Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
2-days to elapse.......
Within the next 48 hours we will know which camp on this site is going to be right.
Worth checking out the posting history on a certain individual on this board. I'm picking that one of the other penny stocks you refer to is Z-Trim. No smoke without fire IMO.
Are you familiar with satire, judging from your reply I'd say not as my post went directly over your head, although I guess most things do for obvious reasons.
I'm not particularly interested in your rhetoric, however I will take you to task on one issue and that is what happened in Germany. You know full well why the MAXD case failed (you were there remember) and why MAXD's lawyers strategically withdrew from the hearing before the judge gave his verdict. The judge had already indicated that the information presented was insufficient to demonstrate infringement of the patent and was going to rule accordingly plus MAXD's standing was also going to be ruled on, as per the ruling in the Google infringement filing in the USA, i.e. MAXD had and currently has no standing.
What you are attempting to do Rurouni is aptly summed up by an Abraham Lincoln quote:
“You can fool all the people some of the time and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time”
Your only purpose in posting all your nonsense is to pump MAXD stock, albeit very unsuccessfully over the last few months, to pay your legal bills. This is now evident in the information presented in MAXD's declaration to the Default Injunction. Perhaps Tom could elaborate as to why peanuts, buttons or MAXD stock are not going to cut it anymore!
And BTW, I've been meaning to tell you for quite some time, 'it definitely ain't so'!
Rurouni, Rurouni, Rurouni................ it is patently (get it?) obvious that anyone associated with Vedanti does not read the posts on this board, and more specifically your posts because if they did, surely they would have packed their bags and gone home a long time ago. Your almost instantaneous knowledge, (in some cases before filings have occurred, sush sush, wink wink, careful legals) not only about the litigation going on between MAXD and Vedanti/VSL but also about the whole legal system is astounding, absolutely astounding. After-all, your predications to date have been spot on, no doubt you'd like to regale us with a full list of MAXD's successes in litigation matters versus Google, Vedanti, VSL, Netflix........... and not forgetting the progress with the IMHC deal?
I've asked this before and you've never given me a straight answer, why do you bother? If you are so sure that MAXD are going to clean up and take all the spoils from Vedanti, VSL, Ms Nash, Google, Netflix etc etc why don't you keep quiet, let the MAXD stock price slide down to 0.0000001 and you could then pick up all 1.6 billion shares for $160? Then bide your time as all your predications come to fruition and sell the stock back at a healthy margin.
I'm not going to speculate on who you are as I believe that most individuals who peruse this board have a very good idea. Suffice to say that you must have a lot of time on your hands to maintain such a prolific posting regime whilst wading through all those court documents to give us such a glowing review of how MAXD will conquer the world and turn 1.6 billion shares at circa 0.004 into 1.6 billion shares at 0.0041.
Good luck going forward, you are going to need plenty of it IMO.
PS. What u think MaxD is doing..hmmmm...aaahhh ^_^
I'd hazard a guess and say they are looking for the original copy of the contract between Vedanti Systems Ltd and MAXD. Problem is Ru, it don't exist does it? I wonder what the contingency lawyers think about being duped into filing a case against Google on the basis of a forged contract? This is starting to get serious, I mean really serious, safe to say the brown stuff has well and truly hit the fan.
So shares sold in that day by the company?
"There will be a surprise on April 7Th OSC..interesting!"
I'm picking more than one surprise actually, and it will not bode well for the MAXD share price.
BUYER BEWARE
I wonder if the MAXD insiders who post on here are going to divulge some recent events that could very well affect proceedings on the 7th? As per my previous post, I'm picking a share price of 0.002 by close of trading on Friday 8th.
Looking forward to your feedback guys.
I would check your facts Rurouni, some of the information you have been posting recently is not only misleading but wrong. Go back to your source and ask for the original documentation before you post.
Anyone want to pick the MAXD share price at the end of trading on April 8th? According to what Rurouni is claiming will happen at the contempt hearing on the 7th there must be a good chance of 10 cents, maybe higher? My pick, 0.002 possibly lower depending on how many 'faithful investors' decide enough is enough.
The current speculation on this board is very similar to pre Dec 8th 2015, when MAXD was going to clean up in Mannheim and the stock went over 4 cents. If you track back to the postings at that time the number one pumper was Rurouni, hey, deja vu. There have been a number of posters who have suggested who Rurouni might be and therefore his association with MAXD, I'm not going there as it previously got me banned for trying to 'out' someone on this site. However, it is a very fair assumption that Rurouni is very close to the MAXD action and posts information that could only be known by someone who is has access to privileged information and who also states he has additional information that he cannot/will not divulge. (SEC issues here, but lets not go there)
So, let's assume that Rurouni knows a lot more than most of us on site and if that is correct, why is he pumping the MAXD stock like there's no tomorrow? If, what Rurouni states is true and MAXD are going to get a result out of the contempt hearing on the 7th April then why, as a substantial stock holder (his words) is he pumping? Surely, if you were so confident that MAXD will be handed the holy grail on the 7th then the best outcome as a stock holder would be sit tight, keep stum until after the hearing, get the desired outcome and the stock will head into the stratosphere then clean up offloading your stock.
The only explanation I can fathom is that nothing is going to happen in MAXD's favor on the 7th and someone is trying to off-load as much stock prior to the hearing as they can.
"By the way, who cares who I am as long shareholders get some nice information shared...ssshhhhh"
The SEC?
Ho Ho Ho, touched a nerve there!
'Methinks thou dost protest too much' I wonder why?
I never said you were any good at pumping, and based on the current share price I'd have to say you are pretty useless. Wink, wink, cough, cough, bingo, to quote your good friend Rurouni.
You claim I am completely clueless, however I seem to have more knowledge about the MAXD / VSL Communications issue that you, so if I'm completely clueless what does that make you?
It seems every time anyone, not just me, posts any contrary perspective to either you, Rurouni or Quantum Sound, you guys get very aggressive and want to shoot the messenger, why is that?
If you do not want to waste your time, do not read my posts. Wow, that was simple wasn't it and if you could not figure that out on your own I wonder who is the clueless one here?
BTW guys, what are MAXD going to do about the circa $700k that Google have been awarded in costs against MAXD? I know what, you could sell another 250 million shares at 0.0028
Hi Newbies, this is the Rurouni & ican335 site.
The format is we pretend not to know each other and keep posting complimentary information which hopefully the casual observer will swallow and buy our failing stock which in turn will get us the funds to pay our lawyers.
Pump, pump, pump & pump.
Correct me if I am wrong, however you've never answered the question that has been asked many times on this site, what specifically is your role within MAXD? Your avatar recently stated you were Chairman and CFO, it now reads Top Executive and CFO. Are you Chairman or a Top Exective? You obviously have a lot of insider information which you selectively disseminate on this site, why not divulge your role and add some credibility to your claims?
Another question that a number of shareholders have been asking and no answer has been forthcoming, is what has happened to Lloyd Trammell, the inventor of the MAXD audio technology? Surely, all those shareholders who came on board due to the claims that were being made about licensing the audio technology deserve an answer?
And why do you consistently target 'newbies' with your posts? Is this to entice new investors to purchase shares off the company which in turn bank rolls the $10 million expenses that MAXD burns each year? If your claims about monetising your litigation on the 7th April is true why do you keep pumping the stock, why not wait and and cash in after the event?
And finally, can you ask your colleague Quantum Sound, why he was asking me recently about the weather in Auckland? It's a bit difficult to tell when you are circa 12,000 miles away!
"OSC is between the President n the Judge, n monetary damages n relief to Max Sound Corp, which reflect in shareholder value in due time." (sic)
Interesting theory................ how much "monetary damages" do you believe the judge may award? Whatever the figure, deduct the necessary legal expenses etc etc and then divide the resulting amount by 1.65 billion shares. Let's say the award was $50k (look up some contempt awards and even $50k is over the the top), deduct 50% for legals etc and then split that amongst 1.65 billion shares. The result? 0.000015 cents per share!
Add this onto the current share price and the shares will shoot up to 0.002615 cents!
This also assumes the 'President' has $50k!
Interesting point re Rurouni changing his avatar from Chairman and CFO to Top Executive and CFO. It is only in the last couple of weeks that Chairman and CFO were added, it was blank up until then. Maybe this reflects a changing of the guard at MAXD with Lloyd Trammell gone?
Anyone find out why Lloyd has departed? As the inventor of the original MAX-D HD Audio does his departure indicate a major shift of MAXD's approach to making money? If so, surely MAXD should be informing shareholders and potential shareholders of their intent? It is also worth mentioning that the information on this page entitled 'Meet The MAXD Team' is now out of date and incorrect if Lloyd Trammell is no longer part of the team. As a shareholder, I would appreciate an update please?
Where's Lloyd?
Can anyone tell me when I get out of jail?
Does a subscription get you out of jail?
Would love to meet in a London pub over a pint of Guinness! Trouble is, I'm currently circa 11,386 miles away.
I have a feeling this exchange could be taken down pretty soon, you could try knowwhentorollem@hotmail.com
Hi Urban,
Funny who you meet in here. I've only spent the odd night in jail before, so this is a whole new experience. Apparently I'm being bunked up with Bubba tomorrow, wish me luck!
Any ideas on going forward?
Cheers
Brian
Yep, nuts.
I'm sorry, can I get out of jail please?
Hey Nauty, you mean this Section 11?
. Disclosure
The Company is committed to providing timely, consistent and credible dissemination of information, consistent with disclosure requirements under applicable securities laws. The goal of our Disclosure Policy is to raise awareness of the Company's approach to disclosure among the board of directors, officers and employees and those authorized to speak on behalf of the Company. The Disclosure Policy extends to all employees and officers of the Company, its Board of Directors and those authorized to speak on its behalf. It covers disclosures in documents filed with the securities regulators and written statements made in the Company's annual and quarterly reports, news releases, letter to shareholders, presentations by senior management, information contained on the Company's web site and other electronic communications. It extends to oral statements made in meetings and telephone conversations with members of the investment community (which includes analysts, investors, investment dealers, brokers, investment advisers and investment managers), interviews with the media as well as speeches and conference calls. As a prerequisite and condition of employment, all employees must sign an acknowledgment by which they agree to adhere to this policy, which is provided to the new hire prior to his/her start date.
Does your head actually spin whilst you are typing your posts? One thing is for sure, they don't make any coherent sense.
With regards to Ms Nash going to court on the 24th for the contempt hearing, that's between her and the court, nothing to do with MAXD or MAXD's share price. Yet more smoke and mirrors form the MAXD management.
If I was hoping for a return on my MAXD shares (I wrote off that possibility a long time ago) I'd be very concerned that all the Chairman seems to do is sit on this blog pumping his stock! Says it all really.
"Re-post to newbies, shareholders n viewers, the 1.65 billion shares filed is a direct result from the US Court Case n the Germany Case ruling caused by Vedanti VSL (Ms Nash) interference."
SAY WHAT?
So there you have it everyone, MAXD management confirm that they have to issue more shares to stay afloat. This is called ever decreasing circles as the stock gets more and more diluted until, to use a phrase often quoted by Greg Halpen, BINGO they disappear up their own orifices.
I just do not get who would be buying this stock? Irrespective what price it is, 0.0028 or 0.000000028, it's doomed.
BUYER BEWARE!
Excuse me, or am I missing something here? Greg Halpern, the Chairman of MAXD, in his bio on this site makes the following statement:
"For his diverse efforts, Halpern and his innovations have been featured on most major TV and radio networks and in many major publications including books by celebrities such as Dr. Oz. Famous leaders in several industries have endorsed and worked with Halpern and his innovative ventures including Steve Forbes, Al Gore, Wes Clark, Steadman Graham, George Foreman, Larry King, Mick Fleetwood, Pitbull, SBA Chief Hector Barreto, Congressman Michael Oxley and Congresswoman Sue Kelly who brought him to congress to testify on ways to improve small business in America."
I'd just like to highlight the part where it states: "Famous leaders in several industries have endorsed and worked with Halpern and his innovative ventures including Steve Forbes, Al Gore, Wes Clark, Steadman Graham, George Foreman.............."
Hold on a minute, George Foreman???? Hey Greg, are you absolutely sure that Big George would like to endorse you based on this litigation between you and him: https://casetext.com/case/george-foreman-enterprises ?
Just to make sure George is AOK with his endorsement, I've just emailed him to find out if he's comfortable with you associating yourself with him. Depending on George's response, I might just contact all those other "famous leaders..........."
Watch this space!
Meet the Chairman, wink wink!
If you have the time and the inclination to sift through the multitude of court documents available on the internet pertaining to Greg Halpern, Chairman of MAXD, you will find a lot of information. In 5-mins I found the following documents. You could argue that anyone in business has to endure litigation as part of doing business however most business people I know have never been near a court as they conduct their business activities to avoid having to spend so much time and money tied up in legal stand-offs. Then I guess there are serial litigators, I'm not sure how many court cases you have to be involved in to be classed as such but there is certainly a common thread with this individual.
http://www.wiwd.uscourts.gov/opinions/pdfs/2006-2009/06-C-361-C-02-05-07.PDF
https://casetext.com/case/george-foreman-enterprises
http://www.jurisnotes.com/Cases/circlegroup.pdf
https://casetext.com/case/wexler-v-circle-group-holding
Trust me, I was being facetious, nobody in their right mind would give you anything for this stock, it is worthless and I fully expect it to dwindle down to nothing in the next couple of weeks. Hoping to monetise by taking an 80 year old women to court is like hoping for 100 straight reds on a roulette table, it doesn't happen and as you quite rightly pointed out, getting an award is one thing, getting paid is a completely different matter.
Buyer beware, very aware.
Give them a break, all they have to do is issue another 862,068,966 shares at 0.0029 cents/share and they'll be AOK for another quarter.
With 1.65 billion shares issued, no revenue and expenses of $10 million last year I reckon you are on money.
Good post, now 19 million shares gone at 0.003 cents.
I note someone off-loaded 4.6 million shares at 0.0031, why would they do that for a measly $14k when they must have bought in at a much higher level?
How many shares do you have?
Please be aware that Vedanti has no involvement with MAXD, this is smoke and mirrors from the MAXD management team. The agreement is between Max Sound Corporation and VSL Communications a shell company that owns nothing, zilch, zero. If you go back through Rurouni's comments on this site you will see a host of posts directed at the "Newbies" i.e. those unsuspecting potential investors that MAXD needs to bank roll their company. Last year, MAXD revenue $0.00 expenditure $10 million. MAXD shares issued 1.65 billion. Even if MAXD did manage to gain a payout of some sort (big "if") it would have to be hundreds of millions to affect 1.65 billion shares.
I rest my case.
Yes, what is that wink thing?
I commentated on it previously that my impression is of a con man about to perpetrate his fraud, I reckon I'm pretty close to the mark on that one.
MAXD stock down 19% and 17 million shares changing hands today, seems that whenever Rurouni posts the share price falls, must be some sort of inverse logic, maybe Qauntum Sound could explain it for us..........
My post was nothing to do with MAXD, it was to do with Greg Halpern, suggest you read it again, slowly this time so it sinks in.
I read through the "license agreement" throughly, several times in fact and I even got a lawyer to read it to get a legal perspective. The agreement is between Max Sound Corporation and VSL Communications (not Vedanti or Vednati Systems Ltd as you keep spinning) and VSL Communications is a shell company which owns nothing, zilch, zero. Sure, you will get your day in court and the AAA with Ms Nash however that's all you'll get, you cannot touch Vedanti Systems Limited the patent owner and that was confirmed by the latest federal court decision. Spin that one Greg!
"Draw u own conclusion" (sic)
I have Greg, based on what the judge said not the MAXD spin.
I see you've stopped targetting "Newbies" as regularly as you were, is this because selling 400 million outstanding shares at 0.003 isn't going to pay the MAXD management salaries this month?
"If the German case, if the German case.............."
It's a broken record. Greg, you and I both know that the German case failed due to the MAXD mismanagement of and your inept counsel and experts. I repeat:
As I have already stated on this forum, I had a friend in court on Dec 8th 2015 in Mannheim, back in the days when I believed MAXD was a sound investment (no pun intended). You were there Greg and you will recall the reasons that Judge Kircher was going to pronounce a decision on the day of the hearing rather than wait the obligatory 2-3 weeks and why at that point MAXD's lawyers withdrew their claims rather than wait for the decision.
The judge gave 5-reasons with there was no-infringement and none had anything to do with Ms Nash:
1. Vectors that merely indicate a relationship with an earlier frame are not pixel data. Although the expression "pixel data" is broad, the interpretation cannot be without limits. This is confirmed by the purpose of the invention: the patent does not want to compress, but vectors represent compressed data that are decomposed on the receiver's side.
2. Data that merely relates to such vectors to blocks but not to individual pixels is not pixel data. Pixel data is only data that is related to individual pixels.
3. It is not sufficient that such vectors are determined just for some regions and not for all regions because the claim says "each block". MAXD wants to make a difference between expressions "every" and "each", but this is not convincing. Also in the description of the patent, there is no hint that one could leave away data for some of the regions.
4. There is no selection of pixel data because only one vector is determined per block and it is always this vector that is transmitted.
5. No selection is made on the basis of the degree of detail of the frame, but if at all on the basis of the degree of detail in a previous frame.
Judge Kircher then went onto say that since there are so many reasons of non-infringement, we do not have to discuss other defences.
So, in a nutshell, Ms Nash had absolutely nothing to do with the infringement case failing in Mannheim and to claim otherwise is not only disingenuous but a lie. The blame for the case failing falls fairly and squarely on the shoulders of the MAXD management, the MAXD lawyers and the MAXD so-called "experts" who prepared the case.
Good luck with crucifying Ms Nash, you may well succeed in one form or another however I can state unequivocally that MAXD will never make a cent from the Vedanti patents.
"Quantum Sound knocked that down"
Q. But where is Quantun Sound?
A. Banned from posting on here.
Q. Why?
A. Draw your own conclusions.
Q. If the MAXD hype is true, why is the share price now South of 0.003 cents?
A. Draw your own conclusions