Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So Matt, when may I negotiate with you the terms of my release?
Who are you? I don't know what my time (sentence) is. That's the question? So shut up until spoken to!!!
Matt, I understand my infraction. How do I get out?
I SECOND THAT EMOTION, HALF-FULL!!!
Your guess if probably right on the money!
Every speculation that you stated as fact without a (IMO) preface is a lie!!! There are too many for me to list. I value my time and would never waste it on proving the obvious.
HELLO ... THE # OF SHARES OUTSTANDING WAS NEVER AT ?! YOU MUST BE CONFUSING ME FOR SOMEONE ELSE WHO DIDN'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT ?. YOUR STUCK ON TELLING ME THE OUTSTANDING SHARE AMOUNT. WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? YOU ARE TRYING TO CREATE A FALSE SENSE OF ME NOT READING THE FILINGS TO THE BOARD BY CREATING ?'S THAT WERE NEVER ASKED. KIND OF PSYCHOTIC IF YOU ASK ME.
AGAIN, YOU DO NOT KNOW THE NATURE OF THE PLACEMENT, OR HOW THE PROCEEDS FROM THAT PLACEMENT HAS BEEN USED. YOU STATED THAT THE COMPANY HAS 2 MIL CASH. THERE IS NO WAY FOR YOU TO KNOW THAT BECAUSE THE FILINGS NEVER STATED THAT THE COMPANY HAS 2 MIL CASH, SITTING, WAITING FOR A PURPOSE.
I have always known how many shares were outstanding. I don't know where you got the idea I didn't. The company does not have two million dollars in cash and you can not prove that it does! So you are the picture of a man that gets slapped in the face with a mud pie!
But, the glaring fact remains that you are unable to back up your statements that you present as factual when it is really FLAWED DEDUCTIVE REASONING (GUESSING) and speculation filled with and backed up by assumptions. The chances that you are on the money with your kind of reasoning is less than 5% because there is one constant, you don't know, you guess, speculate and have to credible source or contact with the company. You have filings and due dilligence just like the rest of us and have not uncovered anything new. I think Matt should really look into the number of false statements that you make concerning Biocurex. Like they have 2 mil in cash. It does not say that in the filings and you don't know if it was the company that raised the extra mil, and if they did, the nature of the circumstances.
HOW CAN ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING YOU STATE. YOU POST LIKE YOU HAVE EMPIRICAL INFO, BUT YOU DO NOT. YOU GUESS, RATIONALIZE AND ASSUME.EVERYTHING COMING FROM YOU SHOULD BE PREFACED WITH (IMO)! YOU CONVENIENTLY SKIP THAT PART, KNOWING THAT YOU ARE BEING MISLEADING WITH THE ABSENCE OF FACTS. THE BOARD IS NOT ASKING YOU TO FIGURE THINGS OUT FOR THEM. JUST STATE THE FACTS AND LET EVERYONE MAKE THEIR OWN DEDUCTIONS.
Can you prove that Biocurex made a placement, and then sold another million $ worth of stock on top of what you saw in the September filings? I DIDN'T THINK SOOOOO!!!
That's what I'm talking about when I reference an ability to stand behind what you state. Come on, man ...!
I applaud you kind sir!!!
Goldseeker, I am not looking for an apology. Did you accuse me of making an accusation? Uh, I asked you whether your statement was factual or speculative. Since when is that considered an accusation? Did you have liquor for breakfast or something? I'm not sure where you are coming from. Please don't read things into my posts. I am a straight forward kind of guy. When you assume, you make an "ass" out of yourself. I honestly don't understand how you concluded that I made an accusation. Re-read my post and buy a one-way ticket out of bizzaro world!
Thanks for your long winded response to my simple queston!
IS THIS A FACTUAL STATEMENT OR ARE YOU SPECULATING AGAIN?
"they have over 2 million in cash."
There are many ways to prove that you established a process first. The least of which can be accomplished by a poor man's patent. Writing down the complete process, sealing it and then mailing it to yourself. The postage marked date will identify the time when it was mailed and can be presented as evidence in court!
If that was an apology, I accept it. Thank you!
For a person I have absolutely no respect for to tell me what I should have done, is perfectly ridiculous.
If the transcript was indeed correct the first time, then who gets the credit / respect for getting it right? YOU? Your assumption that I had my own ideas makes no logical sense. What ideas could I have possibly had that would correspond with me thinking I heard "AMEX" instead of "DYNAMICS". I have no medical research experience, therefore I've already conceded that I might have gotten it right the first time. As you stated, the change doesn't flow or add up, based on your insights. So, in using your own words, it doesn't make sense. If it doesn't make sense, how could I be trying to "... totally changed everything he said to make it fit with (my) ideas, not his."? What was my idea then? Exactly! You contradict yourself. There is no idea worth noting in the second version that I could possibly be trying to manipulate. If you question that one part of the interview, then, logically you would have to throw the whole thing out, because you couldn't trust the source. So, do you have faith that I (in good conscience) transcribed the interview correctly or not? Then shut up then! Look up the word idiot in the dictionary please. I'd like to see you increase your vocabulary. If what I said about not being clear in terms of what word he used because of his accent, isn't suffice for you. I guarantee, you stand alone!
The mind is a terrible thing to waste!
I don't think anybody ever really expected a payment to be made in January. Remember, that was you that 1st brought up that remote possibility and tried to sell it to the board. So, don't try to put that off as Half-full's hairbrained postulation! You planted the seed, he just looked into the possibility by asking questions. I'm glad you now realize "YOUR" speculation is highly improbable. You probably should rethink a lot of things.
"I am very pleased that mysscat took my suggestion of creating a group over on yahoo and left. I hope all of you have a good time singing campfire songs. She should have no fear of me attempting to post there and I will help her get the word out for her group."
I think it is very presumptuous of you to think that your presence could incite fear into anybody! We will have fun and enjoy singing the praises of the little company that could! Could make a global contribution to healthcare. We also eventually will collaboratively celebrate the riches that will come as a result!
A feather in the cap for you, but apparently I didn't "blow it" because I posted both versions of what I thought I heard. Therefore you need to adjust your semantics to express yourself correctly and more appropriately in determining who blew what.
GS: You are the only outcast because I was in fact invited to the new party, by Half-full. Habits are hard to break. I will be joining them shortly. I supposed you wore out your welcome. Perhaps you will be intelligent and learn a lesson.
"...(we are talking to a number of people about that), then getting into dynamics. After we get into dynamics, we need to raise about 4 million dollars. I'm close to getting revenue from Abbott for royalties. It holds me back a little bit in terms of, why increase the share base of the company when we can get our money from Abbott? But I need to move to AMEX, or the Nasdaq (small cap), we can get out even from the bulletin board. At that time we are going to have a very, very different credibility and access to additional money that there is no way we have access to so far."
GS: Go back to the drawing board and rethink your flawed hypothesis, because when I replayed the interview I realized that I misunderstood the term "dynamics" because of his heavy Fench Canadian accent. He said AMEX! I posted the correction a few days after I posted the interview! Oh, you must have missed that part. I'm sure you will offer a revised rendition of your speculations in light of this new information. Do you every shut up, or how about just keeping your speculative thoughts private. Does the world need to hear what you think? I could see if someone asked you. You obviously have a very positive self-image, feeling that the world might somehow benefit from your insights! That is hillarious! It must be very blissful existing in your own private world, huh?
GS: Don't go starting rumors with your "tired ass" speculations again! He was responding to a question I asked him. That's it! Stop reading things into it.
"If on schedule, we should hear something before the end of the year about the animal studies that were forecast to start when the interview was done last February."
What makes you so certain that, "if" the Goshen thing is on schedule, he would publicly give updates, via press releases?
It is entirely reasonable to assume that if everything was progressing smoothly, an announcement wouldn't be forthcoming for years. Doesn't it seem logical to see the diagnostic aspects of recaf all the way through, before hyping the imaging? Or at least wait until they have a greater amount of exposure with recaf as it relates to diagnostics and perhaps have licensing deals in the pipe line for the imaging?
It's hard to offer any infomation to people like you! People like you take tidbits of info, run with it, put your own spin on it and then begin to mislead people with statements presented in a factual way, not disclosing its speculative nature. Then, try to turn it around into something negative, like, "Things must not be going very well because we haven't heard anything about the Goshen research." And you try to pass yourself as someone credible? Plueeeeeeeese!!!
It especially annoys me because now your doing it with information that you attained from me. Board, it is important to note that as usual GS is uninformed, not close to the situation and doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. It would be intelligent for posters to just assume that any statements coming from Goldseeker stated as fact are nothing more than speculations. His Modus Operendi is to not qualify his speculations as such.
I resent the fact that you did not disappear until the 29th of December as promised!
Half full: Thanks for that link!
Get a life!!!
GS: ...and I suggest to you wise up and invest your time meandering about something you are actually interested in and stop wasting your time here. Life is too short! As a retired older man you should understand this! I thought you were supposed to get out and get some sun. You must be as pale as an albino recluse!
Good, it's nice to know that because of the numerous errors and miscues Biocurex's manangement is making we can't expect you to invest, therefore eliminating your need to moniter this message board right? Your behavior certainly does not correspond with your statements!
Good point!
For what?
You couldn't be that dense, or could you? He speculates future events down the road without having much facts to support his deductions, assumptions and otherwise. For instance, if you listen to him, the threat of Abbott returning the license looms very large. He has stated nothing that represents a reasonable likelyhood of a return. His motives and presence here is highly questionable and suspect, and you can't trust what he says in his posts. Sometimes they are flat-out lies, most often they are presented as facts, but are almost always assumptions and speculations, which sometimes are flat-out incorrect! I say get back to jocking stocks so you can get off and stop hugging Goldseeker's so tight.
Proposition: Can I get at least 3 posters to commit with me on putting GS on ignore?
Nonesense!!!
"I did intend to stop posting for a while and return after the years end ... "
The question Tigert asked you as well as myself is "Why are you here?" Why did you plan to return after the end of the year? Why did you return at all? It's not like you are welcomed by the majority of the posters here! No financial interest, no emotional interest. Why? What is your purpose? Why are you obsessed with this board, but down on the stock? Why won't you get lost in cyberspace? There are thousands of other message boards that would welcome a non-invested character such as yourself. Do crave attention? Is that it? Does that make you feel loved, even though it is negative. For $150 per hour I can refer you to a specialist that would help you sort out some things. I can think of many adjectives that describe that kind of behavior, but "NUTTY" is at the top of the list!
Don't you have anything better to do, like feed the cat, mow the lawn, wash the car, read a book on how to make friends and go out and implement those strategies?
There seems to be a geek in every class!
Well, thank you very much kind madame!
Hmmm ..., the only energy worthwhile for me to exert in response to any question that you pose to me, is akin to the same amount of energy I would exert in irradicating the life of a gnat that landed on my biscuit!
Why would GS go to the trouble of making a formal complaint to the administrator of this site against Half-full deleting his posts, if he didn't have some kind of interest in the performance of the stock, one way or another? It "APPEARS" that he is extremely misleading in stating his persistent and unerving presence here!
How's that Kag? Does that qualify as an attack? Is the implication that he might be a liar a bit too strong, or do I get a pass under the freedom of expression guidelines?
What kind of strange are you? Most normal people want to discuss stocks that interest them or they are invested in. You already made it known that you don't have any faith in management and don't own any shares. Give me one good reason that makes you think anybody cares what you think about this company. Why are you here?
My function is to keep up with all discussions and information related to the company (MY INVESTMENT) because I OWN almost 1% of it! I'll ask you again, because my question is not rhetorical, "Why are you here?". You moniter a board that you "supposidly" have absolutely no interest in monetarily or otherwise, and are negative about. That certainly qualifies as "odd", if not a basher. You post more than anyone else on this board. Pretty weird stuff (kookoo - kookoo!)If you were to add up all of the hours you spend on Biocurex relia, weekly, you probably invest at least 6 hours a week. (kookoo-kookoo!)
I have a better game we can play. Let's gather all of the people on this board who actually own an investment in Biocurex, and start a new message board that only allows actual investors in to post! Excluding non - invested bashers!
Kag - That's BullS*#t! - I didn't attack him. Everything is implied. I stated my opinion about what I think sarcastic people are like. I didn't say he was necessarily that way. You are too damn conservative with your interpretations.
I will not attack anyone anymore and am not here! I merely pointed out an observation and made a general statement, noting how sarcastic people tend to be!
Who gives you the right to read things in between the lines and make judgement calls based on what you interpret? Shouldn't you make your judgement call based on what is stated instead?
"The notorious, sarcastic "one-liner "bandit strikes again! "
"It's interesting to note that sarcastic people don't use sarcasm as a means of humor, just to needle others. I think there is something socially dysfunctional with people like that. My guess is that they are loners, have few friends and a very limited social life."
myscat- We will have the last laugh! It's apparent that Goldseeker is very untruthful in his explanation for his presence on this board. I'm pretty sure he, as many other bashers have not only created an alias, but a whole ficticous profile. He probably is not even married!
Half-full - do you think Dr. Moro was being conservative with his $8.00 (unofficial target) by 2010?
"I rest my case. They are indeed dumber than dirt when it comes to the business side of the company."
Okay then, tell your friends who were stupid enough to invest their $ into this pathetic company before they lose their investment, be done with it and move on! I hope you don't consider those who post on this board your friends because it sure doesn't appear so, and you've already warned them a multitude of times. So, what is the real reason you are here? I'm here because I have a whole lot of $ invested. And you? What's that?
I REST MY CASE!!!