I think we then just disagree on what is a traditional and what isn't.
This non-psychoactive CBD talk in the media is mostly driven by non-scientific entities that might think something is traditional when it isn't.
It's pretty clear in the scientific literature and always has been
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28089139
"Misconception: Cannabidiol Is Non-psychoactive and Non-psychotropic
CBD is frequently mischaracterized in lay, electronic, and scientific sources as ‘non-psychoactive’ or ‘non-psychotropic’ in comparison to tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), but these terms are inaccurate, given its prominent pharmacological benefits on anxiety, schizophrenia, addiction, and possibly even depression. More accurately, CBD should be preferably labeled as ‘non-intoxicating’, and lacking associated reinforcement, craving, compulsive use, etc., that would indicate a significant drug abuse liability [1]."