Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thank you! That’s a “sh*t load” of equipment.
Where do you see this referenced?
I voted yes for everything. I believe in this company and Lugee Li.
I voted yes for everything. I believe in this company and Lugee Li.
Tried. The app didn’t know your name. When you open LQMT, on the bottom of your phone are options home, rooms, discover etc. hit rooms. That opens with a circle pic and under it is LQMT_STOCK. Hit the pic and you’re in the room.
LQMT’s acquisition of debt securities has reduced cash on hand to approx $1.5M. At that level, the company has so restricted its liquidity, it would not be able to operate in the ordinary course going forward for very long absent net income from revenues. I think that conclusion is inescapable.
That would have been prohibited insider trading.
Now that is more than an intriguing statement.
Aah. Concur.
I think this is perfectly wrong. Can anyone put their hand on the apple agreement. I recollect that it sells the right all use of LM in consumer electronics and all component parts.
CE is excluded from the LQMT Eontec PLA.
Curious to see if we have any volume today, or any price movement. Materion has a market audience that may give us market recognition/affirmation.
“... it’s ready to go.”
It seems that way. Cocked and loaded.
Thanks. And good luck back to you.
That would be wonderful. We will see...
I think your analysis is incorrect. We were told in the prior quarterly report that the increased revenue was due to customer inventory reserve ordering before shifting to China manufacturing and that the revenue level would NOT be indicative of 4th quarter sales. I am expecting reduced 4th Q sales and, hopefully, 1st or 2nd Q ramp up, if we share in the maze production.
THe 13th was the court outside date, which has now been pushed a month to January 16 bLQMT attorneys have been all over this...
You are correct. There have been filings subsequent to the 13th (in the 17th) and Mr. Kang defaulted under the partied previously signed settlement statement. There are multiple cases extensions and motions pending with the court and much of it is under seal.
Yes. I found the docket and filings on pacer.monitor.com/filings/liquidmetal_technologies. They will prompt you to buy and you will have the option of buying one or more docket entries.
I will — will be able to do this in about 2 hours.
I have downloaded the docket documents, but they are 23 pages and I don’t know how to attach to a message. If i can, pls explain. Otherwise, I can forward to you by email if you want to send that to me privately. Alternatively, you can buy on line for US5.00.
The docket entry you are quoting from is December 12. I am relying on the filed settlement agreement and parties request for dismissal dated December 13, and signed by all required parties, including Kang and his counsel. It appears Kang had not performed as if the filing on the 12th, but did perform on the 13th. If anyone knows anything different, I would appreciate hearing from you.
By its terms, the settlement agreement is effective upon entry of judgment — when the judge signs.
I could not find the docket on line and purchased the filing.
If there was an assumption of legal costs in the settlement agreement, it was redacted. It was not in the collateral court documents. My instinct is that we got an admission of liability and a moral win in the $10,000 and no more.
The court’s acceptance of the parties’ settlement is procedural not substantive. The case is over.
There are functionally 3 documents filed with the court dated 12/13. One is the settlement agreement and, yes, is substantively redacted, but fully signed. Attached to the settlement agreement is the court’s order signed by all principals and a dismissal of the case, also signed by all principals. The agreed upon court order and case dismissal both contain the admission of liability of john Kang and an injunction against him for future infringement of the Liquidmetal ownership of the Mark Liquidmetal in all instances (including an injunction against Kang asserting any association with BMGs or having a position with LMT or Apple), except the limited exception of coatings. This is a perfect win for Liquidmetal, a perfect loss for Kang and a final disposition of the case (with court reservation of jurisdiction for enforcement).
Our agreement with a Eontec excludes all CE
Hear hear Willy Bones. You said in a few words what we all feel every day!! Thank you.
I agree. 90 machines is NOT a build it and maybe they will come. It is a hard commitment to fill contract needs. But we don’t know if any of this capacity is for Liquidmetal USA. It may be Eontec. We just don’t know.
I see. Thanks for taking the time to explain.
Thank you for your reply..., but, if the 106 formulation was not dependent on 105, he didn’t need LQMT IP. If it was dependent, then it changes the entire analysis. Do you know?
If this is accurate (and I am not challenging your post), then what value did LQMT have to Li to substantiate a $64 million purchase price? I think for a conduit to establish wealth in US dollars, free of Chinese control. He just divested a block of EONTEC for functionally the same price point he paid for LQMT, but retains substantially all of Liquid Metal China (manufacturing) and functional control of LQMT US (the “head” of the brand) ... with a healthy piece of EONTEC to round out his empire.
Appendix C to the PLA EXCLUDES CE from the cross license grant
Isn’t ALL CE outside the PLA?
On what basis do you think the upgrade served any customer who might lease the space? Or is that conjecture on your part? It smells like an upgrade for business that didn’t materialize.
Tesla doorlocks. Are you not aware that Tesla’s doorlocks retract and extend with locking and unlocking. It is not the mechanism you have been using for 60 years.
This may be an Eontec manufactured part with LQMT US involvement, but even so it puts Liquidmetal in mainstream production.
New ASUS ZenFone 6 has a rotating camera Liquidmetal module. https://www.dpreview.com/news/2648050618/asus-zenfone-6-features-rotating-camera-module