Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I never stay in after a dilution...
IMO, a dilution is one of the most
reliable downtrends I ever see !
the last dilution I went out from $ 2.41
down to $ 1.35 and nearly bought puts
to 'double-up' but they were already
over priced... I held out for $ 1.35
because the calculator told me that
was the new per-share value after
adding in the new shares at $ 1.70.
I can't imagine holding
shares after an announced dilution ...
do nearly all stock traders hold their
shares after an announcement of dilution ?
that makes sense... and technically I'm a half-breed
short at the moment being 'out', with the intention
to re-buy in lower next week...
I guess if I had instantly bought some Puts I'd be a
full blooded short !!! LOL
hey china !!
are you 'out' too ?
waiting for that lower re-buy-in ?
this could be nearly as good as the $ 2.40 -to- $ 1.35 one !!!
at his point I'm expecting a gap-down open on Monday
in the $ 1.32 -to- $ 1.36 range, with likely a peek
below the $ 1.30 line before wed.
if it touches $ 1.24 at any point it should make the
'teens' price possible.
or, neil parker could do a press release about supporting
DC-Vax and pop that sucker up to $ 3.25 while I'm killing
my mouse button on the 'buy' screen !!! LOL ...
well, I wasn't considering that you meant 'one person' was getting 400,000 shares on short hops out / in ... but that
there are many float traders doing that...
for instance, to earn 400,000 free shares on a super
week like selling 1,000,000 shares on Dec 22nd 2015
at $ 4.55, then rebuying in 4 trading days later at $ 3.32 ...
you'd only earn 370,481 free shares on that $ 1.23 cents hop.
so says the calculator...
and that's if you did it perfectly. which is not easy.
even though my $ 2.41 -to- $ 1.35 hop looked perfect.
I don't expect many of those.
but I've 'Averaged' 448 free shares weekly since my first
hop out on Feb 17th ... and that's with my puny $ 20,000
account. if I keep averaging over 400 shares a week, I should
have over 8,000 'more' free shares by Sept 1st.
but 400,000 free shares ? in a week ? one person ? ummm...
that would be woodford maybe. but, I wouldn't put it past him !
but free shares weekly ? absolutely... about 80% of the weeks.
exactly... one of my hops-out was only across 4.5 cents giving me 192 free shares. I could have done that easily more than once a week if I were trading more aggressively...and that took only 2 hours ... in Commodities trading, this is a common strategy...
I almost got out today on the first pass down to $ 1.40, but I waited for the bounce and exited all shares at $ 1.43 AFTER I saw it penetrate the $ 1.40 on its initial run down to $ 1.36 ...
right now I'm out at $ 1.43,
with $ 814 profit on a $ 19,750 investment,
yeah, that's only a 4.2 % profit BUT !!!
4,481 of the 14,670 shares I sold today... I NEVER PAID FOR ...
( I had a $ 1.33 break even price on my core investment )
thanks to the earned shares !
so I had only bought 70% of the shares I sold. I earned the other shares by hopping over mini-downtrends while out of the market. I've always done that and always will.
my only goal once I decide to believe in a trading idea, is to get my break-even price as low as possible... I do that by dollar cost averaging my entry with multiple purchases as it is dropping 'if' it does that, and also by getting free shares by hopping out during intra-day / Intra-week mini downtrends. although, once I was out for two weeks after exiting at $ 2.41, and re-buying in at $ 1.35. that was SWEET !!!!
so, I'm dreaming about $ 0.96 re-buy-in of 21,368 shares !!!
leaving me at an even 50% free shares ! go 96 ! go 96 !
in the last six weeks there has been a bit over 4 million shares above the average for weekly volume, with nearly all of that in a barely two week period.. and... if you issue a buy order on a fixed limit, your order will not "drive" the price up, but take
longer to fill while freezing the PPS at or above that limit you entered for your order.
hey !
Don't forget the new, ( and well funded )
Parker institute who have 33% of their
already signed research sites as NWBO sites !
has anyone considered that Ondra and Katherine Wolf
would have done these things in regards to a companies
product that they believed was no threat to them and
basically didn't work ?
aren't corporate spy resources usually allocated
only against perceived valid threats ?
why thanks lots for the wishes of good luck !
even tho I'm sitting at 11% profit as of close
today. so, it looks like I already have luck.
there is a slim chance that my position is the
result of clever trading.
I've only been trading stock since Nov 20th
when I bought my initial shares of NWBO. and
I've been surprised to find the charts are
easier to read than I always suspected.
I should have done this decades ago.
but I opened my first commodities account
in 1986, five years after passing my series
7 to work for a firm in Raleigh NC. which
I did for only two years.
anything over my break-even price of $ 1.35
per share is my profit on 14,670 shares that
I paid only $ 19,750 for in my account that
as of close today was $ 24,033.
I think I'll just keep doing what I have been
doing so far. I have no idea how many people
owning NWBO Shares are actually in the Black
as I am, but I suspect it is a very low number.
Zacks answered about SCR-Zacks
here is the answer I got back from Zacks,
regarding, "Why No Links from Zacks to
SCR Zacks ???
"""" From: Support (support@zacks.com)
Sent: Wed 4/20/16 4:56 PM
Hello,
Yes, the Zacks SCR is associated with
Zacks Investment Research. We have many
different divisions and departments.
In order to access that area of our
company, you would need to visit scr.zacks.com.
Sincerely, Alex Voronov """"
so, They are affiliated, but Daddy company
doesn't want to post links to Baby company.
now we know !
I've been trying to find a connection between
"scr.zacks.com" ( Zacks SCR ) and Zacks ...
on the scr.zacks page is this...
"""Zacks SCR is a division of Zacks Investment
Research (ZIR). ZIR is our parent company and
also the parent company of Zacks.com."""
easy to find, on scr.Zacks.com
SCR Zacks are Daddy Zacks kids took seconds ...
but, on www.zacks.com/
I've not read the entire www.zacks.com website
but I'm doing 'Find-on-page' searches on the
pages I'm going to and cant find diddly squat
about SCR.Zacks ???
I'm not calling "Shenanigans" but I am saying that
if Mainstrean Zacks, created SCR.Zacks, they don't
seem very proud of them or want to send any web
traffic there.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I'v seen
far more than enuf Brand-Name-Copycats to be
leary of one-sided linking like might exist
between Zack.com and SCR.Zacks.com ...
I just sent this email to Zacks.com Help ...
""" regarding the web site ... http://scr.zacks.com
who have posted on their front page ...
"""Zacks SCR is a division of Zacks Investment
Research (ZIR). ZIR is our parent company and
also the parent company of Zacks.com"""
but I am having difficulty finding any reference to
Zacks SCR on your Zacks.com web site ?
is there really the connection they are claiming ?
and, if 'yes', why are there no easy-to-find
reciprocal links to them on your web site ?
if there are reciprocal links to Zacks SCR, would
you please point them out to me ?
very best regards !!! love your work ...
Frank Blunt ... """
I'll post the answer and any links I might receive !
LOL
the color of my contact lenses is
'Bloodshot vodka' ... it's a new line.
thanks a lot for that link. I always try to post links
also, for others that might be trying to keep up
is it common to say "keep up" to the people on these
forums that do not have a data chunk that I do ?
I am new to these things...
if everyone is expected to find a thing at the same time,
what is the point of these forums if we all know the
same thing at the same time ? what would we talk about ?
anyway. thanks TZOR
I expect anyone to block me who finds anything I ask / say
to be irritating since that is what that button is for
I suspect. I wish I had more time available for google
searches but I appreciate the links I find on here and
of course the time those save me.
I wish more people posted links as TZOR did.
then I wouldn't find myself on google so much trying
to verify something I was told on these forums ! LOL.
60 day, $3 warrants expire soon !
Chinatown , questions never bother me, and when I have time,
I always enjoy answering them. but not only is Social media
crippled by the absence of all the visual communication
cues we rarely notice face to face, but is too often
polluted with ill intent. that's why I sometimes do a two
part answer when I'm uncertain, which is often .
one in case they are genuinely curious and the other in
case they are otherwise. and nearly all the time, I "ask".
I would typically be reluctant to assume a person I know
nothing about is definitely experiencing a specific emotion.
only good poets are able to indicate such things in brief text.
about this oscillation period. One of the main tools
I use for a hop-out / in ... are trend lines, which require
a period of time to establish unfortunately. with calm
application it is not too hard to profit from the meaty
center of a trend in any direction, of any length without
much risk.
I almost never draw lines on Minute bars for indicating an
exit, but will often for a re-entry when already 'Out'.
right now, I am getting in / out 'conservatively' ...
I did one hop out / in successfully that was only a few
hours "out" ... only got 192 shares, but, it was part of
a multiday trend that I could realistically channel between
a couple of lines. but the lines I was using were over two
days long.
this down trend on the 'Day' bars, is about 6 months long and
it still hasn't completely pierced the roof of that channel.
which using my bars, is at about the $ 2.50 area.
I also am using multiple sets of trend lines, longer term
bars for exits, and shorter term bars for re-entry.
my goal is to earn another 10,000 free shares by sept.
there is also the issue of 'Price Compression' when this low
in value. meaning that going down a dime from 2.80 -to-
2.70 requires less 'compression' of value, than say going
down from 1.30 -to- 1.20 ... picture it like compressing a
sponge between your hands and changing its thickness as
a percentage from uncompressed, to current, while imagining
the logarithmic pressure curve differences to compress
from 70 - 65 % vs, 35 - 30% ...
so, I increase my skepticism and conservative-risk ratio
as prices get closer to 0% , than I use at say above $ 3.
if you private msg me your email, I send you the list of
all my entries and exits, including date-time, price
and share volume. and I'll explain how I ended up with a
$ 1.33 break even price and 30% free shares.
I don't mind privately validating that list with actual
screen grabs of my Ameritrade 'Transactions' screen, since,
honestly, that would not afford anyone the opportunity to
cause me any harm. and I'm certainly not embarrassed by
my trading decisions the last four months, LOL.
not to say I am unfamiliar with that shame a few times !
and i'll happily answer any 'why' questions that
you care to ask.
yeppers. it disappeared... I never found any 2nd validation of that which was def suspicious LOL...
I did find this, this morning tho... a $ 5 target ( again )
from "The Street" ...
NWBO 12 Months Target of $ 5
ps: Are you intending to ask me this again at
any future downwards oscillations ?
or just this one ?
I'd like time to actually prepare a
more educational response regarding
'two dimensional trading' if that's
a yes. since it is a topic I love
and enjoy discussing.
in case you are ~not~ being 'snide' ...
the answer is "No, I only have hopped out, then back in
5 times in four months because I only seek to get the
middle of established small trends, which, if you have
any charting experience, you already know that this
oscillation is not. Despite there being literally
over a hundred small oscillations over the last 4
months as anyone with a chart can see...
so, 'No' this is not one of the oscillations I
would have even remotely chosen to hop-out on.
especially since I consider this oscillation to be
an intentional downwards 'Push' for a better long-term
entry position by wealthier traders than myself.
I see a 'push' the same as the Wile-E-Coyote in
that old cartoon, pushing backwards on the giant
slingshot just prior to an expected rush in the
opposite direction.
if you are ready to compare your "five for five" vs
my "Four for Five" hops-for-free-shares,
I'm more than eager to learn from you which possible
profitable oscillation I missed . but first, I'd like
to know your profit / loss since mid Dec to see how it
compares with my 16ish % before I decide that your
wisdom is worthy of any learning time.
I have publicly posted every entry exit I have made
since my initial buy on Nov 20th 2015... until you
have done the same we really will not be able to
compare strategies to see what each can add to the
other for our mutual benefit. assuming that 'mutual
benefit' is anything you value.
for part two... 'If' you are being crude, snide or
whatever anyone wishes to call it, I would bother to
respond to your invitation seeking my answer to your
question,,, with a question of my own,
Q > ...
" are you asking that as a way to show your exit timing
superiority which you have yet to display to me ? or,
are you asking me this question because you have been
sitting on a financially negative position for the last
few months and are upset that others profit in a downtrend ?"
for your information, many traders operate 'two dimensionally'
meaning that all movement, whether up or down presents an
earnings opportunity. and, easy to understand strategies are
readily available for both directions. the fact that a very
high percentage of stock traders remain ignorant of this has
always amazed me. especially since in the Commodities trading
world where nearly all my prior experience came from, thinking
one dimensionally about price movement would be considered
a mysterious lack of comprehension.
and please note that, I'm NOT assuming that you need to be told
this as I'm ignorant at this point of your trading expertise,
but your question belays a bit of unawareness of two dimensional
trading experience, or you would easily see that this oscillation
is not displaying any "trend" personality traits. and not have
bothered to have asked me that.
for your information, I'm very happy with my 16ish % earning
in the last four months on this stock which I have happily
reinvested in the form of 4,481 free shares I happily did
not had to personally pay for. if you have been one of the
people entering / exiting in a less fortunate pattern and
might be a benefactor of some of my free shares, then I
maybe should be thankful for that contribution. but I will
happily re-share my exit / entry dates, prices, and shares
volume again, if you'd be interested in seeing it, including
the hop where I lost 466 of the 4,947 free shares I earned.
My current position is ...
14,670 shares, which I paid $ 19,750 for = $ 1.35 per share.
so, at any pps point over that, I'm profitable.
and having 4,481 free shares out of 14,670 means that
over 30 % of my shares are literally "FREE SHARES" ...
please, allow us all to know, the percentage of shares
you hold that are not representative of your total investment ?
I have been trying to verify this "Zacks $ 16 target" with any other source referencing it ... anyone else have any luck with that ?
I've traded myself into 4,400 free shares since mid Jan.
I passed my series 7 exam in NC back in 1982 and worked
for a firm there. I'm not totally uneducated
and having made over 30% on this stock since new years.
I might be doing a few things correct. though, no one
is 100 % ... on one of my 5 hops in / out, I lost 466 shares
just a few weeks ago.
thanks for the heads up about my incorrect date.
and my vetting policy now includes all sources
I may not be reading posting anymore at 4am LOL...
even if my neighbor keeps me awake !
best regards !!!
do I agree with you that I overstated ???
at 1.8% into the trading week ???
at 35 min into Monday morning ? no ...
that seems like a silly time to demand an
explanation to me.
"push" strategies are placed to push a price
past a significant line, not to push a price
towards a significant line ... wait to see
what happens if it gets near $ 1.80 ... see
if any 80k or 100k buys occur ...
on the 2.5 million volume day ...
at 9:35 am the volume was only 59K ...
I just checked that...
we are double that today at 9:35
I already explained and apologized about the date.
I also changed my Avatar after the date SNAFU as a reflection of this morning's hectic stormy activities... had a fence panel blow into our pool at about 2:15 am also, I know exactly when as it is sheet metal and sounded like a car crash !
gonna be fun retrieving that ... after tree limb pickup.
but, I have some NWBO computer-Screen staring to do first !!!
to see how many of Cramer's Street-Gang of 43,000 subscribers Buy into NWBO today !
I knew about 4am, just after I ran out of edit time...
that's what I get for giving too much leeway for stuff my neighbor sends me at 3am all psyched about...
he must have texted me 20 times until about 4am. LOL.
he's freaking out ... funny guy. he's been in for over a year. his break even point is nearly $6 share.
--- Public apology everyone for missing the
woodford article date everyone ! ---
it wouldn't have happened with a slightly longer edit-time-limit !!! my roomies also got in at 3am, from driving 13 hours from an Atlanta convention too... in a rental car cause the giant storm cancelled tons of flights last night !
( Vetting policy modifying,,,, ~ now~ )
aren't these things the same as good news from NWBO ?
Jim Cramer is sending his "Street" Gang after NWBO
to start buying the hell out of it. prob start in
about 6 hours too... several others are telling
their followers to "Buy" or watch NWBO just this
Sunday the 17th !!! it will likely hit $5 + Monday.
The Street - NWBO = one of 8 Stocks under $ 10 for Big Returns
Eight Stocks Under $ 10 for Big Gains !
Realist Investor - NWBO = "Strong Buy"
Strong Buy - Rated a #1
Daily Stock Reporter - NWBO On "Stocks to Watch" List.
Keep an Eye on NWBO
((( Deadline for the 60-Day Warrants is the 29th... just sayin )))
"""The purchase will take place in two closings, with
$11.5 million closing on or before April 8, the remaining
$28.5 million closing on or before April 30"""
Woodford Buying into NWBO for another $ 40 Mil !
now there are three Sunday the 17th Buy / Watch Recommends
for NWBO !!!
The Street - NWBO = is one of 8 Stocks under $ 10 recommended.
Eight Stocks under $ 10 for Big Returns
Realist Investor - NWBO = "Strong Buy"
Strong Buy - Rated #1
Daily Stock Reporter - NWBO On "Stocks to Watch" List.
Stocks to Watch !
I also don't think the timing for this "Push"
accidentally coincides close to a lot of short
positions "Cover Deadlines" either.
the shorts covering will be buying along with
the Cramer Street Gang in the morning...
and I hope to see a press release about NWBO
and the Brand New Parker Institute just announced
last week... since two of the 6 new Parker Institute
sites are NWBO Trial Sites... coincidence ?
now a positive press release about Phase V
about Thursday a couple hours before Friday close...
and our perfect storm will be ready to roll !
+ $ 20 by Friday !
--- On April 17th ---
The Street - NWBO = one of 8 Stocks under $ 10 for Big Returns
Eight Stocks to buy under 10 for Big Returns
Realist Investor - NWBO = "Strong Buy"
Strong Buy - Rated a #1
all the insiders are acting... someone put the word out.
even Jim Cramer from "The Street" Recommended buying NWBO
Sunday the 17th ... Spread the word ! Buyers on the way !
Monday Morning I will expect a tidal wave of buyers with
Jim Cramer's gang and several others being ordered to buy NWBO.
The Cramer Street Gang is kinda large last I heard.
--- On April 17th ---
The Street - NWBO = one of 8 Stocks under $ 10 for Big Returns
Eight Stocks to buy under 10 for Big Returns
Realist Investor - NWBO = "Strong Buy"
Strong Buy Rated #1
the STRONG BUY Tidal wave is starting...
Jim Cramer on the street just put the BUY NOW word out
along with a few others !!!
On Apr 17th ....
The Street - NWBO = one of 8 Stocks under $ 10 for Big Returns
Eight Stocks to Buy under $ 10 for Big Returns !
Realist Investor - NWBO = "Strong Buy"
Good Bottom - Strong Buy
how many million will NWBO get if those 60-day-warrants get converted into shares ? I remember reading that the 60 day warrant was for 5.88 million worth of shares at $ 3 ...
or in shares, about 1,960,000 shares ...
here's the mystery, how many of these 5.88 mil, 60 day
warrants were handed out to investors ?
you estimate about three ? what if it's six ? that
would be 12 million in shares for the dilution-math ...
or about a 10% Dilution, that drives the share value
down as we all know. ( 6 = $ 35 Mil. )
what if there are 12 of those warrant contracts ?
( 23,520,000 shares ... a 20% dilution then )
point is, nothing I read indicated how many of the
60 day warrant contracts were created.
if you saw text that indicated a definitive number,
please share the link . ooo ! 12 contracts = 70 Mil !!!
that would be 70 mil for NWBO, 20% off the share value
for holders. and I never thought long term investors
really will ulcerate over what a share price does
between the time they decided to have confidence in the
company and product, and the time they expect to hit
pay-dirt. unless you sell low, an interim low-share-price
is kinda meaningless.
so if we get diluted, at what start value to we put
into the calculator to dilute us from ???
if the newly freed up money woodruff just grabbed is
used to not just convert his warrant contract(s) but,
to also buy float shares ? hmmm, what happens to a price
when a large influx of buying happens for a couple of
weeks ? all the sellers get de-inventoried ?
many would switch from sellers to holders as the
ratio of buyers goes into the 20 / 1 ratio over sellers.
our float pool was barely 25ish percent of all shares
just before the last dilution, maybe 19% now ? that's
a tiny pond to a fund manager.
where will it peak to ? $4, $7, a dilution from $9.50
wouldn't make too many people cry LOL...
if I were woodruff, I'd buy float shares till there
were no more sellers left in that little pond, and when
the price hit about $ 10 a share, I'd trickle my new 60-day
shares into the float at a slow rate, and have my Feb
investment back in my hands after only about 90 days.
remember, the actively traded shares by us peasants
is not likely more than about 30 million shares. all the
rest are sitting long term in the hands of the primaries,
not being bought and sold regularly like ours are.
a kind of small pond really.
with woody looking at it with a hand full of big pond cash.
that's what I'm almost doing LOL ... no loans tho,
I hate debt. but I moved a chunk of my savings into the stock.
I learned about NWBO from my neighbor last Nov and bought my first 1,600 shares at $ 4.81 Last Nov 20th. since then I've gained 4,481 free shares from hopping off the oscillation peaks.
and from selling stuff I was already gonna sell anyways.
my Limo, my Portable welding business on a trailer, two boats...
( I'm not Duddly Moore in the Movie Arthur, the Limo was one of my many little jobs )
every time the price dropped enough for another buy-in to lower my 'Break-Even' point a healthy amount that's what I always do. my entire focus is on getting my break even price as low as possible... the rest takes care of itself.
I finally ended up with 14,462 shares partially from jumping out on down turning peaks and buying back in at the bottoms. 4,481 of my shares I didn't pay for so I have a $ 1.33 break even point.
it was a $ 1.15 break even but
I bought 4,439 shares at $ 1.62
when I sold my sailboat last week,
which moved my break even point up 17 cents.
my first peak-hop was in Feb.
I sold all my 5,750 shares on Feb 17 at $ 2.42, then,,,
Bought back in on the 29th at $ 1.86 for $ 7,400 shares with
zero added cash, free shares are the best shares !
then hopped back out again at $ 1.82 when the trend resumed that same afternoon to only buy back in again at $ 1.35 on Mar 16th.
ending me up with 10,067 shares. I was out over two weeks that time, right after the dilution... that was my "dilution payoff'.
- trading the way I do, stock dilution is just another payday.
except dilution downtrends are the most reliable ones of all.
I exited again on march 23rd at $ 1.456 then back in on Mar 28th at $ 1.426 giving me another measly 192 free shares for a new total of 10,259 ... only a 3 cents profit on that mini hop.
then another hop for less than a day on Mar 30th exiting at
$ 1.496 and reentering that afternoon at $ 1.434 yielding another 438 free shares, ( total 10,697 ) only a 6.4 cents hop.
but I lost those on Apr 5th on a mistaken downtrend ...
( - 466 shares )
then I put my sailboat money in last week. I'm gonna keep hopping in / out most certainly. I want to earn as many shares as possible before the sept fda report deadline. my goal is to gain at least another 6,000 shares by then.
since I'm sitting on 30% free shares I'm stoked.
if I could get my printing business sold for the $ 4,200 it is listed for, I'd dump that in there also !
if I keep my 85% successful "Hop Ratio' going,
I should have over 20,000 shares by sept,
and a break even price of about 97 cents / share ...
if woodford buys float shares, ( it will be a lot so not a lot of detective work will be needed ) , then when he's done making the $ 3 warrants profitably convertible into returned-investment, followed by trickling those shares back into the float market, that would be a good hop for me !
they have to get the share price far enough above the $3 warrant price, to not only return their recent investment, but also for room for the share price to absorb them returning 6 ?, 12 ?, 20 ?, million shares back into the float pool without getting below their aggregate profit target share price.
well, "IF" that is what happens of course ...
we should know in about 8 days.
a press release about the Parker institute supporting DC-Vax would certainly help out. since two of the six listed centers on the Parker-press-release ARE DC-Vax sites.
he is gonna buy a lot of NWBO before those 60 Day warrants expire on the 29th April... if he's smart, he'll buy out every seller between here and about $ 9.00 ... he has the cash to do it too ! and on top of that, when activity verifies that is exactly what is going on, many sellers will turn into holders making his job easier...
that would make so much more financial sense than buying freshly printed shares and actually diluting the stock he is trying to get well above $ 3.00 before the 29th, so buying float shares is what a smart millionaire would do. driving up the price.
then he will gradually sell off his new 60-day-warrant shares slowly enough to not crash the price downwards. him and whoever the other investors were that accepted 60-day-warrants at $ 3.00 share while thinking, "We will get this investment right back in only about 90 days after we clear out all the sellers ! lets do it !"
two of the six parker institute centers listed have DC-Vax trials ongoing there, UCLA of course and also University of Penn.
new $ 250 mil, cancer immunotherapy center opened.
by billionaire Sean Parker, includes UCLA among the 6
lead cancer centers on board already.
Forbes article about the Sean Parker Investment
there are only 4 open trials ( of the 115 ) at UCLA that
mention Dendritic Cells and only one in phase three
and I'll let you guess who is that only phase three
dendritic cell cancer trial at UCLA ...
list of open trials at UCLA... see the list.
so what are the odds that DC-Vax research was just
mentioned indirectly in the press release about the new
Parker Immunotherapy cancer institute ?
other than DC-Vax what else would UCLA have to offer the
new Parker Institute ?
not a surprise to me. I know an intentional push against a resistance line when I see it. the 10:00 am drive thru the $ 1.70 line had 80,000 shares in 3 min sold at a wide limit to drive the price thru the 1.70 line, BEFORE the price went thru the line.
and --- the 1:35 pm 2nd drive thru the $ 1.70 line had over 100,000 shares sold on a wide limit BEFORE the price went thru the $ 1.70 line.
both spikes were a price reaction to volume, NOT a volume reaction to price. the difference between an intentional push to get a price thru a line, and, natural market movement.
I've successfully done pushes myself. but volume has to be miniscule since I'm not holding 7 figures of shares.
another hint to the pushes theory, is the near absence of volume after the push-spikes very similar to the volume we've been used to seeing all along these last few weeks.
very nice list / post !!!
about the vague video info ...
if this was intentionally constructed to imply that
big deals are afoot, the goal is to fluff the price for
the quick-pay, 60-day warrants recently dispersed,
as to not disappoint the small remaining investors
pool willing to invest in NWBO. there will be another
inference if this one fails to make a $ 3 warrant
valuable. they will need between $ 3.50 / 4.25 to
make the 60 day warrants worth the time of the
investors who recently accepted them.
when the warrants are converted at $ 3 / share
divided by 5.88 million ? ( about 1.9 mil new shares )
per contract issued, ( how many contracts ? ) ???
there will be some small additional dilution from
that. I expect a 30% retracement from the point the
60 day / $ 3 warrants are converted into shares.
--- that's my suspicion at this point.
if this was intentionally constructed to imply that
big deals are afoot, the goal is to fluff the price for
the quick-pay, 60-day warrants recently dispersed,
as to not disappoint the small remaining investors
pool willing to invest in NWBO. there will be another
inference if this one fails to make a $ 3 warrant
valuable. they will need between $ 3.50 / 4.25 to
make the 60 day warrants worth the time of the
investors who recently accepted them.
when the warrants are converted at $ 3 / share
divided by 5.88 million ? ( about 1.9 mil new shares )
per contract issued, ( how many contracts ? ) ???
there will be some small additional dilution from
that. I expect a 30% retracement from the point the
60 day / $ 3 warrants are converted into shares.
has to be soon, a couple weeks.
the only way that NWBO principles could be
manipulating the share price of the 20% being
traded by "US", without buying / selling their
own personal shares and risking the SEC finding
out and arresting them, would be if the mystery
perpetrators of the mysterious Phase V report
was NWBO themselves.
otherwise, the low share price is the fault of
the daily / weekly traders of the 20% float and
that of course, is "Ourselves".
there is one new thing that stood out to me,
NWBO issued recently some 60 day purchase
warrants ? why ? why not 2 year warrants
or 5 year warrants like usual ?
why did the recent investors allow 60 day
purchase warrants to be handed to them as
if they were likely to be valuable ? as if
someone knows that before the 60 days is
up those $ 3 purchase warrants would be
convertible at a profit ?
either NWBO has found a new way to con
the few remaining willing investors, or
someone heard something to cause belief
that in less than 60 days those $ 3 warrants
will be a good idea to have ?
only 348 patients in phase III Trial as of Mar 29 2016
as per slide number 3 used in the tuesday presentation.
not 400, or 380 ...
http://www.nwbio.com/NWBTWorldVaccineCongress_slides3-30-16.pdf
hey, I looked up the previous slide also,
practically identical.
they presented the same data,