I’m guessing someone bought in at the high and didn’t average down and even a billion dollar settlement won’t recoup losses.

Probably in at .30+ and didn’t average down and don’t see the returns. .03 is a 2X for some

I said it a few days ago, the T-Mobile right behind Verizon to me is HUGE for the stock price support at positive momentum. We've got 2 huge jury trials that are about to happen. Deerballs, as you say, VPLM and shareholders in THE BEST POSITION EVER! Buyers are thanking Sellers now.

Good Volume!

Fireworks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am really liking the fact that T-Mobile is lined up right behind Verizon. These next few weeks/months are going to be real fun to be a part of.

Pre-trial is where VZ is going to realize what they're up against. Pre-trial hearings are used to determine legal issues. Pre-trial matters are decided by the judge and in most situations both the defense and/or prosecution present evidence and/or witness testimony. At pre-trial hearings judges have an opportunity to hear evidence presented in order to determine what evidence is admissible at trial.

This little OTC scam stock has a pre-trial in 11 days and by SCAM im talking about.....
Superior
Chance
At
Monetizing

Go VPLM!

WBW - The selling irks me too. I looked at Kevin Williams yesterday and he has 45mm warrants at a .005 price, that's $225k.
For him to exercise these warrants, probably selling shares is his best option. Makes me believe there is no buyout being discussed, because he wouldn't have to sell, would just be paid the difference for his shares. Pre-Trial 7/9 and Trial 8/19 for verizon. If I'm Kevin, I'd be doing the same thing.
It would be nice if Deerballs would ask Rich Inza reason for the selling and give a simple response, besides he's excited and working so hard.

We'll find out soon enough who'll be thanking who.

As insider selling does irk a bit, Buyers will be thanking Barbara/Chang for selling, especially at these levels.

How could you not be aware of the up-coming trial outcome? Why would anyone need to get back to you?

Joint Venture update
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/06/18/2900479/0/en/Stovall-Ranching-Companies-and-Bion-Team-Up-to-Produce-Eco-friendly-Montana-Beef.html

Clue me in on the trial transcripts? Not clear to me

Loophole- you’ve been quiet. Miss your comments on the FILINGS. You provide good input.

The heat will be on when the buyers show while shorts need to cover

I'll be at the VPLM party when they get financial judgements that are in-line with the "billions and billions of ongoing" infringements that the CEO has spoken about.

Pretrial 5 weeks away!

I don't know if it's the best position ever, but I dang sure do like the position VPLM is sitting right now. Move's make by Hudnell and team have been very strategic and execution thus far have been very very promising.

V- good point. If trial does happen 8/19…I might be in position to attend and will be happy to report.

Anyone plans on being at the Trial?

2 1/2 months til 8/19. Let's freaking GO

You make a good point AZ...Alice is out of the equation. Alice will be a non-factor in a jury case.

Interesting!
The Company is also announcing that since the November 1, 2023 announcement of the two new RBR continuation patent grants in India, Patent No.: 450851 and Patent No.: 450865 VoIP-Pal has been approached by representatives of potentially interested parties. They have scheduled to begin exploratory discussions.

If memory serves me, last i looked, shares were a supplement to salary.

Q2 is June Qtr end. hasn't happened yet

I'm willing to take the risk on those FACTS at .015 That's what the general market is priced at.

There is still 9mm shares shorted. upside seems to be very limited at this juncture.

I'm very surprised too! Opportunity for shorts to cover

9mm shorts out there! HOLD, HOLD, HOLD!

It is a bit of a gut punch watching the insider sells. Even with the Huawei settlement backdrop. and the upcoming trials. That's $165k in back in ole Clifton's pockets.

Expecting things to really start moving in a few weeks. It's been 2 yards and a cloud of dust! Few more yards to go.

Patent Litigation
The Company is party to patent and patent-related litigation cases as follows:
i. VoIP-Pal.com Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al. Case No. 6-20-cv-00272 in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas.
In April 2020, the Company filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Western District of Texas, against Amazon.com, Inc. and Certain related entities, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,218,606. The case is pending.
ii. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Verizon Comms., Inc. Case No. 6-21-cv-672 in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
On September 25, 2021, the Company filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, against Verizon and related entities alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,630,234 and 10,880,721. The case is pending.
iii. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al. Case No. 6-21-cv-668 in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
On September 25, 2021, the Company filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, against T-Mobile and related entities alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,630,234 and 10,880,721. The case is pending.
iv. VoIP-Pal.com Inc v Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd. et al Case No. 6-21-cv-1247 in US District Court, Western District of Texas
On November 30, 2021, the Company filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, against Huawei and related entities alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,630,234 and 10,880,721. On January 18, 2023, the Western District of Texas granted Huawei’s motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of Texas. The case no. is 3:23-cv-00151. The case was dismissed on May 13, 2024.

Just felt like reposting this:
Huawei’s motion for judgment on the pleadings under § 101 was denied.
VoIP-Pal CEO, Emil Malak, said “This is extremely good news. Once again, we have received another positive ruling in one of the many challenges attacking the validity of our patents. Each of those times our patents have stood on their technical merits. I am very grateful to our incredible, expert technical and legal teams that have worked so hard to help get us across the finish line. We are looking forward to having our day in court soon and hopefully bringing our long legal battles to a favorable conclusion. Patience is a virtue.”

This paragraph has me intrigued, specifically a technological improvement (patentable) as well as additional special advisory appointments. Hmmm! This seems to be extremely positive leading into Verizon and T-Mobile

The Court is particularly not persuaded by the Defendants’ argument that the
claim recites mere routine practices akin to switchboard operations that are
performed by a computer. From the record before the Court, this appears to
misrepresent the claimed invention and the asserted technological improvement. As
described in the specification, the invention does not merely involve the routing of
phone calls like a switchboard operator would do. Instead, the invention involves the
initiation of a phone call from a mobile phone. This includes a determination of
what the best manner would be to initiate the phone call to avoid roaming or long distance charges. To accomplish this, the invention includes the steps of requesting
and receiving an access code from a server. The access code identifies a number
that is local to the mobile phone and is associated with the callee. The call is then
initiated using the access code, as opposed to directly initiating the call using the
callee’s phone number. This appears to be the invention and technological
improvement captured by claim 1 of the ‘234 patent, which precludes granting a
motion to dismiss at this stage of the case.

9 days for shorts to cover on average volume.

Yes, I'll be happy to "Get back to you when they get financial judgements that are in-line with the "billions and billions of ongoing" infringements that the CEO has spoken about. If I don't get back to you, then it's a complete failure and confirmation that the patents aren't worth near as claimed".
You can stop cutting and pasting same ole line.

Just a reminder:
May 02, 2024
Huawei Can't Get VoIP-Pal Patents Axed Under Alice
A Northern District of Texas judge has shot down Huawei's motion that two VoIP-Pal.com patents on initiating mobile phone calls are invalid under the Alice standard for claiming only abstract ideas.

It's simple math equation .017 > 0.0 How can you say the patents are worth Nothing! The patents are currently worth .017/share.

Verizon tried like heck to transfer to NDCA but was denied. Looking back, but letting go of the NDCA cases paid off bigtime in keeping the case in Texas. I can't wait to see what develops. With a little over 3 months to trial, Verizon has got to be a bit behind the 8ball. This is going to be a very, very interesting next few weeks.