Wow. I showed a picture that the building is much bigger than the one door you show. They have 2 signs but you only show the area where one was. Maybe it was damaged and they removed it. Do you want to continue with this fraud or do you want to take a picture of the whole building to show both signs are gone, proving me wrong. I think everything here is a sham. If you are lying with this one picture, you must be lying with everything else. I want to know the truth. If you ban me, I will know the truth.

More fake news. The cropped picture gives a false representation of the business. Here is the Google Maps street level picture. You should either take down the false picture or update with a picture of the full building proving they are closed.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/601+NE+26th+Ct,+Pompano+Beach,+FL+33064/@26.2639967,-80.1141064,3a,75y,358.7h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sFSoqKKENzTsBXrKEhxEcnA!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DFSoqKKENzTsBXrKEhxEcnA%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dsearch.TACTILE.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D360%26h%3D120%26yaw%3D358.6981%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656!4m5!3m4!1s0x88d902b3703695d5:0x95d9d7978f996954!8m2!3d26.2642315!4d-80.1141125?hl=en-US

Referring to the boat in the 27752 comment has brought me back to this blog. I thought this was about being paid by a competitor to hold back this technology. I now have another thought about this. Some of you ate talking to yourselves. Long pages of distortions. The boat for example. I am not a boat expert but I have a friend that has a Trojan yacht that Mr. Schoell designed. He said the picture was famous in the early 1980's and on magazine covers. Look at the sail. It has windows and the propeller is a wind generator. These are common on sailboats. Even I noticed that. There are similar distortions about the Cyclone engine. You did not even know the difference between a bushing and a ball bearing, especially hybrids. You probably grease your bowling ball. My second opinion besides you being paid, there appears to be a personal vendetta against Mr Schoell. It is obvious your dual personality could never create these products, design, or even have any patents. Do you know him, is there envy? What about the disparaging remarks about Miss Fruge? Could there be a psychological problem here? Also, it could be your outlet for other stresses, hiding under the alias of a comic book character who did amazing things. I am not throwing stones but am serious and concerned that maybe you should see a psychiatrist. Just trying to help.

Sorry, I typed FCC instead of SEC. I thought the broker would catch this. Comic book Tom rudely commented without correcting it. I was catching a plane and did it on my phone. Of course, this is a blog, not a white paper.

All this bad mouthing about a garage size company run by a couple of old people. I still think they have the best kept secret and this group wants to keep it that way. The more they incorrectly say things, the more this is reinforced. No engineering skills from the comic book engineer and a washed up broker that can't even read a financial statement. This will be my last post for a while. Nothing learned here, only deceptions from this group.

Hello Ball8,

Notice how the comic book engineer had to look up the bearings. He did not know the difference between ball bearings and bushings.

The stock broker still does not know how to read a financial statement the is FCC approved. He just adds his own and calls others rude names.

I was not convinced until now to the motives of the thousand pages of badmouthing and the purpose of it. This much time spent... Is there a conspiracy here?

Hello Ball8,

You are so right. They claim to know about engineering and cannot even have a discussion about it. They do not even correct themselves about the patents, bearings, and the use of water. These are simple distortions and because of this, I have a problem believing his engineering skill, only bad mouth skills. I even have a hard time believing one of them even visited there. All this negative response only reinforces what I said earlier. Let me see, fifty patents and a number of awards and even in Popular Science and other publications, The critic, Tom Swift, a comic book caricature.

That is why few people get any information here. Just wanted to see for myself. I have a friend who did visit, he was duly impressed. I do not respond quickly because I travel. I will visit there soon. Of course, reporting on this would be futile, it would be again distorted. Have a good day..

My gosh it must be the Joker, all that laughter. I am interested in the
technology not character assignation.

About the spider bearing patent, if you knew anything about patents, you would know that they are illustrations not working build by drawings, and a patent wants to be as large in scope as possible. The bearings you are referring to are not full rotational. Composite bushings need no lubrication in their calculations. The V is low but the BMEP of the engine is high so it appears that bearings on the outside of the crank double up the bearing area to handle the large P. This would also enhance the patent value by using this unique addition. This does not mean they have to use this system. It is an old patent and I am sure they have improved on some of this. On HOW IT'S MADE there was an engine that had ball bearing in this area. They have been very quiet lately and I feel there is something going on at Cyclone. I agree with Ball8 about the extent that you are going through to bad mouth this very small company. Your lack of engineering and patent knowledge is obvious. All this so called research work and distortions does not lend much credibility to what you are doing.

I wonder who is behind this. Any theories on this Ball8?

Hi ball8. I feel like I am watching the judge on tv. There has been a thousand pages down playing this company, long full pages. Why is this happening. Then when they are countered with someone like you they knock you off. I am more encouraged because of this. Why so much time to damage such a small company. I know you see it! They have something!

Hello, Tom. You do know the difference between a car engine and a Cyclone Engine? The car engine has bushings, the Cyclone engine has hybrid bearings. I looked over the patent on the spider bearing and it has two rods contacting at the same time, like a gear engaging. I understand the reason for this is to even out the stroke length that varies using a master rod in a radial aircraft engine. Could not find any claims of 400 mph for their land speed car, I read 200 mph. Politics would be a good career!

Sorry for the typo on the bearing company. It should be MRC not NRC. Thought you could have picked up on that. I now understand how somethings are taken out of context or misquoted. If you did look it up, you would find lower viscosity fluids allow higher rpm in ball bearing. Heavy grease is mainly used to keep out contamination.

Thanks Ervin. Could use a little help here. I want to research this technology, not have to explain and filter confusing opinions.

I did not say that water is the only lubricant for hybrid bearings, I said they work well in water. How do you think they can operate in outer space, dry, and other harsh environments. Please do your homework. SKF, NRC, and a few others make these. I could go into detail but...

Anyone here with engineering skills? This is my forte. Please do not resort to personal attacks, not a good engineering solution, research it yourself.

To answer what is the difference between Tesla and Cyclone, $5,000,000,000.
Derivatives are not the real money spent. Cyclone development has spent $8,000,000 on R&D.

Engines can be called motors but it is unusual for a motor to be called an engine. Sometimes, terminology can cause some confusion. For instance, bushings and bearings are called bearings, but I never heard of a ball bearing called a bushing. From my research, the Cyclone bearings are hybrid ball bearings. They are non corrosive with ceramic balls designed to run in water. Your car engine has bushings and must run on an oil film. Balls do not have to have this. In ball bearing engineering, the grease filled bearings, have a lower RPM rating than lighter oil. Of course, a normal bearing would rust without some kind of oil.

Does anyone out there have an engineering background, not just here to bad mouth what they don't understand?

Thanks for your opinions but I am interested in their technology. I am also interested in why you and a few others write long dissertations on such negative opinions. So much negativity against a few people and a small undercapitalized company. They must have something. R&D takes a lot of time and money, I’m impressed with how far they have come on so little.

Cyclone trucks running clean on cheep fuels across the country without oil changes. Is it the oil changes? Mini-grid power stations with energy storage. Is it the power companies? Where does the electric trucks get their power from? It is from a Rankin cycle engine power plant. Electric is cheep because they burn cheap fuel.

I am learning more about this. This little company is still surviving, in spite of all the challenges of being a small R&D.

Still would like to hear from a real visitor. What I have heard from some folks is they don’t look at the IHub because of this negative atmosphere. Too bad, it could be a good round table.

Thank you for the response. I'm interested in their technology, not their sign. I saw water brake dynometer under the engines as well as people and lights being lit in the videos. I would like to hear form someone who has actually been inside to see the operations. The more I research about them, the more I need to know.

I take it you haven't been there. I have seen the many impressive videos of engines running. They have spent $8 million on R&D. Elon Musk, who I much admire, has spent $5 Billion and has 7000 engineers. Still trying to get more information.

I have been interested in this company for a while. I see that it's a small R&D company. Has anyone been there and talked with them?