Did anyone else read about Stanford univ invention on extending a batteries life cycle from 4 hours to 40 hours using nanowires. I wonder if this may help sanswire and well just about everyone else too? In sanswires case less equipment on the ship like not having to have fuel cells for overnight storage. Less solar cells for slower charging less batteries and so on. Is LTHU and Sanswire still connected?

Anything New??? Did yall see the discovery at Stanford university increasing the use time on lap top and similar batteries from 4 hour to 40 hours they use nanowires. Wow I wonder if it could be used with LTHU batteries. And maybe even in Sanswires airship allowing less wait more storage of power using less solar cells and so on. Msn has a article on it.

Has anyone heard anything new lately? Will filing be out before the 31st?

When we acquired TAO did we also acquire their office as our main headquarters? Do we have a office still in Florida? Is it actual or virtual?

Did you watch the video housedad? Isn't H2O and the extraction of the Hydrogen from it the hard part. If it is, this possibly solves that problem. Speaking of course large scale extraction collection and distribution. How much energy do we currently use drilling transporting refining then transporting again petroleum. If the flame on reg salt water burns at 3000 deg fahrenheit then that must be a major release of hydrogen done extremely fast don't you agree? The Next job would be to collect it. I'm thinking of course for fuel cells for home car business and transportation etc! Go GTEM

Hi everyone Go GTEM quick note if you haven't seen it already type in John Kanzius watch you-tube video on burning salt water. Whats this got to do with GTEM maybe nothing then again maybe everything. If you have seen it great whats your thoughts. I'm thinking maybe change the freq slightly stop the burning but start the collection of hydrogen and oxygen from salt water. And the equipment would be powered by solar wind hydrothermal or river current {dam}. Is it possible that this could end our dependence on most if not all petroleum?

I wonder if in large scale with solar power the frequency would be changed slightly to release the oxygen and hydrogen without burning but for mas storage then collecting and storing it for use in fuel cells isn't that our dilemma with hydrogen collection that it wasn't profected maybe this is the key to that. Isn't also funny that a pig farmer invented hydrogen into electricity starting the first fuel cell and a TV station owner inventing this wow whats your thoughts?

Hi guys Doc I followed your lead and purchased LTHU stock in Sept. I believe a lot of things hinge on the upcoming election as far a so called boom in these type of stocks. I believe its just starting as we speak. Just last night I watched an add by Honda for the fuel-cell car on national TV did anyone else see it? It was with guys shooting neon water guns like in the Matrix and then shifted to powering your car with that same water.{Good commercial} That's the first time I believe I have seen a add about fuel cell technology passing the R&D and headed to retail advertised. Kind of by passing the hybrid technology altogether. Honda has funded a company by the name of PLUG which I also own which refuels your car and partially powers your house using natural gas. Separating it and storing the hydrogen in a storage tank in your garage or outside. Which eliminates most refueling outside of your home which cuts down on having to retrofit all gas station's quickly. I also own BLDP HYGS MCEL and LTHU for the reason of the change that I believe is about to happen. At least I hope it does? Ow one other tidbit did anyone read a article on burning salt water. I think it was on MSN yesterday. It seems someone has learned how to ignite and sustain the burning salt water. I can just imagine a million uses for that. That in itself could change the world. From creating electricity in cars homes and so on. Things are a changin. Sorry about the lengthy blog yall have a great day.

Whats going on within GTEM?

When is the testing for the navy does anyone know? Also is there another test/showing we signed up for. Something with hotzone?

I have a stupid question? Can a airship be tested in international waters without any compliance from the FAA? If so how far out is that 5 miles and how high? Can the navy take responsibility excluding the approval of the FAA for testing in or out of US controlled air space especially during war time. If GTEM could test its airships over the ocean without FAA approval or compliance why ha vent they done it sooner? Or have they already? I'm feeling way out of the loop with my publicly traded company named Gtem! Investigation or not I'm still very uninformed! Looks great with the navy and or Mexico. But as I have learned from the PAST looks can be deceiving. Well see

I agree SAM!

I know how to clear this up! Mide Rocky Justfrank or someone reputable call GTEL and Trimax ask the questions about ownerships of said eqipment and rights and revenue from said equipment and post your findings email works too. It Seems we have supposed bashers and cheerleaders leading this discussion and we need reputable individuals for clarification on this hotzone ownership of said 4000 through 7000 Tri GTEL equipment. Please!!! If I do it the people here would not believe the findings! I'm not sure what my classification is here anyhow Basher/cheerleader/Idiot! Nope don't answer that.

I believe the next possible chapter will be. A New company starts up next door to Sanswire called Tryship Airship's and Sanswire will share and test all it knows for free for the better of our company. OW by the way they also are working on a airship for the US navy and possibly homeland security. You know the Transwire 6000/1.

Am I wrong by saying Rocky that In one way I feel GTEM is trying to get their foot in the door. That I know is good but why Pachuca Mexico? Have you done research on Pachuca? The mines in this Mining town and the biggest resource of jobs have closed over a year and a half ago. Per the mission workers I spoke with that live and work in that city. How much are we asking the citizens of Pachuca to pay to use GTEM services? 49% of it is ours. Cha ching. Expansion would definitely be extremely critical for GTEMs survival as soon as Pachuca is up and running. That's just the way I see it! And If Gtem's 4010 is so sweet why hasn't anyone else climbed aboard yet after so many Pilots? I know what some here will say and that is''' well''' they are just waiting for the STRAT to fly and then many will flock to gtems door. Well 2009 or 2010 ???? or further is comin real quick and a lot changes happen with electronics in that amount of time. Sorry just venting. Ill be quiet now.

I only ask one thing from GTEM and that is shut up with the overly promotional NR - Pr's until a signed money in the bank deal is done. As they have said they would do well over a year and a half ago. I really don't care about 70 units built for Mexico with all of the past Pilots such as the forestry service and then downtown Austin Texas, Too China Peru Columbia Germany Russia and so on we must have had at least 50 to 1000 or more 4010 units left from them alone. Or were all those the same unit just fedexed aroundGive me a break I'm feeling very strung along. very used. I think i'm going to cry boooohhhhoooo. Man I need a shrink.

Rocky I wasn't aware that GTEMs Hotzone needed 300 separate units to blanket the size of a city such as Pachuca. My question is how many people will it take to operate and maintain a 300 unit hotzone blanket on Pachuca? And if we install these units on roof tops do we have to rent those spaces. For each one and have access to it 24-7 for maintance and such. I'm just wondering out loud. I don't remember them stating having to have that many units in the Russians very large cities. Now I'm not sure but if it takes 300 units for a small to mid size city such as Pachuca wouldn't it be better to raise a tower somewhere in the city and have less units to maintain then to have to pay rent to landlords or worry about having vandalism happening? I'm by know means am trying to say I know more than them or you but I just couldn't imagine having to have 300 separate units for a city the size of Pachuca! And also to be profitable. Please know that I mean No disrespect to you my friend. Without you I would be lost.

Didn't they have a 15 cloud system set up already. Its been a while since I researched Pachuca but forgive me if I wrong but a 15 cloud hot-zone station is just about enough to cover most of Pachuca. Especially since the Mines just out of town are closed down as of a year and a half ago. Whats the 70 units for? Pachuca???? Is it possibly a different city? Are they aloud per the SEC to set up a different city without publicly announcing it and signing a contract that the publicly traded companies shareholders can see? OK ill try being positive sorry GTEM please show us the details of the contract with VPN! Not the proposed 8K of possibly having a contract.

Great news But Did I miss the contract signing and details of it?

Nerd that article was written in the past. Its at least 5 days old my friend lets not lose our focus here! Stay current just jokin.

Does VOZ Brazil still have a working costomer service line#?

That's great GTEM''Show me a signed contract don't tell me about the future! I'm tired of being baited. Money in the bank is the only truth. Raytheon has shown interest in the past if i remember correctly. EOM

Mide Or Nerd If you were VPN would you sign a deal/JV with a company with a virtual main office and a past history such as GTEM'S? Has anyone here attempted speaking with someone at the virtual office as to when this JV will actually happen such as money in the bank, inked deal. And as far as GTEM having a 8K with Mexico! The Russian 8K didn't amount to anything but a law suit and a boot from the exchange followed by a SEC investigation!--------- Also did we get the 5 million test phase money from VPN yet?

Don't read this if your faint hearted please. I have another question for everyone. IF and that's only a IF --- GTEM cant seem to manage getting their creditability upwrite with a following from new shareholders. Is it possible GTEM splits the divisions leaving the worst one holding down the ticker symbol of GTEM. And the rest moving on up to the east side under a different company name or names? And I'm not trying to start a scare I'm just wondering out loud! Is it legally possible? Rocky Nerd and other longs?

The Past. They are waiting on Money in the bank. A bank deposit slip with said names on it. That's all!

Timing! Why timing? To make money of course. Also if it were concluded as of late they just may be waiting to push enter as we speak. Hear again I'm sure money has a lot to do with it. This is all just speculation on my part. But try as I have putting yourself in VPN position. How would you handle this deal? Knowing what you know about the company your partnering withs past history! If this deal truly goes through it says a lot about GTEM credibility finally! "I" think so anywho! I may be totally wrong so don't go out buying until you feel confident about this company.

I believe
the SEC investigation has concluded and nothing bad was found on GTEM. That is why VPN signed this agreement now and not earlier! If I were VPN I would never have signed a agreement with a pink stock company dropped by the American stock exchange and under investigation by the SEC with lawsuits and at .38 cents. Unless all has been cleared up before hand. And I felt confident in the company I'm going into partnership with. And also know I wasn't funding a fraudulent shell company with my money. Would you? This is my guess. We shall see! gltal

Question?
If you were VPN would you sign a JV with a company under investigation by the SEC? I would but only if I knew the outcome or it was being finalized near the time of the signing. This is only speculation but could the SEC investigation be concluding, and that being the reason for the delayed PR of the JV? I'm not sure either way. But I guess anything is possible. This is just my thought I have no proof at all. What do yall think?

I personaly would just like to see results. Money in the bank, A signed JV that I can read. As im sure all here would like also! And enough of the well worded puzzle oriented PR & NR'S.

Vern don't take anything I said today seriously I'm just a frustrated long term shareholder. And Nerd sorry for my last post to ya I'm messed up today my friend. Heck I read my post again and I cant even make sense of it. Gltal

And Nerd if I may say we are not ahead until we test something either. We can say we are ahead until we are blue in face but its not true until we actually do it! And not on the other end of a tether cord. Being ahead means tested proven done or even attempted and making adjustments for another run very soon without a cord attached. At the record altitude or above it. If I'm ahead beginning a running race but fail to finish in first then the prize goes to who finished now doesnt it. Then all I would be known as a fast starter but a late finisher. Results are needed very soon! On any front! its way past due!

My my how time flies. Was the software program partially developed by GTE and why if it was did we waist our time on it? If we learned anything from it we sure haven't used it yet. And now its commercially free for any other company to use ----- hmmmm ok! Rocky Nerd and Mide whats your outlooks on GTEM presently? Thanks before hand

What ever happened to the simulator that was built because someone wanted it? I thought the government or NASA or one of them did? And heck which year was it that Sans I half completed airframe shown at SHM? Was that 2 or 3 years ago I forget! I know I should look myself! I'm lazy today sorry.

I have a question Vern in the building and dismantling of SAN I why was SANS I dismantled in your opinion? I find it strange that we built but never tested SANS I only to say it was too heavy and couldn't have carried a payload to 65.000 ft. Only to be replace by SANS II that in your opinion cant reach 65.000 ft either. I think if i'm not mistaken you said 35.000 or was it 40.000 max altitude for SANS II. Why build a second ship and take apart a already built almost completed vessel without first testing it even without a payload for dynamics alone to whatever altitude it could have reached? It seems we went to carbon fiber semi ridged frame for what reason. Our goal was and still is 65.000 feet is it not. It doesn't make sense to me at all. Also when Sans I was built was there such a thing as auto cad? Wouldn't they build it on a computer first to test its weight and payload capabilities first. Or did they get so exited they ran down to ACE Hardware to get supplies to start immediately! ?

Thanks game7alcs I do think if they can say 94~ km NE of Mexico city why not just say Pachuca. If its sabotage they are worried about then I say they are paranoid for nada. I would have a third party news agency to do a article on it saying its in a undisclosed area but still marketing it and showing proof of its reality. And still keeping it secret and raising the share price by building confidence. That's what I would have done. Gtem's Technology has been installed in the forest of California to Russia China Peru and down town Texas and everywhere else so far with no takers yet. I don't think Its a secret still. Nothing a patent wouldn't take care of. Thats Just my thought I'm ready for results.

I'm hoping Sam that they made a error and meant to say Northeast Mexico 90 miles from Texas. It seems to me that Monterey is a much larger and more diverse city than Pachuca. That is from reading the stats from each city. Pachuca is a mining town with very little tourism. Monterey is A large city with tourism and industry. I think its second or third to Mexico city in stats with colleges and a good size airport. Well have see! Either way I just wish GTEM would say the name and be done with it. Released from A company NR or PR. But then again who am I? Monterey is I think in the north east part of Mexico about 90 miles or so from the Texas border. If I remember correctly. Have good day my friend.

Glow_beatle He introduced himself only as John but I believe it was Jonathan Leinwand General Counsel. I just said oh hello sir I'm who ever and started asking the questions I posted. I always seem to nut up when calling GTE even when I write the questions down before hand hehe. I'm a gob! The Mexico city of Pachuca De Soto was told to me also by Rocky weeks earlier. I just don't understand the reason for not disclosing the name during the first PR among other things. Well nice talking with ya glow.

No nothing new on China! Well I didn't ask. After the car wreck 16 years ago that took all my long term memory I had to start over. My grammar has suffered I'm truly sorry. My doctor has said many times if you can read this count yourself lucky. I still have trouble with no,go,to,up and,yours, for some reason. Again im truley sorry! hove a great dya

Quick note called and spoke with a---- John yesterday. Mexico has customers using the service for free at this time with some kind of access card from company in exchange they give feed back on quality and concerns of the network. After the network turns to pay as you go the customers that want to keep it will pay for the access card. No time line was given as too when. And I asked the city's name he said its still confidential. He didn't know anything on Germany. As far as the Strat goes. The Strat data is being compiled from the previous 2 flights to be used on the free flight coming next. After that flight supposably it will then be moved to Edwards. No dates or times were exchanged and many of my questions went with the reply I can not comment. Thats it! I know its not much but I thought yall would like too know anyhow. Have a good day!

I may be incorrect but each PR that came out like China's pilot gave the amount of people that live in the area and even more than that. I think some early Mexico pilots gave projections of possible growth and expansion and amount of people in areas. Columbia also and the The Russian deal gave projections on all the cities and coverage areas and I think projected money income after months then years. Am I incorrect on this? I maybe Im just going by scattered memory.