Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
100,000 @ .005
exactly so how can we even hold them accountable if they don't abide by our rules? How do we make money? on a possibility of a naked short position?
that even if does exist, it may not even do anything for us.
i don't understand. let's say there is a naked short position. wouldn't the broker just drop it because it's illegal anyways?
or it could just mean nothing. perhaps
whats everyone's projections before the 8/19 court date?
what happened?
Global warming lol same here. this corona virus really put things in perspective. go ENZC!
nice to see a familiar face. Gonna load up here and at SNVP.
dont kill the momo. meeting has nothing to do with dbmm
not sure if that was there before. If not. oh boy.... DBOOOOMMM!
whats the danger here friend?
i heard something about locking in shares at higher pps or something. does anyone remember how that worked?
either revocation or lesser sentence? I thought the only option was to revoke? What's this lesser sentence nonsense now?
Hopefully DBMM is preparing for BOOM TIME after this sec business is over and done with! Imagine DBMM is free and almost qualifies for PINK uplist.
epic time indeed!!!!
iv heard theres been companies coming out of greys. so DBMM might be next. Who knows at this point. But i heard courts are still going on via Video conferences. ZOOM maybe.
ironic yes, But let's not overlook the possibility that in a couple days or weeks from now, this could be finally gone or up in the sky somewhere. lol Let's hope for the latter. I could certainly use the boost!
Like i said- it's all a possibility. But the possibility requires you to assume that the Delay is because of DBMM and not the SEC.
- Fact is the Judge already Dismissed the OIP in Favor of DBMM. So i don't much think it's the fault of DBMM's legal team nor do i see any evidence to support a "lack of payment" theory.
-The SEC filed for a motion to review- and we've been waiting ever since. I see more evidence for the "it's the SEC's Delay" theory.
Also- any ideas of how DBMM's attitude was before the SEC stepped in is completely irrelevant because the JUDGE having known all the facts decided to rule in DBMM's favor.
only if you assume the delay is because of DBMM's legal team and disregard the possibility that it may be due to the SEC.
which is why SEC had to file a petition for review because they lost in court!
The subject matters of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:
Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
Resolution of litigation claims; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
Maybe DBMM will be brought up. I really don't see why not but who knows at this point
"The subject matters of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:
Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
Resolution of litigation claims; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings."
hey pink! how do you know about the meeting? do you know what the meeting is about? thanks in advanced man!
what did it go up by?
that was a pretty good article tbh. what are your pps projections?
been here for years man, DBMM is about to officially make history! I'm locked and loaded already.
i was in at .0013 before DBMM went to greys. Havent been able to get any more but im hoping to hold till we hit. 45
Yes please! Please do so. I would like to see a link. I've never seen one of these short positions every one keeps talking about. I mean up until a little ago the claim was "there is no short position" now there is? The plot thickens.
So there is a short position? How big is that short position?
Nope. DBMM doesn't just have hope. It has lawyers! And those lawyers made their case to the judge and the decision was made in DBMMs favor.
The burden of proof is on those making the claim. If the claim is there are 300 mil shorts then there should be evidence
Wheres the proof of this?
The Dismissal becomes effective under Rule 360 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R., Section 201.360, following the Commission’s Order of Finality.
On December 3, 2019 The Division of Enforcement Submitted a Petition for Review of Judge Carol Fox Foelak’s Initial Decision dismissing The Administrative Proceedings rendered on November 12, 2019.
The Company filed a Motion for Summary Affirmance of The Initial Decision on December 20, 2019.
Almost as "ERRONEOUS" as claiming a Judge Lied on the ruling.
So the Judge who has access too all the evidence... just missed the fact that DBMMs filings were materially deficient?
Or could it be that the SEC lost and is willing to try anything to save face.
i know lol. i was being snarky. The people who run the company aren't not getting paid in order to pay for court costs and such. DBMM is turning out to be a good play, especially since the shot callers and investors have the same goal.
DBMM won- now we just need to get this review behind us. After that..... Blast off
exactly!!!! DBMM management are prioritizing SEC case in order to get the company up. They want DBMM to win this just as much as we do.
Maybe even more so, since they've invested so much money into this.
who are they though? i've never heard of them.
Who's Mr. James and Ms. Perry?