Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I guess we shall find out
Seth has had several very successful deals. Of course over a 10 year period there are major fluctuations.
On Lightbridge for example, between 2005 and 2011, many Investors did extraordinarily well. If an investor chooses to never take a profit, then that investor bears the responsibility for his or her greed
Why should Seth be defended?
Look what happened July 2015. Which was not Seth's fault at all
And look who stuck with it for 18 months and never abandoned his shareholders and gave his company a chance
Show me one other CEO who would have done that??? Show me another example of a company that became current again after a catastrophe like what Cowan Gunteski caused?
show me one?
Seth Shaw is a class act and an outstanding CEO
Seth is clearly not a fan of reverse splits and he has never enacted one while involved with Tauriga.
I think all of these incorrect assumptions need to stop
It's a disservice to the public
I don't agree
I think Seth was trying to make an interesting acquisition and Stella felt there were better things to focus on when she took over
Also, why are you always attributing negative intentions to that Seth does??
Clearly Seth is not working hard to hurt his shareholders
Seth invested $50,000 in January of 2009 along with a bunch of other people
When the company appeared legit.
The people who committed fraud were prosecuted.
Seth was a shareholder who paid for shares. These people have tried to smear Seth with this for years. My point - ask them to show a link that proves that Seth was accused of or prosecuted for any wrongdoing. It's crazy to attack someone like that. There are no links.
Keith Berman started calling Seth "spongetech Sethie"
Berman is literally deceptive and has harmed shareholders lives. And put out whacky and false press releases. Berman may actually end up being prosecuted.
Talk about the cat calling the kettle black.
Berman started this crazy war with Tauriga and Seth because Seth decided that Berman's offer was too low and Berman I can imagine, was less than forthcoming with due diligence material.
I think Berman should tread very carefully because he has made me pretty angry. And I may do soemthing about it with the authorities.
Seth Shaw was not the person who caused the reverse split of that company
Was not his decision to make and he does not like reverse splits
Seth never reversed TAUG in 2013 or 2014 when it was way under a penny nor has he ever been someone who constantly reverse splits stocks
To accuse Seth of being someone who reverse splits stocks, is false.
Why is Tauriga still alive today?
Answer that question.
Why?
Perhaps the Company wasn't able to fund the necessary Pilus Energy Trials under the circumstances that faced the company the past 18 months
I have a question for you
Why is Tauriga still in business? Why does it still trade? Why is it fully reporting? Why is it progressing in its lawsuit? Why is it still worth $10,000,000 in market cap
You show me one other CEO who would go through that in July 2015 and raise $300,000+ and catch up on scores of delinquent filings with little to work with.
Maybe some credit is due
Isn't TAUG supposed work towards building long term shareholder value
And not worry about day to day trading.
Nobody cares about TAUG closing price today.
This is really very inappropriate
Calling TAUG a POS is rude and not based on any facts
TAUG has just become current again after 17 months. It is prosecuting a strong lawsuit and is building a new foundation for business.
When you write "TAUG = POS" that is kind of like spitting in our faces.
Some of us feel that management has tried very hard to turn this around. There are plenty of Companies out there that never even put in the effort like this management has.
And I'm sure you also think that Cowan Gunteski never did anything wrong!
I strongly disagree with this statement
It's not true at all as it neglects to take into account the fact that any potential acquisition opportunity was nullified by the auditor malpractice and delisting
You realize that delinquency caused by Cowan in July 2015 precluded Tauriga from raising capital, relying on Rule 144, and the daily trading volume deceased by 90%
Seth actually stepped up as CEO in July 2015 because he had a plan to make an acquisition.
So Cowans malpractice made it impossible for Tauriga to possibly complete an acquisition. Therefore it also possibly prevented Tauriga from potential product and revenue
Your comment is very very one sided and really not accurate.
The damages were significant and Cowan did not ever takes steps to help the company fix the problem. They were very bad Guys.
Tauriga just overcame 15 quarters of SEC filing delinquencies and is trying to launch a business in a non dilutive manner.
Perhaps we should remember that Seth did not expect to be in this position the day he became CEO again in mid July 2015
We should keep an open mind and be supportive. Let's hope he does the things well that he does well and has learned from previous errors and is ready for some real success
And as for Cowan, they are represent everything that's bad about the world and society and I can't wait until they are made an example of. They are disgsuting human beings
Yes! I read it in its entirety 3 full times
And I have a lot of insight about the Meyler Deposition
It is a very powerful instrument for Tauriga in prosecuting it case
It's shows the conscious choices made by Cowan and Meyler and it leads directly to a path of punitive damages
We can discuss anytime you want
It's definitely headed in a better direction. And I know Seth is working hard to put together business opportunity that will hopefully be successful
And I appreciate his perseverance and the fact that he brought us back to current
That is not correct at all
Cowan caused the delisitng because Tauriga could not file its Form 10-K in July 2015 due to independence breach / malpractice committed on FY 2014 audit.
You are correct. Tauriga was below a penny during late July 2015. However it still had several more months to remedy that.
You cannot definitively state hat Tauriga would not have been able to remedy that deficiency with a strong acquisition. It's not fair to assume that Tauriga would never have been over a penny again
The point is that Tauriga was not delisted in July 2015 due to stock price. It was delisted because of a filing delinquency. So perhaps as a compromise, OTC Markets could uplist TAUG temporarily based on the exact parameters that faced the company on July 30, 2015. So the company would have to be compliant by May 6, 2017 for example. Which would have been same time frame (in days) that the company faced on July 30, 2015.
So OTC Markets certainly has a rationale to consider Tauriga's argument
Let's not speculate on how the petition will go on Thursday. But let's try to stay factually accurate. My guess is that it's 50/50. That's my personal opinion. The outcome
I think Tauriga should not be punished for Cowan's clear malpractice. And maybe OTC Markets will agree
Come On!!! Is this a serious question?
The Company clearly stated its Forming a new wholly owned sub and developing a new product. Why don't we wait a few days and see what the Company updates us on
You know the product hasn't yet been announced as completed yet, so there is nothing constructive about a post asking about "ordering product" when you know it hasn't yet been announced as complete.
There is no reason to do that.
Inside info -- give it a break
And the stock will trade based on fundamentals -- give it a break
Maybe Taug will fly another day? Who knows. Give it a break
Once again
You have no right to call him a liar
He is not perfect. But certainly not a liar. The language used here is offensive
I think that would be a reasonable approach
To explain that the delisting really wasn't Tauriga's fault in July 2015. Because it actually wasn't
Why don't we let Seth deal with it this week -- and not speculate
Maybe you should Refrain from calling Seth Shaw a liar
It's clearly not the case at all - and it is highly offensive to a lot of us
He worked his butt off since last July to catch up on the filings and is trying to build shareholder value. Even if he failed, that would not make him a liar.
I'm tired of the insults thrown around.
Since 2:23 pm Eastern Time today
December 5th
It's a remarkable achievement considering the overall picture since last July (2015)
I think we should all congratulate the company
Why does Berman feel the need to continually bad mouth Seth?
What's the point to it?
Seth did not accept Berman's final offer from DECN and that's that. Why the vindictiveness?
This has become an obsession. It's ridiculous
I totally disagree
I find Seth to be honerable, trustworthy, and highly compotent.
As for his articulate enemies, I find them suspect and nothing that they ever state or claim ever adds up.
Seth has stuck with Tauirga, brought it back to Fully Reproitng and done it with little to work with
Cowan Gunteski caused these delinquencies and should have been honest with Tauriga many months prior to July 2015. I have yet to hear any explanation from anyone that excuses what Cowan did to Tauriga or that shows me that Seth was in any way responsible for what Cowan did
Seth IMO has proven that he is a stand up guy and that's why I'm here
Are you sure that Tauirga was offered only $200,000 at mediation? Are you positive?
Are you sure there haven't been any offers made in the last 90 days? Are you sure about that? Id love to know what proof you have of that!!!
Please state definitively -- are you sure that there haven't been any offers made in the last 90 days well in excess in $200,000???
Also, Seth Shaw never states in that text that he was offered $700,000. He simply states that he would not settle the case for a small Amount like $700,000. Honestly - nor Should he
Seth Should switch the case to a more accomplished lawyers who will be more feared by the Other side and go after punitive damages that are so richly deserved. JMHO.
I have an idea
Why don't you post the text where Seth (as you've repeatedly stated) claims that Tauriga was offered $700,000 by Cowan
You have stated this text exists numerous times
I want to see it with my own eyes. That would make Seth a liar
So prove to us that Seth is a liar and show this text?????
Otherwise - this is BS
I doubt it
Why should Seth be nervous? Just because someone makes baseless allegations on IHUB
I think moneysnip is dead wrong
I think you'll find that these are empty threats.
And that your source(s) on information are badly misguided. You state that Seth has "conspirators North of the Border"
I very much hope for your sake that you have proof of that claim
Because it is totally false. Always has been and always will be
Once again - be careful what Info you rely on.
Seth Shaw is working hard to turn Tauriga around
These type of posts are not helpful. And are meaningless.
You said that you were putting out a press in November with proof that Seth Shaw masterminded fraud
I have called BS the whole time, with respect to Seth Shaw. He has never committed fraud and you should not publish public statements without proof
The other people involved with Breathe were heinous people and nothing would surprise me. But you had no business targeting Seth Shaw.
Which is why I am calling BS.
It's December 1st.
What are you hearing otherwise
I think these kind of threats of fake PRs should be prosecuted
Where is it??????
I disagree in the strongest possible terms
It wasn't a great post and it fails to take into account any of the facts about Tauriga
Tauriga, once again, is making the correct moves to provide shareholders with the chance to create value
Waiting for what??
Some press release that doesn't exist and will never come.
If you haven't figured it out yet.
As I've called, I'm calling BS. Enjoy your wait
Really Dianne? Really?
American Greed?
SpongeTech was a major fraud that entailed major government resources at both the SEC and Dept of Justice
They looked over everyone with a fine tooth comb. If Seth had participated in fraud he would have been prosecuted.
Does it make him guilty, than he was never prosecuted?
You state that he is not innocent just because he wasn't prosecuted. I think that logic is obscene
Seth does not deserve to be attacked like this. He has clearly not committed fraud
Dianne
You are citing message Board rumors as your evidence
I am citing actions taken or not taken by the SEC and FBI
Once again, why was Seth not prosecuted if he was guilty of committing fraud?
The answer is, I'm sure, because the SEC and FBI found no evidence that he did anything wrong.
DECN has never been decimated by an auditor
And Seth has kept Tauriga alive as a going concern
Is this really even debatable ?
He is not a magician. He just filed Q1 17 last week
The auditors take their standard review time.
I'm sure he's doing the best he can. Maybe you should instruct DECN to follow suit
Seth has every right to make money and assist as many companies as he can
If he is doing very well, then good for him. God bless
yes the filings do Define his status clearly
That is called transparency. Shareholder were informed fully of Seth's Affiliate status
If they chose to sell shares because Seth was no longer an affiliate after may 2014. Then that's fine
I am not Seth but I am defending him
And I ask again. Are you accusing him of stealing?
Berman has been spreading lies about Tauriga for a long time. And he should stop doing it. Plain and simple
A picture of Seth throwing a first pitch at a baseball game hardly proves that he committed fraud.
Especially if this pitch was thrown prior to any legal issues that sponge tech may have had. Flouting this picture around does not in any way demonstrate that Seth has done anything wrong.
Also, Seth Shaw has never worked at Maxim and there are many other people with that last name. So it would wrong to suggest that this person at Maxim is Seth Shaw. It isn't him
There were 7 people charged criminally in Spongetech and many others prosecuted by the SEC.
There can be no doubt that everyone involved in that transaction was closely looked at by the Feds.
My question -- if Seth Shaw committed fraud, then why wasn't he prosecuted by someone????
All you have shown is that Seth Shaw was at one point a shareholder of SpongeTech and threw out a first pitch at a baseball game presumably in 2009
That is hardly a case to make that Seth is guilty is something. Especially when the Feds never accused him
Of anything or prosecuted him for anything
See my points?