InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 488
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/27/2016

Re: diannedawn post# 34657

Wednesday, 11/16/2016 9:21:50 AM

Wednesday, November 16, 2016 9:21:50 AM

Post# of 54032
A picture of Seth throwing a first pitch at a baseball game hardly proves that he committed fraud.

Especially if this pitch was thrown prior to any legal issues that sponge tech may have had. Flouting this picture around does not in any way demonstrate that Seth has done anything wrong.

Also, Seth Shaw has never worked at Maxim and there are many other people with that last name. So it would wrong to suggest that this person at Maxim is Seth Shaw. It isn't him

There were 7 people charged criminally in Spongetech and many others prosecuted by the SEC.

There can be no doubt that everyone involved in that transaction was closely looked at by the Feds.

My question -- if Seth Shaw committed fraud, then why wasn't he prosecuted by someone????

All you have shown is that Seth Shaw was at one point a shareholder of SpongeTech and threw out a first pitch at a baseball game presumably in 2009

That is hardly a case to make that Seth is guilty is something. Especially when the Feds never accused him
Of anything or prosecuted him for anything

See my points?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.