They tried the same thing with BBDA, but were headed off the the pass, 3) The resurrected CTLE instead of Christ and it worked out the same as BBDA. Roll that beautiful bean footage back to LEAS, and realize that this attorney letter has been pending for way to long and then you'll realize that they were busted on their original scheme.
And I'm an idiot because I HAVE money in these scams.
Or the answer may very well be... the answer.
And a secondary question. If the LEAS, BBDA, and CTLE folks truly own their domains, why do they use @yahoo.com and @gmail.com email addresses?
I hate to play the white devil's advocate, but don't we all know two or three Bolbats that may spell their name differently. Hell, there's Jackson/Jaxson and Cameron/Kamryn, why can't there be Dennis/Denis?
1.18M is what FinViz says.
Strangely nothing at all. That's why I think this is a build up to new info being released.
My guess would be that it is trading on insider info. BPTH went up like 20% and then settled back down the day before the press release that skyrocketed it.
Selling and losing are one in the same now :) I'll leave the crumbs hoping to catch something bigger. I wound up with a picture of a "stratellite" the last time I fell for this trick. Google ADGI, Globetel, or Sanswire and you'll learn that saints and martyrs don't live on the OTC.
This is probably true. I've paid no attention to the man behind the curtain.
At this point I'm just pissed with myself. Normally when I get screwed it's by a professional. I lost money to someone that didn't even give the illusion of having their crap together.
The amended attorney letter still isn't showing on OTCMarkets. Hopefully they check their spam folder every now and then.
I went back through OTC and looked at similar stocks that were revived and received their yield sign. They weren't missing any years in their annual reports. The new team would file all of the annual reports for prior years. I see that we are missing 2016 and 2017. I'm not certain if it's a requirement but it was an observation.