Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
LOL!! How about throwing sunken treasure into the mix? That's always fun.
Here's some excitement! Today an online friend of mine attended a Walmart opening presided over by Sandy. Here's his report:
In a word... BORRR-ING.
All Sandra did the entire time was sign copies of one of her books. She was all mic-ed up and everything, but all you ever heard was her side of conversations with the people in line. I was able to kill some time in the coffee shop across the way (the store is rather upscale for a Walmart), but there really was no "presentation" to speak of. Items that could have been used for some sort of demonstration were still sitting there unused when I finally gave up after over an hour.
Her staff dutifully churned out samples of strawberry shortcake (hard to screw THAT up when you start with a store-bought cake), placing them on the far end of the table from Sandra, behind a bunch of boxes of decorative stuff stacked there for no apparent reason other than to make the samples unnecessarily difficult to reach.
After about 45 minutes they switched over to making smoothie samples with strawberries, bananas and orange juice (and sugar, I think). The concoction resembled Pepto-Bismol in appearance. Eventually, I opted to take the tablespoon-size sample medicine-style, throwing it as far back in my mouth as possible. The back of my tongue reported that I had made a good call on that one. It was really surprisingly sour for a drink with added sugar. And it had the seeds from the strawberries in it, which seems to me to be contrary to the concept of a "smoothie".
He adds that her boobs are slung unnaturally low.
On the contrary: after a year or so, he realized that he wasn't prepared to be an anchor and became a field journalist.
You lie like a rug, and you're arrogant enough to think everyone else here is stupid.
You couldn't be more wrong.
you may want to stick to roaming BB at ihub..
And you may want to stick to inchoate ramblings about the Battle of Austerlitz. You're marginally more likeable when no one has any idea what you're talking about.
you didnt have the talent to put a good segment together, and your segment was not worthy to be put on prime time.
You seem to have great difficulty reading for meaning. Check out my post again.
Im guessing you were fired immediately after your "pennie" segment b/c it was un-watchable.
"Fired"?? We weren't working for them. We weren't even gonna get paid. We weren't writing the script. We were merely contributing information. The SEC's John Reed Stark was involved as well. We didn't go to them; they came to us. They were gonna interview us, and probably use only a couple of minutes of that.
BUT we would have got to meet Peter Jennings, who was to be the host.
But all that doesn't tell us what Melchizedek is gonna do for poor Filipini.
Yes. Maybe that's some kind of laser hitting his forehead.
PAIM will be thought of by many investors because they've seen the prs lately...
Sure. PAIM "investors". But I'm afraid that 99.9% of all U.S. market participants have never heard of it, and never will. Unless somebody falls out of a helicopter.
Yeah, and she's caught onto the religious affinity thing pretty fast, too.
lol, the DoM is supposedly an "ecclesiastic sovreignty". What's their official religion?
LOLOLOL!! If you want someone who's worked on the DoM and Pearl presenting a segment about PAIM, you really don't understand the Law of Unintended Consequences.
Tell me something: so far, what have you been right about? Nothing I can see. You should think about that.
Back in 1998 and 1999 a couple of friends and I worked first with 20/20 and then NBC Dateline on shows about penny stock fraud. The producers and the writers were enthusiastic, but in the end, management was not. On one of these occasions--I forget which--we were days away from shooting when the show got cancelled.
It was replaced by one about defective electric blankets, which management felt was of greater interest.
Well, if he is, he won't admit it. He'll probably start yammering about "suppressed facts" or something.
Like the NSS companies themselves, they always have an excuse.
and thats what pearl has been cryin for a while.
Snicker, for about two weeks, to be more precise.
Yes. Occam's Razor doesn't play very well with the Get Shorty bunch.
I guess you missed the last time they did that. Or maybe it was 20/20. The Get Shorty bunch was expecting all kinds of drama.
Didn't happen. Very vague treatment that lasted about ten minutes and didn't get into specifics.
I suspect tomorrow's show will be much the same. And don't forget that they always present both sides.
are you gonna tell me that this segment will in no way help pearl and her struggle against the naked shorters?
Yes. Responsible TV networks don't do stories on Stinky Pinky gold mining stocks. And if they did, they'd also have done research that would have turned up Pearl's DoM connections, and then they wouldn't have touched it with a barge pole.
Either you're extremely naive or you just say anything that pops into your head.
Ain't gonna happen. As you'll soon see.
we'll have our own little trigger report, its called 60 minutes. its obvious that pearl has been putting these prs out about taking on the naked shorters to get the attention of the press... it may pay off tomorrow blokes
You really are nuts. Everyone knows what the 60 Minutes segment will be about: Biovail.
What will you think if CMKX goes over 703B?
I don't think that'll happen. But if it does, I'll be wondering about all those certs for which there's "no record".
What I'm really curious to see is that, once the final count is reached and verified, what happens if the company or the TA announce that so many billions of shares (pick a number, say 500B) are accounted for and weren't (for whatever reason???) included in the Task Force cert count?
In that case, nothing would happen. You need people demanding certs and being unable to get them.
Of course NSS is possible. And it does happen. Usually the naked short position is covered quickly. Naked or "clothed", you still have to pay margin and maintenance.
But in the case of CMKX and most of the other penny companies that are whining about it, there are far better explanations for their problems. Like insane dilution, toxic financing, abject incompetence, and corruption.
lol, if you understood it, Jimmy, then it's almost certainly WRONG.
One flaw I can find is that it doesn't apply to CMKX which was never eligible for the Stock Borrow Program.
The way I understand it (forget apples) in that the original lot of shares get borrowed from the Stock Borrow Program (SBP) which then get sold through a broker to an investor. Those shares then sit in the investors account where they are borrowed and sold to another investor. This can continue indefinately though a series of brokers.
That's exactly the same as my apple analogy. The trades happen consecutively, not all at once.
Once again you're not keeping up, Jimmy. There was one last Wednesday. All*n was in attendance.
Shorty's there, Gump. Borrowing apples and selling them. But, as noted, they're always the SAME apples.
And don't forget, as a nod to reality, that CMKX was never eligible for the Stock Borrow program.
lol, let's stick with apples. We can, if you like, introduce a grocery store owner who acts as middleman.
Doesn't work that way. You don't actually KNOW that your apples have been borrowed. In any case, it all unwinds from the most recent borrower.
WHAT???
There is no such thing as a dumb CEO.
Don't be too surprised if you find out All*n's client was himself.
lol, I DID raise that possibility.
E isn't at liberty to "return" the shares to A. He doesn't even know that A exists.
The concept is really very simple. Try to visualize it. I'm so sorry I can't get the bunch of you in a room with some apples.
Definitely.
Nope, it's always the same apples that are being borrowed as they move down the chain.
Ahhhhhhhh, I see.
What does this mean?
:?D
Nope. There are still only 100 apples.
Losing your temper because you don't like the answers you're getting, yet can't refute them?
1. There is no "counsel to the Owner's Group". In fact, the Owner's Group is irrelevant to the current situation. What he's looking for is the Task Force. Two members of the Task Force are attorneys.
2. They've already caught up with the backlog of faxes.
Burrell is clueless. He also has a British business partner who's a Bad Boy. His name is Terry Ramsden. Burrell and Ramsden own an offshore outfit called Birchington that's been characterized by many as a pump and dump outfit. It's domiciled in the British Virgin Islands and trade on the Irish Exchange.
Sorry, gumpster; my analogy holds.
That's what I'm telling you. The SEC began investigating Mad Mikey Sylver and AZNT back in 1998. They won their lawsuit about three years ago and passed the ball to the State of Nevada, who brought criminal charges of bank and insurance fraud against Mikey.
Is Mikey in jail? No. He's managed to get his trial postponed for more than two years. It's now set for this summer.
You just got an answer: the investigation isn't complete. The SEC is still taking depositions.