Seth has had several very successful deals. Of course over a 10 year period there are major fluctuations.
On Lightbridge for example, between 2005 and 2011, many Investors did extraordinarily well. If an investor chooses to never take a profit, then that investor bears the responsibility for his or her greed
Why should Seth be defended?
Look what happened July 2015. Which was not Seth's fault at all
And look who stuck with it for 18 months and never abandoned his shareholders and gave his company a chance
Show me one other CEO who would have done that??? Show me another example of a company that became current again after a catastrophe like what Cowan Gunteski caused?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.