Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Never mentioned the cabal nor care about the share price, I mentioned some pretty remarkable results dont you agree?
Maybe you might need to consult with the local grammar teacher on this sentence structure.
My mistake if you are alluring to AA in AD being filed, then peer review coming out which would then reinforce or weaken the results, from an investors view and decision making.
Granted, English is not my forte, however looking for spins is.
I agree, it is laughable.
Just look at what he tried doing yesterday with SAVA.
I do not have an investment there.
But my oh my, he went out of his way to mention how NOBODY (except him) was talking about their drug on CTAD, just because they were up 20% on the day lol.
Talk about sending the dog out when scared lol.
It all depends when he bought.
Also it doesnt matter, have you ever seen glioblastoma of the brain survival patients like the ones in NWBO?
The results were published in a peer-reviewed cancer journal, JAMA Oncology12. The publication was co-authored by more than 70 physicians from leading institutions across the U.S., Canada, U.K., and Germany
Or are you in the AF camp that these "Doctors" are just miss guided lol.
When approved, it will be irrelevant buying at 1.04(recent high) or .40 (recent low).
So you really believe Anavex is waiting for the peer review to apply for AA LMAO.
Nice try, but Im not in that camp.
I'm in the camp that they are meeting with regulatory agencies in parallel as a peer review last time I checked was not an NDA requirement.
6-10 years, that soon? dam ill be in my early 40s if luck permits, not bad not bad at all.
He clearly doesn't care what experts in the field have to say.
He sees himself and his political science major above the medical and scientific field.
Look at what he did with NWBO, which has brain cancer patients surviving after 5 years in a terminal type of cancer.
Drs in the field have spoken about it this breakthrough on journal paper.
All he has to say is these doctors mean well but he knows better, NWBO failed its trial according to him.
Again!
Even tho they have survivors in a disease that is terminal AND professionals agreeing it is a never before seen break through.
He is in the spin business not the fact one.
So? What difference does it make?
Again missing the forest for the trees.
FULL AD DATASET, which was argued here was not going to be released by some here, wink wink.
WILL be released in a JOURNAL.
This year or next, who cares the year is over in less than 2 months.
BUT RETT will be THIS year not FEBISH.
So thank you Dr.M for the update.
He suffers from selective reading comprehension.
I suspect.
YOU!! are missing the forest for the trees.
The beef of the PR in my opinion is this:
We also look forward to presenting in an upcoming major publication the complete dataset of the Phase 2b/3 Alzheimer’s disease trial of ANAVEX®2-73 (blarcamesine), a potential next-generation precision medicine convenient once daily oral Alzheimer’s disease treatment,” said Christopher U Missling, PhD, President and Chief Executive Officer of Anavex. "We are also on track within our neurodevelopmental precision medicine Rett syndrome program to release top-line data of ANAVEX®2-73-RS-003 Phase 2/3 EXCELLENCE pediatric clinical trial in the current quarter of 2023.”
3-71 was just the vehicle of delivery!
This is the beef.
"When The Time Comes To Buy, You Won’t Want To" Walter Deemer.
Why are you asking others? Your crystal ball seems to be working fine.
Are you fishing for a compliment? Just in case kudos!
The data up to date is pretty darn good. So one of your options is out if the question.
This is a an AD conference, and our AD data is stellar!
An Anavex PR is possible.
However what I do not find possible is a late breaking presentation at CTAD.
Unless CTAD is running very very late on accepting our abstract.
Since once the abstract is accepted, the company has to make an announcement saying it is so and expected to present.
Was?
Who says the partnership ended?
Lol
Not I will argue that the IDIOT, as you claim!
Is the guy who keeps harassing the other guy when there is an IGNORE button.
Unless he is looking to learn how to be a Pompous man that is.
No! not my posts about motorcycles, or pompousness those are not qualified with IFs.
Those looking for a travel guide and are looking here for it in the traditional form of information seeking, will be guided astray.
What I look for here is for dis-information, what they dont say, and how they say it or dont.
Now that is the information that truly guides me!
Yea yesterday all the participants of QQQ and XBI, released a statement to defend their dropping share price lol.
Why didnt AVXL do the same?
Goshh what an ..... !!
Maybe a memory problem, you may want to revisit my posts, but I have always used IF in all my WGT statements.
Because the CNS field is where the goal post is the widest, and market the most lucrative.
Also because that is where we have the fastest route to revenue.
The rest are cherry on top, if we get our drug approved and revenue coming in.
Then we can fund those other competitive indications, speaking more on the pain killer side.
At the end the company is a business, and needs revenue ASAP.
Mag, there are differences between viruses' multiplicative effects vs dementia.
The best way I can put it is if you get dementia, your neighbor will not catch it by being exposed to you.
Virus in the other hand have an exponential effect because they are spread.
That is why we can not compare virus to dementia deaths.
Now I do not fully agree on how things were handled, but that does not make the above incorrect. Hence the justification for over reacting.
The how was the problem in my opinion, not the why.
Look at xbi, stop the harassment!
Not answering is a form of message.
It tells you, all you need to know.
Similarly to basing your "concerns" on a posters predictions lol.
That concerns me.
Geroge, honest question.
What is gained by announcing imminent news today?
How would you know something ahead of time.
If you have an intuition or logical deduction on to why "News today".
Would you please share uncompromising details?
Yes last-minute shorts sizzling breaking news announcement from the company is very possible.
I just want to make sure the poster doesn't think we will be attending CTAD, since our deadline for submission and approvals has passed.
Unless I missed something, in which case a SMART person should help.
What exactly do you mean by this ?
Very very SMART response.
LOL
No you are missing the point in various ways.
1- our met endpoints argument has been verified by Kun Jin
2- our indication is in AD, where there are virtually no EFFECTIVE therapies vs Aldeyra`s indication which there 5 approved drugs that work.
You are actually probably not missing the point, you just can not acknowledge it for w.e reason.
Cmon now you are a SMART person.
No you deliberately not seeing that our ex FDA guy Dr Kun Jin VP & Head of Biostatistics, at Anavex Life Sciences Corp, was on board while our latest PR was released.
Nor has he jumped ship since its release or after seeing the data.
Can Aldeyra say something similar?
Your CEO argument is outdated.
I know is been a rough day, but dont forget who came in here today throwing stones from a glass house.
Posting about a company that is down 73%, which is in a complete different universe in terms of indication, and comparing to AVXL was not with ill intent?
Unfortunately for you, the weak attempt to instill fear only made you look bad.
Furthermore, saying that institutions or investors maybe should get the remaining and invest here in hopes for the opposite outcome, while then claiming to averaging down in that same company is laughable.
Thank you bas, I fixed the typo.
At least it wasnt the kind of typo certain "Doctors" make
A perfect example of deflection and ad hominem!
Good Game!
More interested on what the SMART ppl are and why they have not answered my Kun Jin post.
Also why they dont take their own advice, but this would just be the cherry on top.
Well you could always place a picture of your broker trade history, Im sure our tools can verify it.
But they have all of those FANCY tools created by FANCY and SMART people.
How can this be?
Neither, you can keep chasing our own pompous tail lol.
Maybe a case of dish but dont take your own advise? LMAO
What DOES matter is that Kin would have jumped ship by now!
Ofcourse, if he is rational and in the know.
Correct my assumptions, I know you will.
It is obvious that this is a very WEAK apples to oranges comparison to instill fear.
I mean, why does he keep ignoring that our last PR was while having Dr. Kun Jin on board.
Comparing an eye dryness drug to an AD drug is also very very laughable.