Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yea that would do it
I popped into Tim Howard’s blog this AM. No news there either.
I’m looking at the monthly volume which is still below average so guessing this is speculation on someone’s part. If real news hits volume will explode far beyond the current level.
Also tremendous supply exists between $.80 to $1.00. It will be tough to get past that level without real news.
I vote #3.
I hope so but frankly would expect more volume. We’ve had great days lately but zoom out to the monthly and the volume is still below average. Time will tell. GLTA.
The P vs C debate is pointless. I own both. I balanced my position so if common went to zero and preferred went to 80% par I would still have a tiny gain. So I got f’d by both. Welcome to the rigged system.
ST was selected by Biden to be an administrator not an innovator. She won’t do anything beyond maintain the status quo unless there is action and direction from congress. And we all know the likely hood of the latter.
Can’t it land back in his court?
Now Lambert can re-craft his evidence suppression strategy to ensure a government win and ensure he never has to talk about GSE's again...
“I’m sorry Your Honor but I don’t recall that conversation…”
Are those your dogs? Which one if Fannie and which is Freddie.
Not giving up. Been in this thing since before NWS. But stopped reading the various “analysis” offer here and other places long ago. This is a lottery ticket no one can predict.
Foolish to pick a side. Have a blend of all.
If my commons go to zero I still make money @ 80% par on preferred. If commons go to 5-10 huge payday.
This is still a lottery ticket no one can predict.
What’s your trade strategy with the BB’s
Why the EOD spanking?
I though Sweeney was out of the picture now??
She did enable/permit a lot great discovery from the 11K documents. But she does not move fast. I’d really like to see this matter resolved in my lifetime.
I received nothing.
I had the same message on my TDA account, but not on my Fidelity account (I’ve had to make similar acknowledgements on Fidelity in the past).
But I’m not sure what the big deal is? They are just asking you to acknowledge inverse and leveraged ETFs are tricky instruments and you better know wtf you are doing if you trade them.
It made me laugh out loud when I read it Sounded just like some of his press conferences.
The tone of that letter was all Trump. But sure lawyers were involved.
Anyone catch his interview? If so we’re GSEs discussed?
Where do yo check premarket for OTC?
I know it doesn’t mean a lot. OTC does not really trade off hours so I’m curious where people see this. I see nothing on TOS, Yahoo or CNBC.
Debit ceiling challenges. Maybe time to tap that IOU…. Hope not but won’t be surprised to see it happen. Nothing about The GSEs surprises me anymore.
No specific thoughts on either. Just seems there is a lot of recent activity for an “acting” director, who assumed the role instantly after the SC ruling.
Looks to me someone has a plan (Biden Admin) and FHFA is marching to it regardless. So I’m more interested in the WH perspective than who is finally confirmed as head of FHFA. There is a new sheriff in town.
Down 1.6% on Volume 40% below avg. Not sure this qualifies as “tumbles”.
My thought too.
Wasn't that the plan of the last administration?
Agreed. Over 50 K shares hear a mix of common and preferred and I get screwed both ways.
I had a bad feeling when I listened to the Craig Phillips interview. I should’ve trusted that feeling. What bothered me was the situation then had everyone wanting to release the twinsYet somehow still managed to avoid doing so.
Biden administration will have no desire to release the GSE’s.
You might be reading too much into this. It was a binary choice, either the director stays or goes. Any competent administration would have a plan ready.
I'll sit on this till year, then consider harvesting losses with gains to minimize taxes.
OK. But was there such a statement from the administration? No they were onboard completely.
I don't see any light behind this statement from Alito.
I would prefer a favorable (for shareholders) GSE Opinion to be released immediately after another opinion that generates a storm of controversary. Maybe it would lessen the greedy hedge fund narrative if the media is busy chasing some other political football in search of eyeballs.
Interesting comment on Tim Howard's blog about this 'living will"
The “living will” requirement comes from Section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act, requiring that “bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more and nonbank financial companies designated by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) for supervision by the Federal Reserve periodically submit resolution plans to the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.” HERA does not make any reference to living wills, let alone authorize FHFA to require them of Fannie and Freddie
Love It!
IMO this is to far away to make a pop in share price
Any idea why the small pop?
Awesome company. Even with all the recent gyrations I’m still up 20% yoy since 2014. Very excited about Alibaba Cloud as well.
Green everywhere. Small but green. Any news?
Just checking in after a few weeks for any news. Your post told me everything I needed to know.
Seems like a low number to me.