Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thanks for the link padre.
*********
From Tony Chung, CEO. “I look forward to providing our investors with an update on the business during our 2021 year-end conference call to be scheduled in conjunction with the filing of our annual 10-K.” *********
Great quote, but without a link to the source one has to take it as a matter of faith/religion. When/where did he say it? Please provide a link. Did he also give any indication on why we have to wait until March to hear from our employee? Keeping shareholders informed interferes with tee time?
“Sideways for the next 3-4 months then up-up and away….”
Ahh yes, the proverbial next quarter/soon prediction.
But the secret,confidential TC communications make this upcoming March 22nd the one to believe in.
March of 22 when the 10k is released is the earliest that we can expect to hear from our CEO according to who/what? Did TC tell you this in a secret communication? Why not November of 21 when the quarterly report is issued? Any link to substantiate your assertion would be greatly appreciated.
As one mushroom to another, I think you are overstating the case.
1. Our shared IP with Apple and Eontec
2. Our CM network - WHICH WILL MAKE LI RICH BUT NO ONE KNOWS IF WE WILL BENEFIT
3. Our COB and majority owner is a visionary BMG genius - AND NO ONE KNOWS WHAT HE PLANS FOR US. HE CAN PROFIT OFF OF BMG WITH OR WITHOUT US
4. Our low overhead - EASILY DONE WHEN YOU GET RID OF ALMOST ALL EMPLOYEES. THE TEENAGER WHO MOWS YARDS ALSO HAS LOW OVERHEAD. WITH REGARD TO “LQMT IS GOING TO BE A LICENSING COMPANY,” QUALCOMM STARTED OFFAS A LICENSING COMPANY, BUT THEY KEPT PUSHING THE R&D TO KEEP THE LICENSING REVENUE COMING IN THE FUTURE. LQMT DOESN’T HAVE ENOUGH EMPLOYEES TO DO THAT.
5. Our recent $30 million FOREX investment yet to be revealed - “YET TO BE REVEALED” = SPECULATION
6. Our incentivized CEO -THE ISSUE ISN’T WHETHER HE IS INCENTIVIZED, IT IS WHETHER HE CAN DELIVER. NO SUCCESSFUL TRACK RECORD TO DATE.
7. Our involvement with Whales such as Tesla, Apple, Huawei, Samsung… SO FAR THAT HAS BEEN A SMASHING SUCCESS AND REVENUE WINDFALL.
“Li is pointing to $15 a share and higher.”!!? Am I missing the joke or is there something that Li has said or done to back up that statement?
“The fundamentals are all pointing to Liquidmetal light at the end of the tunnel.”
LOL. I guess that depends on how you define “fundamentals”.
REASONS TO BE OPTIMISTIC ABOUT THE FUTURE OF LQMT
1. Our shared IP with Apple and Eontec
2. Our CM network - WHICH WILL MAKE LI RICH BUT NO ONE KNOWS IF WE WILL BENEFIT
3. Our COB and majority owner is a visionary BMG genius - AND NO ONE KNOWS WHAT HE PLANS FOR US. HE CAN PROFIT OFF OF BMG WITH OR WITHOUT US
4. Our low overhead - EASILY DONE WHEN YOU GET RID OF ALMOST ALL EMPLOYEES. THE TEENAGER WHO MOWS YARDS ALSO HAS LOW OVERHEAD. WITH REGARD TO “LQMT IS GOING TO BE A LICENSING COMPANY,” QUALCOMM STARTED OFFAS A LICENSING COMPANY, BUT THEY KEPT PUSHING THE R&D TO KEEP THE LICENSING REVENUE COMING IN THE FUTURE. LQMT DOESN’T HAVE ENOUGH EMPLOYEES TO DO THAT.
5. Our recent $30 million FOREX investment yet to be revealed - “YET TO BE REVEALED” = SPECULATION
6. Our incentivized CEO -THE ISSUE ISN’T WHETHER HE IS INCENTIVIZED, IT IS WHETHER HE CAN DELIVER. NO SUCCESSFUL TRACK RECORD TO DATE.
7. Our involvement with Whales such as Tesla, Apple, Huawei, Samsung… SO FAR THAT HAS BEEN A SMASHING SUCCESS AND REVENUE WINDFALL.
Wouldn’t it also be nice if LQMT had public events (quarterly reports, ASHM) where they took questions AND answered them.
The Liquidmetal goal posts are just like liquidmetal. They bend and bend and bend but don’t break.
Any particular reason for that optimism?
Link please.
I’m curious to see if our certified partner know our name - Liquidmetal not Liquid metal.
I think we are all rooting for you to lose the bet and win the lottery.
So what is the pertinence of that article today? It was released in March 2020, involves Li and Yi’an, and uses the two word phrase “liquid Metal” synonymously for “amorphous metal.” What is your theory for how we (shareholders of LQMT) benefit?
Did I miss something relevant to LQMT due to a faulty translation? If so, please let me know what, and please post a translation. TIA
And we are a much longer from getting revenue from the TM as you have suggested.
Imagine in ASPRIN was your trademark?
Oh, that’s right, Bayer held the ASPRIN trademark and lost it because it became a generic word for a pain reliever. If LIQUIDMETAL becomes the generic word for describing amorphous metal (instead of identifying LQMT as the source of goods or services), then LIQUIDMETAL will become generic too.
Perhaps TC is happy with his “piddly” salary. After all, it could be money for nothing - is he actually expending any time and mental effort towards advancing LQMT? TC could be living the good life and enjoying his retirement while collecting his “piddly” CEO salary.
I wonder if the CEO will do a conference call, and if so, take questions? Wouldn’t that be awesome and potentially enlightening.
How do you distinguish between subtle accumulation and subtle selling?
TO DA MOON!!!
You were right. Already up almost 3% and above 10 cents. LQMT is launching and is a go. At this rate we might break into 11s, (or much more likely) or not.
I think DA MOON might be the name of a neighborhood bar.
Very true. LOL
How high is the moon? $1, 50 cents, 12 cents? 12 cents would be over a 25% gain, which ain’t bad for one day, but probably not enough to meet expectations. What is your expectation?
No. Read the MTA with Apple.
Let’s hope you’re right. TWT
Is hopium addictive?
And if this too pans out as a nothing what will be hyped/pumped next?
Very true, anything is possible, but that also means that maybe the pessimists/realists are right or that the optimists/unicorns are right or possibly something else.
“***The current status of the*** ***LIQUIDMETAL*** ***filing is*** ***Appeal pending****.*”
In other words, the mark was DENIED and now they are appealing the denial.
TWT. I hope you are right.
And don’t forget about the watch. Surely Apple will use BMG in the next watch to help commemorate the 10th anniversary of Steve Jobs’s death.
Yeah, just like Bayer gets paid for the use of aspirin.
At pennies on the dollar that would be similar to selling now and missing the possibility that LQMT might pay off.
I wouldn’t be surprised that a sharp attorney might be able to bring Eontec into the suit. The argument being something like Li ran Eontec and LQMT simultaneously and Li breached his duties towards LQMT to favor Eontec. I wouldn’t be surprised if such an attorney sought an injunction against the importation of BMG into LQMT’s exclusive territories until a court appointed master negotiated a true royalty agreement. In that case, it wouldn’t be pennies on the dollar.
I’d be much happier if LQMT hit it big, but I also think that a class action suit would be almost inevitable if Eontec/Li make big bucks and we are left in penny land. I’m willing to gamble that the pay out from such a suit would exceed what I can sell for now.
If Eontec/Yihao start making big bucks off of BMG and LQMT gets a reasonable percentage of the profits, I’m here for the payday.
If Eontec/Yihao start making big bucks off of BMG and LQMT gets a unreasonable percentage of the profits, I’m here for the inevitable class action suit against the Board, collectively, and Li, individually, for breach of fiduciary duties.
The possibility of the latter is the only reason I haven’t sold. TWT
If I were running LQMT, I wouldn’t put all of faith in a single contract manufacturer. I’d diversify the contract manufacturing among multiple companies so that no single company could hold LQMT hostage. That is what I’d do, unless I had a vest interest in that single CM and didn’t care about conflicts of interest.
Turning LQMT into a licensing company is the genius of Li. He controls where any profits go - either to LQMT or Eontec or Yihao. Even if LQMT’s CEO were independent, rather than Li’s handpicked puppet, LQMT has no leverage in negotiating with Li’s contracting manufacturers. Any amount of the potential profits garnered by a supply agreement between LQMT and a customer can be gobbled up by Li’s contract manufacturer.
Oops, my bad. I forgot to qualify the small number, pittance, handful of employees as “virtually” no employees. I thought it would be self evident because we all know that TC is an employee and we all know that Li engaged in cost cutting (I.e., getting rid of employees).
(And, I should have qualified R&D with virtually also.)
I totally agree with what you say in general with companies developing new technologies and markets. The problem is with the specifics of LQMT. Unlike any other company trying to bring a new technology to market, LQMT doesn’t have employees, R&D, nor internal manufacturing capacity, and LQMT has a COB (who controls the CEO) with conflicts of interest. IMO, these facts should be considered when comparing LQMT to other companies.
How is LQMT in the middle of the race? LQMT has no manufacturing capability, virtually no R&D, virtually no employees, no revenue, and no public pronouncement on how it intends to make revenue, let alone dominate BMG.
LQMT has some contract manufacturer capability, but Li will control how much profit LQMT gets from any job. Do you believe that TC will go against Li?