Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Too busy to write your own material now? Have to subcontract to Kund?
As the saying goes: “You get what you pay for.”
What? They wouldn’t let you ask a question because you don’t own a share?
It would have seemed awkward for the guy refreshing the donut, juice and coffee table to be blurting out questions?
It is blatantly obvious that you have never attended one yet you are compelled to comment as if you have. Don’t you think it’s time to stop the charade?
As Steady implies, a pre revenue bio that never gains an approval nor gets acquired by another will have a stock price sustained at zero.
If you consider that brilliant analysis, that is even more amazing.
Are you implying that the performance of equities always follow some loose pre-ordained calendar of events? I don’t believe that to be true.
If you think the future is positive for Anavex, I guess you can hope that world events drive the broader market lower and drag Anavex with it, but how much more is there to gain?
I’m comfortable with the cards in my hand. SUMLIECANTSELL is likely holding something different in his hand. Hope it doesn’t cause him to go blind.
I agree with Frrol’s assessment:
“There's a lot of skepticism over our commercial prospects, and management credibility. The shares have sold down, which is a normal market reaction. Fortunately, these are not factors in the actual performance of our lead drug, which does appear to show efficacy signal. We are on an encouraging decision path for EMA assessment in AD.”
I think we get there and that Anavex is a compelling risk reward play even more so at current price levels. When there’s blood in the street….
“but won't convince any of the Longs on this board not to own this disaster.”
And this is so terribly important to you, why exactly?
Similar to when he states: “if and when Anavex actually files an MAA”
When he full well knows that their likelihood of not filing is damn near zero.
He’ll throw around these broad %’s like they have real meaning but criticize you:
“About 60% of filed fraud cases are dismissed for one reason or another many before a lead plaintiff is appointed. About 60% of those cases that goes to litigation will settle because that tends to be the cheaper option than going all the way to a court determination.”
Go figure!
And he’ll pound his chest and boast of his credentials from behind the curtain of an anonymous message board.
Are you as impressed as I?
He’ll give you 20 pages of legal bull crap related to discovery in the midst of a busy day for a guy of max import.
“Might imply that the peer reviewed publication is out by then.”
You’re not connecting dots again by some chance? My understanding is that is strictly verboten by the Dot Connecting Enforcement Committee.
Are you not the founding member?
So where will we be able to find you until there is any news a year or more down the road?
Let me guess….
So SUMLIECANTSELL,
When did you unload your shares?
Certainly in light of your powerful and passionate “fool me once, fool me twice, fool me fifty times” speech, you exited this stock.
Or did you get fooled a 51st time?
SUMLIEDOTELL:
Your words:
“ I do not like how the Rett announcement went down and it was a major turning point for me. Last straw so to speak. The EMA news, the anecdotal stories, the January 2nd announcement date. Too hard to believe these were coincidental.”
“ IMO a CEO is fully responsible for the actions of a company. Full stop.”
“As far as the other things you listed (AD, Rett, Peer Review), the concern is that too many things have been said only to be subsequently ghosted. Credibility is reflected in the tape. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice (or many more times) shame on me.”
Full stop? Stop, Fool!
You had this all figured out at the end of 2023 and you claim to be holding your shares 3 months later? Who’s your financial adviser? Time to find a new one, don’t you think?
Based upon your statements above and your constant assault on anything Anavex, it appears highly unlikely that you own shares. If you do, you can’t even follow your on advice.
Seems your obvious mission to make other shareholders just as disgruntled. Seems what would make you most gratified is for visitors to this forum to share your despair and hopelessness and sell their shares.
Shareholder? Not so much. Influencer? You’re certainly trying. Effectiveness? Not so much.
But keep swinging Dylan!
How do you think they kept it from him when he interviewed for the job?
Maybe the D in PHD is for deceivable.
Makes you wonder how the Evil Doctor slid this bye or managed to hide this from Kun Jin.
Wow! No limit to his deception.
I understand.
Wink. Wink.
Must be karma as it landed appropriately.
It is understood that you really mean “no”, but can’t be in outright disagreement with him.
It’s OK to say “no”. He’ll get over it.
But like the EMA approval % of 85% this 60% chance of dismissing can’t be related to Anavex. Their chances in broad terms has to be more like 10%, because after all, it is Anavex.
So it just doesn’t make sense to bring up these historical stats as it just muddies the water.
Yes! Quite content.
Have made good money with this company and expect to again. Great risk/reward ratio at this level.
And you? Are you in total gut wrenching anguish?
I’m assuming you remain here because you like, or sorry, perhaps more like love, the prospects and the current risk/reward angle.
So come on; give your fans their real money’s worth. $3 or $13 next?
Are you biosplaining again??
Sounds more like reaching.
What is truly sad Reyeton is that you are forced to languish in the deep and dark despair of an AVXL investment; that this is the only investment opportunity available to you and that you must continue to suffer thru this hell on earth.
You should put yourself on ignore, perhaps you’d make better investment decisions. Fire your financial adviser.
“I got nowhere else to go; I got me where else to go!!!”
Sad and comical.
Your words: I would have said very well done and smart low cost moves. Now it looks more like pennywise and pound foolish with more dilution over several years in the pipeline.
And this statement relates to “Calling it potentially pivotal and using AUC was Missling's”?
Appears that you are speaking about trial size when referring to “low cost moves”.
$3 or $13 Eighty/Twenty?
So trial size was not a Missling mistake in your judgement?
As “shareholders” pound the message board lamenting the drawn out and dire prospects of Anavex, just ponder this enigma “I got nowhere else to go.”
How many investment opportunities are out there in markets that are setting new records with regularity. There is just something about Anavex.
“I think”
Yes, more thinking and less “Influencing” would be a good step for you! At least that’s a start.
Be an Investor!
I detailed my plan, not that you are really interested. If you were interested, you would have looked back a few posts instead of repeatedly asking for it. You’ve got nothing but time, so go find it. And you don’t have to sift thru 24,000 posts.
How about you Eighty/Twenty??? $3 or &13 next?
Are you an INVESTOR or just an “influencer” too?
So you’re really not an investor SUMLIE.
You’re just an “influencer”. You’re the Dylan Mulvaney of IHUB!
SUMLIEDOTELL,
“As an investor this trial was a failure. Given the history of this company it's highly likely we will never hear of this again.
Same as PDD.”
So, “as an investor”, you are expecting what next? You plan on buying when? You’re looking to sell at what price?
You are an investor, correct? Or are you just a spectator and this board just your avenue to companionship?
So good of you to have sold and remain here to provide public service messages.
The love for your fellow man/investor is a beautiful thing.
Really?
And what do you think will be the immediate market reaction to firing the CEO?
And how long do you think it would take the new CEO to “fix” the situation?
How long do you think it will take the stock price to recover after we dip into the $4’s?
Why are you sorry?
And why is it a buying opportunity? What are you expecting to happen after the price drop?
The 15% had their starts as printing companies and are led by CEO’s with long hair and German accents?
Obfuscating again.
I do. Even told you at what prices I’m selling and what % of my shares I plan to continue to hold. But you really don’t care to know and that is why you don’t remember. You ask in order to deflect.
You can speak to every aspect of the science and the statistics and biotech investing. You have an opinion on everyone and everything but you can’t seem to find a voice on where you think the price is moving next.
The onion is peeled. You’re a charlatan, but a good one. Probably not even Danish but some other breakfast pastry.
You hammer the obvious pumpers but gladly dance with those that obviously don’t own long positions in the stock and continuously bash the company.
“In the meantime, Anavex is trying out various drug trials like they are shopping for a new outfit from the department store. If this doesn't fit let’s try something else. No rush. No need for expediency. Take your time. The shareholders will foot the bill and finance whatever we decide to do. They never complain.”
If you honestly believed this, you would not be pitching your tent here. You can’t explain why you are drawn to Anavex. You can’t state a price that you are looking for to allow you to exit, if you actually do own shares. You claim that nothing is happening here for the foreseeable future but are in no hurry to go anywhere. Inexplicable, but you’ll offer some lame reasoning.
Frrol, from your posts:
“The failure of the Excellence Rett trial was not a consequence of its size. The trial size was increased, and after consultation with the FDA. It was much bigger than our previous trials. It simply missed its endpoints, some barely, some definitively. This is unfortunate, and very common. And trial size does not increase (nor reduce) endpoint scores. It simply improves their validity. It also doesn't reduce type 2 errors. Incidentally nor does it increase type 1 errors. “
“The most likely outcome is the FDA saying 'it looks like a bigger trial will give a clearer picture of the drug's possible efficacy in Rett Syndrome, we suggest you consider doing one.'”
Seems that you need to elaborate on the second post detailing what else would change in the new trial.
The annual shareholders meeting is on the horizon. Since you essentially live here, indicating that the Anavex future will greatly impact your life, you undoubtedly will be in attendance.
By all accounts Missling is very accessible and open to many questions. I’m sure you will have yours ready and hold him accountable.
We look forward to a full report from you. Those of us that are glued to your every post will welcome the insight you will gain from the meeting. Don’t start to get tight lipped after the event.
If you don’t like what you hear, will it be time to turn the page?
And you are holding Missling accountable how exactly?
Selling mythical shares?
Hey Dudley!
At what price are you buying or selling, or are you just here to flap your jowls?
“soon to be penny stock”
So you are hanging around for?…… what exactly?
You’ve obviously exited the stock? You’re not holding shares to ride into oblivion? What’s left to do?
As you can see by the emojis, I could be a marriage counselor. First time George and BDR have come together on anything.
I bet George leaves the toilet seat up and doesn’t take out the garbage. Am I right, or am I right??