Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
crook, it is obvious because if you are going to sue someone in CA then you need a CA atty that will know CA law. My father-in-law is an atty in CA. he is not with the firm that mcbride has contact (so don't try that one).
I jump at you because you have a very nasty temperment and it is not appropriate on this board. We tried asking you nicely to change but you refuse.
I will ignore you after tonight as you belong on the RB board, that is where you fit in.
sorry to the rest of the board, just tired is guy.
JMHO
ender, mcbride never was convicted of a crime see post on RB from a few minutes ago. actual report on link and my response.
It clearly states that adjudication is withheld and suspended probation which will be terminated early if $41k paid.
The court is not finding him guilty, just that he should pay the money in question. sounds exactly like what mcbride had said in his view.
JMHO
I too am local. please include me in on the planning.
crook, obviously so he doesn't have to answer the same question a 100 times. MOVE ON!
Crook, just leave, it is obvious why a california Atty. just think about it!
Don't give me a bunch of bunk about "head in the sand", "sheep", or whatever. We have all seen what was going on the last few months and made our own determinations.
I am tired of hearing your whinning.
JMHO
crook,
either way. who cares. I own shares, I have RSVP'd. I am going.
end-of-story
SH,
I plan on going and staying for as long as I can muster for the exact same reason.
How will I know you when I see you?
You can PM me with a hint & I will do the same.
I Know MPS, thanks eom
By rats, you mean shorts covering?mkt closed.
Just called SEVU...
I wanted to order a secureview. But, I think I will wait for the color version. according to Kim they are working on the color version. Oh, she told me 8 week wait.
FYI
172,000 shares in 25 minutes!!!!!!!eom
Bill,
Not really sure where you are going with this, but SEVU does submit audited financial statements once a year, just like other publicly traded entities.
Made my RSVP today!!!!!!!
Bill,
No info on tuscano, however I'm sure your aware that those filings are not actual sales?
Lashark,
my only comment is that I hope it is not true, however if A@P said it on the board, I am sure it will be in his report in some fashion.
JMHO
Golfnut, couldn't say better myself.eom
I will see you there...
I just RSVP'd for myself and wife. looking forward to meeting some of you there. perhaps we should all wear a white carnation. LOL
FG...
Not sure if someone has stated this yet, but perhaps we could individually ignore certain posters (like RB) and/or have a TOS type violation wherein if, say 20, boardmembers report the poster than it is considered a vote of the thread to terminate the poster. If 5 TOS on a single post than post is deleted.
This would eliminate you taking the brunt of the "dictatorship" type comments.
just a thought.
AWINNER, may I post your message on RB?
awinner, thankyou. eom
can anyone post a link to the part II of A@P's ravings, I want to check something out. I have got a hunch.
thanx in advance
claire,
So Rich only needs 8.8% to get to 50% or approximately 1,360,000 shares to go along with him. (15% of the remaining 9,072,000 shares). Seems to me the Board of Directors could more than make up this small amount.
My point is that with only approx 3mil shares in float, the bulk of the shares are held very close to the vest and in my opinion can be easily used to make voting decisions however Rich sees fit.
Not good or bad, just information to consider.
JMHO
I don't know, but didn't someone post here that SEVU was recently placing large part orders?
anyone else remember this?
I think the shorters can't cover their positions because there are not enough shares available because too many longs still won't sell.
Why else would they stay? They have already shorted from $10 to $1.50.
Any realistic input?
OUCH!!! down $.78 on 21K!eom
Chuck...
thanks for your "over-my-head" info, LOL. If I understand you correctly, this VCXO problem is minor and is relatively easy to adjust for?
I have to believe that IF this problem actually is a current problem SEVU is experiencing that they would also be able to come up with a working solution.
Would you say that the average "EE" would have this knowledge or is this considered to be "higher order thinking" that only a few highly experienced EE's would understand?
BTW, I'm in no way implying that you are average. Just don't know the field.
regards
searcher, You da man!!!!eom
I thought you said the reason why no production in january and february was because there was no cash for parts suppliers.
which is it? no cash available or no parts available?
also the product is SECUREVIEW not secuview.
BTW, that will leave more shares for us.
thanx
For the first time sinceyou started posting,
you have made a worthwhile contribution to this board......Let's throw a party.
I agree it would make a huge impact in the SEVU market for Rich to buy back some shares.
It would also make a huge impact for Rich to pay for the first production run out of his own pocket. This of course could be done by either paying back the SEVU loan plus making additional loans to the company or by issuing more shares to Rich in exchange for the additional capital. In either case SEVU should get their loan paid back to them.
I personally would like Rich to Loan the company the money as to not dilute the stock, but I feel the additional capital created by the issuance of new stock would greatly help the balance sheet. As it would be an increase in shareholder equity as opposed to an increase in corporate debt. In the long run, I feel a little more dilution to get this puppy flying is a small price to pay.
NOTE: this assumes that cash within the company is a major contributing factor to the lack of current production. I'm not dure if that is the case, but if it is, the above is a plausible solution.
JMHO
Not a matter of don't want to hear it...
We need some sort of reasonably verifiable source. You should understand this given our recent pounding A@P gave us, not to mention the wave of bashing this stock has taken.
There must be some middle ground somewhere.
JMHO
Your Proof? First post?
I have considered this as well. As a last resort a buyout is likely.
JMHO
That would make sense....
if Mcbride believes he set up the contact and logis-tech believes the same then LT would expect their cut and SEVU would be unwilling to pay it.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm, quite plausible.
JMHO
camfan, excellent..thankyou.eom
FG, Thanx...eom
prox..right on point!eom
FG...
not sure what you mean by "clean slate stock take"?
ABSOLUTELY!!!!
FATT MATT...
can an individual poster get some satisfaction as to the deletion of an obvious basher?
arrow & frankng (which i believe stands for "Frank no good").
JMHO