Reverse Split it and merge it with a mining company! Simple business logic. I'll be in Flash Video Chat tonight.

TBS04

20% Per 8K

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=8698451

Tim

JB,

Remember the Chat Session, WL said there were several offers on the table. Not one but several.

Hope this helps, check out my new blog!

TBS04

ITS ON IF TOO

More Volume today, not enough though. 32.5M 15m left of the 8's. Someone needs to help knock out the eights so the nines will take effect.

This needs to be at .001 for a nice launch. I would do it but one of my 2.5ton AC units just went out on the house!

D(*^& Luck!!!

Cold Cock the ask just don't slap it!!!! LOL

Tim

I wonder who is doing all the buying? LOL

Tim

That was my strong paint job @ EOD

Tim

Wowza,

contact me I need some help.

tbs04@comcast.net

Luke,

The DD on the Technology is solid and what really lured me in. Kgem told me about it on another board. So I started digging about and watching the T&S and the MM's. I think this company is poised to run. How much and how long, I don't know? But it should be nice.

GLTY
TBS04

Order had been in for a while, and had a partial fill. I called my Broker and complained heavily. Finished filling today. Sorry I should have clarified.

GLTY
TBS04

They were broken up all day. They started @7's down. Allot showed as sells.

GLTA
TBS04

Seems I have been reinstated and have my posts back.

I think this one is about ready to go. Too many good and positive things showing up now.

TBS04

I have watched this one for a while and I am finally in. Glad I made the leap. I wish everyone here the best of luck.

With all the DD uncovered this one should do well.

TBS04

One thing about me, I never cross people and I never burn bridges. Life is too short.

fione,

tbs04@comcast.net

Thanks
TBS04

Only offering help here that's all. Sorry you misinterpret my intentions.

GLTY
TBS04

I'm going to try and put my order in before close on Thursday.

We'll see.

TBS04

Picked up 1MM shares today. Hope to pick up more on Friday.

TBS04

fione,

Let's have a chat session with Michael Brennan before or after that date and see what he has to say?

TBS04

Rocket Man I need your help with something

Please contact me.

tbs04@comcast.net

Institutional BUY????????????

I AM BUYING ALL I CAN!

Do what you want.

TBS04

Uh hmm... They're not land purchases. They are concessions BIG DIFFERENCE!

Do you know how to find out?

Everyone read this!

This is from a MMTE PR.

Yes it is leagal jargon but it is written in PR's, because it is the way business happens. That's a fact I know, I've been there and done that!

Forward-Looking Statements
This press release may contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and such Forward Looking Statements are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact in this announcement are forward-looking statements, including but not limited to the viability of the company's business plans, the effect of acquisitions on our profitability, the effectiveness, profitability, and the marketability of the Company's products; the Company's ability to protect its proprietary information; general economic and business conditions; the volatility of the company's operating results and financial condition; and other risks detailed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission..

These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about the company and the industry. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent occurring events or circumstances, or to changes in its expectations, except as may be required by law. Although the company believes that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, management cannot assure the public that their expectations will turn out to be correct, and investors are cautioned that actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results.

Chroma, this just scued everything you posted.

Hope this helps allot of people
TBS04

the "guts" of the operation

That is strategic information at this juncture and not for competition to see. This is a startup company not a full blown NASDAQ company. The other companies you mention are FULL BLOWN NASDAQ with SUBSIDIARIES. One is actually a Chilean Company.

Sorry you won't see anymore than what you're getting till it is time to unveil everything. Even then it will come in portions as the start up is built into a Senior Mining Company or Aquired by a Senior Mining Company.

Do you know how to build a company of this magnatude from the grounf up? Because your touting MMTE to be a big player in the markey now, not when they're ready.

What time was that buy? Please.

Only to people who don't understand what's going on. Only people who read lawsuits but can't put the pieces into place and figure who's right and who's wrong.

Opening one's eyes needs to be opened all the way. Gotta put together all the information across a timeline and figure out who's who? PR's, 10K's, 10Q's, from before it was MMTE and 10K's and 10Q's from other companies and who was there before current management.

Taking time to do this DD paints a completely different picture than just a complaint by one party.

WRONG. MMTE has kept its shareholder up to date through OTC filings and through PR's. If that isn't enough for you, that is why there is an OPEN DOOR POLICY WITH MMTE and it CEO.

Sorry your argument does not carry water.

Any sensible shareholder who has questions CALLS the company they will invest in or have invested in. If that person doesn't then thay have only hurt themselves and put themselves behind the 8 ball.

WHY NOT? Any sensible investor would.

For those who don't understand what a political connection can do for you. "IT IS BEYOND HUGE"

Hope you understand
TBS04

I have read and there is nothing that says William Lieberman has been crooked or has gone back to people that he knew was crooked.

At best this is conjecture and you have not read and understood correctly or you have been mislead. I urge you to reconsider your stance on this CEO.

GLTY
TBS04

The only pattern that can be established is the fact all the companies that William Liberman has become apart of was infact in financial trouble, per 10K's and 10Q's. At which point he went in and shored up a company that was being diluted or was not producing.

You need to do your DD because as of now you are skating on thin ice. Possibly Libelous?

Hope this helps
TBS04

I have looked into those and the 10k's and 10Q's and the PR's. Those companies were already in financial trouble before he got there. Did you fail to read those before you slandered his name?

I think the board would like to know?

TBS04

It also appears as if Izzy is the one that got Liebs the position.

No IZZY did not get William Lieberman the position. It was a vote by the board of Directors. No one was appointed CEO without interviews by the board. Do you know how many people were interviewed?

I found it very interesting that Liebs then went back to the same group that he took over for and tried to obtain financing.

How did he go back to them. He didn't finance anything through them until he got to MMTE. Now did he know they were crooked? Point out to us where you find this, please?

You are making very gratuitous assertions, and each and every gratuitous assertion can be equaly and gratuitously DENIED!

Please post factual information

TBS04

Show us where it is stated he went back to the crooked people for deals. That is pure speculation on your part. How do you know WL knew they were crooked. Again that is pure speculation. I would watch it if I were you . That could be misconstrued as malicious slander. You never know who's watching the board? Or who you're posting to on the board.

Just food for thought
TBS04

Only trying to shed some reality light on the subjects.

Yes when we uplist. It is REQUIRED. Right now the company does not have to file at all. But is doing so by a CPA, then having a high ranking official sign off on them SPEAKS VOLUMES!!!!!

It is sad that a past CEO who is crooked and had crooked people around him when William Lieberman was voted in as CEO, but that does not make him guilty by association. He is still cleaning up a mess he inherited so to say.

Now there is no dilution going on because there is no 504D filed.
Now there is selling and there is manipulation (extreme). if you will go back and read the 10K and the 10Q, I swear it will answer all your questions. If it doesn't it is likely that it can't by contractual law.

I really hope this helps
TBS04

Why Not?

Not until the laws say its OK

Let me correct myself then. #4 is probably not a part of the suit but will be answered in the 10Q as it has been stated here ad nausem about the S/S per WL and B/M it has not changed.

2,3,&4 all tied to the law suit

IMO