Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Jenna, How can you ask about the "relevance of posts on an
investors platform"?
In your post #1776 on this thread, you asked "cOUSIN SHORTY":
"Your pictures all over IHUB are neat, did you paint them or
copy 'em and what is their relevance to an investor's platform?"
Here are just a few of the posts from your "rant" on IHUB
earlier this month when you did not seem overly concerned
about the "relevance" of the content of your own numerous
posts on several IHUB message boards. These are from the
Clown Free Zone. How were posts like the ones linked below
relevant and if you agree that they are not, how can you
justify what seems to be a double standard in your viewpoint?
http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=91365
http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=91361
http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=91346
http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=91346
http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=91176
http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=91069
In the following post, you explained your viewpoint to
"The Real Poet" at the Clown Free Zone thread:
http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=91067
You wrote: "poet, I can and will post what I want, when I want, and to whom I want as long as it doesn't go against the
terms of use so go about your business"
The links above were all posts that you made on the Clown
Free Zone thread on May 2. How were they relevant to an
investors platform ?
Here is a post from "Mark Marcellus" to you at the Clown
Free Zone thread on 4-29. It provides links which question
whether 4 posts that you had made at IHUB Bob's thread were
"relevant".:
http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=89079
"Posted by: Mark Marcellus
In reply to: jenna who wrote msg# 65
Date: 4/29/2001 10:17:02 PM (ET)
Post # of 185
We post once or twice a month
Jenna, that being the case, someone has stolen your profile and is apamming Bob's thread.
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=88885
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=88820
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=87736
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=86150
Thought you might like to know."
"Mark Marcellus" was responding to your post at the Clown
Free Zone thread where you wrote:
"We post once or twice a month and not 25 times a day. The rest
of the day WE TRADE and make money."
http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=87749
Jenna, are you not aware that on May 2, you did post what
seemed to be at least 25 messages on various IHUB threads in
one day that to this observer, did not seem relevant to the
spirit of this investor's platform ? Can you convince other
IHUB members that your posts that day were relevant ?
LennyBruce, yer the true American Spirit
Watch out. Luc will ban you here, too ! >gg<
O.T. Sam: Why does she talk to her subscribers on IHUB ?
(Again....forgive me, Bob !)
< and Jenna talking to her subscribers which,
to the rest of us, is useless without her service.>
Communication with her subscribers could be easily accomplished
privately on the website intended for that purpose.
Communication with them here on IHUB is either intended as
some grand gesture of selfless charity to the world at large,
as she would like us all to believe, and may even believe
herself; or may not be intended as communication with her
subscribers at all.....could it be......I dunno....SELLING????
O.T. Reminds me of Cleopatra, Queen of DeNile
Forgive me, Bob, for this O.T. post on your forum to comment
on another poster's primarily (but not labelled as such) O.T.
post here- #976. Since the poster is the COB of the board
where post #976 would be more appropriate, but has repeatedly
demonstrated a tendency to delete any post like this one there,
I request your patience and understanding. I also ask that
you consider that the author of post #976 on your forum, makes
a persuasive case; illuminated by the contradictions in post
#976 highlighted below (comments in parenthesis are mine) for your close surveilance due to an extremely biased and inconsistant reasoning process that may hint of unsuitability to act as a COB of an IHUB thread
Title Sentence: "you are wrong.. I am not selling."
Later in first sentence: "if I didn't answer you its because of time constraints."
Last word in first sentence:
"My experience has been an OPEN book for 5 years and 4 of those years are easily read throughout the archives on SI. Had it not been worthy, we would not be proliferating as others are fading."
Fourth sentence: "I also test and delve and research people, claims and allegations." (Sounds like time consuming tangent)
Later in fourth sentence: "I'm just saying that IHUB isn't an advertising medium for Pristine"
Ninth sentence: "We might be somewhat selling something, if you consider just the fact we are around IHUB, but not blatantly"
Eleventh sentence: "The thread gave out very clear "tips" on QCOM, CHKP, CCMP, DPMI, CIEN, JNPR shorts an many more, and we even now have a number of CHARTS that might very well be good TIPS for this week." (Modest comments.....or promotional ?)
First sentence, second paragraph: "I rather think on our presence on IHUB like the "free" area for everyone as well as an area for posting to our subscribers when I have the desire." (Huh ???)
Second sentence, second paragraph:
". All commercial financial sites have free areas and their goal might very well be to garner up more subscribers, sure, but they are in the process giving away some valuable information that will continue to benefit even those that won't ever subscribe."
Fifth sentence, second paragraph:
"Commercialism and captalism is the AMERICAN way and as long as we can continue in the way we have been doing, its not hurting anyone."
Seventh sentence, second paragraph:
"We are an open book as a commercial ENTERPRISE MUST BE."
Hello realpoetchick,
Due to the sheer numbers of long term members who are the true
measure of a successful COMMERCIAL site, transients, such as
yourself are little more than a blip on the screen that are
soon forgotten. So.......?????
We have not requested, nor do we have any use for your "comments or suggestions". We are doing quite well without
them, thank you.
Who are you to quantify "taste" ??? This thread is a cesspool
compared to veiled COMMERCIAL threads that function in the
spirit that the moderators of this website have stated a strong
preference for. There is a huge difference between posting
here, since nothing is off topic, because there is no topic,
and posting distracting nonsense on an informative thread that
is actually about stock trading.
Do not confuse anger with legitimate and justified righteous
indignation. When one works very long and very hard, one does
not hesitate to reply in kind to even the most feeble
disparaging remark. You are certainly not in our league, and
unfortunately for you, never will be, but; we wish you a good
life anyway, realpoetchick. So much for wasting precious time; back to work !
OT: LennyBruce, I was under the impression that SI Jumper
knew some people in New Jersey who could discourage
>>PM flames in his inbox w/ offers of violence<< ?
If I recall correctly, they have a last name usually
associated with an ability to sing the high notes ?
Observation: I did notice that some posts were
quickly deleted on the Market Gems board.
Same thing happened to me when I paid a visit to the MG board.
The COB, Jenna, seems to have absolutely zero tolerance for
OT messages. Lenny should not waste time that he could be
spending on trading. Oh well.....and now, back to work !
Not_Jumper
Poet, just ask IHUB for your SI nickname
http://investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=84357
Luc did, and it looks like he got it !
not_jumper
Looks like not_luc is onto something, poet
I wonder if only SI nicknames are reserved here for the
SI member who uses a specific screen name on SI and wants to
post under the same nickname here at IHUB, but, like you,
finds that it is already taken.
If an ex-AOL or Yahoo admin. employee who has a method of
positively identifying a user of one of those sites, were to
come to work for IHUB, would IHUB honor claims of nickname or
username ownership from AOL and Yahoo, too ?
Seems like IHUB database has either been hacked by a friend
of SI Luc, or IHUB admin. is opening a big can of worms for
itself !
not_jumper
Looks like IHUB has an identity crisis:
http://investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=84845
Lucretius was changed to not-lucretius and
-Lucretius was changed to Lucretius. IHUB seems to enforce
the notion that SI nicknames are proprietary for those who
use them on SI, and carry over when an SIer joins IHUB, to
the extreme that IHUB will sieze the nickname of a proir IHUB
user and hand it over to an SI member. I wonder if IHUB admin.
is using SI membership data to identify who the real SI
nickname holder is ? Interesting......SI police state: meet
IHUB police state ! -g-
not_jumper
Ban this clown, Bob !
not_jumper
Stop double posting, or we'll have you banned.....
-gfy- -g-
Bob, Please Explain Deletion of Market Gems MSG# 664
I posted what I considered to be a "friendly, humorous, message:
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=75264
Hopefully, I am not being "singled out" primarily because I have
chosen a "screen name" or member I.D. that could be confused with an I.D. that is regarded as controversial on another stock message board.
I am writing because I read your declaration here:
"but they don't accept that I simply will not allow any deletion I feel is unwarranted. And that *all* deletions will go through me."
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=15661692
If you approved a request for my post to be deleted because my
I.D. makes me "guilty by association", I must lodge a strong
protest. I urge you to always err on the side of free speech.
Chairperson "Jenna" at the Market Gems board had no possible argument about the content of my deleted post that could
possibly be compelling enough to justify an exception to free
speech principles. The basis for and the content of my post
were humor. There was no maliciousness or profanity in the post.
Since you, yourself, have experienced being "removed" from S.I.,
(on a much more serious than just a "member level", in your case)
please tell me why you would approve a request to delete my
humorous reference to 2 S.I. member suspensions. Is such a thing
so serious and somber a matter that humor is an inappropriate
reaction ?
This site will not be well served if you approve requests to
delete messages because of the perceived reputations or influence
of accusors and accused.
Found a new home.....
May never go back to SI !
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=75264
(Disclaimer: I.D. of the poster of this message is not the same or related to any similar I.D. or screen name of any
other message author or poster on any other website or other
internet forum.)
POS calls ?
GFY <g>