Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Texture, formerly known as next issue, was founded in 2009 as well.
TEXTURE:
http://digiday.com/media/throwback-thursday-next-issue-media/
http://www.foliomag.com/next-issue-media-raises-50-million-kkr/
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/next-issue-media#/entity
https://www.crunchbase.com/product/texture-app#/entity
https://techcrunch.com/2015/09/30/next-issue-relaunches-as-texture/
--------------------------------------------------------------
PIXELMAGS:
http://stateoftech.net/pixelmags-inc-reports-record-growth
http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/fundamental-needs-publishing-industry-pixelmags-inc-is-moving-their-business-model-saas-1888103.htm
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/pixelmags#/entity
https://www.crunchbase.com/person/ryan-marquis#/entity
https://netin.co/open/cERGbHFVclFEY1FnK095MHVmbUFkUT09LS1kOW5LSGh0NHJPSklGWU1rR1AycnFBPT0=--d917fd40f8ac599adf3a2ae641fcf08acb6d13b0
Pixel Mags is rebranding itself, kicking off the summer with some insane promotions! Contact our publishing team for details 310-359-8713
— pixelmags (@pixelmags) May 29, 2015
This was a Passage taken from 2013 8-k - over 3 years ago, when the share price was $0.70
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411730/000106299313004478/sched14f1.htm
Pixelmags moved in last year, All officers have since changed.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411730/000149315216010214/form8-k.htm
http://getfilings.com/sec-filings/161201/Solaris-Power-Cells-Inc_8-K/
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/solaris-power-cells-retains-aas-associates-to-evaluate-solaris-pesa-storage-cell-with-potential-40-million-valuation-615210623.html
Pursuant to an option and separation agreement, dated as of May 16, 2016 (the “Separation Agreement”) between the Company and Leonard Caprino, the President of Solaris, Mr. Caprino agreed as of May 31, 2016 (the “Termination Date”) to voluntarily resign as an executive officer and member of the board of directors of the Company. Under the Separation Agreement, the Company agreed to pay accrued and unpaid compensation and other obligations to Mr. Caprino valued at $150,000 by the issuance to Mr. Caprino of (a) 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, and (b) a convertible $100,000 Company note due on October 15, 2016 (the “Severance Note’), the payment of which is to be secured by a lien on the Company’s existing assets, consisting of existing assets, consisting of the Solaris Sun Car Golf Carts, Solaris Sun Car EZ Go Model, Solaris F2 Vapor Mod and associated PESA Electronics, associated PESA Cell storage arrays, and related technology, as well as domain names relating to such assets. The Severance Note is convertible into Company Common Stock at a conversion price equal to the volume weighted average price of Company Common Stock as of the date notice of conversion is given by the holder of the Severance Note. In addition, the agreement with Mr. Caprino grants him an option, exercisable at any time commencing July 15, 2016 and ending December 31, 2016 (the “Option Period”) to purchase the Existing Solaris Assets for the sum of $60,000; which amount is payable by Mr. Caprino either in cash or by reducing a like amount of the Severance Note.
Retain
re·tain
verb
past tense: retained; past participle: retained
continue to have (something); keep possession of.
Solaris Power Cells, Inc., the creators of the Solaris PESA™ or "Passive Electron Storage Array"™, (SPCL) (the "Company") has retained a leading technology valuation firm, AAS Associates. AAS is being retained for the purpose of reviewing and placing a valuation on the Solaris PESA technology, to assist the company in a potential divestiture, joint venture or licensing agreement.
Thanks, INSTATRADER
I appreciate your DD and effort. Saw the vape dog post after submitting my own; I'm still curious about the whole situation - hopefully we'll find out more, soon enough.
Still invested, and confident in this play
SPCL/Pixelmags
Hmmm.., this doesn't make sense to me - why would Caprino choose not to keep PESA tech if it were worth that much? I think we're missing something....
At least we know vape dog confirmed the news with Neil, himself.
Still invested - still confident in the play
3 years of audited financials includes 2014, Jerry. - the company's revenue from 2014 is relevant.
Stock price was 0.0019 on 10/6, - I guess you caught me? No offense..it seems this logic has some missing pieces
dont trust anyone DO YOUR OWN DD
SPCL/Pixelmags - long and strong
My mistake *no other company in VC2's portfolio had revenues of $48 million in 2015 - and S-a-a-S is what they're officially listed as. Thank you for the article, McPatrick.
SPCL/Pixelmags
GLTA
Yes! I wonder who would liquidate a company that can integrate published content to apple news, google newsstand, amazon kindle, etc.. a big difference between Pixelmags, and other Vert companies is their REVENUE!!!! None of the other companies brought in $48 million for 2015, and none of the others were leaders in a market that's turning into the modern day printing press.. a market that expected to grow past $35bn in 2020
SPCL/Pixelmags
GLTA
D-a-a-S for publishers,, Their IP is be used for S-a-a-S -
the Readr app is still running, and their upload process is also S-a-a-S,, quite possible theres a few things we're missing as well - not enough information, at the moment.
Lol.. Track 1. Neil Kleinman (feat E40) - Choices
December 1 8-k:
http://getfilings.com/sec-filings/161201/Solaris-Power-Cells-Inc_8-K/
May 23 8-k:
https://www.lawinsider.com/contracts/4TkCHkeZcy2Q2UrhvmWmVg/solaris-power-cells/1411730/2016-05-23
Vert Capital Transaction Criteria:
http://www.vertcapital.com/transaction-criteria.html
Hoovers insight:
http://m.hoovers.com/company-information/cs/company-profile.pixelmags_inc.61e87a0bf2f42e57.html?__utma=32432935.1904016065.1481298306.1481298819.1481298819.1&__utmb=32432935.3.10.1481298819&__utmc=32432935&__utmx=-&__utmz=32432935.1481298819.1.1.utmcsr=hoovers.com%7Cutmccn=(referral)%7Cutmcmd=referral%7Cutmcct=/&__utmv=-&__utmk=61984430
Vert "affiliate" (VC2):
http://www.vc2capital.com/portfolio
P. 14 - announced M&A transactions
http://vistapointadvisors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Software-Update-Q2-2016.pdf
NSOS:
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=24uUSGFwtG9LWMfRZzvvhg%253d%253d
https://www.delawarelookup.com/company/5708725/pixel-holdings-inc
SPCL/Pixelmags
Correct - Filing was edgarized 7/29/2015; before Pixelmags legally had anything to do with SPCL. According to 8-k filed in may, Pixelmags was aware of SPCL's financial and legal statuses, and had already audited their own company's financials, minus the transaction footnotes, and schedules - which, i agree - is probably one of the requirements they've been working on since they started this deal.
Thanks for posting,,
-------
LONGS IN THE HOUSE. still holding, still accumulating. No matter what is said - Jan 31 is around the corner, and the truth will be revealed.
Waiting on those fins..
DON'T TRUST ANYONE - DO YOUR OWN DD -
GLTA
Interesting.. Texture seems to be 'next issue,' reborn..
http://www.foliomag.com/texture-cleared-for-in-app-purchases/
Focusing on original content.
http://www.foliomag.com/texture-debuts-exclusive-series-with-eyes-on-producing-original-content/
Good to know - thanks for posting
SPCL/Pixelmags
GLTA
Thanks,, all quotes from 8-k - Credit to all the Trips that contributed to the DD before this was a blip on anyone's radar - and to the investors that continue to provide credible DD and insight
- DON'T TRUST ANYONE DO YOUR OWN DD -
DEBT:
4.14 Indebtedness and Other Contracts. Except as set forth on Purchaser Disclosure Schedule 4.14, neither the Purchaser nor any of its Subsidiaries (i) has any outstanding Indebtedness (as defined below), (ii) is a party to any contract, agreement or instrument, the violation of which, or default under which, by the other party(ies) to such contract, agreement or instrument would reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, (iii) is in violation of any material term of or in default under any contract, agreement or instrument relating to any Indebtedness or (iv) is a party to any contract, agreement or instrument relating to any Indebtedness, the performance of which, in the judgment of the Purchaser’s officers, has or is expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.7 No Breach. Except as set forth on Disclosure Schedule 3.7, Pixel’ execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the Transaction Documents and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby will not violate, conflict with or otherwise result in the breach or violation of any of the terms and conditions of, result in a modification of the effect of or constitute (or with notice or lapse of time or both would constitute) a default under (a) Pixel’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws; (b) any contract to which Pixel is a party or by or to which it or any of its assets are bound or subject; or (c) any law or order against, or binding upon or applicable to Pixel or their assets.
4.8 SEC Filings.
(a) Prior to the date of this Agreement, Solaris has furnished or made available to the Company and Holdings complete and accurate copies, as amended or supplemented, of its (a) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the SEC, which contained audited balance sheets of Holdings as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related statements of operation, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended; and (b) Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the three quarterly periods ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, and (c) all other reports filed by Solaris under Section 13 or subsections (a) or (c) of Section 14 of the Exchange Act with the SEC (such reports are collectively referred to herein as the “Solaris Reports”). The Solaris Reports constitute all of the documents required to be filed or furnished by Solaris with the SEC, including under Section 13 or subsections (a) or (c) of Section 14 of the Exchange Act, through the date of this Agreement. The Solaris Reports complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder when filed. As of the date hereof, there are no outstanding or unresolved comments in comment letters received from the staff of the SEC with respect to any of the Solaris Reports. As of their respective dates, the Solaris Reports, including any financial statements, schedules or exhibits included or incorporated by reference therein, did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
(b) The Interim Financial Statements (i) have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, (ii) reflect all assets, liabilities and results of operations of Pixel as at and for the fiscal periods applicable thereto as required in accordance with GAAP, and (iii) except that the Interim Financial Statement do not include footnotes and schedules as required by GAAP and are subject to annual audit adjustments which are and shall not be material.
4.10 Securities Representation. Solaris acknowledges and agrees that the Company Exchange Shares are “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and have not been registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws and thereafter must be held indefinitely unless they are subsequently registered under the Securities Act and under any state acts where registration may be required before sale, or an exemption from such registration is available.
(b) Neither Holdings nor any other Person associated with or acting on behalf of Holdings has made any illegal payment to officers or employees of any governmental or regulatory authority, or made any payment to customers for the sharing of fees paid or payable to the Company or to customers or suppliers for rebating of charges paid or payable to the Company, or engaged in any other reciprocal practices that violate any laws, or made any illegal consideration to purchasing agents or other representatives of customers in respect of sales made or to be made by the Company.
Great post! let's not forget...
http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapid=37186265
Thanks! 8-k has a lot of useful information and factual evidence - I will gladly continue posting quotes and passages that clearly lay out the specifics of the RM, as well as legal/official documents that confirm RM, company financials, and plans to uplist.
SPCL/Pixelmags
GLTA
8-k provides information on [lack of] debt, Share Structure, RM/RS process, legality, and MUCH more - just gotta take the time - i find the search function to be particularly useful.
https://www.lawinsider.com/contracts/4TkCHkeZcy2Q2UrhvmWmVg/solaris-power-cells/1411730/2016-05-23
SPCL/Pixelmags
GLTA
Section 3.7 No Breach. Except as set forth on Disclosure Schedule 3.7, Pixel’ execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the Transaction Documents and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby will not violate, conflict with or otherwise result in the breach or violation of any of the terms and conditions of, result in a modification of the effect of or constitute (or with notice or lapse of time or both would constitute) a default under (a) Pixel’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws; (b) any contract to which Pixel is a party or by or to which it or any of its assets are bound or subject; or (c) any law or order against, or binding upon or applicable to Pixel or their assets.
4.8 SEC Filings.
(a) Prior to the date of this Agreement, Solaris has furnished or made available to the Company and Holdings complete and accurate copies, as amended or supplemented, of its (a) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the SEC, which contained audited balance sheets of Holdings as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related statements of operation, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended; and (b) Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the three quarterly periods ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, and (c) all other reports filed by Solaris under Section 13 or subsections (a) or (c) of Section 14 of the Exchange Act with the SEC (such reports are collectively referred to herein as the “Solaris Reports”). The Solaris Reports constitute all of the documents required to be filed or furnished by Solaris with the SEC, including under Section 13 or subsections (a) or (c) of Section 14 of the Exchange Act, through the date of this Agreement. The Solaris Reports complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder when filed. As of the date hereof, there are no outstanding or unresolved comments in comment letters received from the staff of the SEC with respect to any of the Solaris Reports. As of their respective dates, the Solaris Reports, including any financial statements, schedules or exhibits included or incorporated by reference therein, did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
(b) The Interim Financial Statements (i) have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, (ii) reflect all assets, liabilities and results of operations of Pixel as at and for the fiscal periods applicable thereto as required in accordance with GAAP, and (iii) except that the Interim Financial Statement do not include footnotes and schedules as required by GAAP and are subject to annual audit adjustments which are and shall not be material.
4.10 Securities Representation. Solaris acknowledges and agrees that the Company Exchange Shares are “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and have not been registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws and thereafter must be held indefinitely unless they are subsequently registered under the Securities Act and under any state acts where registration may be required before sale, or an exemption from such registration is available.
(b) Neither Holdings nor any other Person associated with or acting on behalf of Holdings has made any illegal payment to officers or employees of any governmental or regulatory authority, or made any payment to customers for the sharing of fees paid or payable to the Company or to customers or suppliers for rebating of charges paid or payable to the Company, or engaged in any other reciprocal practices that violate any laws, or made any illegal consideration to purchasing agents or other representatives of customers in respect of sales made or to be made by the Company.
4.14 Indebtedness and Other Contracts. Except as set forth on Purchaser Disclosure Schedule 4.14, neither the Purchaser nor any of its Subsidiaries (i) has any outstanding Indebtedness (as defined below), (ii) is a party to any contract, agreement or instrument, the violation of which, or default under which, by the other party(ies) to such contract, agreement or instrument would reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, (iii) is in violation of any material term of or in default under any contract, agreement or instrument relating to any Indebtedness or (iv) is a party to any contract, agreement or instrument relating to any Indebtedness, the performance of which, in the judgment of the Purchaser’s officers, has or is expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(ii) The Intellectual Property owned by Pixel, and to the Knowledge of Pixel, any Intellectual Property used by Pixel, is subsisting, in full force and effect, has not been canceled, expired, or abandoned, and is valid and enforceable.
(v) Pixel has used best efforts to protect the confidentiality of its trade secrets. To the Knowledge of Pixel, no trade secrets have been disclosed or authorized to be disclosed to any third party other than pursuant to a non-disclosure agreement. To the Knowledge of Pixel, no party to any non-disclosure agreement relating to its trade secrets is in breach or default thereof.
Agreed! Patience is key..
I would much rather have them take time to get things right, than rush through protocol and get dinged for it later..
SPCL/Pixelmags
the 8-k states approximately 18,328,978 shares outstanding .. not 1,832,897
e) Reverse Stock Splits. Prior to the Closing Date, the board of directors of Solaris and Solaris Majority Voting Stockholder shall have approved and consented to reverse splits of the 2,160,000,000 authorized shares of Solaris Common Stock and the issued and outstanding shares of Solaris Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Splits”), as a result of which, as at the Closing Date, (i) the authorized capital stock of Solaris shall be reduced on the basis of a 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split to an aggregate of not more than 217,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 207,000,000 shares shall be Solaris Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares shall be Solaris Preferred Stock, and (ii) the issued and outstanding Solaris Common Stock shall be reduced on the basis of a 1-for-100 Reverse Stock Split to an aggregate of approximately 18,328,978 shares of Solaris Common Stock shall be issued and outstanding (or such other number of shares as shall represent one share for each 100 shares outstanding at the time of the Reverse Stock Splits) and additional shares of Solaris Common Stock reversed for issuance under the Solaris convertible notes shall be similarly reduced on the basis of one share for each 100 shares.
*1 million shares of Series B preferred stock (convertible) WILL go thru 1:100 RS upon conversion
*1 million shares of Series A preferred stock, WILL NOT go thru 1:100 RS
1.2 Solaris Series A Preferred Stock. The 1,000,000 shares of Solaris Series A Preferred Stock previously issued to the Solaris Majority Voting Stockholder has the rights, privileges and designations, all of which are set forth on the certificate of designations of the Solaris Series A Preferred Stock in the form of Exhibit A annexed hereto and made a part hereof (the “Series A Preferred Certificate of Designations”). The Solaris Series A Preferred Stock shall (a) have an aggregate stated value or liquidation value and a par value of $0.0001 per share; (b) rank pari passu to any other Solaris Preferred Stock and senior to any Solaris Common Stock, (c) votes, together with the Solaris Common Stock on all matters requiring the vote or consent of Solaris stockholders, and each of the 1,000,000 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock shall cast two thousand (2,000) votes on all matters required to be voted upon or consented to by stockholders of Solaris, or an aggregate of 2,000,000,000 votes, (d) is not convertible into Solaris Common Stock, and (e) may be redeemed by Solaris at any time for one cent ($0.01) per share, or $10,000 as to all shares of Series A Preferred Stock..
1.3 Solaris Series B Preferred Stock. The 1,000,000 shares of Solaris Series B Preferred Stock shall have the following rights, privileges and designations, all of which are set forth on the certificate of designations of the Solaris Series A Preferred Stock in the form of Exhibit B annexed hereto and made a part hereof (the “Series B Preferred Certificate of Designations”):
(vi) Conversion Rights. The Solaris Series B Preferred Stock shall be convertible at any time by Holdings or other holder(s) into Solaris Common Stock at a conversion price per share equal to the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of Solaris Common Stock for the ten (10) trading days immediately prior to the Closing Date (the “Conversion Price”);
Solaris Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Splits”), as a result of which, as at the Closing Date, (i) the authorized capital stock of Solaris shall be reduced on the basis of a 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split to an aggregate of not more than 217,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 207,000,000 shares shall be Solaris Common Stock and 10,000,000 shares shall be Solaris Preferred Stock, and (ii) the issued and outstanding Solaris Common Stock shall be reduced on the basis of a 1-for-100 Reverse Stock Split to an aggregate of approximately 18,328,978 shares of Solaris Common Stock shall be issued and outstanding (or such other number of shares as shall represent one share for each 100 shares outstanding at the time of the Reverse Stock Splits) and additional shares of Solaris Common Stock reversed for issuance under the Solaris convertible notes shall be similarly reduced on the basis of one share for each 100 shares.
INTL on level II
VERT CAPITAL'S VALUE-ADDED PHILOSOPHY:
-Having the right management team
-Low cost, efficient operations
-Maximizing cash flow and liquidity
-Creating the optimal capital structure
-Strategic Acquisitions
-Business Development
INVESTMENT STRUCTURE:
-Preferred and common equity
-DIP Financing
-Subordinated or senior debt
-Structured equity
-Private Investments in Public Entities
INDUSTRY FOCUS:
-Media, IT and Tech Services, Food & Beverage, Beauty and Personal Care, Household Care, Apparel and Accessories, Financial Services, Retail and Services, and Education]
Great post! Thanks to all who are/have been contributing CREDIBLE DD to the investors looking for facts and useful information.
All your insight is much appreciated! Keep fighting the good fight....
SPCL/Pixelmags
GLTA
Pixelmags is being bought; in return, Solaris founder/CEO has resigned and been compensated - Solaris officers have been replaced by Vert/Pixelmags officers, and SPCL is now the home of Pixelmags....now they begin renovation.
SPCL/Pixelmags
GLTA
Yes, it is a REVERSE MERGER - If Pixelmags' intention is to go public, it would not make sense for them to acquire SPCL - it would defeat the whole purpose! If they bought Solaris, they would still be a private company.
GLTA
LEGAL SEC FILINGS.. for this to be a SCAM, they would to have taken the time and spent the money to:
-buy SPCL shell, and compensate Leonard Caprino
-pay for all services required to RM into a Shell company - this includes lawyer fees, auditing fees, SEC fees, State fees, and everything in between.
-write up and submit an extremely detailed 112 page 8-k
-plan a 1:10 RS on Authorized Shares
-actually audit their financials
-Employ ~50 people - all of which would be affiliated.
-code and release their readr app. - must have taken time and money.
-pay all other expenses involved with running an ACTUAL COMPANY
Wouldn't they have to answer to all those publishing companies, if they could not deliver?
Social media presence seems to have died down last year, around the time Pixelmags announced it would be rebranding itself - don't they distribute to other platforms, anyway? Also, around the same time Ryan Marquis, and Mark Stubbs left to start Plastc.. THEY ARE ENTREPRENEURS - does this not make sense? They have given themselves to Pixelmags since 2009, so why not grow a new company? What if they don't want to spend their entire lives running Pixelmags? Many entrepreneurs grow their businesses with hopes of selling or being acquired by another company, so they can move on and start something new. My point is, the founders leaving is a neutral piece of information, until proven otherwise.
There are more than just audit and RM updates. The filings list the companies involved, parties involved, and lays out legal stipulations regarding share structure. In addition, we have seen updates that confirm the statements made in the may 8-k. Any plans that stray from statements made in previous 8-k must be ammended ASAP, as per SEC. This is what we know.
Aside from the 8-k and the SEC - There is a lot of market research that can be done, in regards to HTML5, D-a-a-S/S-a-a-S, and other trends. This company has the ability and capability to distribute cleanly and as intended, content and ads across multiple platforms IMO these capabilities and real world applications, make Pixelmags a valuable asset.
Am I missing something?
SPCL/Pixelmags
GLTA
What we have an 8-k from may, an 8-k from nov 30, and NSOS updates in late november - there is enough information to confirm Pixelmags exists, and is in the process of a Reverse Merger into SPCL shell. Right now, we are waiting for 2014, 2015, and 2016 financials to be made public.
3 years of financials (including current year, which ends December 31, 2016) from a private company -
and just to give some insight on what pixelmags can do
Content and Ad distribution that has the ability to reach younger generations....
Pixelmags specializes in formatting across multiple platforms (not only can their content be viewed on any site/device/computer, but it can also appear presentable and as intended) with HTML5. Interactive magazines, interactive ads, videos inside magazines, video ads, the list goes on. The ability to format digital content with HTML5 so it appears as intended on any platform, coupled with the capability of pushing to countless digital platforms, could be a valuable asset for someone, IMO
Ryan Marquis, Founder and COO said, “PixelMags has provided the opportunity for advertisers to see a full report of impressions served, engagements of videos, and actual engagements of links. This allows advertisers to see how successful their campaigns are, and what changes need to be made to engage their target audience even more if they feel needed.”
The features of this network include but are not limited to; new and enhanced ad placement opportunities, the option to choose the ad page of an issue, as well as controlling and editing all your ads. An advertiser can also specifically target demographics, such as age, sex, or if they just want an iPad or iPhone specific ad. Rather than running an ad in just one magazine, advertisers are now able to reach as broad or specific of an audience as they see fit by utilizing the entire PixelMags reader database, which encompasses over 200 plus magazines.
Google has made a cautious move into digital magazine sales by recently introducing a limited range of digital editions to its Google Play entertainment area which already delivers music, film, books, and games. The current strategy is to learn about how the dynamics of the magazine market work before making a full range offer, yet it believes that the market must settle down to have a dominant, more open technological platform (possibly HTML5) before the sector really takes off. At this point, Google will doubtless make a more committed move to increase share of digital magazine sales.
-Inside Magazine Publishing, David Stam & Andrew Scott 2014 p.243
RSI below 50, MACD above zero, signal approaching, above zero
Anyone can edit wiki. Why not focus our efforts more constructively - we have an 8-k from may, an 8-k from nov 30, and NSOS updates in late november - there is enough information to confirm Pixelmags exists, and is in the process of a Reverse Merger into SPCL shell. Right now, we are waiting for 2014, 2015, and 2016 financials to be made public.
3 years of financials (including current year, which ends December 31, 2016) from a private company, and people are wondering why it's taking a while to audit - patience, and faith. I have done my DD and I trust my research. I have come up with several different scenarios, and look forward to amending them in light of new information.
Pixelmags specializes in formatting across multiple platforms (not only can their content be viewed on any site/device/computer, but it can also appear presentable and as intended) with HTML5. Interactive magazines, interactive ads, videos inside magazines, video ads, the list goes on. The ability to format digital content with HTML5 so it appears as intended on any platform, coupled with the capability of pushing to countless digital platforms, could be a valuable asset for someone, IMO
Ryan Marquis, Founder and COO said, “PixelMags has provided the opportunity for advertisers to see a full report of impressions served, engagements of videos, and actual engagements of links. This allows advertisers to see how successful their campaigns are, and what changes need to be made to engage their target audience even more if they feel needed.”
The features of this network include but are not limited to; new and enhanced ad placement opportunities, the option to choose the ad page of an issue, as well as controlling and editing all your ads. An advertiser can also specifically target demographics, such as age, sex, or if they just want an iPad or iPhone specific ad. Rather than running an ad in just one magazine, advertisers are now able to reach as broad or specific of an audience as they see fit by utilizing the entire PixelMags reader database, which encompasses over 200 plus magazines.
Google has made a cautious move into digital magazine sales by recently introducing a limited range of digital editions to its Google Play entertainment area which already delivers music, film, books, and games. The current strategy is to learn about how the dynamics of the magazine market work before making a full range offer, yet it believes that the market must settle down to have a dominant, more open technological platform (possibly HTML5) before the sector really takes off. At this point, Google will doubtless make a more committed move to increase share of digital magazine sales.
-Inside Magazine Publishing, David Stam & Andrew Scott 2014 p.243
I don't think the wikipedia edit is that serious of an offense - just can't trust it, at the moment is all.
Regardless of financials, we know that both shutterstock and pixel mags use SaaS and DaaS monetization models; they are still not very different from each other.
---------------
What we have are legal SEC and NSOS filings, that paint a pretty detailed picture of an actual company with revenues, that's planning to go public by means of Reverse Merger into a shell company.
May 8-k:
https://www.lawinsider.com/contracts/4TkCHkeZcy2Q2UrhvmWmVg/solaris-power-cells/1411730/2016-05-23
NVSOS update:
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=24uUSGFwtG9LWMfRZzvvhg%253d%253d&nt7=0
Nov 30 8-k:
http://www.advfn.com/news_Current-Report-Filing-8-k_73046216.html
Note: recent 8-k signed by neil kleinman
There is also an entry on bloomberg, that states "Vert Capital invests $2mil-$25mil in growing companies between $10-200 million with a max EBITDA of $25 million"
http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=217263204
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/pixelmags/funding-rounds
As per 8-k, the previous owner/CEO, Leonard Caprino, has been compensated. The officers have been swapped, and the financials are being audited.
SPCL/Pixelmags GLTA
The bot updated spelling errors, the edit below with the encrypted name, shows the account updated more than that...
Caught the wikipedia edit, as well.. SMH
Are private companies required to provide financials publically to non-existing shareholders?
Also the Pixel Mags wikipedia page was edited recently... not sure how reliable the information is, now....