NEWBIE
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Throw in vape testing and it could be even more understated. (That is assuming it will be mandatory in the future)
Nice post. Thank You.
So there isn't any "documented history". It is just your assumptions and WAGs?
"is it another in a long documented history of material info being leaked by insiders" - Can you be more specific about the "documented history". Like a link to the "documented history"
Nope, I don't know and I don't really care. I see it more as advertising of GuardedID. So I will wait to see how the test goes.
I am done on this subject.
https://www.cinoltd.com/shop/guardedid-martinique
https://www.themartinique.com/about.html
Welcome to The Martinique New York on Broadway, Curio Collection by Hilton, set in Midtown Manhattan near the city’s finest attractions. Rising 19 stories above Broadway at 32nd Street, the Martinique is listed on the register of Historic Hotels of America, and blends French Renaissance and Art Deco style for a unique stay.
Hilton property with 531 Rooms. Should be a good test.
"one man's trash is another man's treasure"
Carter is only stating his DD same as you are. Everyone can judge what they see/read for themselves. If you see/read something you don't agree with then argue that point.
I actually find it amazing that Carter is sharing what he has found. It is not like many here give him props for it.
There is a reason why I stopped posting much over the last few months. Talking to deaf ears gets old.
Your premise was "He only has a flip phone, so he is poor" and "He is pumping so he does not lose money" and "He is not buying as he claims because he is poor"
Did I not understand what you were saying?
I could care less if he took pictures or not. I could care less how EVIO "looks" right now or how you or anyone interprets how it "looks".
I have my DD and you have yours. Invest or don't.
Why are you changing the subject? I am only talking about the DD that Carter is bringing up.
I am well aware of the status of EVIO and its filings.
Yes. I have been to the EVIO offices in Henderson and I don't have pictures either.
More correct or more vocal?
BTW: Thank you Carter for all your work. It is appreciated.
So your saying Carter is posting to pump the stock so he does not lose money. You also say that you are posting to warn people to no invest so they don't lose money.
Why should anyone listen to your advise over Carter's?
I show the address as 804 7th street eureka ca not 205.
Which location/address?
2340 W Horizon Ridge Pkwy #120, Henderson, NV 89052?
Looks like a office building to me.
Or were you not speaking about the Nevada location.
I think they have 180 days from first delinquency before delisting. Again, I think that is correct.
You asked Mark "I guess my question was is he still involved in ongoing lawsuits in any way?" - He cannot discuss anything involving the cases that are not public knowledge. The names of the lawyers are public knowledge.
"There are a lot of questions about SFOR and where the money goes" - As I get told all the time: READ THE FINANCIALS. Just like everyone else. He cannot send you an email with information that everyone else does not get. SFOR releases information in 8Ks and 10Ks/Qs. There goals are clear to me.
"He was open to admit he is a friend. Then when asked if he’s involved he shut it down" - Your first question was if he knew Mr Horton and he answered Yes and he is invested in the Pre-STO. Your 2nd question was about the lawsuits directly.
So believe what you want and invest how you want. Be a long or be a flipper. I don't care.
You were asking about the court cases, which he has said many times that he cannot talk about. The shareholders only get to know about what is publicly released about them.
For instance, if Warren Buffet had something to do with this case on either side, letting that be known would sway the stocks.
He did not say yes or no, he said they don't give out that information.
From their last 10K: https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=12479848&guid=6XrtUpL2klAabth
William Waldrop, CEO, Director:
2016 = $1
2017 = $1
Lori Glauser, President, COO, Director:
2016 = $1
2017 = $1
If I remember correctly for 2018 they got "raises" to $150,000 each along with one other officer. Plus a car allowances of $750, $500, and $350 respectively.
So, $451,600 total for those 3 officers.
What is "420k each WW / LG"? 420k each of what? I must have missed something.
As I stated in a previous post. Malware.
Can you explain why they would have used another companies image for their software? https://shieldapps.com/products/identity-theft-preventer/
"why would someone scam a website in sfor name" - the same reason these types of websites are setup to sell Office 2016 for $4.99. So people will put in their credit card information so they can steal them.
"And did you ask kay about bruce horton yet ??? No you did not as you are like the rest .. scared of the truth". You do not know if I called or emailed Kay.
Believe whatever you want. I don't care.
Yeah, but that is from a scam site. It is like believing everything you see on a resume.
Now, if you can find "CryptoSafe Technologies" listed on SFORs site(s) I would change my mind.
I did search http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=searchss&state=4804:9iuj14.1.1 also. for "CryptoSafe Technologies" and got back "No TESS records were found to match the criteria of your query.". Can you find it?
So you don't see where it say Free and Try It on this page: http://crypto-safe-tech.org/index.html
I looked at each of the pages on this site this morning and I followed the domain. Issues that I see.
1. Free GuardedID without anti-clickjacking or anti-screen capture.
2. $499 version of GuardedID
3. Registrar is in Panama
4. FAQ page fails
5. email is hosted at registrar
6. using SFOR address. why if they are in Panama?
7. the graphic used is for https://shieldapps.com/products/identity-theft-preventer/
I am sure I could find more if I wanted to, but that was enough for me.
Oh, you should get the free trial then if you think this is actually a StrikeForce subsidiary. Let us know how that goes.
The South American deal is with a channel partner not a subsidiary. BUT, if somehow this is it, if they sell GuardedID for $500 then more power to them.
Oh, sorry. I was not talking about financials so I had no idea what you were referring to. I am well aware of the late financials.
Yes, that is my opinion that "CryptoSafe Technologies" is a scam. I doubt is a "college kid". Also, remember that site says they are a subsidiary of SFOR. The only subsidiary that I know of is BSAFE. I didn't see an 8K for "CryptoSafe Technologies".
Why do you care what they post over there? If you think they are wrong then don't believe them.
"I never said SFOR said that. It’s shareholders did"
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146837148
"Blocksafe’s major appeal was it’s the first company around to claim it protects anything crypto."
I am only saying that "CryptoSafe Technologies" looks like a scam. I think they are either a malware site or just ripping people off.
When did SFOR say they were the only company that protects anything crypto? There are many forms of crypto like there are many forms of 2FA.
Sorry, what filing are you referring to?
EVIO isn't the only one that NetworkNewsWire is doing this with. Look at NetworkNewsWire recent ihub post history.
Still seems a pretty bad way for them to be approaching this to me.
I had not looked at the other board yet. Still digging, but it does look like it is not a real company. Even the products that they are selling don't seem right. Since it is only sounds like GuardedID features and those cannot be separated out. ie Anti-Clickjacking and Anto-screen capture are built in to GuardedID.
Also the pricing, a free version, then a $500 is next step?
Screams scam to me so far. I will wait for information from SFOR about this.
I must have missed something. What are you referring to?
Correct. I think the person that bought announced it on the other board before he/she set his/her bid.
Ah, sorry, your response was vague so I thought you meant that I sold.
Oh, and Yes, I did post the deal documents and No, I don't remember them having a provision like that.
Nope, that is why I put in the "Note: it was not me." line.