Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I can’t believe we are taking a fantastic victory and throwing shade on it just because of when an announcement was made.
There was no “botched timing”. As much as respect your opinions on this board, I don’t agree with your comment. As an average shareholder, I feel I was more than adequately informed
Either way, NW has no control over the releases of the MHRA. The fact remains that it was great news that they PRed in an appropriate amount of time.
My understanding from previous posts on this board is that most MIA announcements occur between 3-5pm est. Even if it had occurred between 3 and 4 pm during market hours, would it have really been possible to get a PR out before the 4 pm closing and would that have satisfied people more than what was done?
If they waited till morning, they would have had many upset that they didn’t PR it last night. The MHRA are the ones that essentially PR’d it yesterday afternoon, kudos to NWBO for doing what they said they would do and sending out a PR right after it happened. It seems like they can’t win regardless?
Well, I did it. After years of my policy of no buying no selling, I scrapped together enough funds to buy some more. A drop in the bucket compared to some, but well worth it!
And by October 2020…
Glad to see you’re back. Hope you had a nice time off.
You said,
Bottom line, valid time lines bring big investors. There is no absolute timeline yet.
Another reason I have always preached patience when waiting for the prize that I’ve had my eyes on for the last five years! The time lines will materialize when Ms Powers has more control over them.
I would like to believe it is not ‘baked in’ either. The only way the stock will behave in a consistent upside fashion would be for there to be more PRs shortly following the MIA acceptance. As much as I dislike the short narrative, we will spike (probably within 10cents) at MIA acceptance and then quickly fall again to the 60s until more good news. Good, awesome, news is coming- more patience is required for the future when multiple RAs are involved and processes must be validated. I have faith in our future and believe we will get to the goal of being able to provide DCVAX to the masses.
Results were definitely FDA approvable. Everyone is probably just upset because no buy out was announced. Give it time, it’ll bounce back.
I concur with Margin Buu. Your reposting of the Tweets is most appreciated. I look forward every morning to seeing your posts!
Very good line of thinking, Smokey!
Yes, true that! Just really would miss the great due diligence (medical related) that I glean from it’s posters. I’m just sayin that the more we dwell on a lawsuit that probably won’t show any results within the next 3 years- the more people lose sight of the true value of what we have and have to gain within the next few months.
I’m reaching a point of exhaustion as people continue to post (positive and negative) about NWBOs lawsuit endeavors. This is a biotech stock. Let’s continue to support the medical related catalysts that will surely occur before anything major happens on the legal fronts. We have a winner here - even without a lawsuit!
One would argue that, as a long holder of company stock, you are already a stakeholder in it’s outcome…
Okay, even if we were to believe the news was bad (which 70 coauthors and all longs here would dispute), it is not the normal selling of an equity because of news that our lawsuit is about. NWBO is claiming that the MM s are/were spoofing our stock on pivotal days and therefore giving the false impression of a company that is struggling with a presentation of bad news when it is widely held that the news is indeed good!
I’m sorry if this was asked before but do you believe the conference today at RI was what LP was alluding to at the ASM?
Or maybe JJ spent enough time with other members of the board to realize they have his best interest as a shareholder at heart?
Keeping in mind Ex’s response as well, it just wouldn’t seem to be a leap to expect them to submit to MHRA and FDA in a short time span. Here’s to hoping!
Thank you for your reply ex. With the company using both facilities to manufacture DCAX (Advent and CRL) and with their plans to have them overlap each other to create redundancy, I can imagine that both facilities would be scrutinized by each RA involved. Overall though, the general submission to each agency should be similar save plans to procure and deliver DCVAX by the contract manufacturers.
One would wonder- maybe someone more familiar with the process could answer- are there significant differences between the submission to the FDA vs MHRA? I mean, the trial data doesn’t change. Make two copies and send to both? Or else count on Orbis participation?
Nicely said. I agree with your timeline.
I keep thinking of the 60 minutes story many years ago when they showcased TTF fields as a way to inhibit cancer growth. If only 60 minutes could do a story on our science. As an aside, they could even go into the information we know about the forces other companies use (both financial and scientific) to make sure we don’t succeed…
While I’ll admit there ARE pumpers on this board, your list of pumpers IMO isn’t accurate. Many defend against FUD without pumping. Agreed, however on those that said ‘big things are happening’ without citing evidence!
I would much prefer that they spend their time focused on gaining approvals. I don’t think that they should dedicate even one more minute defending their science (they hired a law firm to handle the financial misdeeds). The JAMA paper speaks for itself and most people understand and can easily see the conflicts of interest of those presenting an opposite view.
There was ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with the ASM. Linda set out to describe to anyone listening the forces that are present- whether working for or against the company. Management shares the same passion that us shareholders have for bringing DCVAX to market. Like every other company, no matter how badly everyone would like to see approvals go quicker, there is no substitute for following the rules and procedures and doing it right. Linda was candid in her opinions and my take was that she was quite positive in our prospects in getting DCVAX to market.
Probably won’t be the first (or the last) “HO” heard from a courtroom… :)
Probably doesn’t matter if it takes till 2050, the fact is that the field of play now is more equal than the beginning of the week.
Thank you for your response. Even with the lawyer’s cut, that would give the company a lot to move forward on. I wonder if they would consider buying back shares and reducing the float?
Do we know how much they’re asking for? When do we know this if we don’t already?
Didn’t someone from this board once say that management has enough shares to, in essence, sway the results of any vote to their advantage anyway?
I am quite satisfied with my decision to vote my shares in favor of the board’s recommendations. This past month’s events -the JAMA paper and subsequent presentations have reminded me that they are committed to making DCVAX available to the world. We spent a lot of our time and comments over the last 2 years debating whether NWBO would, indeed deliver results (as DI kept insisting they would). Many doubted the caliber of journal and if even if the company would remain sustainable long enough to make the article happen. It all happened as they said it would and it was grand!
I refuse to buy into the argument that a vote in favor is not appropriate at this point. This is the time that all long shareholders should support the company’s position. I see 500 million shares as a very, very conservative increase. LP and company could have come to us asking for MUCH more. I’m not sure I care if the shares are for a JV or merger or just money to make sure we are manufacturing ready. It’s all good. I can’t wait to see what happens next year (even next month!). Again, it’s all good! Good luck to my fellow longs.
Great DD Mr Spooner! The use of external controls especially in oncology trials is becoming mainstream! There is no doubt we will get our approval’s based on the solid evidence that DCVAX works. Happy Thanksgiving to all!
Definitely agree that some of the shine is off the apple. I paired down my position (sold about 1/3 shares) last week for about a 40 percent profit- would have loved to sell more, but that’s all that was ripe for the picking. Now I wishfully hold on for approval or partnership/buyout! Happy Thanksgiving to all and good luck!
Feasible at over 90 sites internationally!
Less leverage with a racket???
SLICED BREAD<<<<<<<JAMA ARTICLE!!!
But imagine if you were one of the ones 'chasing and buying' when it ran up, especially the one(s) that paid up around the peak price.
So True. I was just venting. Just hating the process/ bad timing I guess.