For a person I have absolutely no respect for to tell me what I should have done, is perfectly ridiculous.
If the transcript was indeed correct the first time, then who gets the credit / respect for getting it right? YOU? Your assumption that I had my own ideas makes no logical sense. What ideas could I have possibly had that would correspond with me thinking I heard "AMEX" instead of "DYNAMICS". I have no medical research experience, therefore I've already conceded that I might have gotten it right the first time. As you stated, the change doesn't flow or add up, based on your insights. So, in using your own words, it doesn't make sense. If it doesn't make sense, how could I be trying to "... totally changed everything he said to make it fit with (my) ideas, not his."? What was my idea then? Exactly! You contradict yourself. There is no idea worth noting in the second version that I could possibly be trying to manipulate. If you question that one part of the interview, then, logically you would have to throw the whole thing out, because you couldn't trust the source. So, do you have faith that I (in good conscience) transcribed the interview correctly or not? Then shut up then! Look up the word idiot in the dictionary please. I'd like to see you increase your vocabulary. If what I said about not being clear in terms of what word he used because of his accent, isn't suffice for you. I guarantee, you stand alone!
The mind is a terrible thing to waste!
