Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Great eye, Rich!!!
That email takes me to a Chinese website too that I can't read. Consistent with the original filing at SOS with the mystery address. And consistent with this:
https://www.dallasnews.com/business/business/2015/02/05/as-little-sheep-hot-pot-brand-loses-steam-in-china-texas-locations-expand
I never heard of the chain. Apparently YUM Brands bought it, and it's a China based company. But they took a massive hit. It wasn't good for Yum, BUT franchisees in America are advancing. And for a penny stock like this, IFFF this is a franchisee trying to come through, this is really good. Then I want to know how many locaitons he already has, if this is true. This is looking legit, IFF it's a franchisee. That address matches up. It's in business. On the surface, that what it appears to be. Unless somebody is just renting space in a backroom and sharing an address. I lean to Little Sheep. It would be legitimate.
The class action is real, but I've been through those. Most things settle. My beloeved Diedrich Coffee settled for 1M.
The key words here are:
Meanwhile, the U.S. Little Sheep business, which is run by franchisees, continues to advance.
You are correct, Rich. Very interesting. It's a big franchise that I never heard of, once owned by Yum brands. It's still there according to Yelp reviews. So, I'm confused. Intrigued.
It can't be the company. I'm just skimming some reviews, and one says, "sure, it's a franchise..." implying it's a franchised location. I don't have that much time right now... But it leads me to believe that *maybe* the franchisee himself is trying to go public?
Just skimming, but appears there was a class action brought against that owner here:
https://www.classaction.org/media/li-et-al-v-hot-pot-flushing-llc-et-al.pdf
Lots of Asian names as stock holders, mentions the hot pot business. Mentions sales over $500,000 a year and some other locations. On a skim. That would all be consistent. I like it.
I lean towards the franchisee trying to come through. See if you can find his name in there. I really am doing this on the fly... The address absolutely is on this public filing. Corroborates your beliefs. Thanks for the DD. That consultant is too common of a name. Maybe a time-tested restaurant chain trying to raise capital for expansion with some time-tested locations and a proven concept with a YUM Brands endorsement.
Wow, Rich, thanks. I'm at work. I just had a feeling you might be here saying something, and I was right. I saw a big poop on our price. I'm going to check this out later. Thanks for the heads up! I appreciate you!
Hi, Craig. Yes I am. I haven't been watching them, so I have no idea. Been busy and distracted. I don't think anything is going to happen for quite some time. But I'm not going anywhere.
I hope Mr. E doesn't think I'm his enemy. I'm not. I get the feeling he's mad at me. I don't know why. I can just feel it. I see no evil; I hear no evil. I'm just here to make money. Not to get in the way. I just don't want our shares cancelled. I believe in reform. Any mess I might have cause, I apologize. :) I'm just going to sit back quietly and enjoy the show. Just want my tickets to be valid is all.
Vodka-Drinking Vulcans Part II
You are missing all the good disclosures, Spock.
As my vodka company comes into clarity, and I learned I got 6 shares for every one I had - thank you very much - I also said the following in my first post:
"I always picture him as someone that would be on shark tank and getting turned down by all the sharks. He has a weird niche. I can't see the sharks being enthusiastic about it, not to mention the fact that this is such a highly saturated industry."
Well, I just happen to be watching Shark Tank tank tonight, and there is an entrepreneur that reminds me exactly of this Vodka venture. Only his is OBVIOUS WINES.
This guy:
https://www.obviouswines.com/
Versus my Victory Vodka:
https://www.victorylondon.co.uk/vodka
Here is what they said:
1) Daymon John: "I'm out. Building a brand is extremely difficult."
2) Kevin O'Leary: "I obviously can't do this deal. I'm competing with myself if I do. I'm in the top 5% wine sales... That's how tough a business it is..."
3) Mark Cuban: He's just out period. He doesn't like his pitch.
4) Lori Greiner: She liked it. She made an offer. $150,000 for 12.5% . He almost blew it by dilly dallying around with her offer.
So, I'm surprised a shark was interested in that highly saturated industry for a newcomber with no brand. Although, he did have sales and a good product. And it was an "anti-snob" wine. But, there are many of those too. He really wasn't any different. They are all good.
That's the only thing I don't collect is wine. Although, I sure do want a glass right now after hearing all that discussion. wines mature in 7 years then start turning to vinegar. I don't like short shelf lifes. Unless you are a special kind of alchemist, and what's the point?
Maybe this Vodka company can capture people's interests. My Fineqia is the real winner, but people can't understand that. They can understand vodka. We shall see. Vodka is so uninteresting to me. Bourbons and whiskeys and scotches are way more interesting. So many of all of them. Too many. Like Daymon John said. It's hard to build a brand. I just go for the prettiest bottle. At least they have that. Lots of artisans in the bottling of the hard liquors.
That's a very good article, NY. Short and sweet. Zach is highly intelligent. Zach is the brains, Ogur is the Financial wiz. Great team! And it's a team of proven longevity. This isn't their first rodeo.
The truth always comes out in the shake!
No, I came to dead ends, BRich. But I'm still here and not going anywhere. I locked in profits and hold "free shares," so I'll buy them all back at .002 or not. Sooner or later, they will have to reveal themselves.
No matter how the cards fall, I got all bases covered.
Nothing on SEDAR either. That 3 digit address still makes no sense to me. That address doesn't exist as far as I can tell.
FINEQIA (FNQQF) invested in PHUN
And apparently made a killing, based on this article:
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fineqias-announces-value-of-shareholding-in-nasdaq-listed-phunware-300781387.html
I have a 2-million share position in Fineqia, led by a dream team. This is great news for me. Birds of a feather flock together.
Your techno jargo is over my head. But it's nice to it's Austin's fastest growing tech firm. Did the Phuncoin ever get launched? I'm going to guess not yet?
If anybody could explain in simple English what Phun is and its future, that would be great.
Fineqia is probably just as hard to understand for newbies, but I actually do understand them.
Basic algebra says that if Fineqia's shares must be 149X=2,424,975. Therefore, solving for X, Fineqia must hold 16,275 shares of PHUN.
What was their cost basis for the preferred, which gives them an equal number of warrants, 16,275 warrants? And what is the exercise price of the warrants? Just skimming here.
Wow! What an investment!!!!!! And then they have token rights on top of that??????
Yes, but what do you think about all of this? :)
Yippi TV
This just popped up today. This must be the Yippi TV the filing was talking about.
Filing is out, Spock
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=13158773&guid=8W68UWVWxsz-uyh
This came out today, Spock. I sold 20,000 shares of To ga the last few business days, as testified to by my profile history. I'm down to 9,100, locking in about $39,000 in net profit so far. I think that's a safer number for me to be at we go into uncharted territory. This will be a new experience for me. I don't know how this is going to play out.
It's an incredibly interesting filing. It lays out all their plans. It's the reverse split (1 for 10) that has me spooked, planned for next month. Next month also officially begins their "investor relations activities" I never would have dreamed they would announced their relations activity. And definitely not on the heels of an announced reverse split. That's not the behavior I predicted at all. And their interests are still in alignment, which has me baffled and blindsided. For some reason, it's intentional. Well, part of the plan to go "Nasdaq" but I never really believe that as the true motives. Now it's just illogical to me. But, prove me wrong and go Nasdaq. I would love to be proven wrong. I don't see how they can pull that off, and my actions say I don't believe it. But I DON'T KNOW. Now, I just don't know anymore.
An RS is usually the kiss of death. But this one still will be full of restricted shares. And then an investors relations push. So, I don't know. That will be a new concoction of physics I've never seen before. It will be a learning experience. Part of the new advisors or mgmt. mentioned or whatever role he got is the owner of Zero404. That's the 3-month contract we found a few months ago that I've not seen any evidence of having done anything yet. So, I'm guessing that starts next month too.
I don't know what happens from here, Spock. But I do know it's about to get very interesting. If it splits from today's price, I'll have 900 shares of an $8.00 stock. I have never, ever seen promotion around this scenario. I don't like the psychology of it. Then again, I have no direct experience of this. Wow. I feel good no matter how it plays out though. My fate is sealed. Here we go!!!
Another 10,000 TOGL shares sold.
Sell 10000 TOGL Executed @ $0.8
01/16/19 | 03:46 PM ET
Over 9,000 shares left. I expect a very, very late 10k filing soon as of this date. I expect things to get very interesting between now and April. I have locked in further profits, which are already extraordinary, just to ensure those solid, documented gains.
There is some chatter from seminars out there of things to come that I don't agree with, but I'll ride the rest out and see what happens.
Our fearless leader Westover has yet another project:
http://xchains.net/
He is all over the map with blockchain. My Google Chrome can translate that website. He seems to have too much on his plate to work on this project. Whatever... However long it takes.
Our fearless leader Westover has yet another project:
http://xchains.net/
He is all over the map with blockchain. My Google Chrome can translate that website. He seems to have too much on his plate to work on this project. Whatever... However long it takes.
Hi, Ronin. What put this on your radar? Just curious. I built up a 4,100-share position here over the last few months, as corroborated here:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=145100936
The 6-share "dividend" for each share for shareholders of record on Oct 12th was a pleasant surprise. I didn't even notice I got those until today. It doesn't even pop up as a transaction or a "dividend." It's just there, as no cost-basis in my recorded "buys" of that ticker.
That's why my testimony above mentions 4M OS, which it was, until that 6 for 1 increase. Basically, a 6 for 1 forward split. What do you think about all of this?
Vodka-Drinking Vulcans.
I'm ready to reveal my vodka source now, Spock. This filing here sheds light:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=13145165&guid=Cfv8UFGGBzsz2yh
I just realized I got a dividend of 6 times the shares I had prior to October 12. Basically a weird way to have a 6 for 1 forward split as far as my rights go. But I had no idea. Pure luck. There is no record of a "dividend" either with my broker. But all these extra shares do pop up into my portfolio if I expand the dates of purchase. There are those that have no cost basis, and number 6 times the amount I had purchased prior to Oct. 12. Weird. Well, that was a new experience.
This information wasn't filed until last week. That would have been good to know back then. Well, that's just a case of being in the right place at the right time. I bought some after that date too.
I have a total of 4,100 shares there now and I'm content.
Mr. Lawler, who's also connected with To ga is behind the help to take this little distillery in the UK public. I really don't know what to expect. But you can see that the deals have been consumated.
This is the company.
https://www.victorylondon.co.uk/vodka
Every description and observation I gave in this post I'm referring to is corroborated by this post.
Ticker is MMNT. For now. I expect it will change soon enough...
The company makes no mention of any plans to go public. I consider that a bullish sign. I also wrote them a letter to which they did not respond. I also consider that a bullish sign. I prefer people that don't want to be seen. If you are advertising your plans to me, I don't want to hear it.
10,000 togl shares sold
Pardon me, as I take another $7,500 pure profit off the table.
Sell 8400 TOGL Executed @ $0.75
01/11/19 | 09:54 AM ET
Sell 600 TOGL Executed @ $0.79
01/11/19 | 09:54 AM ET
Sell 1000 TOGL Executed @ $0.77
About 20,000 shares left.
If you were not shareholder on ex div date you don’t get it. And it goes directly to your broker. Auto
Deposit. Anything otherwise is lip service. Won’t haooen which actually was lip service all the way
Here I. Regard to my requests for supporting evidence of an end game
To answer your last question, the shares are cancelled. Not even an empty shell. Which is why I said earlier, "I'm not sure what this is." That it wasn't even an empty shell. That it was a "lesser of something". That's why I said earlier, nobody is buying Transbotics, right? Scotts bought Transbotics.
It was a zombie ticker after the ex-dividend date, which is the only way I can think to describe it. There is no definition. In fact, all definitions surround this stock were categories, not true to their surface or implied meaning -- Confusion. I like it though. This better than dividend capturing. I hope to see something like this before the ex-div date. Maybe one of those many non-reporting, buyer-beware stocks that have potential to be bought this way one day in the future.
This is why you need to look for alignment of interests. It's a case where a beneficiary need only not speak up. Just let the facts run the course and his prey be confused. Very, very interesting. Like a Venus Fly Trap.
And the legal name change was for a legal purpose. I don't know. That's why I emphasized that this was a name change and not a ticker change, asing for supporting evidence for a future use of this ticker. It really doesn't matter what the legal purpose was. I'm sure it was for something relevant in the whole process, but I don't know all the fine details. The macro world is where I live, not the micro world.
That's not what a date or record is. It's very confusing. The only reason I know is because I used to dabble in dividend capturing in the '90s. But it's too volatile a strategy and not worth it since too many other #$@holes were trying to do the same thing, creating too much volatility that would whipe out the dividend in that short window of time when where it mattered.
You have to be a shareholder at minimum the day before the "ex dividend" date. That was a few months ago as I recall. The date of record is when the company looks at its books to see who was a shareholder on the "ex dividend" date.
You could go in one day before and leave one day after the ex-dividend date to capture that dividend with certainty. Calling it closer is too close for comfort. Or really 2 days before. I don't remember because its' compounded confusion by the fact that there is a "settlement period" from the time you actually "buy" and the time your buy is actually bought on the record. That's where the records are going to come from on record date. The 27th, taking your word for it, will be when those on the record (shareholders on the ex-dividend date) will be paid. Not those on the 24th, UNLESS they were there from atleast the time of the ex-dividend date.
Somebody here was compolaining that TD America canelled there order. They might want to thank them instead. The reason it might have been cancelled is because of the settlement date. When they saw it "bought" it really wasn't bought. It never really is. There is a settlement phase. The book transaction hadn't happened yet. And how could it if the shares got cancelled just after he "bought" but before it settled? So he is mad when he shouldn't be, if I understand his gripe correctly.
And to add to the layers of confusion here, which is why so many seem to have gotten burned, is that this payout is not even really a dividend, which implies recurring. It just following the rules of a dividend, but it's a final liquidation. The payoff from being bought by Scott's, hence the liquidation of the shares. Which is why I asked in mu first post, how can you be bought and not have your shares cancelled? Well, this is an unorthodox answer to that question. It all makes sense now.
IFFF memory serves correctly, I think this stock soared prior to the x dividend date. I would suspect some person(s) intentially created confusion around that date, so they are gegging the payout, plus all of your pipedreams. Another case of manipulation. And it is confusion. Somebody capitalized on that confusion. It's very confusing. Especially when your focus is on Transbotics, which is where the originator of the confusion wanted your focus. Like a magician, keep your eye on this hand, not that one. That part is speculation, and I can't review where the ex-dividend date was to be certain, but that's what I feel like happened. Which is also why I said in my first post (or second), this seems too good to be true. Which made me look harder. Because the story as it was being told was good. And believable due to the confusion of this "dividend."
I'm pretty certain shareholders as of 24th get nothing. As I recall, there was an ex-dividend date that was confusing people here. I believe that was much earlier, wasn't it? I seem to recall it was a few months ago, but I may be wrong. You had to be a shareholder on that date to get the payout. It was semantics to call it a "dividend." So, anyone on that date would have benefited by creatign confusion around it, getting a payout plus money for a ticker of no value. And it was confusing by the way it was presented, and I feel like many were sincerely confused.
I don't believe deliberate deception for some, but for others, I believe it was intentional. Being the good judge of character I am, I'm sure i could separated the sinerely deluded from the charlatans into two stacks and have a 95% accuracy rate. But, I won't go there. I'll just say Mr. Holdings was sincere and I feel bad it didn't work otu for him. He had some good DD. I wish I was here sooner, but I dont' believe he would have listened. People tune out if they don't get what they want to hear, and Fox News capitalizes on this. They have a target target market for their agenda, and they are going to feed you the twinkie diet. Not many people get the nutrition for critical thinking they need these days. If you go to church, you probably were invested here. You definitely aren't getting your critical thinking skills there.
I see that the ticker is alrady removed at OTC, so I can't even look up that ex-dividend date. That falls under unintended consequences again. It's more like a category. The market cap was a flawed calculation based on outdate data; the "ex-dividend" language more like a category because no better place to put it. It's a strange way to be bought.
Well, you can always follow me and know you're getting the truth. However, truth is repugnant to most. I don't work for Fox News or Mr. Market. I don't follow bad orders. But it requires patience, and if you think you have that, you probably don't. It also won't likely adhere to your moral code, especially if you go to church. But that's because you believe in lies and your life is a lie. Live and learn.
Like I said in a few post below, it was nto a ticker change. It was a name change. That was for an unknown legal reason, and now we know what that reason was. It was not in alignment with your interests. Like I said. What I say usually comes out in the shake, but usually not this fast. It gets forgotten and buried. Next time you see me, it would be wise to listen. But you won't really "see" me. You'll just have to see me. I'll be shot by the authorties before long for violating low-level invalid, bad orders. At least, an attempted assasination, but it will fail. The reality is that I'll just get lost from their cross heirs, and you'll just have to search to find me again. Those that know me can see.
So I was right again. Shares cancelled, liquidation for old shareholders. Company was bought; it was not a dual listing.
It's amazing how far simple logic can take someone in life. Just because you don't like what you hear, don't tune out. This isn't Fox News. This is real life. Truth doesn't care about your agendas. Truth just comes out in the shake. Always. So, it pays to be right. Truth is not voted on. Truth can't be deleted. Truth prevails. Period. Capiche?
No it’s not a dual listing. Scott trading in nz and otc
Would be a dual listing. This was a bought company
It has not been spun off.
What you have is conjecture. Again I ask for supporting
Evidence of your claim. If there is an end game here
I need to see evidence. So far you have given lip
Service. I need supporting evidence. Capiche?
Nothing on finra filings supercede your flawed market cap.
Nothing on finra invalidates anything I said here
You should go with the facts and not some random dude.
The problem is not the facts. It’s the receiving end of the facts
Facts don’t speak for themselves. They just be interpreted in the
Light of theory. Your regulated reputable site also says
Beware. Don’t trust the data. Again they have good intentions
But that is just a computer generated calculation.
Garbage in. Garbage out.
That is inaccurate. Which is why it probably shouldn’t be on
Otc. It’s misleading in the context you are interpreting. I can
See how that is an unintended consequence of their mission
At otc. But that’s is a calculation based on faulty info.
Garbage in garbage out. That calculation is always updated
So I think they should remove that. Good intentions but can be
Misapplied. The other numbers there would be updated by a transfer
Agent which they are not. And those can be trusted. Your number
Is a calculation from old dafa.
That is a good point dd. But all things are not equal. Fineqia is not an empty shell.
This one is more like 500k for an empty shell at 5 cents going with the Colorado
SOS. That’s expensive. Too much activity swarming around it too. I like empty
Shells like fpwm that have a smaller os than your market cap here. And no interest
And further along and extremely tight float making it near impossible to buy shares
Below 30 cents. Takes months and patience to get a good position in my type of
Shells.
This one needs dust clearninf and things to settle. But it has future potential as a good shell
For my tastes if there is nobody around and it’s say .002. I don’t see what dividend
You guys are expecting. I’m see payouts for old shareholders to my understanding
ThAfs not a dividend yield. That’s more like a pointless iou. Why bother ? Just keep the
Money rather than being paid back wirh your own money. And then holding an empty shell
That is the end game as I understand it here. If they have a plan for this ticker that is quite
Another story but that is pure conjecture and no supporting evidence as far as I can tell.
But I welcome any information to show otherwise or any supporting evidence to the contrary
Thanks, Adijas. Okay, so some things are starting to come into focus. There was a payout to shareholders. This is not an RM. I'm not sure how this all ends, but I'm not seeing any shareholder rights. These are legal name changes for an end game not in alignment with my interests. This is all just a settlement for prior shareholders that does not benefit me in any way. Nobody is buying Transbotics here; is that right? Scott bought Transbotics.
This is -- Well, I'm not sure what it is. It's not an empty shell, but seems to be on its way to one. Or a lesser of something. Whatever it is, I better stay away for now.
I have another foreign company with a filing last month that wasn't released in a PR.
https://webfiles.thecse.com/20181006_FNQ_Form_7_October_2018.pdf?ZruhUPBDA8PQhJv_Ht8XgF._8jqxRFms
This is more straight forward. A UK company on the Canadian Stock Exchange, trading for less than $7M. No ambiguity. Just a startup with a run rate. Very clean. Will they take off or will they need more runway? Just very straight forward. Not many moving parts. That's more my speed. I'll stay with these foreigners for now.
Thanks again for the DD, Mr. Holdings. Very good work. I think I'll pass as I don't think we are buying Transbotics. But if you can prove me wrong, I'd love to be proven wrong. I wish you the best. I think your motives are pure.
That's some very good work, Mr. Holding. I like the way you circle and highlight and link. So it's not a ticker change. It was just Transbotics to Transbotics Group. It seems to me, according to my understanding, that you could be right about that 11M OS. That's the true OS I'd go with at this time. I'd prefer a transfer agent verify that so I would have no doubt, as I don't have a full understanding on the NC SOS. That seems like a valid interpretation from a reputable source. Which is still good.
It is intriguing. It's a lot of moving parts, and it's hard for me to grasp what's going on, so help me fill in the blanks here. My understanding is that Scott is a publicly traded foreign company on the NZ stock exchange; is that right? Just skimming still (busy month).
I found this PR
https://www.odt.co.nz/business/scott-technology-buys-us-manufacturer
They state revenues on the high end in line with your projections. But if so, why have they not been reporting since 2008? I don't understand. And what is the end game here? If Scott is the parent company, then they are already a public company. This isn't a reverse merger that I can tell. And how can they buy you without buying (and thus canceling) your shares? And the deal has already been consummated since June of this year. So why a name change with Finra? How can you be bought and then have no shareholder rights? Something just doesn't add up. It seems to me that older shareholders got screwed. But maybe I don't understand. And what is that dividend about? Is that part of the missing piece? A payoff to former shareholders that I'm not getting? And where does that leave new shareholders? Is this toilet paper or not? I'm just not getting this.
There is a piece missing here that I'm not getting...
Very good counterpoints. Definitely worth a second look.
Here is a direct link. Thank you for that.
https://www.sosnc.gov/online_services/search/Business_Registration_Results
It does say status withdrawn.
When did this ticker change? Too much talking here, burying information.
That’s a good case mr holding. It’s an interesting company on a skim. Good links.
But the problem is your metrics. I don’t believe that os. 2008 is a
Long time ago. Based on volume I feel the float alone is higher than
The last reported os. The transfer agent could update that info but
Hasn’t. The market cap is a misleading valuation. It could be
10 times more which is still good on surface. Or easily 100 times more
Which would be not enough information even for a skimming of metrics.
The authorized shares are also too far outdated and never means anything to me regardless. That can change with a simple
Filing and no resistance. It’s just a formality.
I would need more information. I need an update from a
Transfer agent. A credible source before making any bets
Or conclusions.
Mr. E is Delivering
ICO's seem to be on a death spiral, but I'm guessing they already cleaned house. Now time to move here.
I'm actually very impressed with the latest TOGL filings, which our Mr. E is involved with. I'm still not a believer in the Nasdaq dream, but he is making us money with an Asian consortium.
There is a director that put up almost 500 bitcoins for shares. And they bought office space with shares, based on a price of .84. And according this filing, bitcoin will still be on the balance sheet. And it's not at 4,000 per coin, better than their 2-year needs at $3.000 per coin. They are definitely exceeding my expecations. I still believe we are going to see over $1.00 there. I don't think this is connected like Spock, but I would love to be proven wrong.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=13117009&guid=Yq_8UFpcsZujPoh
There is a lot of amazing stuff in that 8-k. They are way late on the 10k. Probably being told, go do this right and come back. Go do this right and come back. How come you didn't file this? Just a hunch is all. After they finally comply, I'm expecting fireworks. Then, hopefully Mr. E can pull some off some of that magic here.
Wow. I just can't believe a director put up that much bitcoin. He could have cashed in. So, he needs a high stock price. How did get that much bitcoin to begin with? There is always layers and layers of and layers...
This remind me of the time when George Jong cut out all the middle men, went straight to Pablo Escobar, asked for help in exchange for his help, and got it. It never hurts to ask. I was in a conference a few weeks ago where it was made known that Pablo paid his private waitstaff $70,000 a shift. Now they tell me! That would have been nice to know at the time.
Although, he did throw one in the pool to drown after stealing silverware. My only problem with that is, Pablo acted as his own judge and jury? You can't be your own judge and jury. I question his guilt. Iff true, I mean, at $70,000 a shift, you need some sort of severe punishment. I just don't like de-regulated outcome of that justice system.
But this is good! Regulated, former police and soldiers, government involvement, and the public putting a check on govt. Ok, well, the last part is sorely lacking. Maybe better to say, Russian trolls, but it's better than Pablo. But the wages went down, so it's all relative. How about, just don't steal? Then again, if you are making a living breaking the law, how can you throw somebody in a pool for committing a lesser crime? Then again, if you are making $70K a night, why would you steal? That's so disrespectful and ungrateful. Which makes me wonder, was he an ungrateful idiot, or falsely accused?
Well, whatever. We are in Columbia now, and I like Zac and Ogur navigating this. Former law enforcement with us. This is a much better cartel. And as a shareholder, I have the SEC, not Russian trolls, watching my back. I see Blue Line crushed, beaten to a pulp. Thank you, guys. That's how cartels need to work. We have vertical integration, expanding into new turfs. California, Canada, New Zealand, Columbia. Wow!!! I hope by 2024 the message is clear. That Prohibition 2, a total disaster, was utterly dismantled and destroyed. And that we can finally learn something we should have known before Prohibition 1. If you don't want a black market, don't destroy free markets. And understand that free markets are not la sai fare (sp) markets. True freedom is in mixed markets. And if you are in law enforcement with a criminal mind, you will be more likely to have that criminal mind in a prohibition-type setting. I'm glad to see that our law enforcement was able to break free from that mold and see the bigger picture. That shows intelligence. That's why I could not be a police offer. I would be the good cop. I don't like confrontation. And I just would be walking everywhere blind and deaf, unable to see evil or hear evil. Unless I saw you stealking silverware from an employer paying you $70k a shift. And then you've pushed me over the edge. That's the final straw!
The End
Hmm. It seems no matter what they do, nothing will make you happy. A few years ago your alter ego said there was no liquidity. Heck, I had 10,000 shares back then. I could have sold them all today instantly, no problem, for 600% return or so. There are lot of investors, not just Zac and company, selling. That was the whole point. Yet, the stock price is holding up. Sadly, for bargain hunters. I could buy another 3000 shares at 50 cents for just $1,500. And just hold. Who cares. You can't push fundamentals too far below the surface of their instrinsic value, wherever that debatable point is. Like a beach ball, it will fight to surface, and fight harder the lower it gets.
Fundamentals are your bedrock. This is a stock with good mgmt., good qualititative and quantitative variables. Who cares. We are about to enter a bear market. HLIX is in a growing industry.
They are reporting with the SEC, have liquidity, bought BIOTRACK, all 3 impossibilities your alter egos said just two years ago to the day. How could they buy it, they asked? There is no volume. They have 3rd-grade acct. Yeah, they were a startup, saving money, off the radar, and men of high finance.
In 2 years from now you will be gone, and a new generation will be saying this stock is overvalued. It's always something. It's always something.. Bitch and moan, bitch and moan.
I noticed they got featured on Investorideas. I sure hope they didn't pay for that. Fineqia is a very legit company with great mgmt., like HLIX> Only, like HLIX a few years ago with no sales. Just investments. And they were with Investorideas. I think the contract expires in a few months. Great articles, great potcasts. But world's worst marketers. It's not the message, it's the messengers. I say shoot the messengers here. I wish HLIX asked me first. Worthless. Investorideas is completely worthless.
Thanks for doing that, Craig. This much better!
If our shares don't get canceled, I'm expecting either 1 for 2000 reverse split or 1 for 10,000. I personally hope for the latter.
With all the signs of a bear market looming, I prefer to be here with these guys. I think they have the best chance of creating shareholder value. The honest, straight-line walkers can't get any decent marketing. Boiler rooms have a monopoly on that. We have GE falling off a cliff, once an American icon. Amazon is already priced to the moon. And my straight-walkers like AVNI and Fineqia seem to have no sense of urgency. HLIX is the only straight walkers that came out fast and running, but they had lots of experience. I look at AVNI, and this lady has been trying to go public for 5 years. Lack of experience and shooting straight seems to be her two biggest obstacles to progress.
No, I think I like it here IFF my shsares don't get canceled. I get a feeling they have more experience and more of a sense of urgency. FPWM has Edwards, but a different set of individuals that don't seem hungry. They are doing ICOs and other juggling acts. Not what I see as straight shooters, but not hungry either.
No, I want experience and no heights. And no bears and no shorts. Just rock dirt bottom with skulls and crossbows and trespasser beware signs. Just don't cancel my shares! And buy a legit company like a snowbll stand or something. Heck, I don't care. Just make good snowballs. For at least a year. And then franchise it and have a plan to conquer the world. If it doesn't work out, well, who cares. Hopefully, I'll be gone by then. I'll treat as Trump is treating the national deficit. Ehh, let somebody else deal with it. Great role models. That's why I like it here. The bar is so low, these are choir boys. I trust them more. I trust our transfer agent, my broker, and FINRA. And I trust Edward's competency of getting the deal done. Whatever that deal is. I would hire him to represent me for sure. I like him. I like him a whole lot more than Joel Olsteen, that's for sure. And trust him more too.
Yep, I like it here. Just DON'T CANCEL OUR SHARES. I can't stress that enough. If I can get past that risk, I can take my profits here and put it in GE. And then I'll worry. Right now, no worries.
That being said, this could take 10 weeks, 10 months, or 10 years. Yes, AVNI more like 10 years with that lack of experience. I'm guessing 3 years max here. I have patience. EVCC took about 2 years so far, and that has paid off big. And I still don't know what's coming through there. But that had, and still has, a low share count with not much risk to share cancellation. Whew, this has so many shares. So many shares!! Wow. Billions and billions of shares. But it can be fixed! 1 for 10,000 share reverse split. Voila!
I’m glad to see you as moderator Craig. Do you think
You could erase this board if old useless information ?
I have to scroll and scrolll and scroll and scroll down through
Useless spam to get here and it never ends. It
Just goes on and on and on. :)
Another Appearance of one of our founders here:
https://app.qwoted.com/opportunities/event-ceoklub-investment-forum-2018
That was just as of 3 days ago. He is a conference kinda guy. And has yet another project of many.
https://www.davko.org/
Maybe he take one of these birds public through here. I get the impression that ICO's took up his time this year, but those are fading with the public interest.
I'm hoping his ICO schemes are over soon and the focus turns back to the original mission here. Or perhaps change the mission here. Emlink, 1st Prestige, Davko, Plaza Systems, October Investments, whatever. Just pick something, bring it here, and let's get this show started.
I like the title, "Director of Investments." I would like that direction of investments to take a focus on FPWM. The OS here is smaller than the smallest of floats I've ever seen. We have some great physics here. Just direct investors this way please.
It’s normal butter. Low volume means big spreads. Commission. Had to be that way.
Nobody is selling and nobody is buying. That’s a good sign. But there was an offer to buy
800000 shares at .014 so there is demand. And not many offered to sell even at .022. That’s good.
That means buyer is cheap and sellers are saying no. Like is in my open letter to mr cheap. You better
Come up a lot higher than that. Lol.
It’s normal butter. Low volume means big spreads. Commission. Had to be that way.
Nobody is selling and nobody is buying. That’s a good sign. But there was an offer to buy
800000 shares at .014 so there is demand. And not many offered to sell even at .022. That’s good.
That means buyer is cheap and sellers are saying no. Like is in my open letter to mr cheap. You better
Come up a lot higher than that. Lol.