Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Fair enough Carl, as soon as everyone who doesn’t cite a reputable source precedes their statement with “in my opinion” so will I.
Because if it has a day with 1.3 million shares traded and the difference between the high and low price is 18% to 20% I will buy another 10,000 to 12,000 shares as close to the bottom and sell them as close to the top and make a quick $6,000 to $10,000 just as I’ve done at least 15 times in the past 6 weeks. Additionally I’m here just as you are, I’m a member and have just as much right to assert my opinion as you.
You’re not being uplisted because it’s all OTC forward looking statement bs. I question their #’s, I question how many locations they’re being sold. I’ve made my money here, the volumes drying up into a drivel so I’m done unless it picks up and I’ve warned you as best I can. GL
No, I said I’m a partner in Ibex Venture Capital Hedge Fund. I never said I live in Colorado.
I.I just called, They do NOT carry CBD products through the entire chain. They do carry some Hemp products but never heard of plusCBD. I spoke to the regional Mgr. He never heard of it. Vitamin Shoppe 2205 N Federal Highway. Ft Laud, FL 954-564-3232 - call your selves if you do not believe me.
Completely false. Not listed here;
https://ministryofhemp.com/blog/best-cbd-oil-tinctures-2018/
or anywhere in the top 20 here; https://www.ravereviews.org/health/best-cbd-oil/
Or NOT IN THE TOP 75 here; https://cbdoilreview.org/cbd-companies/
Not in the top 20 here here; ; https://www.marijuanabreak.com/best-cbd-oils-pain-relief
Not in the top 20 here; https://www.cannainsider.com/reviews/cbd-oil-reviews/
As a matter of fact I can’t find one site it’s listed in the top 20
Show me the list. They keep announcing more and more stores yet NEVER in a 10K or 10Q. Just PR fluff. 100’s of locations added weekly but never a formal list.
No, it was a PR Pump, they never hoped to Uplist. It was all for you guys to keep buying but as you can see from the volume, people have gotten wise.
100% WRONG I’ve bought and sold more shares in this company then you’ll ever dream of seeing. I’m just experienced and smart enough never to fall in love with an OTC ticker. I buy, make my money, get out and move on. In this case CVSI (as I’ve explained umpteen Times) Any day the volumes heavy and the difference between the day’s high and low is 20% or close I use my play money 50 or 60 grand, buy 10,000 or 11,000 shares as close to the low as I can and sell as close to the high as I can making a quick 5 to 10 grand a day. Since the Citron article I’ve done this at least a dozen times. Additionally, I bought 100,000 shares at $.36 back in February and began selling at $.72 selling my final 30,000 @ right under $7.00 - Unfortunately not today with the pitiful volume. People have gotten wise. If Mona hasn’t stepped out you could put Dowling on with Jimmy Kimmel, he’s still running things and while he is there will NEVER be an Uplist to a real stock exchange for this ticker. Just as I stated in post 31,328;
This ticker has too many OTC bad actors to do biz with Coke or be uplisted, such as the man Forbes called “The Poster Boy Of The Penny Stock Bubble” Michael Mona, ties to Bruce Perlowin, (now under indictment for Penny Stock Fraud), Donald Steinberg the ex con involved with Mona and Michael Llamas in Club Vivant and of course Tripp Keber recently booted out of the company he began, Dixie Elixer.
Citations: https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2017/06/16/sec-charges-poster-boy-of-pot-penny-stock-bubble-with-fraud/#3409ed5608a1
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2014/03/26/high-times-inside-the-pot-stock-bubble/#2b8464e96b05
Not to mention paid stock promotions including one just today;
https://www.streetwisereports.com/article/2018/10/24/hemp-producer-cv-sciences-q3-earnings-estimates-our-view.html
And fines for fraud from the SEC
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2017/lr23861.htm
Last but not least is the bastion of Investor Relations Firms IRTH Communications, now under investigation by the SEC for their part in the 22nd Century Group Scam;
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4214226-22nd-century-group-foias-reveal-suspected-undisclosed-sec-investigation?isDirectRoadblock=true
Yea, those are just the shing example Coke is looking to “wow them”.
With sides splitting from laughter I have a question;
Uplist Yet?
Bravo, finally someone clear and critically thinking. Well put Vandy and but one of the many reasons there won’t be any “Uplist”. The whole “Uplist application and announcements just as the 3,000 stores was just another Mona Pump.
100% Yes. From a recent insider Financial “Review” ; DISCLAIMER
Disclaimer – This newsletter is a paid advertisement, not a recommendation nor an offer to buy or sell securities. This newsletter is owned, operated and edited by Archangel Media Consulting, LLC. Any wording found in this e-mail or disclaimer referencing to “I” or “we” or “our” or “Archangel Media” refers to Archangel Media Consulting, LLC. Our business model is to be financially compensated to market and promote small public companies. By reading our newsletter and our website you agree to the terms of our disclaimer, which are subject to change at any time. We are not registered or licensed in any jurisdiction whatsoever to provide investing advice or anything of an advisory or consultancy nature, and are therefore are unqualified to give investment recommendations. Always do your own research and consult with a licensed investment professional before investing. This communication is never to be used as the basis of making investment decisions, and is for entertainment purposes only. At most, this communication should serve only as a starting point to do your own research and consult with a licensed professional regarding the companies profiled and discussed. Conduct your own research. Companies with low price per share are speculative and carry a high degree of risk, so only invest what you can afford to lose. By using our service you agree not to hold our site, its editor’s, owners, or staff liable for any damages, financial or otherwise, that may occur due to any action you may take based on the information contained within our newsletters or on our website.
https://insiderfinancial.com/microcap-profile/
Yes, absolutely. Your magnificent management team with lifetime OTC bad actors such as the man Forbes called “The Poster Boy Of The Penny Stock Bubble” Michael Mona, ties to Bruce Perlowin, (now under indictment for Penny Stock Fraud), Donald Steinberg the ex con involved with Mona and Michael Llamas in Club Vivant and of course Tripp Keber recently booted out of the company he began, Dixie Elixer.
Citations: https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2017/06/16/sec-charges-poster-boy-of-pot-penny-stock-bubble-with-fraud/#3409ed5608a1
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2014/03/26/high-times-inside-the-pot-stock-bubble/#2b8464e96b05
Not to mention paid stock promotions including one just today;
https://www.streetwisereports.com/article/2018/10/24/hemp-producer-cv-sciences-q3-earnings-estimates-our-view.html
And fines for fraud from the SEC
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2017/lr23861.htm
Last but not least is the bastion of Investor Relations Firms IRTH Communications, now under investigation by the SEC for their part in the 22nd Century Group Scam;
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4214226-22nd-century-group-foias-reveal-suspected-undisclosed-sec-investigation?isDirectRoadblock=true
Yea, those are just the shing example Coke is looking to “wow them”.
With sides splitting from laughter I have a question;
Uplist Yet?
Finally, a critical thinker with an understanding of the fact that OTC securities are traded by broker-dealers who negotiate directly with one another over computer networks and by phone. The dealers a/k/amarket makers, and the OTC Bulletin Board is an inter-dealer quotation system that provides trading information.
Good for you POT FN - brave but factual statement.
There are too many dirty hands and too much recent history of fraudulent behavior and SEC violations and fines for this ticker to be uplisted. Leaving Mona’s son in charge and Mona in an “Emeritus” position isn’t helping.
All the hate mail that comes my way from board members I ignore. Never read a word. I’ve been playing this game too long. I’ve never had a job or done but 1 thing in my life and I’m well known and respected at it. I’m an investor here just like the rest of you. I bought 100,000 shares at $.36 began selling when they hit $.72 cashed out all my money and the taxes and sold the last 30,000 right around $7.00 On any day where there’s high volume and a 20% move between the high and low prices I use 50 or 60 grand and buy and sell it for a quick 5 to 10 grand profit. But I know better then to fall in love with an OTC ticker and try to ride it to riches. While the markets been down these past few weeks I’ve been up. That’s because the bulk of my money is invested in a small hedge fund which I’m a partner. In February we flipped an 8,600% gain turning 200k into 17.5 million. You can read about it here
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-09/vix-surge-hands-8-600-profit-to-a-tiny-hedge-fund-in-colorado
We’re a small Fund, there’s about 90 of us with $850,000,000.00 invested but we’ve never had a losing year since our inception 8 years ago.
Not this year.
Did we Uplist yet?
Did we “Uplist” yet?
Opinions aren’t “data” or evidence, they’re anecdotal. or, more pejoratively, anecdata and is use of one or more anecdotes (specific instances of an event; stories) to either support or refute a claim. The use of so called “anecdotal evidence” to draw a conclusion is like using the NBA all-star teams to estimate the average height of Americans. Remember: the plural of "anecdote" is not "data" IRS anecdotes.
Whereas “anecdotal evidence” is sometimes the starting point of a proper scientific investigation, it is all too often the ending point and every point of a pseudoscientific investigation. In the world of pseudoscience, an anecdote is the equivalent of a peer-reviewed, double-blind, repeatable scientific experiment with consistent results.
While anecdotes — when true, at least — are nice illustrative stories, they do not constitute evidence. This is because anecdotes only ever apply to individuals or individual experiences and are subject to the biases that this brings with it. It is impossible to say that an individual anecdote is representative and it is also impossible to actually detect the real cause of the anecdote.
For instance, with life-saving medical treatments (say, pills that reduce heart-disease and subsequently lower the death rate), there are some deaths that occur whether or not the medication was taken. Therefore, if someone who is on the medication dies, you cannot tell if they would have died anyway without it — you can't prove that the medical intervention worked, or not, from the one case study.
It is very rare for an intervention to be, by itself, a sufficient cause of something. Rather, they tend to change the probability of a given event occurring. This means, obviously, that one can cherry pick examples that show something does or does not work, regardless of what effect it actually has. For instance, if the municipal government of some city enacts a law to reduce crime, one can find anecdotes "demonstrating" the exact opposite of the law's actual effect, whatever it may be. If it's effective: "Before the law I never had any problems with crime, but since its enactment I've been mugged once and had my house burglarized! This law is useless!" If it's not: "Before the law, I was robbed twice, but ever since the law, I haven't been robbed once! It must be working!"
Ultimately, anecdotal evidence is very prone to false positives.
Improbability
There are also anecdotes in which a person suffered from a disease for many years, and no conventional treatment was able to cure them, but they improved after applying some alternative remedy for a few days/weeks/months. For instance:
I having administered CBD to many people as well men as women, in great number, and being grieved of ten, and of twenty years they have healed old rotten sores in legs, and other parts of the body, with only this remedy to the great admiration of all men.
The implication is that the improvement cannot possibly have been a coincidence, because it was so unlikely. Of course, since millions of people use alternative medicines every day, such coincidences are certain to happen all the time to many people, even if the odds of it happening in one specific instance are low. The odds of a particular person winning the lottery are extremely low, but somebody always does, regardless. Not to mention that most people get sick many times in the course of their life, and the number of such events may number in the thousands or even tens of thousands, if one includes such mundane things as pain, cuts, nausea, or blemishes. Some improbable coincidence is bound to happen during at least one, if not several, of these many illnesses. It is worth also considering a practitioner's situation. Over the course of her career, she will see countless thousands of patients. Even if her treatments are effective, many of her patients' recoveries (and possible website testimonials) will be unrelated to her treatments, and the large number of cases almost certainly means that some of these coincidental recoveries will be extremely unlikely.
While "case studies" exist within medicine that are essentially anecdotal, these are treated mostly as curiosities or communications between doctors, rather than hard evidence on par with real trials.
Selection bias
Selective reporting is the main factor that popularly disseminated anecdotes will be almost certainly unrepresentative. People tend to focus on the interesting, the unusual or the powerfully emotive events while ignoring the mundane. After all, no one ever sold a newspaper where the front-page headline read "girl receives new vaccine; suffers zero complications and is now alive and well". People who believe in alternative medicine may, due to confirmation bias, selectively remember stories that support their belief (which they will, of course, tell everybody about), and ignore those that don't.
Selection bias can have an impressive effect in terms of PR. Let's assume 1 million people (1,000,000) decide to take some ineffective remedy to cure their cancer. Let's further assume (for the sake of argument) that only 0.1% of this million will experience spontaneous remission (the actual remission rate, for breast cancer and basal cell carcinoma at least, is closer to 20%, and that 0.3% were misdiagnosed and so do not actually have cancer. This makes for a total of 0.4%, or 4000 people. Now, 4000 people translates into a lot of testimonials, "CBD cured my cancer" blogs, Internet comments, newspaper articles, and real-life word-of-mouth, so this makes an extremely positive impression for the therapy. But the other 99.6% died and so are not around to leave any testimonials, positive or otherwise. Thus, even in a hypothetical scenario that assumes statistically very low false positive rates, the quantity of false positives is nevertheless numerically quite large. In reality, the number of past and present cancer patients relying on alternative medicine is much larger than one million, and the false positive rate is significantly higher than 0.4%, making the possibility of a given supposedly successful "cancer cure" anecdote being a coincidence even more likely.
Even if a given treatment were effective, anecdotal evidence would still be useless, because many of the cases would be the result of natural improvement, and it would be impossible to tell which anecdotes are cures and which ones are flukes. There is no way to separate the signal from the noise with only single data points suffering from selection bias.
Synthetic CBD and Monsanto MJ, genetically superior and far less expensive https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/oct/22/cannabis-from-yeast-synthetic-biology-cbd?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=GU+Today+USA+-+Collections+2017&utm_term=288237&subid=19780078&CMP=GT_US_collection
btw, is that red I see again and how’s that uplisting going?
1,000 more sales locations, a far better known and branded name, featured on 60 Minutes amongst other National TV Shows and already on a stock exchange, no Uplist required - https://www.newcannabisventures.com/charlottes-web-expands-cbd-retail-distribution-by-more-than-50-since-2017-to-3000-stores/ btw, Uplist yet?
Top 10?
Not on this list
https://www.ravereviews.org/health/best-cbd-oil/[
Or this;
https://cbdoilreview.org/best-cbd-products-to-buy
Or this list;
https://livecbdhealthy.com/2018/07/14/the-top-10-cbd-oil-suppliers-for-2018/
I could go on all day but the fact is checking 10 separate “expert” lists some top 10 some to 20 I could find it on only one list, at number 7. Get smart, take your profits (like I did), Trade it on days where there’s at least a 20% spread and high volume trading with the houses money picking up an extra 10k a day (like I do, or, keep saying Uplist anyday now, any day, a n y d a y//b]
Low volume, in the red and THIS ticker will never be traded on a major exchange, EVER. Not with its history of fraud, deceit and bad players. I understand this is some of your firsts rodeo but you’re selling yourself a bill of goods. None of those three things happen by accident.
A touch angry after you were warned and warned and warned and warned. You’re looking for someone to sound off at and blame? Here’s an idea, look in the mirror! Because it’s only going to get worse for SIGO from here
Lots to take into account. BRK.B has a 1.37 billion share float.
BRK.A has a 740,000 share float (@ $315,000.00 per share).
You gonna argue with Buffet, he’s 87, can out drink you and still outplay you at chess or preferably Gin.
The sooner you guys learn the OTC iis NOT a stock exchange but trade via a dealer network as opposed to on a centralized exchange and move based on
1) PR’s, hype and forward looking statements
2) Hustlers and scammers riding the wave of the few actually trying to build a company
3) Once there’s a reasonable sized float MM manipulated the sooner you’ll learn when you pick a winner sell 1/2 when it doubles and play on the houses money and move on with yours. That of course assumes you have money and are not hoping this is yhe one OTC Ticker that will allow you to “retire”.
Of the 100’s of thousands of tickers that began on the OTC ONLY
MONSTER BECERAGE
Scott’s Miracls Gro
BJ’s
Pier 1 Imports.
Sirius XM.
Xerox / RadioShack / Eastman Kodak.
LoJack / Second Cup / Alcatel-Lucent.
Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac.During The Housing Crash
Mylan
And True Religion ever made it big. Look at Radio Shack now? . You can subtract FNMA / FMAC as they began big and fell to the OTC.
Those, outside of ADR’s are it. With that in mind Uplist Yet?
Instead you can read medical facts about chiropractic here;
https://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/chiro.html
Or this article written by a world renowned Oncologist here;
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-war-against-chiropractors/
Or here;
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7783892?dopt=Abstract
https://health.spectator.co.uk/the-evidence-shows-that-chiropractors-do-more-harm-than-good/
Or here;
https://theoutline.com/post/1617/chiropractors-are-bullshit?zd=1&zi=xdsrazqc
Or here;
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/cracking-down-on-chiropractic-pseudoscience/
http://www.historyofchiropractic.org/app/download/8299364/ChiroHistoryPrimer.pdf
Or just google “chiropractic Quackery” and you’ll get 1,000’s Of hits.
Or continue to believe in Quackery and be scammed. It’s your life.
Uplist yet?
I bought Thursday at $.1253 and sold 10 minutes later for $.1295 Todd cares about Todd. If they let the OTHER Todd have a say you might see something positive.
No, they’re not seeking millions, they’re seeking hundreds of dollars. It’s for the prestige of being a plaintiff and going to school to become a J.D. AFTER you pass the bar. As for this alleged “uplifting” according to this very detailed post its 6 weeks max - https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143175899
Yet aim replying to your post written six (6) weeks ago and 11 weeks since the company applied.
Ben, you’re a nice young man and you’ve made an admirable score. Listen to some Nirvana or Ween, roll a nug and enjoy, life is good.
Why? Did you ever visit the place?
Great find. Surprised I missed it as I subscribe to Forbes so thank you!
Sky High? Where? It can’t be sold through mail order and there are NO dispensaries in Ohio and none expected until at least June. Read and learn;
https://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2018/08/is_cbd_oil_legal_in_ohio_state.html
Uplist yet?
Canadian Aurora.
So is Xmas. Which one do you think will arrive first? Hint, it won’t be any CVSI Uplist.
I’m familiar with him and his works but thanks
Of course it will. It’s the OTC and this ticker has the typical cheering section as it’s many of their first investment big wins.
Many don’t understand the OTC is NOT a stock exchange and is ripe with predatory hustlers.
Never fall in love with an OTC ticker. Catch the Pump, ride it as high as your risk tolerance will allow, day Trade it thereafter as the volume flies sky high and the price differential on any given day is 20% or better and then as the volume recedes as does the price move on to the next one.
As for the magical healing powers of CBD here’s an article by a world renowned Oncologist who’s pro legalization on the subject;
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/medical-marijuana-as-the-new-herbalism-part-5-turning-herbalism-into-science-based-medicine/
Incorrect The study the NBC article concluded;
Conclusions:
“Beyond the role of cognition in vulnerability to substance use, the concurrent and lasting effects of adolescent cannabis use can be observed on important cognitive functions and appear to be more pronounced than those observed for alcohol”.
That study can be found at this URL; https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18020202
This was an actual] clinical study of a population-based sample of 3,826 seventh-grade students from 31 schools consisting of 5% of all students entering high school in 2012 and 2013 in the Greater Montreal region.
This as opposed to the article you cited in JAMA which was not a clinical study but alternatively was a Meta-analysis or review of a group of studies and can be found at the following URL;
https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18020202
The difference being the NBC article was quoting an actual clinical study. The article you quoted is a
meta-analysis or comparison of a group of studies not an actual clinical study
The mistake was easily made by one biased or a novice in clinical trials and clinical studies and the jargon or terminology used in both.
No, just the price As witnessed by FACTS.
Uplist yet?
Doesn’t CVSI also have IRTH Communications as their IR Firm?
Right on the PRICE, that’s what’s most important