Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's a good indication that Adobe has not decided to cut ties with nFusz based on their own interactive video product.
HA! Mine was gone months ago.
I-Glow, what has you convinced Ruppert and Nash are complicit, as opposed to Nash being swindled by Ruppert?
Thanks Rory!
10K Filing today, they are still alive.
https://research.ameritrade.com/grid/wwws/stocks/secfilings/filing.asp?data=B64ENCeyJEb2N1bWVudEtleSI6IjEzNi0wMDAxNTMwMTg1MTgwMDAwMDktNjMzNkIzUjc1MzFUMk5SMU9RSUxWNU5FRDUiLCJGT1JNQVQiOiJIVE0iLCJGT1JNX1RZUEUiOiIxMC1LIiwiRG9jdW1lbnREYXRlX2YiOiIxMC8xMC8yMDE4In0%3d&c_name=invest_VENDOR
Should also show up here if the above link only works for Ameritrade customers.
http://xbrlfinancialwidget.com/?CIKNum=0001530185
Excellent DD Nfuszed
That movie should be the backdrop for the NASDAQ after party. :)
I think the Q3 earnings report will be out Nov. 14th, if it's good they'll use it to spring board the uplist, if not so good, 2019 becomes the revised target. Purely a guess.
The PRs are tough, because they've had a LOT of them and they will always be short term (and getting shorter each time) fixes to the pps. (Down to 1-2 days now). Revenue is the ONLY sustainable way to fix the pps. Sure things like genuine major partnerships with Tier A companies, buyout offers, even uplisting, are temporary boosts in the pps, but nothing replaces revenue. I feel like a lot hinges on an improved Q3, because longs are thinning out with endless pumps that deliver only momentarily. Hanging on indefinitely is seldom a good investment strategy, it's a lottery ticket. It's possible some will be willing to wait for Q4 earnings, but the veil of vague information is not helping anyone, except perhaps the SEC, and traders.
I mentioned in the 8/24 SHAC, Rory states outrightly, that customers are paying for the product. I'd guess that's his legal way of conveying that revenue is beginning to come in.
I took in stride, like a Gartner report, useful chiefly as an industry comparison metric. Agreed, interesting connection. Suggests more staff are taking a longer look at nFusz. As always I only make a big deal of it when the stock price rises and revenues are realized, but it does speak to the market over the next couple years. Thanks.
Instinct says, real estate is a very good fit for interactive video, and the accompanying analytics. Probably a bigger market than most have considered, although it would require nFusz to be disseminated into the key advertising channels. Nice find.
Revisiting this point
Based on the 2nd quarter financials release, it could be the 3rd quarter will be released on Nov. 14th. Unless they accelerate in order to uplist sooner. My guess.
Probably been posted before, but perhaps I missed it.
Green Friday Galactic Amusement.
https://nfusz.com/super/ajax/ajax2.php?mediaid=iWV9eQ
Yeah, I have his personal cell number on speed dial.
Sorry to hear about your medical troubles, perhaps notifiMED will be a chance to recover some medical expense costs from the medical providers. I don't know what you paid, apologies if I implied as much. I was intending to say that I've paid as much as $2.72 for some of my shares. Needless to say, I've also taken advantage of the upper $0.030s to even up the investment value. but being that we are closer to the 0.30s than the $3s, my diminished valuation is not small, and as such, I too am emotionally invested. I know a few that bought in, in the sub 0.10s and who simply can't loose now, it's just a matter of how much they gain.
Smart TVs could use nFuszion.
If nFusz could get manufacturers like Samsung, LG, etc. to add nFusz code, APIs perhaps, it would open the door to having tons of tv commercials have the buy it now function. I wonder if the team is working that angle? Right now I think it relies solely on the video streaming. But having code on the TVs themselves, would raise visibility and interest. I.e. Adoption.
Got you. I too bought in an nearly $3/share, due to the hype. I was foolish. I was in a big hurry to jump in based on hearsay without looking closely enough. I fight myself all the time balancing the practically of how I've experienced big business to actually work against my lack of understanding of how a small company can drill a niche converting it to a household activity. I still don't KNOW that it can be done. Some of the hurdles are to be expected, Rory himself made some zealous gross over estimations that I'm certain he'd love to take back. I want to be mad at him, but I can't say any of us would have been less enthusiastic. I do think a refined product has real potential, but one thing no one is really talking about is that in addition to the modest price of the product, it needs to be layered on top of a HIGH quality video to really drive sales. Sure, anyone can record a video on their iPhone, but the production costs of a commercial grade video dwarfs the cost of the nFusz interactivity and to some degree has to impact adoption rate. While you could just use existing videos, to really leverage the interactivity component, movie directors and marketing companies, need to retool their approach to generating a video capable of maximizing the integration with the notifi products. I can see, done well, it could be quite powerful, but examples like the zoo are relatively primitive compared to what should be able to be accomplished, but that time and expense simply has to slow adoption.
If you'll allow me to tackle a couple of these:
Well spoken, but you'll put your neck out there for saying so, and get accused of what is untrue, ...c'est la vie..
Everyone says they KNOW, when in fact they simply have strong emotional fortitude, based in proven activity, but not in proven KNOWledge of adoption and resultant revenues. I appreciate the enthusiasm, I do, but not the clouded sense of what actually is. Guessing an unknown connection with a multibillion dollar company is the same thing as actually generating billions of your own revenue, is nothing more than hopeful speculation. I've had salesmen from vendors chase me for years, because they had my contact info and discovered I read an article about their product. Not the same thing as placing a multi-million dollar order, which is a profoundly more complex endeavor. Just like politics, there is little value in arguing reality, only in sifting out facts presented by both sides to form your own best position. GLTY.
I've worked for a couple multi-billion dollar companies, and can say first hand that is not always true. I watched one company piss away $1B on a terrible market guess. I wish what you are saying is true, but I can only say, "sometimes".
I'm sorry I forgot what you just typed, next time use a video.
It would be quite reasonable to assume they have many NDAs out to protect all parties.
Correction: I'd be even more concerned if they didn't.
Hey, their main telephone number now has an answering system, instead of just hanging up. I left a message to see what is happening with them.
I pulled the text of one of my emails with him from early August, here is part of his response:
Very similar to his reply to me.
I too contacted Thomas Nash a couple times over the few couple months and received a similar responses. He seems like a genuine gentleman. And said that he too was surprised by the pps drop and that he had nothing to do with the manipulation, but that he had a plan to fix it that he couldn't speak about, but that would surprise everyone.
Probably worth holding long.
Same Answer, speculation. Having been on the side of business, I've come to never count my chickens. I prefer to error on the side of conservative and if things go better than expected, all the better. It's really hard to detach what you hope will happen from what really does, unless they happen to work out congruent.
For example, in the discussion with nFuszed, we are pretty confident that merger will happen and that SC staff will or already have begun offering nFusz product to clients. But they can't force clients to buy if they aren't interested, or simply don't have the budget. Most companies plan yearly budgets, so their purchasing plans can be come very long, where they have to submit requests for purchase approvals as part of the following year's budget. They might be really stoked, but simply don't have funds allocated. It happens sometimes. I've had to prepare budgets, and that's been my experience.
Next we have to estimate how important the nFusz products are to each different client grouping, and the quantity of each grouping. If they are a sales, or medical customer relations, or school customer, their interest might be a surprisingly high number of potential orders. If they are an auto salvage yard, maybe no interest. Creating a matrix to forecast such adoption and penetration can be a work. So when we are guessing overly generalized numbers like 10% - 35% adoption rates, they are mostly gross gut guesses based solely upon experience based instinct. Hope that helps explain the context of my comments.
They don't, we just don't have access to those numbers yet, so everyone is trying to put their best guesses out based on what little we do know.
Based upon the nature of the partnership of FUSZ and SC, I think your 10% figure for adoption is not unrealistic, especially in the short term, if the nFusz tech really does generate great sales conversion rates, no reason to think that wouldn't reach at least 25%-35%, I'm curious how long it will take to hit that initial 10%. That's a lot of customers, But with the merger, SC staff will have elevated motivation to expose existing clients.
I would also point out again that a merger (reverse or forward) is not analogous with an acquisition. That means that the management and ownership are not handled the same as with a take-over. I've been speculating that the remaining BoD member(s) could well be sourced from SC. If so, I wouldn't expect any further BoD announcements until the simultaneous event has happened.
Perhaps someone can clarify, but I thought AGP was an underwriter. That suggests to me that they loan the money needed for the purchase and uplist, then they get to sell that new valuation to the market as part of a Purchase Offer (Initial or Secondary). If correct that would mean they will have a big/primary interest in up selling the price and turning a profit. Anyone know?
Thanks, that's how I read it too, but I can see why the disconnect. It seems counter intuitive that you can trade one day, move the stock to another exchange and the suddenly and arbitrarily pick a new trading price. But I do not believe that is what is happening, contrary to arguments suggesting so.