Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Perfect example of the pot calling the kettle black!
You really are an educator! Thank you.
Oh that is correct, you can only place one limit order lol.
What a joke.
Is that your sole audience?
In which you communicate to via a public message board?
Very convenient.
Horrible advice, just like the one you gave me at 7.17 when I told you I would wait to below 7.
Again, why would his friend not place a limit order and save money?
His friend I suspect is not in the business of sustaining the price, but of making an investment.
The lower the price you buy at the better no?
50k shares you think will keep the price up??
Cmon now.
They want to short more to create volume.
They are trapped, nobody is selling at these prices.
Without taking stop losses via more shorting, they cant cover.
So I take it as a great sign.
PAY UP! Shorties.
All I got to say is GL getting any of MY shares below 15.56.
Steady, unfortunately the times of reasonable arguments passed when intentions were revealed.
How can one take any of it seriously when they (cabal) have publicly announced their sentiment in every negative EVERYTHING Anavex?
Even caught correcting their own "typos", which opportunistically helped back track some of the tiny positive comments, I guess were slip ups.
I cant take a non verified "doctors" opinion serious that has a clear agenda against the company.
Remember back then, they would argue against each other to create a nice smoke curtain of being reasonable.
Now notice they find each other find "typos" in their arguments against the company lol.
Too easy, and too obvious in my opinion.
Dam we are bringing in the bench folks.
We must be near a bottom or something.
Welcome to the board! Let me guess you felt the need to publicly exclaim your fears lol.
Seems like under $7 is the script.
I can afford the cuts from the falling knife.
I cant afford the gap up past $7 if Rett data shows approval potential.
Different strokes for different folks.
Yea it could drop all the way to 5 also, but just highly unlikely.
I have heard this song before.
Like I said I`ll be a buyer a gain at anything below 6.50
I will re assess then, is not about where it makes it but how it makes it.
Yup, max pain yet they cant generate any volume at these prices lol.
Oh well.
Like buying a top on low volume, they are playing with fire.
They knife cuts both ways, no matter how you paint it.
Just and FYI shorties, i`ll be buying once again if you manage to hit 6.50 and below :)
How much cheaper does the script say?
God bless the shorts and manipulators.
:)
Even viruses serve a purpose in life.
So I see you make your investment decisions based on random and unverifiable doctors over the ones you can verify lol
You have heard him at his conferences? Or just taking his word for it?
Because I'm still waiting to read one of the peer reviewed papers he has written.
Lmao!!
What a bunch of nonsense!
Yes, why I said he constantly pomps the stock.
As an investor who does their own DD and thinking.
A pomper is not as harmful as a person spreading negative spins on a company when they dont have all the information.
But that is just my opinion, because I own my decisions.
But I do have to thank posters like Doc , they have shown me that this is more about emotions/temperament than facts.
Why take out your anger on George?
Because he constantly pomps the stock you own?
But let's belive DOC? Because his FUD sounds good and scientific?
But in fact is smoke and mirrors/ scientism not particular to our data. (He doesn't know what he doesn't know)
Kin knows, he has the data in front of him.
Doc assumes with a negative spin, always!
I can see there is frustration here, because of share price action and manipulation.
Just know you are in their grasps if that's how you feel.
Remember this is a temperment game more than IQ game.
We did have TLD via a different analytical method performed by a 3rd party, ODDs ratio.
Not sure if this is a geniuen question or something to bring back an old argument.
But the question is pretty revealing, of the intentent.
Welcome to the IG list!
I think what you are showing is how desperately Roche needs us.
As long as they bring their check book.
I don't mind being associated.
We have cheats here and they don't even bring the check book.
Like the saying goes if your going to !%#%@% me at least buy me dinner first.
Michael Jackson practices Moonwalking pic.twitter.com/hgEa2EJ1Ea
— Fascinating (@fasc1nate) September 22, 2023
As far I know, I was referring to your call to rescue Docs "misstep".
Not your stance, we all know your stance.
Which by the way since it is a P2B, dont you agree AA is the fastest way to revenue?
Funny how now it is a typo.
Kind of Citadels coding error huh.
Schiiett happens huh.
Cute.
SEC-Charges-Citadel-Securities-for-Violating-Order-Marking-Requirements-of-Short-Sale-Regulations
$7 million only?
Zero corruption in CANDYLAND !! Yell it out! It makes it true!!
Citadel blames a coding error lol.
How many short shares were really out there if they were being marked as long shares?
So much for reporting integrity, nothing to see here folks lol.
I dont buy it, and makes me wonder if this is the cover up for the other manipulations law suits being brought against them.
https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/181507/SEC-Charges-Citadel-Securities-for-Violating-Order-Marking-Requirements-of-Short-Sale-Regulations
AI prompting takes skills.
It is flawed if the right questions are not asked AND challenged.
The same question needs to be asked from different angles.
The sources need to be analyzed; the ones used by the AI to come to its conclusion.
One needs to ask for contradictory questions as well.
All the above does not take away from its functionality, and NO is not just to make writing more condense or for writing purposes.
It is a powerful statistical searching engine, with known limitations.
Just like humans have their limitations, like being manipulators.
Electrical Engineer, here who uses it effectively for reducing coding time and finding out things that are publicly available faster than a traditional search engines search or scrapper.
For the impatient:
'You can't produce a baby in 1 month by getting nine women pregnant' -Warren Buffet
The moonwalk never looked so good!
Easier to catch a lier than a limp person.
Is investor mad now?
I do I do!
Just need to know what companies are dirt-cheap compared to their revenue potential, and what is way overvalued.
While the general market remains overvalued considering monetary and growth conditions.
There are always companies that are at the floor level or even below.
Two come to mind AVXL, and NWBO, both groundbreaking science and gigantic revenue potential for the next 10 years.
Just look at what happens when shorts start to sniff the Grim Reaper, in the NWBO case.
I know I know wrong board wolf!
But these two are closer two each other than one might think.
They share the same Cabal!
I expect shenanigans/buying opportunities, there will be manipulation all the way till partnership, peer review, or approval.
Peer review carrying the smallest stick, since when it comes out, they will criticize the reviewers or the data they were given. lol
The other two are hard to swallow and spit out any other form, so they carry the elephant's rear trunk.
Does it matter?
Don't try to predict.
It only sets up unrealistic expectations that the shorts will use to emotionally manipulate you!
But if you want one, soon to both.
Ther order is irrelevant in my opinion.
In my opinion the confirmatory trial will not charge anything to its participants.
There are enough AD patients to give the trial participants free meds, while at the same time marketing the drug to those not included.
Insurance do cover drugs under AA, do some research.
However they will not likely cover a drug that causes brain swelling, have marginal benefits, and arae administered at a hospital setting via IV. (a few come to mind)
Our drug works, is safe, and cheap to administer.
I still dont see your point when our path to market is fastest with AA, and not limited like you claim.
AD patients and care givers are looking for something that works, recruitment will not be an issue at any price point.
Crap I would say the opposite is true, if a drug gets AA and is sold for $$ , why would you not want to participate in the trial for free.
This has a limit, even if the trial is of 1000 participants, Still got around 6.7 million patients in the US alone with mid to mod AD you can sell the drug to.
They will buy it, I know I would, and pretty sure you would too.
We wont get away with it, OLE will be used for the AA case not confirmation.
We will probably run the P3/4 confirmatory trial, if granted AA.
All good, is how it works, the great thing is we will be making REVENUE to fund these trials.
All good stuff.
SAME!!
Get it as ugly as you want boys, good luck getting those share back lol
I don't know is below $7 where institutions want to accumulate at?
Is this the price where the shorts dont get margin calls?
OR is below these prices where stop orders are at with the highest volume? Which helps both above.
SO many factors.
What happens if we get AA, and Rett approval?
Will below $7 matter?
I guess only to those in margin before then.
But Im more interested to what happens to the 16M short shares.
Lmao, did you ever think I can be part of the WGT group when it comes to data presented by the company.
But also acknowledging there is more to the system than just great data.
Here in the real world, not Carebear Land, there are other forces at work, outside of Anavex control.
So I keep myself grounded to reality, and acknowledge a potential investment loss.
My Odds are < 5% with what we know today.
So yea WGT!
Ahh the predictable lunch take down is here :)
If we get AA, we are not limited only to sell the drug to trial participants.
We are limited to a potential withdrawal of the drug if the confirmatory trial fails.
But from when AA is granted to the read out of confirmatory trial, we can sell to all patients in that market it was approved for.
Not sure why you are confusing enrollment and participation in the confirmatory trial with revenue.
As promised, I took a stab, exactly at 7 because why not?
Got a bit more for the lunch takedown.