Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You have a severe case of AZCowboyitis! He literally lives between your ears! 😂😂😂 I know I can count on you to comeback with some junior high school comments, please don’t let me down!
Ok already Lodas, I’m on it! How’s that for a response to Ole Cactus?
Pick, wake up, time to post some nonsense on the COOP board in response to AZC, aka Ole Cactus!
Copy that Split T, all too true!
Serafino 1, you’ll not get a response from the individual you address. I’ve addressed Lodas in the past, Pick responded, I addressed Pick in the past, Lodas responded. You specifically asked StormyVolcano1 a question and Pick responded. The three stooges! Or, maybe just one stooge, playing the role of three.
One thing is for certain, critical thinking is extremely important! Definitely important and extremely critical to know the difference between 8 zeros and 5 zeros!
Well whirlwind I’d say your off on your mathematical calculations on the high side by 10/11 years.
2.5 billion, 2.5 million? 💤💤💤💤💤
But you do have time to post your rhetoric! 😂😂😂😂😂💤💤💤💤💤
💤💤 fix yourself another drink Bill48. No 75/25 on those 100 P’s you own!
Cowboy has done everything but color a picture explaining down to the finest detail of how the cusip# 939322103 is tied to the addition 36 millionish COOP shares yet to be distributed at the rate of approximately .058, plus, accrued monies related to the POSIT. Cowboy has on countless occasions made the statement, "know what you own." because there is NO 75/25. If one held and released Perferred's he/she received a number of common shares correlated to those released P and or K, but those common shares are NOT related to the registered commons shares on the ballot with cusip# 939322103 "Beneficial Holder Ballot For Class 22"
(Common Equity Interest) (CUSIP NO.939322103.)
"why wasn't the miracle #"3" cusip brought up in 2012?"
The entire cusip including the #3 was brought up in 2012, the entire cusip#939322103 was on the ballot of those releasing common share owners. "Beneficial Holder Ballot For Class 22"
(Common Equity Interest) (CUSIP NO.939322103) If you held old commons, class 22 and released, your good!
Lodas has been checked!
Again, a response that is totally irrelevant! Missing a 3 and that’s most relevant!
And that’s your rebuttal! Definitely expected, when a simple yes or no would have been the correct response. Yes, because you’re human and being human you err. No, because you are without fault! Yep, missing a 3!
You ever make a verbal or written comment that didn’t come true? Don’t respond as I know the answer to my question. Gezzzz! You missing a 3?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 liking, loving, anything, doesn’t make it anymore real!!! Gezzzzzz! 😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 ok, there are those individuals that are under the impression the earth is flat too! 😂😂😂 WTFU,!
Lodas, his new handle and expect a response from pick.
AZ, thanks for your response, feedback and your expertise, very much appreciated! Your continual statement, "Know what you own," your phrase was and is the give away that shot down the 75/25 theory. because that statement only pertains to those holders of 939322 10 3 - "REGISTERED" common shares.
I'll just sit back, relax and watch this long drawn out and expertly planned fiasco unfold the rest of the way, BAM! Pay day!
Needs to lay off the sauce and go back to school.
Cowboy,
its clear you've made an extraordinary attempt to explain the difference of the two associated escrow numbers, along with the potential payout numbers for those 939322103's.
1. 939322103 - REGISTERED wamuq' Common Shares, directly associated with COOP SHARES and bringing the number of outstanding shares back 100 million. The disbursement of the approximately 36 million shares will be evenly divided and distributed to the owners holding those UQ's (939322103) that were registered. That divisible number could be as low as .04 and as high as .08, again dependent on how many were registered.
2. Once the first item occurs, then and only then, the wamuq WMI common share 2012 signed releasing participants (939ESC968) could potentially see the release of accumulated Interest earnings, if and when that occurs the continued performing Trusts can continue to issue earned interest on a normal scheduled basis until maturity.
that sound about right? or did I completely bobble it?
And that’s definitely possible, playing a shell game as to which one post next.
Yep, Lodas, Pick and now Crop, all the same person! 😉
BAM, got em good! ROTF!
So you read 700,000 post? Then provided your findings summary. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
I am waiting on a return and yet I don’t expect a return. It would be nice, as I did lose a great deal of money during the financial meltdown of 2007 - 2008, especially WAMU, it wasn’t the only one though. I stepped ahead, I’m way past my losses from long ago, now almost twenty years. My life style hasn’t changed much at all. I’m still married to the same most extraordinary woman for over forty years, two extraordinary married and successful adult children with children of their own. There’s not a day in my life that I don’t waste the one and only thing we truly have, “time.” To that point, I read your post and I believe you have others best interest in mind. However, I find it very amusing to the point of being comical when one harps on others for wasting their time and their disagreeing beliefs of returns or no returns. To the point of what appears to being obsessed for not agreeing with you. Maybe I missed something, it certainly wouldn’t be the first time.
Your wonderful Lodas, thanks again for ALL you do to educate others. Especially those messages informing others of their time wasted waiting on money and or stock returns. You are truly a worthy, kind and caring individual. I’m. certain others on this board feel as I do, not that my words or thoughts matter to anyone here or else where. Keep up the good work, all the while not wasting too much of your time.
Thanks for your response Cowboy. I do my best to interpret ALL of what another writes and or speaks, emotions aside. I’m not always successful. However I can’t take credit for anything good that I may posses as ALL of those accolades go GOD almighty.
I do understand your reference to whom the Wells Fargo Trustee is and their role in distributions of quarterly dividend payments to WMB holders that followed the guidelines accordingly and to receive those quarterly dividend distributions.
I’m not sure why or how other individuals misconstrued the Wells Fargo Trustee with the LT that no longer exists other than it suites their not owing, releasing anything and or both.
As for myself, I owed UQ’s and I’m just waiting for payday.
Take care and regards.
Since you didn’t answer, I now know the answer to my question regarding your ownership of WMB’s. 😉
I truly don’t believe in luck or coincidence, I do however believe in skill and knowledge.
So, back to my question do you own WMB’s? Not someone else, as that’s the only investment outlet that Cowboy has referenced as having received payment.
Nova most certainly stated “LT.”
Post #728858
AZ has been claiming for over a year now that he has been receiving regular payments from the LT.
Now that hilarious! 😂
You’re correct, it’s not complicated. Cowboy has indicated that he is receiving what I interpret as quarterly dividends on WMB’s. Do you possess WMB’s? If so, did you meet all of the criteria and follow the same protocol outlined by Cowboy to receive payment on those WMBs?
“WMB Note holder, vetted, and found to be finra compliant, and an accredited investor, and had your financial information submitted to the WMI Wells Fargo Indentured Trustee.”
I’m not denying anything. Cowboy did make claims that he was receiving dividend payments. He never stated he was receiving those payments from the LT, of which you are now referencing as the Trustee. Which is you, the LT or the trustee. I suggest you go back and read Cowboys post again.
There’s nothing in Cowboys post to indicate he is receiving “regular payments from the LT.”