Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
T Woods, J Rose, S Garcia, R Fowler, E Els..........276
T Woods, A Scott, S Garcia, M Kuchar, P Mickelson
Tiebreaker = 283
McIlroy - Woods - Mickelson - Scott - Bradley, K...............277
Thanks
McIlroy, Schwartzel, Woods, Day, KT Kim - 272
Donald - Kuchar - McDowell - Mickelson - Els - 282
Krak - your inquiry to ACA Howe specifically asked if they were on the mountain working on projects related to MDMN, correct?
Is it possible you didn't ask the right question, they truthfully answered you that they were not working on anything related to MDMN, yet they were still indeed on the mountain?
Your DD has offered no indication they were not on the mountain - just that they were not on the mountain relating to MDMN. You are aware there are 2 compainies with property on the mountain, correct? I beleive one of them announced property examinations by geologists have been recently completed. Does ACA Howe employ any geologists?
Krak - just curious - if "there is no deal" as you have always been saying, just what is it that you mention CDCH being "cut out of"?
Which is it - there is no deal, or those "in the know" have known for a while that CDCH was going to be cut loose from said deal?
TIA
Your right - I read/scanned the update WAAAYYY to quickly, and just read the $50 million part - and divided by the shares out for the ~.30 ceiling. As I read closer, ~.30 ceiling is indeed laughable - as the 15% retained interest should be worth $$'s in the long run. And I am long - so thanks for getting me to read closer after posting an obvious erroneous estimation.
GLTA
So - the CDCH valuation estimates got a bit more of a ceiling - no more beliefs it could pop to $1-$2 dollars. Looks like ~.30 cents is the highest it's going??
GLTA
I still have shares. I did sell ~half several months ago ~$2.05, but also added quite a bit back ~$0.65. $1.30 is looking better than .65, but north of $4.00 again would look nicer.
GLTY
Because there is no company?
Looks like you were right. Get back in lower and profit again.
Thank you for catching that, my mistake. Please replace him with Ryan Moore. Everything else the same.
Luke Donald. Rory McIlroy. Rickie Barnes. Dustin Johnson. Ernie Els. Score: 286
Anyone want to bet that EV hasn't issued north of 10 BILLION shares in the past ~60 days to redeem all outstanding convertable debentures? That way he can say "hey look, I paid you back in full, it's the SEC's fault that the revoked shares you are now holding are absolutely worthless, but I'm square with you, you're debt is paid in full!!
Where is all the $$$ EV, and did TRON get his cut?
GLTA
Has BLDV been suspended from trading yet by the SEC? You would think that the SEC would act on public companies that lie to the general public and to the SEC???
GLTA
manufactured deadlines
Let's discuss that statement a bit furhter. Are deadlines mandated by the SEC "manufactured"??? They have missed SEC deadlines for filing, as well as the extension granted by the deadline "manufactured" by the SEC. Are you saying the SEC is a phony regulatory agency that just "manufactures" deadlines to hamstring companies who are just trying to grow their shareholder value? EV aught to sue the SEC if that is really the case.
GLTY
However according to the filings the Civil Actions have since been taken care of.
That is a flat out incorrect statement. Show me a filing, or any other link that indicates the Civil Actions have been taken care of. Quite the opposite in fact, and the filings do not even include all the Civil Actions. In FACT, one of the Civil Actions that was not even mentioned in the filings has resulted in a default judgement against, with the authorities looking to sieze assets, and finding NONE. How can you say that is "taken care of"???
Regarding a QUADRILLION. Here is the easy math.
50:1 R/S times 24,000:1 R/S = 1.2 Million to one R/S.
Well over a Billion issued since then (according to the filings)
1.2 Million times well over a Billion = well over a QUADRILLION. Please feel free to correct if the math is wrong. Mathematical facts are not speculation. Neither is active court actions. The only thing that is speculation is believing the filings tell the whole truth. That has been PROVEN to be an incorrect thing to believe as the whole truth.
GLTA
OTHER claims PROVEN
1) He's issued over a QUADRILLION shares (split adjusted) since he's been CEO. (currently no-bid and worthless)
2) He's lied in Press Releases.
3) He omitted several legal proceedings in SEC documents.
4) The sheriff went to headquarters to sieze assets related to those legal proceedings and found NOTHING.
These are not items that can be just dismissed as consequences of a bad economy.
Being an incompentent businessman, and having no ethics may not yet have resulted in a criminal judgement, as you have said, but unethical incompetence is not a recipe for building shareholder value - and that is really the main point in running a public company.
How has he done for shareholder value since he's been CEO?
GLTY
Interesting website registration information:
Visit AboutUs.org for more information about ARTFESTSCAM.COM
AboutUs: ARTFESTSCAM.COM
Registrant:
Artfest International, Inc.
13300 Branch View Lane
Dallas, TX 75234
US
Domain Name: ARTFESTSCAM.COM
http://www.networksolutions.com/whois-search/artfestscam.com
Maybe they know something?
GLTA
Interesting that this sentance was in the amended 10k filed on 5/2/2011.
On July 23, 2010, Mr. Steven Rash, filed a lawsuit in the State of Texas against Artfest International seeking monies owed for services rendered while employed at Artfest from 2008 to 2009. As of the date of this report, Artfest has retained counsel and is working with them to investigate the matter and develop a plan to remedy the issue.
According to the records of the Dallas courts, was this statement filed with the SEC an outright LIE?
GLTA
They had the new address (13300 Branch View) on the amended 10-K from 2 week ago. If, as you say, there is an address "template" on what they file, they had to have specifically changed that field on the "inability" filing of today.
Does anyone that lives in Dallas to a drive by and verify if in fact they indeed have been evicted again.
GLTA
From today's inability notice:
Address of Principal Executive Office (Street and Number): 13342 Midway Road, Suite 250
What happened to the state of the art studios and gallery at 13300 Branch View Lane that was touted recently as proof that they were a real company.
Did they get evicted again?
GLTA
ARTS HAS NEVER BEEN FOUND GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW OF ANY CRIMINAL MISS DOINGS.
Is that like the feather in their cap that they should hang their hat on?
They've been on the wrong end of SEVERAL court actions for civil mis-doings - is that not enough?
Follow this logic:
I'm a great CEO building shareholer value because I'm not a convicted felon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is that really the best message available?
GLTA
Facts about the company is the topic of the board.
The facts are:
They have outstaning court judgements which have yet to have been satisfied. (Been shown with official court document links)
They have issued over a QUADRILLION shares. (Simple math)
According to the sheriffs attempt to serve a siezure warrant, the have no assets at there headquarters. (Official court document links have been provided)
They EITHER have no cash, OR are guilty of obstruction of justice by hiding that cash from a court ordered judgement. (When a court is authorized to sieze assets, one of the locations they have legal accesss to is a bank account. If there was any cash in that location, the judgements would have been satisfied already)
They have had multiple lawyers resign from defending them in court proceedings. (Links to official court documents have been provided).
These facts are noted.
GLTA
YOU HAVE PROVIDED NO FACTS TO YOU CLAIMS THAT I HAVE STATED THAT IS MISS INFORMATION.
What? Your asking me to provide facts to the claims that YOU have stated? There are no facts to the claims you have stated, how is it on me to provide them?
The FACTS I have stated.
They have outstaning court judgements which have yet to have been satisfied. (Been shown with official court document links)
They have issued over a QUADRILLION shares. (Simple math)
According to the sheriffs attempt to serve a siezure warrant, the have no assets at there headquarters. (Official court document links have been provided)
They EITHER have no cash, OR are guilty of obstruction of justice by hiding that cash from a court ordered judgement. (When a court is authorized to sieze assets, one of the locations they have legal accesss to is a bank account. If there was any cash in that location, the judgements would have been satisfied already)
They have had multiple lawyers resign from defending them in court proceedings. (Links to official court documents have been provided).
Please pick one (or more if you choose) of the 5 FACTS listed above that you would like to dispute.
GLTA
So you are adamant that they are not guilty of obstuction of justice and have NO CASH?
GLTY
You speak of partial information?
How about the whole quote:
EITHER no cash, OR obstruction of justice.
No indication it was one or the other, just that is IS one of them.
Which one do you think it is?
GLTA
Do you think the fact that RETVi is a non company is the biggest issues ARTS faces?
How about OUTSTANDING COURT JUDGEMENTS, MULTIPLE LAWYERS RESIGNING, NO CASH, NO ASSETS, NEVER PROFITABLE, after issuing a QUADRILLION shares?
The company is solid becasue a message board isn't harping on the fact that RETVi is nothing? Curious logic.
GLTA
Please clarify "MISS INFORMATION"
Are you suggesting offical court documents are inaccurate?
Are you suggesting assets do exist at corporate headquarters, contradicting the sheriff?
Are you suggesting any cash exists anywhere? (careful on that one - if you say "yes - cash exists" you are acknowledging they are guilty of obstruction of justice - hiding from court ordered judgements - so which is it, NO CASH, or obstruction of justice - those are the only 2 choices).
Are you suggesting that they have not issued over a QUADRILLION shares?
Besides posts that indicate EV is honest, what "MISS INFORMATION" has been posted here?
GLTA
Kinda makes yesterday's "agreement to acquire" press release bad news for shareholders.
IF there actually is an acquisition (which would go against historical evidence of "agreement to acquire" press releases - see Picasso, Luxor, et al.) it's a given the acquisition is only funded by SHARES (there is court proof there is NO CASH).
Basically he's telling shareholders "I'm going to keep dumping shares until I can find something that sticks".
Where did all the money go? I wonder how many people realize that, since EV has been in charge - split adjusted, he's issued well over a QUADRILLION shares. Can anyone that understands the number QUADRILLION justify the issuance of that many shares?
GLTA
Of course there is no inventory of seizure, because it was acknowledged that there was NOTHING THERE to seize when there went with a warrant. How could you expect there to be an inventory of something that does NOT EXIST???
The various judgement documents also validate there is also NO CASH either (the first $41K of the $150K judgement was acknowledged as being obtained through garnishmnet actions - if there was any cash in the bank, they would have just taken it from there).
So, how many SHARES do you figure the recent acquisition required?
GLTA
You are correct - probably would have been more accurate to indicate IF there were assests for this acquistion, Dallas police would have found them. Dallas police searched, and correctly verified that the are NO ASSETS.
How many SHARES would you figure this acquisition required?
GLTA
Worth Billions? You decide.
http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=68418396&authType=name&authToken=-Rv9
http://www.soldbysarajan.com/
How many real estate agents with no listings over $200K are worth billions??
GLTA
You wouldn't understand it.
These guys are phonies - I can back that up as well.
These guys are worth Billions
Have to agree with you on that one. I think you did forget to clarify what measurement of "billions" they are worth. Certainly the "billions" you are referring to is ARTS Shares. (Look out below - massive dilution coming)
In 6 months time, I'll put the over/under on that value (1 billion ARTS shares) in terms of $$'s at $1000. Anyone dare to take the over on that bet on what a billion shares of ARTS will be worth in 6 months?
(This should be posted as a sticky to reference the time frame. I'll take the under and book any bet one desires to place on the over).
GLTA
At least the printing press is not broken - holy dumpfest batman - 177,000,000+ gone through today - 99% sells, including a single dump of 50 million alone.
HLTA
Your statement that he is honest is SPECULATION.
What is FACT - he lied to his lawyer, he lied to the SEC, he lied to the public via press releases, and he lied to shareholders (as reported firsthand by them) both verbally and via email.
None of my post mentioned breaking of criminal laws, just who he lied to. Feel free to do your own DD as to whether lieing to the SEC, or to the investing public via press releases is breaking of a criminal law, that is not what my post was about.
GLTA
Also - he's not even honest to his own LAWYER.
Let's see if it passes the believability test.
NOT honest to his own lawyer, yet is honest to a NON-SHAREHOLDER believer of his company?
If anyone has great and honest communication with EV, perhaps it could be asked of him what the criteria is to not be lied to?
So far here is what I've seen:
Investing Public through Press Releases: LIE
SEC: LIE
His own lawyer: LIE
Direct communication with SHAREHOLDERS: LIE
Communication with a NON-SHAREHOLDER: TRUTH???
OK - smart businessman?
GLTA