Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Exactly bas2020! I’m “DrGraniteGuy” and approve your message.
So many in the know “Pharmaceutical Master Minds” inhabit this board doling out doses of misinformation…my time value spent here has diminished dramatically.
Pure FUD…the only turd dropping is what you just wrote.
Wrong, only people who recognize what little value that eventually blocked people bring to the conversation and are essentially time wasting, are assigned and regulated to this lower status.
DadofMarcMax is just fine and keeping busy with his newly opened (within last few years) Epilepsy Clinic. He very occasionally comments at one of the two Facebook group message boards (can’t recall which one now), but as far as I know is still an AVXL shareholder but prefers to remain on the down low until something of significance comes to fruition. I won’t try to speak for him here but his optimism in the past about having A2-73 (Blarcamesine) available as a medicinal compound that could potentially be beneficial in his practice gave us all hope for its future approval.
Agreed Sam K, I pretty much ignore all our resident naysayers and FUD mongers as their agenda is clearly different than a long term shareholder’s like myself. Occasionally something interesting gets posted on this board but it’s typically not originating from the two groups listed above (you know who are) and is driven by either internal news from Anavex proper or is external news, that is related to Anavex’s work space.
I couldn’t agree more bas2020, buy the dips in AVXL share price while avoiding the “dips” giving bad advice.
I think he’s an opportunistic day trader and perhaps holds a core amount of AVXL shares. I don’t think that his motivations to post virtually everywhere Anavex is possibly mentioned is an altruistic endeavor.
And you’re a Dallas Cowboys fan…now who’s the real sucker? The Anavex story is still being written and you have no patience or perspective. Give it a rest.
My bad Joseph_K…my post to you should have been directed to Biochecker. Btw, I generally find your posts here to be informative and interesting even if I don’t always agree with all assumptions or points being made.
No Joseph, it’s called delegating responsibility and not micromanaging. There’s a difference when you assign tasks to employees with a certain level of expertise. Why bother employing them if you don’t trust their judgement? Either way Missling will get judged…damned if you do and damned if you don’t. Like winning in sports, a significant increase in Anavex’s share price will make this topic of conversation fade away.
While I might disagree with you politically, I’m with you on this McMagyar! I do think that beyond the willingness of FUD slingers here to ignore the plight of patients that could use Blarcamesine to improve or prevent further deterioration of their health and overall quality of life, there’s the elephant in this “room” that lives and dies on the altar of greed. Greed is certainly one of those uniquely human traits that is the root of much evil.
Well done bas2020! All I will say is that some on here are more deserving than others. There are many on this list that I know that it’s a waste of my time to even bother opening and reading their posts. I effectively block them in this way and am only limited to one post per day at any rate due to my failure to mince words! The AVXL Facebook group(s) are more carefully curated and generally contain higher quality content.
Well stated Hoskuld!
“Your opinion only” which is always relentlessly negative unless presented with overwhelmingly positive and irrefutable evidence contrary to your opinion that prevents your habitual negativity or would compromise any shred of credibility you’re attempting to project.
Who should we believe? Anshu2 is not a credible source of reliable and unbiased information. You certainly don’t pass the smell test and reek of special interests. I’ll safely side with the European Medical Association versus your negative opinion on all things Anavex Life Science.
Not Anavex’s peer review nor a mention.
That was weak “dadbrothereroftwins”. I have confidence that your decision to disparage Missling’s hair care regimen indicates a fundamental understanding regarding Anavex’s A2-73 (Blarcamesine) and what’s actually required to bring a paradigm changing product to market.
Wrong! That would be so shortsighted. Long term shareholders are not as stupid as you think. You and “Doc” are not convincing anyone here as to the validity of Anavex’s trial data or the capabilities of CEO Missling. Rant away but your messaging is tiresome and misleading.
Your sensibilities are accurate.
That’s my contention as well.
I couldn’t agree more. It’s painfully obvious.
Bravo bas2020 keep hammering the flock of FUDsters that infest this board on an hourly and daily basis! Obfuscation, misinformation and overtly negative interpretation of data, time frames, and events need to be countered and addressed. Thank you for all you do here!
I’m not even worried about SAVA’s impact on Anavex. If anything, SAVA should be concerned about Blarcamesine making their drug obsolete or redundant. From everything I’ve read, Blarcamesine’s MOA (Mode of Action) occurs earlier in the cascade of events that lead up to full blown Alzheimer’s.
I see you two have joined forces to become an echo chamber of FUD and misinformation. Best of luck to you and your short position. Again, after following this AVXL iHub board for over eight plus years, it’s evident where your allegiances lie, and it’s not with trying to support a company looking for a more affordable and effective means of helping Alzheimer’s patients improve their quality of life but is more about lining your own pockets.
You’re spot on bas2020. I couldn’t agree more.
More ExtremeBullshit is what you specialize in. Zero credibility is your calling card.
Well the “Doc” and you are not to be trusted is the simple answer. You both are relentlessly negative these days no matter how good the AVXL news which leaves me to believe that you’re shorting the stock, probably trading in and out as your funds permit. Doc’s especially good at supplying FUD for thought, but I trust the AVXL medical professionals over some random “Doc”, who’s main profession now is being a trader.
Anshu2…just another paid FUD slinger…how long have you been on this board? You showed up at a curious time is all I can say. You have ZERO CREDIBILITY!
I couldn’t agree more, it was simply an all points bulletin or signal to the “group” to sell now.
You’re a known basher and FUDster…relatively new to this board…who’s paying you to post here? I’ve been here for years and always notice how your commentary is negatively slanted. You have ZERO credibility.
Thanks Meghan! Much appreciated.
In other news, what are you having for dinner?
Schmiggins for the win! I agree with your take.
Well stated bas2020! The FUDsters will be getting their marching papers in due time…off to the next baby biotech to try and wreck.
On no, not the Enron mention…maybe I should sell everything? Is this just another Theranos? Is Missling channeling Elizabeth Holmes?
I agree tradeherpete!
Your time line is off for baby biotechs in general as is your assessment of Anavex Life Sciences.
I couldn’t agree more basparks79!
I couldn’t agree more!
Missling is obviously very “pro science” to the chagrin of the many supposedly long investors here. Everyone else who wants trial results yesterday shouldn’t be investing in baby biotech stocks or is shorting this security and using well worn arguments to sow fear and to cloud the truth. Seven years of following this stock has made the above observations abundantly clear.