Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
DBMM was revoked?
You fools thought revocation was going to prove you right, but the judge dismissed it and proved you wrong. YOUR CREDIBILITY IS GONE. You lost along with the DOE. You’re getting plenty of dumbass points though, you’ll probably win that one
You’re really scrambling here. Let me show you what happened with this case:
DISMISSED
The whole argument that the fail to file was exclusively DBMM’s fault was refuted by Foelak.
The JUDGE refuted it DUMBASS! Then she dismissed the OIP.
You’re really struggling here
Wrong post. This is the one you actually responded to:
“What’s your next bs argument?”
Why are you crying because I quote someone with actual CREDIBILITY.
Who do you think is more biased, the judge or the attorneys? I quote the judge, you quote attorneys.
Now you cry FOUL because the OIP is dismissed and IRRELEVANT now, but YOU CANT ACCEPT THAT.
What’s your next bs argument?
That whole argument tries to blame DBMM for the need to re-audit when it was their accounting firms fault it was required. The DOE’s whole argument is that there were no “mitigating circumstances”.
I use quotation marks because those are Judge Foelak’s words. Also, every bit about delinquency is wrong as the filings have been cured per judge Foelak.
PEOPLE KEEP GETTING “facts” FROM BIASED ATTORNEYS 7 year old COURT ARGUMENTS are NOT to be TRUSTED.
You are not very smart, or willfully ignorant…
All that means is they missed filings at some point. Which everyone is aware of and it is EXTREMELY COMMON.
I know you want to talk about lawyers who were arguing against DBMM 7 years ago. It distracts front the strides DBMM is currently taking to grow the business. Anything to distract from the present and future.
The tone is entirely presumptive, morons can believe what they say if they want but that doesn’t make it true.
Foelak had the last objective input on the OIP and she dismissed it.
Foelak dismissed this for good reason.
It’s trash, which is why this ultimately was dismissed. DOE was telling a fiction which Foelak saw through and dismissed the OiP
You need to check your source. IT’s a couple of lawyers creating an argument.
You shouldn’t get your information from one sides’ attorneys arguing a case. They are inherently biased to the extreme.
Not filing is pretty common. DBMM is up to date on their filings and judge Foelak determined the oip should be dismissed and it was.
It is riddled with inaccuracies. Foelak set the record straight with the dismissal. Here ya go. Read carefully:
https://www.sec.gov/files/alj/aljdec/2019/id1389cff.pdf
Current results for dumbest poll ever:
1 vote for stock bashers poll
0 votes for any other poll ever
Looks like your poll is the dumbest ever. Nice work
Let’s vote on the dumbest poll ever:
A) Stock Barbers poll
B) Any other poll
I vote for A
Only objective sources should be running polls…
Clearly you are not an objective source.
I don’t know why you’ve been making up narratives here for so long.
Probably because your friends and family don’t want to talk to you because your an a hole so you have nothing else to do.
Another narrative….
With your suspect 20,000 posts, it’s no wonder you want to distract people from your questionable motives here.
Nice narrative, you are relentless…
Anyone can see your 20000 posts of vitriol to know your narratives are nonstop
Another bs narrative.
You ARE GOOD AT MAKING UP STORIES. That’s why I post, to combat your constant misinformation.
Well, at least you admitted you need a nap…
Your strawman argument is the strawman argument dumbass.
Keep the insults coming, it demonstrates your quality and lowly intentions.
The amount of time and vitriol you have spent here is fantastic…
For someone who is constantly insulting other people’s intelligence and bragging about their own, you’re terrible at reading for comprehension…
Not trying to convince anyone to buy. I’m just warning people that you’ve been overflowing with 💩 for a long time here.
Look who’s talking mister expired facts.
Everyone knows your “truths” don’t last as long as refrigerated milk…
You sound confused…
Shareholders should beware that bananas have a longer shelf life than Barber’s “facts”…
You say that a lot…
“That was a FACT at the time!”
You should keep your “facts” in the refrigerator so you can squeeze a couple more days out of them
“That was a FACT at the time!”
Good things to come from this partnership with rapidly expanding 1ovmany imo.
Taner Kapucu and Mike Horwath are Founders and Co-CEOs of 1ovmany. Taner said, "Our partnership with Digital Clarity marks a significant milestone in our journey. Having the ability to partner with an industry leader in Digital Clarity represents for us a level of recognition and opportunity to truly harness and enhance client engagements and deliver even more value than we currently do."
By combining our internal organizational design, change management, technical expertise, and guidance with their external marketing acumen and execution, we are poised to deliver unparalleled value to clients seeking to unlock new growth opportunities, drive meaningful change, and achieve full, sustainable potential."
The dynamics of having a seat at the table of clients' decision-makers exponentially increase a consultancy's value, much like that of its attorneys or bankers.
Whether clients are looking to expand their presence in new markets, optimize their digital infrastructure, or enhance their brand visibility, the Digital Clarity and 1ovmany alliance offers a compelling solution while positively impacting the environment and society.
Together, they are committed to empowering B2B tech leaders to realize their vision and achieve extraordinary success in today's dynamic business landscape through sustainable execution and transformation.
We will share some of the results achieved on the way forward through updates and normal reporting.
You should put expiration dates on your facts and predictions.
They seem to be only temporarily accurate at best. Recurring theme…
“That was a FACT at the time!”
How many times have you said that?
Lol, the pot calling the kettle black
You’re so disingenuous
Yes, you always try and combine those like they’re a single event and always double down on your misrepresentations.
If you want people to stop accusing you of lying and manipulating, all you have to do is stop lying and manipulating.
I did. You’re lying about the 1:100,000 being a single event.
All you do is manipulate, mislead, and misrepresent.
What was the date of that exactly? Or are you trying to make multiple events look like one? LYING WHILE TRYING TO PROVE YOUR HONESTY AND ACCURACY.
YOU ARE THE KING OF CLOWNS
“Who warned RTGV/DBMM shareholders before the 1:100,000 in reverse splits, you? NOPE!”
I’m sorry YOU’RE FIRED BARBER. You’re a bad weatherman by your own admission, and a proven liar by the evidence.
Now you’re a weatherman? When weathermen forecast for 100% chance of snow over and over but it is 80 degrees and dry, they GET FIRED.
So your argument is you’re just terrible at predictions, but not a liar.
I agree, YOU ARE NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE. But you have also demonstrated yourself to be DISINGENUOUS as well.
“Is a weatherman branded a liar if his prediction is wrong?”
So the answer is YES, LYING weathermen bad at predictions get called LIARS and they are also FIRED.
Lol, I got a hot deal on some good bottom land for anybody that believes that.
“ I have NEVER posted anything knowingly incorrect, nor will I!”