Your lying about 'me' Constance Nash LOSING IN DELAWARE, via your personal Proxy Jerry O'Leary SCAM:

Fact is: . 1. Constance Nash was never sued in that court--ever ever ever! i NEVER lost a court case--EVER.
. 2. #2255 10,000 CREDITOR shares owed by Max Sound, issued by boss MD11-Mike Turner, CEO
for Halpern & Adam Levitt swindle: twisted 'get her to sign a bait & switch: she creates a newco called
"VSL Communications Ltd", in London. She won't let MaxD or anybody to touch hi-tech Vedanti Systems.
Globex to issue collateral for creditor eTechInvestments, Robert's financier company that Gloibex issues 10k shares
to eTech. 10 cents a share. They sign bait & switch: MaxD wants Constance Nash, wet signature to copy/paste it to
fraudulent 2014-2024 (8K/10K/SEC Globex & SEC MaxD -look on Edgar: fraud on SEC, IRS, Courts, Investor:

Constance Nash signs 5/16/14 at Greg's home: IOU from MaxD for newco no patents, no Vedanti, no relationship to
Vedanti Systems,never ever. Hence all lost MaxD cases 2014-2022 March, Judge Davila: MaxD & fraudulent lookalike name, Vedanti LICENSING Limited (looks like Nash's high tech co with 29 patents & assets: Vedanti SYSTEMS Limited) and Greg with Jerry O'Leary PROXY name for Mike Turner MD11, JTF, Grant, and others--confused judges, lawyers investors SEC filings lied to Investors, taxes, lenders, to Google, to Netflix, to German Patent Court where Nash filed 2004 to 2012 GRANTS.

Globex Transfer Mike Turner, partner to VLL scam con-artists co-partners with Max Sound & Dave Parkinson, Paul Wheeler, John Blaisure CEO MaxD, Greg Halpern, Grant & Eisenhofer con-artists lawyers for these GLOBAL multi-billion THEFT to SMEAR TO REVENGE on public forums-to the DOJ in BK court-by Mike Turner, co owned by GLENDALE SECURITIES.

Adam Levitt, lawyer not signed but who hustled me 6 weeks after I adamantly refused to work with crash our front door by John Blaisure and con-artist that Greg made a "Finders Fee" without our knowledge: we were not selling, didn't know Hamid Rowshan, and when -not a neighbor owner or renter in Smithcliffs hustled John to our see through beveled glass front door-rang doorbell, we meet tanned stranger. Con-artist Hamid got my phone & text from HOA manual, texted that he had a guest visiting who he wanted to show our interior design he could see from empty home upstairs window. We met.

Our great wonderful life,29 patents around the world, me working all night with China other tine zone lawyers, fighting for my new invention, my prototype 2003 Smartphone in sale to Qualcomm, my Streaming TV from my source code 2002, my other inventions were granted ATW with 'no prior art' distinction. Most of my family loved ones I grew up with were alive, our children and their lives, the joy of a phenomenal (and of course ups and downs one has from unexpected trials and tragedies, but for the most part: we had joy and the fullness of life.

J-Galt aka the other 1/3 of intelligent, educated Michael J. Turner, and his proxy and sick relationship with Jerry O'Leary who he set us up to receive at 10 Smithcliffs, while our CEO with Oracle was in a presale to Oracle. We'd hijacked by Greg Halpern, Mike Turner the heart of MaxD, Adam Leviftt who reeled me into a 'no sale, no license, NO VEDANTI high tech co --just an idea: a plan that he said -and he was right: that Oracle if we showed the buyer in 90 days, the RESEARCH I was asked to research for $500,000.00 MY OWN GOOGLE POST ITS NOTES --that I had no idea how SMITTEN GREG WAS -and certainly I knew zero about pump and dump and money laundering penny stock THAT OWNED Z E R O -it was a scam-.
with Turner too; No Turner, No O'Leary, No Levitt, No MAY 28, 2014 8k, 10k NINE YEARS OF LYING TO SEC & investors: then there would be no destroyed VedantiSystems, never licensed Grantastic to a soul. I'd not be in GH's 35 cases. My patents in Unholy Union opportunity with MaxD-would not invalidate PROOF of Google's crimes!! But I would no sue Google. I would monetize and sell my powerhouse company & inventions to buyer who MONETIZES patents and inventions.

That was RIPPED FROM MY FAMILY, MY LIFE, MY COMPANY MY LAWYERS DEFENDING ME AGAINST TURNER AND HIS FAVORITE JAVELINS PIERCING US IN HIS WHITE COLLAR LAWYERS, MAGGIO & TURNER letters on SMEAR proof crimes: jAVELINS 24/7 for 8 years. Can I get out of it? NO. WELL YES, BUT IT TAKES THE SLOW AND RETURN TO ENFORCEMENT AU, NZ, UK, FL, DE, CA--AND co-conspirator lawyers--after pandemic closed them-to one day the world sees 60Minutes and Google's Unholy Union- chapter & Verse: theft - that GREG HAD NO RIGHTS EVER TO.

There is no way to convince pump and dump money launderers (except Blaisure, he apologized) but in the main, when you folks have hatred in your hearts for me and write 40 pages of UNTRUTHS, and proof of bank accounts in Bob's company name -all major crimes--and traceable -but my life became one of Litigation purgatory, and stolen money, bank accounts, revenge punishments. For what? It emboldens enforcement. A film series -that's difficult because there is so darn much drama and OMG! moments. . I'll make it. They won't.

Con-Artist Mike Turner, Globex money launderer MaxD, created he boasts on Yahoo, Smear website 40 pages of smut, lies, coverups, money laundering proof and no-lawyer-client-privilege to save him or themselves--he's posted a boatload of proof communications from Chipman Brown, Delaware who writes dear Mike, leading the proxy fraud O'Leary vs CREDITOR of MaxD: eTechInvestments Limited: 2007 to 2023 -long run for an alleged thief of $125,000.00 from fake split of 10M shares 2014 #2255 issued to CREDITOR eTechInvestments, who naively ENDORSED $1,100,000.00 with $975,000.00 to be sent to Bob of eTechInvestments CREDITOR issued 5/16/14 NO SALE, no VEDANTI, no PATENTS, no Tech, just small funder group, Greg owned 10M shares to cash in six months.

All con-job. Mike Turner of Globex, which is owned by GLENDALE SECURITIES, set up Constance Nash, who refused to sell my $5B Vedanti Systems and already in presale April, May 2014 to ORACLE CEO by Dave Ronson, VedantiSystems, so Max Sound STALKED, advertised, marketed FAKE OWNERSHIP of 'Technology Redefined' my Optimized Data Transmission System and Method TECHNOLOGY that reduced all frames of data to transmit via Internet to 3%. Impossible? Not really.


Constance Nash, TopFemaleExec-2014 Innovator In Techology, recognized around the world as the mother of invention:
smartphone, streamingTV, cloud, music transmission 2002 under NDA with MP3.com, who asked me for permission 1/2002 to send to partner Steve Jobs. I solved the Com Bust caused by WorldWideWeb NARROW BANDWIDTH. My algorithm is co algorithm of the Internet.

Go to Yahoo Finance/MaxD and see GRANT posting his death! His neat wife Ann Badham Ewing or family must have taken up his hobby.

I didn't for 8 years believe that Grantastic was Grant. But 2 friends insisted he was/is one and the same. I do not know.

What I do know is I NEVER RECEIVED $500,000.00 FOR SELLING MY COMPANY, MY PATENTS, MY INVENTIONS, AND OR MY SOFTWARE AND SOURCE CODE TO GREG HALPERN, OR MAX SOUND AND NOT TO V.L.L. EITHER.

Bad-rap somebody else. There must be a guilty person you could chase with your mean streak.

Look up your HACKING November 2016 into TopFemaleExec-2014.

I told Investor Hub tech division to check the ID's of both TopFemale and the Hacker of 2016 November whose IDENTITY THEFT OF CONSTANCE NASH is a crime. You are the person I allegedly wrote to. You apparently did the hacking.

Kae Ewing of Newport Securities acting as Grantastic led the hacking of TopFemaleExec-2014 November 4 2016 -just before the BIG ANNOUNCEMENT 11/29/16 'max sound buys 50% of stolen property Vedanti Systems Limited--not sold to sellers, but forgers also: V.L.L. that Harvey Vechery funded which is in the 10-K of Max Sound for the big announcement:

Max Sound buys 50% of stolen property Vedanti Systems Limited 11/29/17.

While you hacked my alias here, and engaged in a major crime: you have me 'selling my SOURCE CODE TO GREG HALPERN. It's all part of the files we got in Munich crimes by 4 men who sold with you, MY SOURCE CODE not even named VSL Technology that Greg and you and wheeler and VLL guys concocted. case. ,

Grantastic you hacked my TopFemaleExec-2014 November, 2016. look it up.

You all knew Max Sound was suing Google without owning Vedanti, or patents, or having a contract of sale, or chain of title from owners signatory of all patents, assets, inventions: but the problem was it was too enticing to Greg whose MaxD was in financial arrears to serious Cartel lenders--the enticing part was how easy it was to lie to me, the female, and to Bob who didn't suspect, and to Dillon Ronson, his dad Dave our CEO with a single Koch Bros client for his day job: Oracle, had us in a sale for $5B but it was new, presale not the sale yet to a female CEO of Oracle; our enticing part to Greg and successful history of forgeries, and crimes, and getting lawyers with huge litigation funding paychecks upfront: my value was worth it to his lawyers. It was two years before we saw Forged Greg sale of Vedanti Systems to MaxD but there were half a dozen -at least law suits using Vedanti assets, breaking our backs, and weaponizing the law. Maybe 60 Minutes might want to expose you?

Greg Halpern & his officer Paul Myers-Bennett resident of Colorado Springs cut and pasted from VSL Communications Ltd--which owned nothing at all--and was unformed--Greg said 'you can sign this, nobody will see it'. He was right, he used the signature block to cut and paste onto FRAUDULENT Vedanti Systems Limited -patents, inventions, and no -debt multi-like $50Billion when I presented concept invention 2001 June to 9 partners of managing partner David Braun. He interrerupted interactive presentation: 'you have a FIFTY BILLION DOLLAR concept if you can make software and write a patent, you have the holy trail.' Akin Gump was hired, they wrote patent. I did helm and made the software. But Mike Turner with a bug up his posterior, Greg,Vechery, Blaisure, Wheeler, TGO4, V.L.L. stolen Vedanti from me; all laundered money as insiders of MaxD.

Forged Vedanti Systems Limited high-tech company NEVER IN DEAL WITH MAX SOUND--EVER--
but President of Vedanti Systems Limited Constance Nash photocopied signature -same on both VSL Communications and forged onto falsified Max Sound -buys--and owns-- Vedanti Systems Limited 'fake sale'. Read Case 5:14-cv-04412-EJD 10/01/14: Max Sound, Vedanti Systems vs Google, youTube, On2 Technology for DEADLY PATENT INFRINGEMENT. Why patents and not Trade Secrets which had they at least done that, our murder by Google might not have happened. TRADE SECRETS category was given to another senior genius: Eli Attia, architect GH signed few days after we signed BENIGN -with signature block of Constance Nash, Rob Newell, Halpern, Paul Myers 5/16/14. Forged Vedanti is 5/19/14. Forged May 2017 'fake Lockup JTF agreement he gives proxy in 3 year case to give Judge to get Judgment against eTechInvestments Limited-those 10M shares from 5/16/14 VSL 'safe' but signature block GH puts onto 5/19/14 Vedanti Systems hijacking.

J, no he did not insert poison pill-nothing at all into what Adam Levitt, Esq pitched after we walked from 6 weeks of non-stop GH stalking where he & JB signed secret 4/10/14 Finders Fee with Greg's Korin Daly and her guy watering lawn next door. I said no to flood of offers. Greg & Paul cut & paste from no-tech-no-assets-just me giving myself permission to co-sue Google FOR TRADE SECRETS with Grant & Eisenhofer with 90 days to research or get a no from Oracle we were Vedanti Systems sale with. Hence: VSL Communications Ltd is pitched: ' a safe ' no IP, no tech, nothing at all owned by MaxD. Greg copied and pasted signature block onto false ' worldwide exclusive license' from Constance Nash photocopied signature -same on both VSL Communications and forged Vedanti Systems Limited 'fake sale'. Read Case 5:14-cv-04412-EJD 10/01/14: Max Sound, Vedanti Systems vs Google, youTube, On2 Technology for DEADLY PATENT INFRINGEMENT. Why patents and not Trade Secrets which had they at least done that, our murder by Google might not have happened. TRADE SECRETS category was given to another senior genius: Eli Attia, architect GH signed few days after we signed BENIGN -with signature block of Constance Nash, Rob Newell, Halpern, Paul Myers 5/16/14. Forged Vedanti is 5/19/14

uberblubbermouth-- you DON'T KNOW zip about 1995-2004 transmitting frames -either compressed, or like Qualcomm were frame elimination, or MPEG-1 (compression & dot-com-bust-cause) or MPEG-2 same. Nor do you know jack about PIXEL SELECTION SYSTEM and MY CODE taught ATW in computer sciences and electrical engineering classes-at top and all universities and colleges around the world: IT WAS FOUNDATIONAL you jerk with AUDIO, 1/4 of my Video, Graphical, Textual and Audio pixel selection system: AKA PARTITIONING. I invented it. Changed your narrow life.

Mike Turner, Globex Transfer for MaxD stock you and Effram Rios (see his email admitting your forgeries partnership with Greg Halpern for the con-job of you saying you had 'a friend' who would buy IF WE SENT ENDORSED #2255 10m creditor 5/16/14 as creditor eTechInvestments where MaxD owed $1,000,000.00 contracted cash owed six months ago, and $1,100,000.00 from YOUR CASHED AND STOLEN #2255 stock Bob endorsed, got medallion from Chase, followed your instructions: YOU BROKERED AGAINST SEC LAW -BIG TIME-you pretended -but didn't do it 2022 when 10/18/14 was endorsed FOR GLOBEX to SPLIT-OFF IN 3 BUSINESS DAYS SEC law: you sent YOUR OWN illegal client BY PUTTING HIM ON THE PHONE WITH Bob and me, when you signed 8:32 AM on 20 October, the $1,100,000.00--and subsequently stolen by you Mike--and cashed at your owners SEcurities company: Glendale Securities, Inc, Sherman Oaks (L.A.) CA and managed CEO by main owner George Castillo: you pretended that Greg's 'fake settlement' to withdraw Max Sound vs Google, suing with MY forged NOT SOLD to Max Sound, it was just his crimes and YOURS and your lawyers: all of them, KNEW ABOUT THE FORGERIES. In fact, Adam Levitt, Chicago, former partner let go from Grant & Eisenhofer, SET ME UP, and created UK concept of lookalike name: VSL Communications: he KNEW and participated in Greg's forgeries. How do we know? He showed various lawyers we worked with -who admitted it years later: the GREG FORGED 'falsified license 5/19/14 -of the documents Greg & Adam Levitt submitted the red-hand into 2015 August -600 pages of MaxD baloney: including the original 'safe' SIGNATURES on my own -to be-VSL Communications: owned ZERO, it was Adam's idea to form it and I could join him in 90 days IF I WANTED, after researching whether Google POST ITS NOTES I had after I withdrew from $5B sale with Google all of 2010.

Adam stole the ORIGINAL NOTES. THEN EXTORTED ME 2015 feb 18, when I was served in the same case vs Google, so now I'm both suing Google, and co-defendant:

Case No 5:15-cv-04412--EJD. Judge Davila, Silicon Valley.
Another case was ruled 2022 by Judge Davila: con-men & 50% partners with Max Sound -as per 10-K of 11/29/16 frauds forgeries too: V.L.L. who hid that name and made swindle agreement with us TGO4 LLC (group of 4 in NZ, UK, AU), sold 50% of forged Vedanti Systems to Max Sound.

Who are they: Paul Wheeler, daddy warbucks with deep pockets, and partner in his Franchise Strategies, Adelaide, AU, with David Parkinson, vintner, day trader Auckland, NZ, Dave had purchased "Cartridge World" franchise for England from Paul Wheeler. His partner in Franchise Strategies and forger of Vedanti Systems, is Duncan Powell of Melbourne, Australia, and the 4th guy who Mike Underhill, drummed out of Boise Schiller Flexner for his crimes civil and criminal -like the lawyers co-conspirators in the Trump indictments; V.L.L. & Max Sound partnered right after the Contempt of Court trial that Hawkins and Greg set me up with their own Contempt scam: 12/04/15 -4 days prior to trial I got rid of in Germany 12/08/15: Steve Hawkins pretended -and it was set up that way-with Mike Underhill: Steve would pretend to be CEO active (not the fired CEO of 2011 Christmas)--pretend in 2015 end and 2016 all year that he was really the legal dude of Vedanti Systems. I did trust him the 2nd time around, so good and smooth is he at conning people. But crimes-are beyond cons. The whole Greg & Turner & O'Leary & Glendale Holdings and Glendale Securities Inc and O'Leary Asphalt Inc a gangster crime group pretending that their crimes and frauds on Judge Mary Johnston with his attorneys managed by Mike Turner-you see on here -24/7 Mike brokers to his Jerry O'Leary -and then has the gall or is it galt?--to state that I owe $2M. Nope. I collect $5 Billion and forfeiture and homes, toys and accounts from 16 of them.

Well yoyo, you don't walk or work in my 24/7 2001-2022 shoes.You wouldn't know how to hire 65 lawyers without ripping off somebody to get the money--and then you wouldn't know about MY INVENTION that I used Gone With The Wind and another film with the attorney to show him how I figured out pixel selection system: why not I was a film industry expert -I worked two straight 7 days a week-TWO YEARS learning and writing for my contracted publisher The ScreenWriters Handbook & The Television Writer's Handbook. I also added my editor Virginia after I had my contract from Harper & Row, I added her as co-author: I wrote the book and showed her typed brick upon brick notes from my five days a way in the film industry in Los Angeles. I drove from Corona del Mar and the home I owned myself -as a single woman that I bought myself--because unlike you and your ripping people off -and lounging in the small potatoes of securites I am an Innovator and not just technology, Film Industry too, and the telecom industry -too. So I didn't need a stupid engineer set in stone with no creative sentence in it for me to solve the core issue of the Dot Com Bust -that your Engineers could not figure out HOW TO SOLVE THE NARROW BANDWIDTH OF THE INTERNET.

i DID. Leave my reputation and my career out of your narrow mind and penny stock world.

Grantastic, they knew they were lied to, and those that didn't know about Eli Attia MaxD fraudulent 'settlement' for 4/2021 Santa Clara, CA billion or more dollars MaxD settlement was a bold pump and dump scheme. They all knew it and profited. Even those who heard me warn people they'd lose the investment if they didn't get out in time, they were and are insiders Steve Hawkins who pretends to Munich Patent Court where my 20 countries patents -were (MaxD & V.L.L. got the stolen patents invalidated by Google in trial 2017/2018, Google sued and gang went BK 2020) but Eli Attia PUMP DUMP run for insiders Dave Parkinson CFO VLL paid by Harvey money as filed in 10-K 11/29/16, and VLL boss billionaire PAUL WHEELER for multimillionaire TGO4 scamster who was V.L.L. CFO Dave & CEO Hawkins & funding by Harvey Vechery & Greg, Blaisure, Mike Turner for Max Sound's last PROFITABLE SCAM 'billion in settlement for Eli Attia/ Max Sound 4/08/21 was for 'fake settlement': why fraudulent? 9th Circuit ruled against Appeal and closed Eli Attia's company 12/20/2020.

All investors knew it was a scam. But it was profitable for investors so they gambled.

How would you like it if the Innovator In Technology Constance Nash taught Halpern how to build an honorable company? We could take over. All others are money laundering swindlers such as the O'Leary Asphalt thieves, Globex Transfer Mike Turner and his libelous 40-page grotesque partnership with the Russian hosts LiquidNet who might be the owners of my own domain and identity theft of my Name, and owners of Bob's 2007 -2023 domain of his C- corporation that was the CREDITOR of Greg's Max Sound May 16, 2014: eTechInvestments Limited. Against the law-big time for Dermer and Delaware C Corporation's.

I know Greg. As I've said, he can't help his tendencies, but he's a good father and was a good husband to his wife, so he can control his impulses.
He owns his PREFERRED shares, as I understand it.

Well then--

Constance Nash

Nash did invent only way to get data through the Internet. My patents are granted with No prior art -distinction. Meaning nothing taught invention. And yes, i did make codec and source code: what does it do? It reduces data received 97% transmitting 3% of received data. What did that make possible? Streaming TV, Cloud, SmartPhones, iPads, music streaming,social media came into being 7 years later.
You were bamboozled, all but two guys getting admin payday here.

Dear Board, Yahoo administrators pals of Max Sound --like to block me from even answering or posting. This is in reply today to Grant on Yahoo... -who gave a LINK TO THIS on yahoo. He asks why Max Sound doesn't post these kinds of actions anymore. --- You all know the answer. But you don't know how we won: there is a saying "truth is the daughter of TIME, truth will out." We weren't paid, we were ripped off, he forged documents, forged my signature by photographic lifting of my signature, greg halpern signature, and Paul Myers from buried but valid Representation Agreement:

no Patent litigation, no Vedanti Systems, no Patents -at all, No Licensing, No $3M cash, no 30M shares of debt stock --only Trade Secrets (means no patent infringement folks), and only Post Its Notes in the pleadings, within the claims of litigation: and no Vedanti.

Meaning: my newco to be --formed--to be formed for statute of limitation -we were talked into, including inhouse lawyer Jonathan Gelfand with me since 2001 December 14 when I signed Akin Gump LLP to write the Patent from our July concept.

So he and I were talked into "the statute of limitations" was 8/13/14 --based upon Greg argued (and he was correct): it's 'when you first knew" about Google using our trade secrets:

I formed VSL Communications Ltd (UK) June 12 2014, to co-sue with Adam Levitt of Grant & Eisenhofer and unsigned yet -with Adam -Max Sound.While Vedanti officers were busy selling Vedanti Systems. We could not allow it to be public, or engaged in litigation. Nobody could buy it. It was a hard sell for Greg to force me to the table. But I did, and with my strategic litigation plan after his badgering: Minewas $132 Billion -treble damages; with Post Its Notes seen on each page of Complaint. Google should settle. --that is not what Max Sound did. They buried the contract. We only found it 2016 after Contempt of Court -where Max officers perjury was rampant and deep: including 'vedandi contract 5/19/14 -bogus forged contract'. The rest is a history of Greg's making. And our wins, dozens of lawyers. While Max Sound's is free: his shareholders pay for the cash register. He pays lawyers. They are not contingency: and when they are? They get $4M Litigtion Funding -loans. As did Greg Halpern he admitted May 2015. We got zip. But won anyway. All the way through 2 rulings by Northern District Court; and through Mannheim, Germany--you read about yesterday from Life of Brian --who got it right; and we won Contempt of Court, even though the judge was hooked on the perjury salactious nature of Greg Halpern's false Affidavits; we won in Arbitration; we won Appeals Court: I filed Amicus Brief as Constance Nash to prove that the Declaration under Penalty of Perjury -was more than perjury by Greg Halpern: I couldn't have been at his home office signing another -forgery -to prove 1st forgery was a forgery: I was in Lake Tahoe, getting married, and in Yosemite, and without computer or anything

but a phone call while we're in Carson City Nv; came from Greg Halperh: 'hurry, hurry, I have my Investors here, they need an address for VSL Communications Ltd.' "I don't have one, we aren't formed yet. We aren't Delaware. But we don't have a foreign VSL Communications Ltd. He pressed, nobody will see it, my investors need it for the contract we're amending taking Delaware off of it, as you instructed, and removing Bob's name since he doesn't know technology." I give him a lawyer address.


-he writes a bait & switch contract we don't read, --very late-script memorized, my staff is there in office: Joe, Dillon, Bob, me, while Paul's husband, David, is in the car outside (he's with the Federal Reserve in San Diego, transferred from Colorado Springs; David, a smart, quiet, intelligent guy, hates anything to do with Greg Halpern and/or Max Sound antics, says David).

I sign ,it's 'aw shucks' Paul Myers, 3 hours late, arrives, ready to take away Source Code for lawyers to test then return'; 'just initial, David's in the car, you know he has no patience.' sign here. I do it. What's in the contract that we don't know? 'worldwide Exclusive Ownership--aka -Exclusive License', and lies about a VSL owning patents, he nick-names "ODT'.

Right afterwards, and I didn't even have a copy: Bob was instructed as part of the 'game plan script bait & switch' -Bob was to scan it and send right away to Greg, while David and I hurry back to Del Mar'. Bob turns it over, doesn't read it as Paul makes sure the deed is done, Bob scans and emails back to Greg Halpern: bingo. Then that Sunday May 25, 2014 documents is memorialized on Yahoo Financial.

Where our London based, successful Brit, --CEO Eric Van Der Kleij found it on Yahoo 5/28/14.Eric calls me, and then he flew to Greg and got him to remove all of lies -that were not in the 5/16/14 Trade Secrets -(and buried from us and SEC for years).

Greg smiled and said, 'all connie had to do was ask." I did. But Eric was powerful. Greg didn't remove most of the lies because he said "the SEC has been filed, I have to stick to the 5/25/14 (fraudulent) agreement.

The rest is history. We win.

But our company and it's no debt-valuable company --all are losses are massive: we never did get to monetize Vedanti Systems. The buyers who advertise as VLL now --but were in -and tecnically still bound by the terms --they breach, and I think they just thought lawyers could run a company like an knowledgeable entrepreneur can (mistake in judgment).

Thus Vedanti Systems Limited, 2017 July 19, 2017: has not monetized either. But they did join Max Sound in stock trading. They took at least 80M shares of MaxD. They might get something going in Germany, in a Netflix or a Google settlement. I wouldn't know except for what Rurouni tells the boards.

However, whatever is going on in Germany, since USA is in Appeal, as I said it would be in April 2014 if anybody with 1 patent was dumb enough and foolish enough to sue Google without Post Its Notes and for Patent Infringement; the patents can't be monetized.

Even though buyers TGO4 LLC, Delaware, for Vedanti Systems Limited ,in a joint venture of terms with Seller's Disclosure contract too; thus TGO4 LLC or VLL or Vedanti Systems as well as Max Sound who are said by MaxD to be "owners of the Vedanti 22 patents and inventios" all are bound by the terms of the 2 phase 11/17/15 & 3/17/16 sale contract.

That means Sellers are supposed to know what's going on in terms of revenue and contracts and losses, etc. Our patience ran out the minute TGO4 LLC said 'we have a $79.5M license discussion going on with Netflix and similar amount with Google: that was said to us Adelaide Australia with all 4 partners: 9/22/16. Plus, VLL-MaxD Joint announcement to the trade: Vedanti Licensing Limited and Max Sound are co-owners of the Vedanti Systems Patents.' Nobody knows for sure.

Constance Nash


December 18, 2015 15:46 ET

MAXD Lawsuit Update From CEO
SANTA MONICA, CA--(Marketwired - December 18, 2015) - Max Sound Corporation, (MAXD) provides an ongoing summary of its legal actions against Google and VSL.
Dear MAXD Shareholders,
Many of you have been inquiring about how the cases against Google are going. I'd like to take this opportunity to give you a brief description of where things stand and what we expect next.
First, let me start by refreshing your memory on what the lawsuits are about.

In 2014 Max Sound (MAXD) identified patented technology called "Optimized Data Transmission System and Method" that would complement our audio technologies and began negotiations with the owner of that technology, Vedanti Systems Limited, to acquire rights to the technology. In mid-2014, MAXD signed a Licensing and Representation Agreement (the "Licensing Agreement") with VSL Communications, a corporation created by Vedanti to transfer to MAXD the rights to the ODT Patents and related technology. VSL also granted MAXD the right to sue Google and its affiliates for their worldwide infringement of the ODT Patents, as discussed in our press release dated December 11, 2014 http://finance.yahoo.com/news/max-sound-corporation-files-multi-032500895.html In the fall of 2014, MAXD initiated patent infringement lawsuits against Google and its affiliates in the United States and Germany
Unfortunately, after Constance Nash, the CEO of VSL & Vedanti, signed the Licensing Agreement and MAXD paid the agreed upon compensation for the rights to the ODT technology, Nash decided not to honor the Licensing Agreement and began to take actions to undermine MAXD's efforts to enforce the rights to the ODT technology granted to it in the Licensing Agreement. As a result, MAXD was forced to initiate legal proceedings against VSL to protect its rights under the Licensing Agreement, while continuing to pursue claims against Google for infringement of the ODT Patents.
The Legal Team
As most of you are aware, MAXD has retained experienced legal counsel in the United States and Germany to enforce the ODT Patents against Google and its affiliates for their infringement of the patents. MAXD's attorneys in the United States agreed to handle the US lawsuit against Google on a contingency fee, reflecting their belief in the strength of MAXD's patent infringement claim. Together, we feel justice will be served, and MAXD and our Shareholders will prevail!
Legal advisors of MAXD in the United States: Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. www.gelaw.com, and Buether Joe & Carpenter, LLC www.bjciplaw.com.
Legal advisors of MAXD in Germany: Arnold Ruess, Dusseldorf http://www.arnold-ruess.com, and Wittmann Hernandez, Munich http://www.wh-ip.com.
As you are aware, in any legal proceedings, often much of the information surrounding the cases must remain confidential, but here is some information we're able to share with you on these lawsuits. Below are brief summaries for your consideration:
Northern District of California Action
On November 24, 2015 the Northern District Court granted Google's Motion to Dismiss based only on the issue of standing. Our legal team is confident that the Court improperly applied the standard applicable to a party claiming standing as a "virtual assignee" rather than the standard applicable to a party claiming standing as an "exclusive licensee" such as MAXD. This error resulted in a ripple effect of additional errors committed by the District Court resulting in the erroneous conclusion that MAXD lacked standing to sue the Google Defendants for infringement of the '339 Patent.
MAXD claims to have standing as the category of licensee -- an exclusive licensee with the exclusive right to enforce the '339 Patent against the Google Defendants but less than all substantial rights under the patent. The District Court, however, incorrectly analyzed MAXD's standing under the more restrictive "virtual assignee" standard. As the District Court stated, "'the party asserting that it has all substantial rights in the patent 'must produce . . . written instruments documenting the transfer of proprietary rights.'" Id. This requirement however, does not apply to an exclusive licensee, such as MAXD, who does not contend it has been granted "all substantial rights in the patent." Instead, the Federal Circuit has repeatedly held that a license may be written, verbal, or implied, and only if a party contends that it has standing because it holds a license qualifying as a "virtual assignment" must the license be in writing. Thus, contrary to the District Court's ruling, MAXD is not required to produce a written instrument signed by Vedanti documenting the transfer to it of rights to the '339 Patent in order to prove standing as an exclusive licensee. Instead, MAXD can show that it acquired the exclusive right to enforce the '339 Patent against the Google Defendants though an exclusive license, express or implied, based upon any form of evidence, written or verbal. The District Court committed reversible error by applying the wrong "virtual assignee" standard to determine if MAXD had exclusive licensee standing and then ruling that MAXD did not prove standing because "MAXD has not shown through written instruments that it received 'all substantial rights' to the '339 patent."
The record contains substantial evidence sufficient to show an express or implied exclusive license from Vedanti, through VSL, to MAXD to enforce the `339 Patent against the Google Defendants. The MAXD License itself expressly provides that MAXD has been granted the "Exclusive Right" to sue "pre-approved violators of VSL's intellectual property rights." The License identifies the patents entitled "Optimized Data Transmission System and Method" as among "VSL's intellectual property rights," and the '339 Patent is one these ODT patents. The undisputed evidence also shows that the Vedanti and VSL considered the Google Defendants to be "pre-approved violators" of the ODT patents.
Significantly, Google did not submit any evidence to rebut MAXD's showing that VSL was the agent or alter ego of Vedanti, and the District Court did not make any findings of fact inconsistent with this evidence. Indeed, the District Court's order completely ignored MAXD's evidence establishing that VSL entered into the MAXD License as the agent of Vedanti. Instead, the District Court only addressed the issue of whether VSL should be deemed the alter ego of Vedanti and improperly conflated the agency issue with the alter ego issue.
Finally, the District Court's ruling that the MAXD License did not transfer to MAXD any rights to the '339 Patent because "that the agreement does not reference the '339 patent anywhere in the document" is erroneous. The MAXD License grants MAXD the worldwide rights to intellectual property relating to technology called "Optimized Data Transmission System and Method" (the "ODT Technology")." The '339 Patent is entitled "Optimized Data Transmission System and Method" and, therefore, is included in the licensed ODT Technology. The patents rights granted to MAXD in the MAXD License are described in generic terms and apply to ALL of the Vedanti ODT Patents. Section 1.01(a) of the agreement provides that "VSL hereby grants MAXD the worldwide license to ODT Technology." Similarly, Section 1.03 of the agreement provides that "VSL is granting the Worldwide License to MAXD to VSL's ODT Technology for all fields of use." The ODT Technology includes the ODT Patents.
While preparing to file an appeal, MAXD is simultaneously seeking that the Superior Court compel the inventor and VSL to comply with the Licensing Agreement (see Superior Court heading below), which should give us the opportunity to restore the claim without an appeal.
German Court Action
On December 8, 2015 MAXD was apprised that the inventor and VSL had ignored the US Superior Court's December 4th Ruling, and through a new German attorney hired by VSL, Nash (inventor of the '339 Patent) made additional inaccurate, misleading and unlawful statement(s) to the court thereby tainting the proceedings. Therefore, after careful consideration, MAXD and its legal team decided to withdraw its German claim against Google and its affiliates, in order to protect our ODT patent rights in Germany from irreparable harm. One of the several strategies we are employing is to pursue our damage claims and legal recourse against VSL and Nash (see below).
American Arbitration Association Proceeding
In August 2015, MAXD initiated an arbitration proceeding before the American Arbitration Association to confirm the rights it was granted by VSL pursuant under the Licensing Agreement and to prevent VSL, Nash and related parties from interfering with those rights. On August 25, 2015, an Emergency Arbitrator issued an Emergency Preliminary Injunction Arbitration Award in favor of MAXD prohibiting VSL from 1) disavowing the validity of the Contract (with MAXD); 2) altering any corporate or other entities formed, owned or controlled by VSL that has any connection with the Contract; or 3) licensing, selling, assigning or transferring, any of the technology, patents, or intellectual property, connected to the Contract in any manner, and 4) is required to cooperate with the pending ODT enforcement litigation and fulfill its contractual obligations.
Superior Court Action
MAXD filed a petition in California Superior Court seeking confirmation of the Emergency Arbitration Award. On Friday December 4, 2015 a California Superior Court ruled in MAXD's favor and confirmed the Emergency Arbitration Award against VSL. VSL attempted to overturn the decision by the California Superior Court by seeking a Writ of Appeal from the California Court of Appeals on December 10, 2015. The Court of Appeals denied VSL's appeal on December 16, 2015.
Moving Forward
The Board of Directors and I are fully convinced that our legal strategies will confirm the Company's Rights to all ODT Patents worldwide (including the US '339 Patent) originally granted to MAXD under the License Agreement. MAXD will revisit pursuing enforcement of these rights in Europe after the MAXD completes enforcement of its rights confirmed by the Emergency Preliminary Injunction Arbitration Award in Superior Court. We anticipate full enforcement of the Emergency Preliminary Injunction Arbitration Award through the Superior Court, and believe this will have a positive effect on the issue of its standing to enforce the `339 patent against Google in Federal Court. Thereafter, we plan to license and/or enforce the ODT Patents pursuant to our rights with the substantial universe of companies infringing the ODT patents.
As always, I look forward to providing you with a full Company update in early January 2016. At that time I'll share information and share with you the progress made in 2015 and the outlook for 2016. Feel free to contact me anytime at john@maxsound.com.
Happy Holidays & Best Wishes from all of us at MAXD.
JOHN BLAISURE
CEO MAXD Corporation

This is CD11. He somehow knows about the Forged 5/19/14 Nash signature on a Max Sound created fraudulent 'Vedanti Systems Limited' contract.

A phony contract that was found in some 600 documents to Judge Davila's Northern District Court: submitted under Penalty of Perjury by Max Sound and their lawyers' October 2015: declarations too, under penalty of perjury. Those forgeries kept popping up, even after case was dismissed and for very concrete and reasoned findings about 'no standing' and why: 11/24/15 was dismissed.

Greg and Rurouni, I would not allow, nor countenance lawyers' and Maxd theft of 2001-2014 $32 Million spent on growth of 'from dirt-concept--patents and inventions.

Your grotesque marketing by you all as 'worldwide license' and worldwide OWNERSHIP' of Vedanti Systems and/or VSL Communications Ltd confusion to readers.

And the inventions? They are not Max Sound's inventions. Never were. Our CEO and officers could not sell the assets May 30, 2014--onward; not after Max Sound and Halpern tried to convince the world that the owners of Vedanti were so damned stupid that they would hand over Billions of Dollars to a penny stock guy who has what? a phony audio company? No. I signed for Trade Secrets and Post Its Notes for Adam Levitt, a famous, successful litigation lawyer: but that didn't happen. You lied, buried Trade Secrets, buried Post Its Notes. And lied all over the Internet, lying that you had a contract for Patent Infringement.

Your Netflix lies and litigation you sued them and Google with, who shared same law firm with in Germany: threw my German patent May 2015 --2015 May --into INVALIDATION QUEUE.

Think anybody can sell or monetize to an outside buyer with Invalidation -a fact -in Germany? Think we should have kissed your ass and said -that's okay, though we didn't know you and lawyers stole us there too (and don't tell this board -well it was your idea Connie)

- because that would only be true in context of what you didn't do: you didn't file with us as VSL Communications Ltd /Max Sound vs Google: for Trade Secrets and with Post Its Notes on each page -or on any page: none were used. Worse, You sued as Vedanti Systems when you had no contract. To have done so would destroy Vedanti Systems. And worse than all of that? you signed a 7 figure penalty with Google in August 2014: 'if any post its are seen on the media you and each lawyer will be fined a 7 figure penalty'. We knew none of that, none of your antics.

Northern District dismissed 11/24/15: shortly thereafter, Google filed Invalidation of USPTO patent of mine and our group Vedanti; exactly what I fought against with Max Sound. Then Max Sound also filed Appeal 9th Circuit. And too, they wanted to 'prove' the first forgery wasn't a forgery -though that was impossible, they found 'another document' and said it wasn't a forgery, so they used a 2nd forgery under penalty of perjury to prove the first forgery wasn't a forgery. I was cited as being the author of that lie; I got Chicago lawyer Robert Greenspoon to submit to Judge Devila -my Amicus Brief: proving that I was out of state, and futhermore, we had travel receipts -and more t prove their perjury.

A 2nd ruling by Judge Davila was February 2016: he ruled that VSL Communications Ltd was a separate corporation, that Constance Nash was not an alter ego of either, and furthermore, there was NO CONTRACT FOR LICENSE OF PATENTS AND TERMS SUBMITTED TO Northern District. So Max Sound made another run at that. With additional forgery.

"insert from IHub records: this one from a CD11: giving the dictionary explanation of Forgery."


Monday, 06/13/16 08:17:35 PM
Re: Rurouni post# 4728
Post #
4729
of 7452 Go
Ohhhhh ok, so Maxd decided they needed a contract from Vedanti (the patent owner) that makes sense. Then they decided to just fabricate one and use specifically in their evidence?

Definition's of FORGERY

'The act of making or producing an illegal copy of something so that it looks genuine, usually for financial gain'

'The action of forging a copy or imitation of a document, signature, banknote or work of art'

Hmmm this raises a bit of a flag and seriously Ru what a stupid explanation!!


iHub NewsWire

This is from Life of Brian.


Tuesday, 02/23/16 02:03:42 PM
Re: Rurouni post# 2691
Post #
2698
of 7451 Go
"If the German case, if the German case.............."

It's a broken record. Greg, you and I both know that the German case failed due to the MAXD mismanagement of and your inept counsel and experts. I repeat:

As I have already stated on this forum, I had a friend in court on Dec 8th 2015 in Mannheim, back in the days when I believed MAXD was a sound investment (no pun intended). You were there Greg and you will recall the reasons that Judge Kircher was going to pronounce a decision on the day of the hearing rather than wait the obligatory 2-3 weeks and why at that point MAXD's lawyers withdrew their claims rather than wait for the decision.

The judge gave 5-reasons with there was no-infringement and none had anything to do with Ms Nash:

1. Vectors that merely indicate a relationship with an earlier frame are not pixel data. Although the expression "pixel data" is broad, the interpretation cannot be without limits. This is confirmed by the purpose of the invention: the patent does not want to compress, but vectors represent compressed data that are decomposed on the receiver's side.

2. Data that merely relates to such vectors to blocks but not to individual pixels is not pixel data. Pixel data is only data that is related to individual pixels.

3. It is not sufficient that such vectors are determined just for some regions and not for all regions because the claim says "each block". MAXD wants to make a difference between expressions "every" and "each", but this is not convincing. Also in the description of the patent, there is no hint that one could leave away data for some of the regions.

4. There is no selection of pixel data because only one vector is determined per block and it is always this vector that is transmitted.

5. No selection is made on the basis of the degree of detail of the frame, but if at all on the basis of the degree of detail in a previous frame.

Judge Kircher then went onto say that since there are so many reasons of non-infringement, we do not have to discuss other defences.

So, in a nutshell, Ms Nash had absolutely nothing to do with the infringement case failing in Mannheim and to claim otherwise is not only disingenuous but a lie. The blame for the case failing falls fairly and squarely on the shoulders of the MAXD management, the MAXD lawyers and the MAXD so-called "experts" who prepared the case.

Good luck with crucifying Ms Nash, you may well succeed in one form or another however I can state unequivocally that MAXD will never make a cent from the Vedanti patents.



iHub NewsWire

Erroneous filings from Rurouni on Yahoo state that "Netflix" would have paid money for licensing in 2015" Not true. They called David Perry of K & L Gates to ask if Vedanti Systems was owned by Max Sound and if the German patent was signed by Constance Nash, of record for the European Union patent. The answer to that was simple: Max Sound had no License Contract, and a phony baloney make-believe Sept 2014 'Confirmed License' piece of paper, means zero. zip.

So folks, the Yahoo message board with baloney about Attia's showing how Nash could have won for Netflix' is pure b.s. The lawyer who kicked Greg's and Rurouni butt was Tab Turner: the 'settlement' Rurouni speaks of today on Yahoo was Tab taking back the stolen company EA Technology and the "bait & switch" theft Greg and Paul Myers created on a contract of May 2014 that held in first paragraph, covered by a stapled $93,000 check for the launch of the smoke and mirrors law suit Greg created to be Suit #2 against Google in May 2014: Greg stole the ownership and Blaisure concurred that it was true: he didn't see anything 'wrong' or immoral, or unethical in the Attia's signing what they hadn't read. You will jump on them, and on me too for that, but you dont know the lengths Greg goes to, to set up a 'scenario' where we sign, in a hurry, with total trust in the magician's henchman Paul Myers 'aw shucks' lanky nice guy COO-and SEC compliance officer Paul.

Tab is also our attorney. He called Greg and read riot act to him, and only recently. Greg returned ownership of the technology and inventions of Eli Attia. His post doesn't say THAT. But that is what it is.

As for Netflix and that horsecrap, the boys came to me mid-April 2015: Netlix will pay us $25M if you will sign over Vedanti patents to Max Sound.' Then the price changed to $50M and then more. Still: remember: Greg and MaxD officers stole Vedanti identity. Then made up 'logo' "ODT", then pretended to courts and to judges that "ODT" meant the patents owned by Vedanti. Then they filed with courts and judges and cases against Google, YouTube, On2 Techology --and too: they wrote 90% fiction, fairy tale -under penalty of perjury August 9, 2014 Max Sound, Vedanti Systems vs Google, YouTube, On2 with my patent '339. Fiction. Starting from first sentence through to most of the paragraphs. And worse, Greg could have made you all very rich: he had a contract May 16, 2014, (he buried until he trotted it out to Judge Davila October 2015 for the Dismissal I wanted badly -for Max Sound and their horse-crap thefts that would lead to what?

IPR, Appeal, PTAB, Nullity court Germany --name it, we could not sell or monetize with his crap and these stories. We couldn't. And if Vedanti can now, it is thanks to me for entrusting Vedanti into JV hands of TGO4 LLC buyers in 2 parts: 11/17/15 -50%, and 3/17/16 50%. With terms. Terms that include us seeing the German case, seeing if Bardehle settled with Google, or with Quinn Emanuel in Germany 2016, since I allowed Bardehle to sue Netflix, Google, On2, Adsense, and YouTube with my patents.

I signed it November 22, 2015. So I was the signatory. Greg wasn't. He got kicked out of Mannheim for lying. And cheating.

Now he is riding coattails. But why do you suppose? Not because he was right to be a major thief and con-man. Then why? Would it have anything to do with Steve Hawkins, TG04 LLC, and Vedanti getting back-dated filing dates? Or did Max Sound really and truly end up with Contractual ownership of each patent? is their name on the patents? That is what Netflix and Google need.

And if it is? Well: they all owe us $114,000,000.00 that Tab Turner will collect. Why? Ethical and obligated to us by funded buyers of Vedanti Systems: funded by financiers and builders: Constance Nash, eTechInvestments, Cornerstone Group, and lawyers, some 65, we estimate, K & L Gates' David Perry, and Chris Rourk who wrote the patent and filed for Akin Gump, and on through to Bardehle, in Munich 2015 11/22/15, and Brinkhof in Amsterdam I wrote to, and we and new partners retained 2015, and Robert Asher who did the IPR 2015 -I hired him, and he used to be my patent lawyer in 2013-2014 January. The list is full of costly and notable law firms. We hired them, and built the company assets that Greg likes to boast are his. I rather doubt it. But I do know how Attia's got their assets back: great lawyer Tab Turner.

Constance Nash

Max Sound hooked up with unsuspecting -I guess -buyers of Vedanti. Greg is beyond believable. I believed him that he'd co-sue for Trade Secrets for a newco VSL Communications Ltd, while our CEO Eric van der Kleij and Dave Ronson, and others, were selling Vedanti Systems.

But, when I met Dave Parkinson, Paul Wheeler, Duncan Powell and Steve Hawkins last year in Adelaide, Australia because I thought I was flying to get Pleadings files withheld from me since I even signed for Vedanti and patents and since the part 2 of the sale, Bob and I were sitting a hour at the Adelaide table, being yelled at,

pounding table by Dave Parkinson, irate coming out of the gate -irate with me -and he said he was joining Greg Halpern to sue me, "I have a binder full of stuff about you." yada. That was September 22 2016.

They left us, didn't return after an hour. We needed the Germany, Ireland, Luxembourg, Switzerland court cases' pleadings. We've not seen Greg's of the stolen German patents case against Netflix, YouTube, Google, On2. And worse we funded our buyers in a JV, but are locked out from hour one and have't seen the pleadings, answers, status, Nullity court, nothing. We see Hawkins ad team borrowing, funding from our assets. And we have a plan, they heard from Tab Turner, a great litigation hero to many.

In Adelaide, after long flight, check in and walk into the conference room at hotel, we were kicked in face, lied to, yelled at and faced 4 folks who said 'how expensive Vedanti was' (duh), and that we had to join them in partnering with Max Sound. No way. But the reason for Hawkins, CEO with Max Sound partnership and giving Greg Halpern those patents Greg and Rurouni lied to you about for so many years, was not what you'd expect: or maybe you would: Hawkins and team didn't follow our money-making joint venture funded contract; when they started running out of their spigot of money from Wheeler, they made a contract to become Max Sound Securities business.

Read Rurouni on Yahoo. He said so. It makes sense from TG04 perspective. Pump and dump profits. LIke Blaisure, Halpern, Paul 'chicken s..t' Paul Myers, Forgeries, buried contracts, stolen stock from eTech 10 Million "VSL" shares endorsed, then stolen, then sued, shares sold and hidden from us; so Myers' and Halpern and Blaisure for SEC compliance might be in a speck of trouble. But for VLL, they don't care, they sued Max Sound for Forgery and then cut a better deal at same time.

As for Germany; none of them licensed the Source Code or the Software. They can't settle. And if they do? They didn't license.

They were supposed to. But instead while in Australia Wheeler wrote "we are disavowing the Disclosure." -that Disclosure Grantastic was Part 4 of the 1,2,3,4 part Contract. It had the licensing section in it. But we didn't disallow the Disclosure; they even wrote it and were paid for doing so, we were upfront, and we would not come along nearly a year later and disavow the terms and conditions of the partnership to funded JV sale.

Thus, if Maxd-VLL or something else, are trying to settle the Coding issue for the lawsuits that they did behind my back when I was signatory of Vedanti Systems in Germany, it won't fly. All of the lawyers in Germany and Wilson Sonsini in the US, know that the Coding their clients are sued for in the lying Pleadings I've only seen from Max Sound -online; but if they continue to try to settle with Source Code in the argument against Google, but of course not against Netflix, they can't license the Coding, codec, source code and related algorithm. They just can't. The Asian owners have them.

Grantastic, you are right. But you don't know just how correct you are. I'd like you to be wrong, that way my 2004-to-now-team and I who signed a contract believing that TGO4 LLC would keep the terms which was essentially a joint venture, would succeed. And none of us would hate the sight of "maxD -VLL" have 'wink wink -surprises for the faithful' so writes Rurouni. None of them can make a product.

Constance Nash

Guitarman, even if Lloyd Trammel could set up a studio and tinker around, he won't be doing it for Greg Halpern or John Blaisure or his old name business Max Sound Corporation.

As for similiar audio: all I know is our guys and I too, knew for a fact, that Lloyd did not invent what my patent invented, he knows it too. Lloyd never claimed it did. Greg tried to force grumpy (that day)June 12, 2014 in Greg's home in front of our CEO from London: Eric van der Kleij, who flew over to make Greg kill that bait & switch May 25 2014 stealth-signed- contract that Greg & Paul Myers slipped in a boatload of false statements: 'worldwide exclusive license'.

Usually, friendly folksy, honest Lloyd refused to play his MaxD audio. He was ornery. Packed up and drove home, furious with Greg. Eric van der Kleij is formidable; he's also an inventor, and his field of use was /is audio. He was to sell Vedanti Systems, until he found Greg advertising on Yahoo Financial: 'worldwide ownership of ODT patents' Optimized Data Transmission System & Method. It wasn't true. Eric couldn't however, sell our company: why not? 'he said, she said' phenomenon: court cases and Greg saying 'she did sign'.

Until Silicon Valley judge who knew whereof he spoke, ruled I didn't sign. Then Greg submitted Forgeries, so Judge ruled on VSL Communications this time in 2016; he didn't know the forgeries were forgeries, he did know that there were thousands of documents, but none for License Contract terms and conditions. And none from Vedanti to VSL Communications. Appellate proved that too.

TGO4 lawyer Boies Schiller filed June 2016 in Judge Davila court: Fraud Upon the Court: the forgeries. Our lawyers who worked with Boies too, filed the Forgeries in ICDR and Arbitration. And Greg filed them in Appeals court. Appeals ruled in favor of Northern District. And I filed an Amicus Brief in Davila's court, October 2016.

I don't know if Lloyd Trammel is still in court. You can look up San Diego Superior court: Max Sound vs Lloyd Trammel.

Constance Nash

Hi, if the name is Steven J.D. Hawkins, it must be as an officer because he always laughs that 'his eyes glaze over when lawyers talk about patents to him.' True, he doesn't know inventions or patents or prosecution.

He's a good guy, he'll want to be upfront with you, if there is a signed contract, he'll tell you. I'd hope he'd show folks too because Max Sound is a pink sheet company that has to show S.E.C. the contract for a major event. Another good guy is Duncan@vedantilicensing.com. He'll tell you the truth, he's cognizant of S.E.C. regulations.


Constance Nash

I only created the patents for Cornerstone, then assigned starting January 1, 2012 through to October 2012 to Vedanti Systems Limited formed Thanksgiving 2009 while I was working in London. The Google deal was with Cornerstone Group Ltd patents. Not with Vedanti patents, there was no such thing. We didn't know about Vedanti Licensing Limited.

I don't know when Vedanti Systems assigned to Vedanti Licensing Limited nor do I know who the signatory is. I learned of MaxD-VLL via MarketWired, and from Rurouni on these message boards. Our Sellers terms do not allow for that to happen. But that's a different story.

As for the Appeal of the IPR, it has to be preserved, so an appeal has to be filed before deadline. But the same team can't win. Why not? Nobody there can tell the judges how the invention was invented. That is me.



Constance Nash

Urban, I am unaware of a signed contract. Some of the message board guys know John Blaisure. He can show the contract because a public company is required to share executed contracts. They can advise the board. As for the IPR, the appeal has to be preserved. But there is nobody to save the claims that were invalidated. It takes more than 'a lawyer' to achieve the near impossible. I believe I can do it, but I'd have to own the entire company. That isn't likely to happen.
Constance Nash

Sadly, Lloyd signed off of all ownership a year ago January, 2016. He has nothing. And no building either. Santa Monica bungalows were razed.

Many of you asked what the IPR / PTAB future of Vedanti Systems is. PTAB statistics are quoted to me from Paul Morinville: US Inventor Group, "off the top of my head, I think Apple is the most common petitioner. Now sure who is the most common defendant.

The PTAB kills at least one claim in more than 90% of its decisions. Claims are selected by the petitioner, so killing the selected claim generally neuters the enforceability of the patent, so for all practical purposes it kills the patent.

During the pendancy of the PTAB, suits are generally stayed. It burns at least four years of the patent's life. That lost time is not added back to the patent term. It is just lost.

The PTO argues that about a third of PTAB petitions are settled, so the PTAB encourages settlement. What they don't tell you is that these settlements are made under the very real threat of invalidation of the patent. So, settle for pennies or we will kill your patent. they are not settlement, they are extortion. "

That gentlemen is WHY I WOULD NOT GIVE Max Sound a License of Patents, Not Vedanti Systems, no Patent Litigation. And why I formed VSL Communications Ltd when he introduced Adam Levitt and Beuther because I would only co-sue -at his arm-twisting for weeks -I would allow Trade Secrets & Post Its Notes, and no Vedanti. He didn't do it.

Here we are: 4 years later.

Constance Nash, Top Female Executive

Hi, no we have nothing. Neither does VLL. As for Germany, all I know is that when I owned Vedanti Systems Limited, Max Sound's Greg Halpern decided he could steal MY COMPANY, MY PATENTS, MY LIFE. He had no contract to do that. He has to tell you and the world at large, that he did have that contract. But he didn't. And if he had had it, then the seasoned, knowledgeable Silicon Valley judge in Northern District Federal court would not have ruled against Max Sound for NO LICENSE CONTRACT. Greg Halpern likes to argue, 'but we have a "Confirmatory License" ! That is a tap dance.

When Steve Hawkins flew with me November 20-25 2015 to Munich, Christof Karl, senior partner and his patent litigation lawyers at the conference table laughed and mocked "confirmatory license'. It is non-existent as a License Patents Contract. Ask Steve Hawkins.

What is going on in Europe? I do not know. Can't John Blaisure tell BTX or Ican or whoever he is? They report the facts of John's phone calls or meeting together.

Constance Nash

Attia's is Trade Secrets in the United States against Google.

No patents. He had no patents.

No bearing in Europe for the Attia's Trade Secrets case against Google and Flux Factory for stealing Architect Eli Attia's inventions.

He had an abandoned patent. And that is all he thought he had. Inventions in an abandoned patent. Amazingly when he was a guest our home, (others know this story on iHub) I wrote Google's name into Thompson, and Eli Attia name into same search: I found dozens of patents that neither Attia,Greg or Beuther Joe, nobody knew about.

If lawyers would file asap IPR against all of those patents, Attia would be a nuclear power. He isn't getting paid from Google so why make them richer? Google won't be able to monetize the manufacturers or build anything without PATENT; PATENT IS FOR INDEMNIFICATION, FOR ENFORCING, FOR DEFENDING, FOR MANUFACTURING, VENDORS DON'T WANT TO BE SUED, THEY REQUIRE LEGAL INDEMNIFICATION FROM A PATENT. NO PATENT? NO TICKEE, NO LAUNDRY.


File IPR. See who blinks. Can't do it after Google wins another case!


Constance Nash

The Attia's are known to me; they were my house guests May and June 2015. He is a brilliant, successful, honorable man. He did work for Google on his own EA architecture inventions. His name is now on dozens of stupidly -filed-by-Google-if they-are fighting-his-allegations--But Attia is a listed inventor on dozens of patents; after he was booted out of Google.

I mention Attia's all the time to this hungry board. I didn't know that we'd lose yesterday, but I did foresee it April 2014, and May 2014: and that is why I WOULD NOT ALLOW MAX SOUND TO HAVE OR TOUCH VEDANTI -AND ITS PATENTS, NOR COULD THEY HAVE A LICENSE CONTRACT FOR PATENTS. I spoke it often, I emailed it often. The lawyers in negotiations with my CEO from London June 2014: look up Eric van der Kleij, was at Greg's home, we were all there: Eric asks if he can record the many conversations scheduled with UNSIGNED LAWYERS: Adam Levitt, Catherine and others at Grant & Eisenhofer, as well as Eric Beuther, Chris Joe and Carpenter, and others.

Greg and the lawyers, each time asked, said yes. Record. So that Eric can study the issues when he returned to London. On those recordings Chris Joe and others say: "our marching orders are we can't file patent litigation." -and it goes on from there.

Back to Attia, they have a settlement with Greg Halpern. We have the same outside the Attia v Alphabet et al, lawyer. I don't know their business. He doesn't share it. But I do know there will be a trial. Unless Google settles.

I speak of Attia's for over a year.

You have to do your own MaxD research. I didn't know, nor did I predict that my patent would lose to a trio of judges who may or may not have had the proper information argued. But don't tie in some kind of ulterior motive to me.

I DO NOT HAVE STOCK IN MAXD. IT WAS STOLEN BY A TRIO IN A SCAM: O'LEARY, MIKE TURNER OF GLOBES, AND GREG HALPERN: October 17 scam to get me to sign over San Jose, sign over Germany, sign over Vedanti, sign over Patents -which I wouldn't do: why?

IPR was the heaviest risk, and one that did not need to be taken.

Constance Nash

I've never seen a copy of the Max Sound & Vedanti License Agreement. But I can tell you that an enforceable patent is the ONLY FOUNDATION OF VALUE IN A TECHNOLOGY COMPANY INTENDING TO DO MORE THAN SPEND $33 Million _those are my expenses, not VLL's -, an enforceable Patent with inventions is the only currency for the Risk to Reward.

As for me lying? Where would that be in this grand scheme of BS that your leader Rurouni weaves? I tell you the facts. You can print them and correlate them. The story doesn't vary. More facts come out in answer to folks like you and your opinion. An opinion you have every right to, you don't know anything other than your research which I admire, but you only know what you see on these boards and what Rurouni reports: Nash is sued for Contempt of Court, Nash is sued today in ExParte, she's biting the dust, Nash is sued in Arbitration, watch Max Sound get "their" patents back in an award." Netflix is sued, they are going to settle "our patent in Germany" Nash is sued by O'Leary, Nash is sued, Nash is sued...

I was and am. All the time by parties from and with and from Greg directly too: the Max Sound machine.

Your kaching you give him, the cash register of stock money. Pays lawyers to bring Nash the signatory down to her knees. That didn't happen; he pays and I pay mine. We are on the side of truth. Which isn't good enough by the way; we win but its not easy. Greg is the most formidable adversary a human ever had. And second to human, a successful, valuable corporation.

While I don't have you all and your kaching cash register. I earn mine via my abilities; I pay.I earn. Others don't pay for me.

But I do win. Lawyers do uncover and file Fraud Upon The Court motions when they uncover Max Sound forgeries and the like.

You said $500,000 was a lot of money: absurd. Just Russ August & Kabat when engaged to defend against Max Sound v Vedanti Systems, January 31 2015 service upon me: RAK engagement was $250,000.00. Our corporation development with 65 patentlawyers -individuals who bill--from December 14, 2001 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld -to now where we have 85+ total lawyers, and a big corporation, we spent $32,000,000.00.

So you think a Due Diligence payment to separate the men from the boys who want to see our Source Code, AFTER WE SIGN TRADE SECRETS AND NO LICENSE AND NO VEDANTI AND NO PATENTS--JV, you think that $500,000.00 is lot? No. It isn't even a half a drop in the bucket.

Constance Nash

Pal, I built our codec. Cornerstone Group Ltd Codec. It is the codec that my CEO Alpesh B. Patel and I April 2010 shared in the $5B M & A with Google's senior management.

My Codec. I don't know which one you were referring in your commentary, but I answered about THE CODEC AT THE TRIAL.

THE ONLY CODEC IN THIS CASE OF MAX SOUND RECKLESSLY AND CRUELLY STEALING OUR VEDANTI IDENTITY, SUING GOOGLE, NETLIX WITHOUT THE RIGHT OR MY KNOWLEDGE.

Why did he sneak his lawsuits with me as co-plaintiff? And in Germany with my own lawyers, pretending that I had approved, emails state from those lawyers copies from Greg: 'don't mention the US lawyers to Connie, it upsets her.' I don't even know Max Sound is suing Google with German patent, my Ireland patent for YouTube and my Luxembourg -all 2012 October grants -I don't know they are suing what? Patent Infringement. So frigging disallowed; there was no doubt as to why I would not sign nor allow Patent Infringement. My agreement was for Adam Levitt and Chris Joe to sue Google for Post Its Notes with Trade Secrets, I/0 Conference of 2013 from YouTube to 'their partners they state: Adsense."

Why Trade Secrets only? Why no Vedanti? Only newly formed June 2014 VSL Communications Ltd --not even fully formed, no stock allocated, no officers--but formed for JV purpose to co-sue with Adam & Chris and Max Sound. Greg's partner Mike Spatz is best friends in Chicago with Adam Levitt: that is how he got into this deal: Greg brought to me the top lawyer in litigation in the United States: but I only capitulated to VSL Communications Ltd suing for TRADE SECRETS WITH THE POST ITS NOTES ON EACH PAGE OF THE COMPLAINT. Why? Because Google might have settled due to media all over the Post Its Notes: "go round patent file our own", (they did 46 within 2011-2014 June research); "try to destroy all email". Not ours but their unlawful mail to outsiders not under NDA.

It took Greg and his men (which one would she like, how can we get her to the table, she seems to trust Paul Myers, she gets on great with Michael Spatz) it took Greg days and days and weeks, six weeks actually to write a May 15 2014 Capitulation email with a Representation Contract attached: "okay you're trying to swim backwards across the Atlantic'...here, No Patent litigation, No License Contract, No Vedanti, I will be your field general, VSL Communications will have 66 2/3, Max Sound will have 33 1/3, but I will have to reduce your (negotiated) $3 Million cash payment upfront, to $1.5 Million with $500,000 for Due Diligence and lawyers review of documents, source code, original Margin Notes; they belong to VSL Communication Ltd (he still has them refusing to return). $3MM Cash becomes $1.5M (never paid, just the due diligence heist), 30 Million shares of Max Sound stock is to be reduced to 10 Million shares (I never sold them, he stole them and the 7.9M too, because I refused to sign over Vedanti, refused to allow Patent Infringement,and I I tried to get Delaware's Patent Infringement sneak attack Dismissed August 2014. I refused to allow secret filing in San Jose, when I saw it you can't imagine my stomach flipping:

why? Google will kill my work I started and risked it all June 2001, filed patent by tier one costly firm worth it though, it was a brilliant patent January 16, 2002; I risked it all, building offices and hiring and paying and paying and trusting in my owb leadership.

As for Greg and a house-sitter part-time new neighbor Hamid Rowshan suing me right now and since Christmas, this Hamid and Greg Halpern with Blaisure signing the secret,stealth FINDER'S FEE AGREEMENT, and between Max Sound and Rowshan Hamid and his 'contact' Korin Daly, a close friend of Halpern< they didn't even know the IDENTITY OR THE NAME OF THE S0-CALLED QUARRY: us in Laguna Beach and London, they didn't know. But signed a Finder's Fee. I am being sued for that Finder's Fee agreement now. And why? Who the hell knows. But Greg helps Korin,and Korin helps Rowshan v Vedanti, VSL Communications v Constance Nash --and I had to hire a lawyer for this b.s mish-mash.

And lose my company 2014, and lose the Tent Pole United States hard won Examination into a Grant July 5, 2011. Now we have Germany. I always said I didn't trust that one.

So Grantastic, I was adamant against Greg's efforts for a penny stock company to buy us, we weren't on that market. Greg (your guy so you should praise him for his determination) starting spewing out M & A contracts April 2014, on an on and on. I said: "no", I will not allow an IPR. No.

May 30, 2014 I stood in his kitchen, thinking I had signed May 16 2014 Representation Agreement: strictly MARGIN NOTES AND TRADE SECRETS. Even that took Greg a lot of time to get me to that table. It took Paul Myers calling me,I had walked and was happy walking, I didn't trust things even though I liked all of the guys in Max Sound: all of them, Paul Myers called and said, "you can trust Greg I've never seen him cheat anybody, I sit next to him all day. Take my word for it Connie, you can trust him."

So May 30, 25 or more people are at Greg's, lawyers from Chicago and Dallas too, are staying at his house. I'm speaking with Chris Joe of Beuther Joe & Carpenter: I LIKED CHRIS. He says, "we're so excited to be your lawyers for the patent infringement case." -

"no, you can't have the right to patents, you can't sue Google or anybody with my patent, it will cause Re-Examination which will stop my Vedanti sale to Ellison or Murdoch or Carlos Slim, Ronson and the guys are into those companies now.

"but worse Chris, you'll cause the loss of the Patent, it will go into the deep freeze 3 or 4 or 5 years, then into Appeal. No. You can't. I'll lose the company. We can't monetize without our patent." That was before they did it. And without representation of us the owners. And without our knowledge. And that was before Greg used my lawyers in Germany: I had set up Trade Secrets & Post Its for quick settlement with Google, a Trade Secrets case which if the Post Its Notes were not used, it would turn into a blood bath -and by the way: Lawyers who did not represent us or the patents or the corporation, nor did they take a phone call, those lawyers ALSO DID NOT USE THE POST ITS NOTES ! Thus, my plan for
EU was as a secondary action: 1 Trade secrets & Notes of culpability in San Jose or Delaware, hq of Google + German court --weeks later -for Patent Infringement: a double whammy. That did not happen.

My codec is not returned. My Source Code is not returned. And VLL contract explictly prohibits Vedanti Systems owning it. I had licensed my codings. And to a big organization elsewhere too.

Constance Nash

I built THE ONLY CODEC. The only Source Code. The algorithms. I BUILT IT ALL. Funded it all, and smoked right along until two strangers to us, signed an April 10, 2014 Finder's Fee and didn't consult or tell us: they didn't even know our company name of ours. My life changed after 12 great years: I was a fight-back-target. Didn't do any good: if anybody has 1 patent and they then sue Google or Apple or Microsoft with it, then the end of the line is that day.

I hope your stock improves. There's still architects.

Constance Nash

Max Sound did not have -- at any time in our history of Vedanti Systems Limited-- and newco VSL Communications Ltd, a License Contract of anything.

As for the Source Code? I today, and from the beginning, own it 100%. I built it. As for the Codec? I own it too. And I built it nightly via my webpage in 2002 and 2003. My Webpage was DigitalFilmWorks.net. I worked with my programmers. Not engineers, but programmers. Who spoke a different language. And who used a digital dictionary for the English language patent. We went through 9 algorithms. Until I got it right.

But if that codec is public now, who is the idiot who released it to the public? That can have severe ramifications.

I know the inventions. I know the codec.I don't struggle to explain it. It simply goes over your head because it is a physics invention as opposed to a mathematical invention. And too, I gave you the essence of WHY google has no prior art.

I also know every single ugly detail of the Vedanti Systems Limited business rip-off by Greg Halpern. And yet, it is water under the bridge. Unless you challenge me.

Today, 4 years later, I hope and believe that the PTAB RULING OF MAY 20 IS FAVORABLE.

So Grantastic, put down your negativity about me. Were it not for me, there would be so-called -prior art and Google really would win. I'm saying that I believe that my patent will win the Appeal PTAB May 20. I am the person who hired and shared with Bob Asher; same goes for Christof Karl of Bardehle, Munich. But I've not seen the arguments in Germany. I've only seen Asher's because I convinced him with facts as to why we should not amend our claims.

I do hope you all get your payday. I hope Hawkins and others get theirs too; but Bob and I, for sure deserve to put these last 4 years behind us and our other colleagues who've been harmed, and as a team with Vedanti and our funding of them,we settle with Google, Netflix, YouTube, Adsense, and On2 Technology. I believe it will happen.

Constance Nash

Hi, I don't see my reply to this a bit ago: Shakespeare didn't agree with brevity of wit. Though I do agree I need an editor. As for pills and such that's not my deal.

My deal is grave: exposing Greg Halpern destroying the commercialization 2014 April /May value of Vedanti Systems. If there is any doubt look at IPR and Nullify in Germany: both started by Greg Halpern & lawyers August 9, 2014 Delaware: illegal Patent '339' Infringement Vedanti, MaxD vs Google.Here we are 3 years later, just where I said we'd be if I had allowed License (no I didn't), or Patent (no I didn't), or Contract for License Contract to Max Sound from Vedanti (no I didn') Why not? I argued that my company's assets would be killed if I allowed suing for Patents infringement.

Why? Netflix/Google Defense is IPR / Nullification/ 4 years of zero-I mean-- no commercialization: Vedanti is ON life support. The patents once thrown by Max Sound recklessly too, into IPR have lost their No Prior art status: the can not license, can't sell to News Corp, nobody. Why not? Reasonable Doubt: Google & Netflx put them into INVALIDATION. Can you fight city hall now?


Constance Nash

Hi, Shakespeare doesn't agree with brevity as being the soul of wit. Though I agree with you, brevity of thought is far better than my long-winded epistles.
Constance Nash

Hi,

yes, I'd love an editor.But an editor can't wade through Greg Halpern's horseshit: his creation of the spaghetti bowl of complex bullshit is beyond logic.As for pills and such, that isn't my deal. So you can drop that line of thought.

Greg created a very very complex web of forgeries,scams,and fake deals: unfortunately,it takes time to explain and wade through the layers of his planned, brilliant obfuscation.


Constance Nash
Top Female Executive 2014

Guys, why do you refer to Rurouni as Greg Halpern? Yes he is, but how do you know it? As for the IPR and Nullity, both of which I received after Greg Halpern sued illegally with both my USA patent a major tent pole, and with my German patent, another major tent pole suing Google illegally in Delaware, 2014 August 9, when he and his lawyers unlawfully, illegally and against their State Bar licenses too: used my '339 USPTO patents and inventions, boasted all over the Internet that 'max sound had worldwide exclusive (ownership 100%) License'.

And then sometimes, MaxD'd pitch on iHub and Yahoo, and MarketWired, and elsewhere that Max Sound had "worldwide License of patents" he renamed to odd "ODT", then he forged contracts using my signature from a valid Trade Secrets & Post Its Notes May 16, 2014 -first and correct -but not a License Contract either; a simple Trade Secrets & Post Its JV litigation: he did not do. He did Vedanti Systems Limited -as plaintiff: ILLEGAL. In time it will catch up. A valid no Patent Infringement contract: no license of anything, reduced our stock from 30M down to 10M "you didn't give us a License he writes first, and down from cash of $3MM cash to $500k for due diligence for us to show lawyers our source code and original post its notes (we never got back in their loaning to Greg for lawyers we didn't know we didn't have), plus he owned $1MM cash. He never paid it. He stole the 10MM shares via O'Leary and Globex and themselves Max Sound October 18, 2014. Why? He wanted my signature on the illegal San Jose case of October 1 2014. With TGO4 LLC and Vedanti Licensing in a deal with max Sound, they believe they've solved that situation of Forgery and No License Contract. They believe that Google will settle.

Google walked on the Attia's last week, why will they settle here?
Netflix didn't settle and you were all wound up like clocks for December 8, 2016 in my own case that I cared deeply about: Munich Germany: both Netflix and Google had been sued by Max Sound. Then they were sued by newco Vedanti Licensing. Then somehow they decided at VLL to hook up with Max Sound and to enjoin both cases. But why? Max Sound was kicked out by Steve Hawkins in Germany in December 2015 in Mannheim.


Greg hid valid contract: it had NO LICENSE OF VEDANTI, IT HAD NO LICENSE OF BABY-VSL COMMUNICATIONS WHICH OWNED ZIP --and that is what Eric Beuther said -and knew from hour one -when his partner Chris Joe wrote August 1, 5 2014: "VSL Communications doesn't own patent, Vedanti does, and Vedanti doesn't have an agreement with Max Sound". --then they fildo you see IPR- PTAB in USP, NO PATENTINFRINGEMNENT, from SEC and us too, and ed Patent Infringement in the name of Vedanti Systems as plaintiff: 5 strikes against them all. Would it make money? August 9, 2014? October 1, 2014 San Jose? December 2014 Mannheim, Germany?

Look at 2017 April 13: IPR in USPTO, started August 9, 2014.
Look at 2017 April 13: Nullification in Germany: started Dec 2014. And German patent courts are fastest in the world. Stolen when? May 15, 2014. Paid May 16, 2014. I didn't sign Patent Infringement agreement. I signed Trade Secrets with my Post Its Notes. You really would have made a great deal of stock profit. I would't have lost my 14 years and millions, and lost 2 patents, the sole German and sole US patent to what? How could we sell our assets? We couldn't. Will Google settle? I say no. I always said no. They have too many patents to settle; they indemnify zillions of vendors: they can't afford to settle. I know how to win,but VLL won't do it. I would if I bought the company back.

TGO4 aka VLL,filed June 2016: Fraud Upon The Court with those Greg, Paul Myers forgeries, declarations under penalty of perjury: Vedanti Hawkins/Dave here/Wheeler/Powell --they all, after having ownership less for 2.5 months -- filed against Max Sound for Forgery -true forgery and a crime --in San Jose.

So they can't say that I bring it up: I didn't even file Fraud Upon The Court: they did. That it was my idea to do it is true: I told my lawyers, nobody cares about Forgery of my signature being used on a forgery of a phony Vedanti [Max Sound back-dated to May 19, 2014) contract. But astoundingly it was not a License Contract of any kind. And definitely no rights to Vedanti valuable patents I owned with my Vedanti Systems Limited, UK. Dave here, as well as TGO4 LLC, and Vedanti Licensing Limited, did not LICENCE PATENTS TO MAX SOUND. And they did not give Max Sound ownership YET EITHER. Why not? Maybe Google or Netflix or both won't settle? Then what?

And so far, they haven't signed a contract giving ownership of patents either. It was Google in the Appeals court January 19, 2017 that told us they had a copy of the Vedanti Licensing Limited & Max Sound Contract "partnership", "it isn't signed" says Google.

Max Sound's March 31 2017 10K also states that Max Sound does not own patents by saying "partnership contract isn't signed".

So why go there with those stories? Your stock can profit from it's normal cycles: if it's half a cent and you buy a boatload, it'll go up to 1 cent or more; so it goes up to 1.5 cents, you make a big profit when you sell, and start over. You're in the stock gambling business, not in my patents and inventions and settlements business. Prior to me you were in the Liquid Spin business. And prior to that you were in the 'phenomenal' audio business, name got changed to Max Sound, owned at the time by old-timer Lloyd Trammel "Surround Sound" chap. Who is now sued by Max Sound.

And yet your stock survives. Greg is good at this job. I've said that many times: he makes sure over the last 20 years with Mike Spatz Chicago PR whiz, with Blaisure CEO of Max Sound, and with Paul Myers SEC Compliance, and with loans such as Harvey Vechery's $4M last October -May that he keeps your stock buzzing along.
ps: I was not paid $100M or more. I was paid $1M. With a tough contract which was a JV formation. If I don't get my terms taken care of, you'll be talking about me owning it again.

Haven't you figured out that your stock goes in cycles; long before I was ever the subject matter in iHub or Yahoo. You don't need pumping. The price was low when Hawkins filed against Max Sound in Mannheim Germany via Bardehle Law, Munich for the Google -max Sound case. I didn't file it, Hawkins of VLL filed it:12/06/15.Max Sound officially anyway, had no standing. No License Contract ever. Do they have standing now? I don't know.


Constance Nash
Top Female Executive

Has anybody ever seen a legal document proving that "MaxD Patent" is owned by Max Sound? I haven't seen it. I can tell you that the statement is not true: "all hardware and all software of video compression infringes". It is absurd.

Back to the contract, have any of you seen the VLL-Max Sound ownership transfer? I don't think there's ownership of a patent. I don't know what the trigger mechanism is, but you should all ask to see it, seeing as how this is a public, SEC regulated corporation. And entity that is required to be transparent. Not with secrets they don't have to be shown, but if an Intellectual Property is what you're all believing, then you need to see if the name of Max Sound Corporation is assigned ownership in a particular Vedanti Systems Limited and/or Vedanti Licensing Limited bundle of 22 patents.

Neither of the Vedanti firms has ownership of the software. My company has owned that and licensed it to Vedanti Systems Limited but it's not yet licensed formally to Vedanti Licensing Limited. It can be but isn't yet. I also licensed my coding and software in 2009, and 2013 to a couple of different entities. But not to Max Sound. I offered 2016 to help the whole process of settling for Netflix and Google interests.

I do not know if Vedanti licensing is taking place. It seems that it is stalled for all the reasons I would not allow Max Sound to have my patents, could not have a License, and never had one: if you have 1 patent and you sue Google as Greg Halpern did (and secretly)you end up with NO PATENTS; what you have is a crippled non-commercialized-moribund bundle of assets: why? DEFENSE IS NULLIFY, INVALIDATION, APPEALS COURT -for years and years. And if you win? Maybe there's a license silver lining. But, look at Mark Cuban's deal. That is where my hard-fought-hard-won, costly patents and assets are now for Vedanti: in Max Sound generated PTAB USPTO appeals court, and in Munich Federal Patents Court: nullification.

Go online and read Duncan Powell Vedanti partner's webpage of Vedanti Licensing Limited. You'll get straight answers there. Sellers wouldn't have signed a terms sale if we weren't convinced of their business acumen, deal making strength, and if they didn't have the top firm in the US representing them.

Constance Nash
Top Female Exec 2014

Yes, quite a few lawsuits. Attia in California. There are 3 in USA that I know of, and they're ugly, unfair, and winnable. I don't know if the 3 European lawsuits filed when I owned Vedanti and hired Bardehle in November 2015 are still active against YouTube via my Ireland patent, Netflix via my Luxembourg patent, Google against my Germany patent, all filed in German courts. And not with Max Sound. I don't have facts. I do believe my work on the '339 patent pushed us over to the winning side; I knew we had no prior art. I'm the person who prosecuted and obtained with lots of time and money and fortitude of objective: uber patents all with no prior art; I knew why our patents had no prior art from those old duds that Google pushed on courts. Same in Germany; but I do not know whether Max's filed Google, YouTube and On2 will succeed in Nullification in Munich. But that is when TGO4 buyers of Vedanti hooked up with Max Sound, seemed like a wise solution. So I hope my patent prevailed. Had I been there, I know it would have. Still, they reached out for my help, I gave it of course, I want this portfolio safe as it was March 2014.
Ask Rurouni what the deal is in Germany with VLL and Nullification. He'll find a way to know.
Constance Nash

We paid for homeless Eli Attia and wife Noa, whom we called mid-May 2015,to compare Max Sound curiosities. They stayed in our Laguna Beach home for 3 weeks. Fun, wonderful, erudite, witty couple. Lots of laughter and international lifestyles to share. The Attia's hadn't been paid by Max Sound, they were literally homeless, moving from upstate down to Manhattan to other people's homes, twice a week. I can only hope that John Blaisure has taken pity on them and changed their contract and payment arrangements. We aren't in contact, so we don't know status. All I do know is: they have a powerfully legitimate case, and with pit-bull Eric Beuther, it should prevail against Google. I hope so for Attia's sake and rights.
Constance Nash