Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What is your mission here?
“ there can be several unsatisfactory explanations for it.”
Beautiful!! That’s what’s needed for one of the highest profile decisions at the FDA in recent history.
Seems there are always issues with the site as the ignore feature is malfunctioning again.
You just bought shares yesterday for the 2nd time in the last few weeks with no catalyst in sight to reverse the latest trend. Although the reason certainly wasn’t Anavex sponsorship, what was the reason?
I doubt that you hate $, so let’s rule that reason out.
“Well I did in fact go through a year's worth of MAA stats and looked at each of those filed”
And still time for 5,200 posts since January 1, 2023. You must have quite the team assembled.
And all this for just one investment that you give little chance of success in an entire stable of early stage bio’s! Very, very impressive.
So you are selling your shares now, correct?
Either that, or you just don’t believe your own posts.
So when you sell today, where are you moving your money?
And since you’ll be gone, don’t leave a forwarding address.
Yes, with the huge downward revision to the job numbers for the year showing that the economy could be heading for free fall, looks like they will absolutely need to cut rates to try to ease the punishment that’s on the doorstep.
Another swing and a miss 0-Fer!
Why do you think you missed again?
Yes, with the huge downward revision to the job numbers for the year showing that the economy could be heading for free fall, looks like they will absolutely need to cut rates to try to ease the punishment that’s on the doorstep.
Why do you think you were wrong again?
Why don’t you spend some time explaining to the the message board participants what a tax on unrealized gains will do to their Anavex and other investments?
Never a bad idea to get oneself a good attorney just to be safe.
But I don’t mean that as any advice.
“Don’t take medical advice from strangers on the Internet. Instead, call your primary care doc.”
And yet here you are giving investment advice on the internet with no fear of destroying people’s financial health.
Missling called “Bernie Madoff “and a “
Psychopath ” by two of the cream of the crop genius biotech investors on this board in less than 24 hours. How badly does someone want your shares?
But it’s laughable as Anavex apparently remains the only game in town.
Wow!!! Quite a departure from this statement of yours just a couple days ago:
““Around 20% chance likely lower is pretty good for high risk/return biotech play. I also believe Anavex have good chance of approvals with well designed confirmatory trials.
This is just how it works in biotech, so $AVXL fits my investment strategy.”
But if my mission was to drive the price down to create another buy in opportunity at $4, $3 or even $2 a share, I’d repeatedly post the same thing and celebrate converting message board visitors that show a change in sentiment. Driving a buy back in price lower really amplifies that risk/return calculation. As bad as you claim the outlook is, now at Bernie Madoff level, you ain’t going nowhere my friend!!!
Kundgratulations!!
“Around 20% chance likely lower is pretty good for high risk/return biotech play. I also believe Anavex have good chance of approvals with well designed confirmatory trials.
This is just how it works in biotech, so $AVXL fits my investment strategy.”
Indeed!! And at $6.30, what an extraordinary risk reward play. And imagine if you could manage to drive that price down to $4.00, $3.00 or even $2.00!! That would further rocket that risk reward calculation. And since you recently sold some trading shares, it would sweeten that opportunity to buy back in.
Superb investment strategy. In the end those wasted Sundays will be worth it. The big win is always more rewarding than a Sunday afternoon dinner with the wife.
Moments like these are always cause for celebration.
24,000 posts of pure entertainment.
You’re straining to convert message board readers so hard you may pop some blood vessels.
Be careful! Campaigning is not for everyone! Health always first.
If a poster sounds like a campaign manager, he probably is.
“Froll knows his stuff, but has been wrong before eg. on BTD for AD and Rett.”
I don’t recall Frrol saying that there was a 100% chance of any of these. So was he wrong?
If EMA approval comes, you’ll still be claiming you weren’t wrong because you reflected some chance of approval.
You’ll never admit being wrong. It’s not in your DNA.
Interesting that two elite upper echelon of biotech investors (Investor and Frrol) with access to the same information, can be so far apart in their assessment of Anavex chances of EMA approval.
“I too have worked in and intimately know the industry, including when companies ends up defending securities class action cases. My role in that, if anything, has of course laid plain both collusion with intend to defraud the market and listed companies intent of defrauding investors.”
Very impressive. And here you are 24/7.
Perhaps you got nowhere else to go.
News Flash for all of you message board attendees that are not recognized as “real biotech investors” because you so obviously do not understand the science and have no concept of risk and opportunity:
There is a private message feature on this site that would allow the self proclaimed “biotech investing geniuses” to communicate among themselves (the only real sources of meaningful investment information and analysis).The cost of using this feature is negligible for these wildly successful investors, and along with the ignore button would negate the need to waste time dealing with the wide swath of ignoramuses.
Frrol has outrightly stated that there are only 3 or 4 credible investors on this board, embracing Investor, Doc and an unnamed 4th. Why aren’t they using these features? Why is the dissemination of their information needed to the mass of idiots that are just here as degenerate gamblers? Well???
Beautifully played after the fact call. Sheds light on your refusal to make a prediction as to whether Anavex would hit $3 or $13 next.
Get some rest little one. You’ve already blown another Sunday.
An investor whose portfolio is only comprised of speculative pre-revenue biotech companies would love to have a stable full of companies with similar risk/reward profiles.
All day, every day.
He makes Kund seem like Stephen Hawking.
Your words from a recent post:
“I already explained my position to you but this time I'll talk slower so you can understand three and a half years ago I made 120k selling shares at $24 a piece I still owned shares and I bought a lot more since, all at low prices “
If you bought a lot more shares since “all at low prices”, those purchases had to be recent. Why would you be buying shares in a company that you perceive as terrible?
You really should be mindful of you previous posts. You just posted this 6/12:
“wasn't ignoring it that's where I made all my money I'm one of the lucky ones that cannot lose even if this thing goes to zero I sold 6,000 shares at $24 each 3 and 1/2 years ago and I still own another 5,000 shares I was hoping to get my wife to retire with me, but since then straight downhill”
3 years ago mid July the price hit the $25 range. Just a couple weeks ago, you were only sitting on 5,000 shares. You claim to have bought a lot more shares since that sale which would be part of that 5,000 you still hold. Since we are now sitting near the lows since the time of your 6,000 share sale, those shares could not have been too cheap.
And let’s keep in mind that in much older posts you claimed to have sold “thousands and thousands” of shares at $24 (other stories/posts say $25) and that you still own “thousands and thousands” of shares.
You’re calling others frauds? Now that truly is funny. Remarkable.
“Nor is my objective to deter buying in AVXL”
5,000 Biochecker4 posts clearly read otherwise.
Almost like asking someone not to believe what they just witnessed in a debate performance.
You’d be at 20 posts a day if you didn’t have to attend those remedial English classes.
Ask for your money back.
That placebo effect is an interesting thing. It could have been as simple as stamping the Denmark flag on our placebo that would have gotten us to approval.
“This was upsetting to see. The parents are Angels. Please no a hole response.”
Apparently too much to ask of kund2014.
Have you ever lost money on a pre revenue biotech stock?
If you have ever lost money on a pre revenue biotech investment, you are gambling here. Don’t kid yourself or other people on this board. There are savvy gamblers and not so savvy gamblers. Perhaps you are a savvy gambler; at least you play one on this anonymous message board.
If you are the owner of shares here, you are gambling.