Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I would not look at a federal court case for any basis of a ticker change. The intent of the documents submitted have nothing to do with FINRA.
Personally I needed to see the suit update in Pacer to stay with my full position.
If there was no update I was going to sell half today. I can be patient and hold as long as I see progress / activity by the company to meet deadlines - especially court ordered deadlines.
Today is a good day and may be a day worth adding!
We are assuming the company's intent. All we know is that the company failed meet the courts order for reasons unknown. It should raise an eyebrow.
I think it is the lack of follow up that is concerning.
When the company filed suit, it demonstrated activity. When they have failed to meet any deadlines or submit any requirements per the courts order - this has to be of concern as it demonstrates inactivity.
I would agree with much of your sentiment.
Has anything been updated on PACER?
With the amount of selling today I don't see how that is a game. This is the first day I can remember seeing this level of sell orders in a long time. Patience is not a virtue of many.
I cannot believe 911 trades still happening.
Do they not realize NOBODY is falling for that...
On the FINRA site the symbol commonly begins next day - not same.
No trades since 12:57 CST?
Am I seeing this correctly that there has been no action in almost 30 minutes and the last trade was for 777 shares?
Crazy volume and now nothing? Is everyone waiting on something to drop?
No change
Does inability to serve defendants in the lawsuit demonstrate the company giving up or difficulty finding the individuals which to serve? I believe this is an important question.
Is that per Pacer or is there not an update to the case at this time?
Yeah...okay.
I see no connection with ZJMY and ZF.
Please be more descriptive of you have found something.
No ZJMY listed on IEME site...
Can someone give more specifics as to where it states zjmy is hosting? Take a sceeen shot?
I just don't see it anywhere.
Thank you for the pictures but now more than ever pictures or the words they represent are meaningless until we get a ticker change and information from the company. The pps will not maintain itself with pictures alone. Just my honest and humble opinion as a long.
The cars are demos Jinbojoe...
But thanks for the PM which I cannot respond to. The cars on the we chat are all photoshopped. The previous cars have been claimed as demos.
I wonder if we are looking at this all wrong...
We are all wanting this to be a car company. What if it is not a car company at all. What if ZJMY only provides the EV portion to vehicle producing companies in the end.
It would be great to have a bunch of "z" cars running around, but would it not be better to be a major supplier?
I wonder if ZJMY will be to EV as to what Dana is to heavy axles and brakes?
Even numbers can happen but a round 4,000 raises an eyebrow.
I believe the LongStar & Chery deal but...
I am doubtful of the Ka Wei or SF deal. This is the first time I am not comfortable with the DD. When emailed, Richard stated the following about the wechat site and use of Sf and other companies name and likeness:
I am not aware of a WeChat site, even though I use WeChat.
Considering there is neither copyright protection nor enforcement in China….i can only speculate.
Richard
For this reason I am struggling with any deal outside of LongStar and Chery.
For those wanting a screenshot of the email, I will not be able to do it today but will happily post it when I am in a position to do so. In the meantime, email RO yourself about SF as I did.
The answer I got about SF from RO was that in China there is no copyright protection or enforcement - thus the use of name and likeness would not receive cease and assist notification. I hope that your source is correct. I posted about this a couple of times and there seemed to be no interest. Someone who has the ability to communicate could contact them?
Disappointing? This was a mining shell a year ago. Look where we are now! A little recent history reminder.
Appreciate the positivity...
But none here know anything as to where DOLV is with FINRA. I am long and I appreciate you keeping the board remotely sane but we are beginning to cry wolf with imminent.
Thanks for the article - unfortunately...
Thanks for the article as a long I appreciate it. However - all the pictures and articles no longer matter. The company needs to complete the lawsuit, get it done with FINRA, and release the financials. Nothing else matters at this point.
Something to FedEx and SF Delivery?
We have all seen the wechat and I noticed two things about the delivery:
1. SF Delivery is a legit - large scale delivery service for China. The we chat is using their exact name and likeness.
http://www.sf-express.com/cn/en/
2. There is a FedEx mock up delivery that uses likeness but not exact.
My thoughts at that there must be some level of permission to use EXACT name and likeness and maybe some liberties being taken for the likeness in the case of FedEx.
I would believe there would be a cease and assist for using these companies names if there was nothing to this. SF seems legit but the FedEx is a mock up.
No change in website eom
That is where my confusion comes in - those cars are not part of the lineup on the we chat.
I do realize but why does the website not match the wechat?
Not trying to back just asking a very apparent and simple question.
I am confused by all the various models...
None of these go back to the core Long Star models that we have seen actually produced and being on delivery trucks. So are we to believe that the direction that Z is going is with a whole new product line with no demos built? Are they going to have 20 models? Why does the original website not match the we chat as it relates to the section titled "products"?
I am long and I know there pictures get some excited but they frankly confuse and worry me.
116K Buy - 93K Sell = 23K Accumulated
....but we were told there would be no math involved when screaming dump...
Website back up - however...
I am confused as the first page has the SUV which it lists as the V3. The wechat site lists the SUV as the V9 and the jeep as the V3.
Am I seeing this wrong or does the company need to do some housekeeping?
No. I am only charged by TD one time for the trade but it is being processed partially - mostly 1 at a time. There are a few 10 - 100 increments.
Screen shot from phone of partial sell of 1...
http://imgur.com/a/dNtY3
You stated: Just someone trying to keep the stock "interesting".
The reason this is not accurate is that I am only trying to sell a lot of stock. The "system" is processing 1 at a time. It is inaccurate to state that I or someone is trying to make it interesting - there is a flaw in the system.
Not accurate...
I have a sell order going through TD one share at a time as partial fills. No games here.
Because of how odd this was I reduced my sell from 7,000 to 1,000. As of 9:44 am CST I have 880 more to go.
I need help with how to copy/paste a screenshot of partial 1 sells.
Give me a few minutes. I do not want any account information being shown.
I personally have had 21 trades of 1 share go through in the past 5 minutes..
Again, mine are a sell of 7,000 shares so to own only free shares. They are being processed 1 share at a time.