Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Missed? By whom?
Yeah, I found that out too. Clay sent me a PM at one point explaining that there was no point in me flagging his videos. I have nothing against him, just curious why he disappeared.
You missed my point entirely.
And, of course, every trade has a buyer and a seller. Whether they be investors, traders or the mm’s themselves, one of them is on each side of each trade.
What ever happened to Claytrader? Did he get indicted or something?
Ironically, posters like you are the mirror image of what you claim George to be. Every single development or statement somehow gets twisted into a negative.
A ridiculous argument. Blackrock owns more shares of stock in the overall market than anybody. I guess you should short the S&P, since Blackrock owns shares in all those companies and must be lending them out to shorts. What great logic. LOL
It was a material event to investors, obviously, but not a material event by the legal definition of the SEC regs. Two different definitions of “material.”
It was not a material event requiring an 8k. Guidance from a regulatory body is not a formal governmental decision. Neither would the full submittal of an application require an 8-k, or need to be included in a 10-k.
This board cracks me up. We’ve got an army of fake disgruntled longs (and a few legitimate disgruntled longs) and a smaller coterie of people who are completely fixated on one particular pumper while ignoring the obvious bashers. But they are concerned about disinformation. Very concerned.
Reminds me of the late 90’s, when the shorts had to do most of their work via the media. Now they can go directly to the masses with a “repetitive marketing”scheme.
Next: AI.
Tabula rasa.
You are responding to a guy who created his ID a week ago for the sole purpose of neutralizing George as a threat to the shorts. 17 posts in total, 16 of them attacking George. How obvious can he be? It’s quite amusing. I wonder how he ended up with this assignment.
lol. Way to go, contorting a positive into an imaginary negative. Classic.
Lately? lol
It would be nice if he occasionally gave actual numbers.
He does do pretty good research and often finds relevant information. It’s the endless specific predictions that he should rethink.
The cabal views George as their number 1 threat, which continues to amuse me. They’ve apparently been told that George must be attacked and neutralized. One new screen name was created for this sole purpose.
Keep it up, George. Nothing you say has any effect but I enjoy the induced hysteria.
You have a point.
Yes, and it does not mean they do not remain confident in approval of A2-73.
I’ve already responded. Since this is the first schizo trial there is no need to follow up on earlier A2-73 results, like the other indications. So they are starting with 3-71. Doc also noted that A3-71 has certain properties that are believed to bode well for schizophrenia.
This is not an intended distraction from anything; it’s development of a drug using a next generation molecule. The rest is the usual FUD nonsense, which tries to twist every development into a negative.
There is nothing in the PR to hide, so I wasn’t trying to hide it. It’s very obvious that CGI didn’t come through with the money.
I don’t sell because the stock is too cheap. There is no point. Hoping for a miracle. Either way, we are about to get severely diluted.
Your opinion is duly noted, spin doctor.
That’s silly. This is the first trial for schizophrenia so they decided to start with 3-71 because it’s not necessary to build on prior 2-73 results. And as Doc noted, 3-71 has some properties that are believed to target schizophrenia.
Sure it’s a possibility. And it would make sense if not for the fact that now we have a cash crunch. Where will we get cash now? Evan obviously couldn’t find it elsewhere before, which is why he did the CGI deal. He “kind of” admitted this in a recent podcast. If he does find investors it will likely be for .05 per share if we are lucky.
Nope, I’m not trading. I didn’t post a link to the PR for the simple reason that I saw it on Fidelity and it was not possible to copy and paste it for whatever reason.
Yes, technically we probably terminated the agreement with CGI because they didn’t fulfill their commitment, ie, they didn’t give us the money. That’s another way of saying that CGI backed out.
If you doubt this, just wait til you see what happens next.
The so-called “pivot” to 3-71 for schizo as an alleged distraction from 2-73 is a genuine example of FUD. Classic, really.
I’m a shareholder, my friend. If you believe VCI didn’t bail out you are deluding yourself. Watch what comes next. Toxic financing. It’ll start at around .05 per share if we’re lucky. So $1 million will be 20 million shares. And it’ll get worse from there.
The problem is the lack of sales. The 3D model business is all I care about. Which is a good product. The rest of the stuff is fluff. The problem is that they can’t sell enough models to prevent insolvency. They are so close to break even, possibly, but we are about to either be diluted into oblivion or end up insolvent.
They spent too much money trying to do too many things at once. Should have gone all in on the 3D models and ditched the other nonsense.
Agreed. Really no choice due to SEC regs etc. Although it would have been more accurate if he said that VCI backed out. I’m curious of the reason, which we’ll never know.
Huh? Where are you getting this from?
Translation: VCI pulled the plug.
His screen name seems to have been created for the sole purpose of neutralizing George. Must be a new assignment.
VCI bailed out on the financing.
It’s a common occurrence. The primary motivation is the PR value to the shorts in many cases.
I know this from firsthand information. Not for AVXL specifically but a while ago, from a client.
Yes, and they are also instigated by short hedge funds.
A PR about a lawsuit investigation based on opinions/conjecture, with a cherry picked share price decline period that was manufactured by manipulation. Pretty humorous. Right out of the short playbook. Not to mention that it would be legally impossible to attribute the share price decline to any actual fact. Any biotech investor has seen such nonsense many times before.
Note the complete absence of evidence. A hoped-for lawsuit in search of a factual basis. I wonder which mm/hedgie sponsored this.
Amazing coincidence, an SA hit piece on the same day as the delayed readout PR, huh?
The people who claim to have superior knowledge, and mock those whom they claim are hysterical neophytes, would never make it on Wall Street. The old adage of the more knowledge you think you have, the more you realize what you don’t know.
SAB, for example, gets it. Because he actually lived it. The pompous know it alls here are deluding themselves. All cattle, no hat.
Bingo.
Yeah, sorry. The thing is, at some point the long calls will make a killing. But it’s been a bad play thus far.