Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You should have explained to them that if no law firm files to be lead counsel it indicates that nobody wants to go through the trouble of pursuing a very expensive frivolous case. Including the same ambulance chasing firm who started the whole thing, as they did last time, at the behest of the short hedgies, for negative PR purposes.
Today (Friday) will establish another TZero. Then it may roll on from there.
Wow, the shorts really got trapped on that recent takedown. Appears to be orchestrated.
The buying surge commenced shortly after 1 pm yesterday also.
Is dry powder better than wet powder?
Oops. Looking a bit squeezy.
Yep, it started suddenly. And there is no public news that I can find.
You seem to have made a good call there, doc.
Looks like you can skip posting your worn out blurb today. Take the day off, play some XBox.
Wow. Just … wow. Your linear thinking and comprehension is a sight to behold.
Personally, I didn’t find Dr. Jan’s comments to be grossly negative or overblown.
That is the key issue. The undisclosed indication. You nailed it. I’ve had enough of the mystery about what the indication might be. As a result, I’m selling in the morning. Thank you for reminding me of this major red flag.
It’s amusing to me that none of the “intellectual honesty” watchdogs ever call out this incessant gibberish.
I think what happens next will depend on how the Russell 2000 rebalancing plays out. Today is the relevant date. The ETFs and mutual funds will have to sell some shares based on today’s price. It’s also possible that the market makers have been short term shorting ahead of the rebalance and have arranged to buy the funds’ shares at which point they will use the shares to cover.
I suspect that this was all fairly planned. They drove the price down to force the Russell 2000 funds to sell some shares.
The same parties have no problem manipulating or riding it the other way. They’ve done it before and they will likely do it again. They’d prefer that you bail at the low before they do it.
Expected to be cash flow positive when? What a useless prediction.
COG-13 is a more sensitive (responsive) methodology than COG-11?
lol. You may be on to something.
They missed the endpoint in ADL CGIC and blamed the high placebo effect.
I accept that answer. Others would, however, find a new primary griping point.
If you want to engage in other baseless speculations about the delay in the ASM it could be that a proposed merger or buyout needs to be on the proxy.
This is all just random guessing at this point.
Anyone can direct the ASM. If they wanted to they could just have the CFO or Ma herself run it. Or even an attorney (shudder).
Technically, the only absolutely necessary task is to document the shareholder votes.
Unlikely, in my opinion but who knows? Doesn’t matter to me either way.
But replacing a CEO would not be a reason to delay the ASM.
The only reason the ASM might be delayed by the unlikely event of Missling leaving would be his board seat. The proposed replacement would have to be on the proxy.
On another issue, if he were to leave what would be the new primary fudster talking point?
You are correct. But the algo trading I was referring to is different than HFT-front running, i.e., flash trading. Front running mainly involves an advantage in data speed and processing speed. It doesn’t add up to much of a difference to individual trades but it is significant in the aggregate.
The algos I am referring to figure out how to achieve a desired result: move the stock up or down, accumulate or distribute, etc. It relies significantly on collusion. Creating micro-trends that add up to macro trends. They take turns trading shares back and forth to each other to create the illusion of real trading when in reality it is not. Imagine if you and I could trade the same 100 shares back and forth to each other all day long at incrementally lower prices. The net cost to either of us is negligible but the appearance …
Oh, well they’ve been doing that for years. But I agree, they will likely figure out more efficient ways to steer the trades to themselves for wash trade purposes.
I’m not able to imagine how they could invent “new” TA. It’s basically math and a loose form of geometry. I think what the algos and AI will do is figure out ways to apply the TA. More accurately, more efficient ways to cause the results that they want. TA manipulation. The algos already do that. They are designed to do it.
The trading algos absolutely use TA. So does literally every professional human trader. That is the only reason it has any validity. Empirically, it would have no effect whatsoever.
I’ll accept that non-answer for what it is. A deflection.
I don’t understand your answer. The company has reiterated several times that all endpoints were met.
Do we know for certain yet what the endpoints were?
You seem to have developed quite an obsession with trying to convince people to sell. How many posts per day do you make at this point? 20?
I’m not sure what trial results you are looking at. And apparently the EMA disagrees with you. I think I’ll go with their view over yours.
Exactly. Nailed it.
Sure, pal. So what is your hypothesis as to why they haven’t filed in Australia, considering their huge hoard of cash that you observed? I’m sure it’s a baseless negative assumption so let’s hear it. Or did you not have a point?
Money is not the only resource. There is also personnel, man hours and focus.
Maybe they will file in Australia. We don’t know.
Yawn. Okay, you’re right. They haven’t filed in Australia because the trials were all fabricated, using crash test dummies. Is that what you want to hear?
Or is it that they are focusing on the larger European market first? I’ll let others decide. Enjoy whatever alternative conclusion you’re implying.
It is not a big issue for me whether they file the application next month or six months from now. I only care that it’s filed and accepted.
Go ahead and try to wait to buy, on your trade down strategy. Who cares? Personally, I will not sell any here. I’d be more likely to sell some investment shares if it was in the 20’s, as I did last time.
Those shares will wait until the outcome of the application process, whatever that may be.
So let’s see who’s right. They’ve had a window to work on the EMA application during the time that they are required to due to EMA rules. Not that they would otherwise submit it before the allowed time anyway.
Why haven’t they submitted in Australia? I assume they are prioritizing the larger markets first. They do not have unlimited resources. However, much of the work will be done for the first application so it will not have to be replicated.
“Keep your cool.”
You must be confusing me with someone else.
A baseless assumption, that the former FDA experts have secretly left the company. You make this assumption because you cannot dispute my point that we have noted experts who know how to handle regulatory processes.