Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
More TA I found via Twitter for anyone interested, I thought it was much better than what we usually get from everyone's favorite Clay
this is the same group that does the WarrenBuffetHQ parody account, they just post this shit to get you to their website
I would encourage you to look it up, you are confusing her with a much larger firm. Double check the websites and you will see.
For what it’s worth I have no opinion on the 4 day bad news rule (although as a long I hope it’s true)
Lappin seems respectable enough but definitely doesn’t manage 5 billion FWIW. You have got the wrong firm.
And there it is, someone was going to get shares before close today regardless of price, looks like it wasn't going to happen under 1.70... Merry festivus to all!
Just looking at the OTC markets site..
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/NWBO/quote#level-2
Couple fat blocks on the level 2 at 1.70, if we can nibble our way through those we could have a big finish today
I'm still on the call, i didn't catch the 47% but can confirm the "we are anxiously awaiting data” and “we are hopeful we have a new SOC” quotes.
Good to know, I'm a long time Ameritrade user but sucks they have fees for OTC and options so I just trade options on Robinhood but of course no OTC there, will check those out
is there a brokerage that does commission free trades for OTC? I don't understand a $5 or $10 trade anyway but let alone with a ~$7 commission
lot's of odd trades today, aside from the .005 there are quite a few orders of 100 shares or less, one a bit ago was 10 shares! wtf?
2008 here
lol yeah thats the fun part (for the man at least)
thanks, appreciate the kind words.
As far as success rates, from my understanding it is true the success rates are similar AFTER fertilization is complete. Fertilization however is not a guarantee each time with invocell as the fertilization happens within the device itself which can take a number of attempts as opposed to a guaranteed lab-based fertilization.
First off, again, I'm an investor as well so I never said Invocell is inherently inferior to traditional lab IVF, and am confident the INVOcell will be successful in the populations I mentioned.
That being said, if my wife and I are any representation of the potential customers we are discussing, the biggest advantage traditional IVF has over INVOcell is the most precious commodity we all have, time.
She is nearing the age where there are increased risks and there is no guarantee of fertilization with Invocell. Granted the success rate does look pretty good but why would we opt into less guaranteed method when we have sufficient insurance coverage so that cost is not a factor for the traditional route.
Of course all the opinion of my family and our doctor, just offering my perspective.
I'd say replacing is a BIG stretch. Starting to get some in the industry interested, sure.
Coincidentally my wife and I are currently seeing a fertility doctor so I asked whether he had heard of INVOcell and if so what his take was. I was pleased to hear he was familiar with it and had followed some of the recent updates so at the least it has hit those circles here in Chicago.
He went on to share his opinion that although it may prove to be a very impactful product for developing nations and underinsured parents he doesn't see it making any dent into the existing IVF market which consists mostly of sufficiently insured couples looking for the premium option which for the foreseeable future will still be lab based procedures.
Again INVOcell competes on price so can it make an impact in the groups I mentioned earlier? Sure. (hence why I am long) but will it become a new standard of care, definitely not. It's also worth noting that cost of traditional IVF has been on a steady decline.
Just trying to help manage expectations GLTA
Wouldn't shorts just pay the dividend on each share and hold their positions naked or not?
Seems like if they think this thing is going to zero a few pennies a share isn't so bad.