what is it that you think fox conn does? these factories are all the same. the neurosync was made in shenzen china, as is the I phone... you've been wrong about so much, you have no idea what you're talking about and you claim to be an engineer.

http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2012/12/19/life-inside-foxconns-facility-in-shenzhen/

What we learned today:

1.don't trust someone on a penny stock board who claims to be an engineer

2.the neurosync has both fcc and UL certification

3.companies routinely outsource assembly of there products

4.the neurosync uses the tgam1 r2.9 sensor with tgat-L64 1037 voltage regulator making it the latest think gear am sensor on the market, the mindwave utilizes the tgam1 r2.0 which is the sensor from 2011, this really is the best device for the money. the most current tgam1 sensor currently available is the tgam1 r2.4 as seen here: http://pt.aliexpress.com/item/Brainwave-Sensor-Brain-Control-Toys-Mind-Games-Bio-sensor-Neurosky-Thinkgear-Am-Tgam-Geek-Bci-Bio/32318993776.html?spm=2114.02020208.3.69.o5UpQY&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_6_79_78_77_82_80_62,searchweb201644_0,searchweb201560_6

apple products are made of no actual apple components. coincidentally the same factories that assembled the neurosync are the ones assembling I phones

fcc i.d.:

http://i.imgur.com/IWiJYTr.jpg

ul certification:

http://i.imgur.com/XSMzIa5.jpg

prove that you're an actual engineer and you know what you're talking about. everything you've said proves otherwise

any eeg is an antenna, it reads electric impulses. rechargeable aaa batteries are actually sub 1.5 volts, generally 1.2 volts . so they are actually safer. you are 3-5 times more likely to have your ear blown off by that Bluetooth in your ear than the neurosycn with an aaa battery. btw the neurosync is ul certified and has an fcc id

you state it had no fcc i.d. well:

http://i.imgur.com/IWiJYTr.jpg

you also stated it had no ul certification...:

http://i.imgur.com/XSMzIa5.jpg

does that look like a sticker to you? you erroneously stated that ul certification is a sticker on the pcb, that was never the case, the ul cert, as well as other letters and numbers on the pcb, are a white silkscreen on top of the solder mask, attempting to remove them damages the soldermasks and potentially the substrate layer.

did you make that up about it being a sticker for ul certification? and for the manufacturer being required to remove the "sticker" from the pcb? utter malarkey lol.

1.5 volt alkaline < 5 volt nicd or mihd. < lithium ion

your blue tooth is 4.75-5.8 voltz, the aaa battery in the neurosync is 1- 1.5 voltz, the Bluetooth in your ear is twice as dangerous as the neurosync... nicd mihd batteries are much more dangerous than the neurosync, yet you just admitted you put it in your ear...

"Circuits, or parts of a circuit supplied with voltage not exceeding 35V (peak) ac or dc and not generating voltages above that value, are not considered to present a fire hazard. Such supplied circuits are not subject to fault condition testing."

that is not how ul certification works. for starters, they dont put a sticker on a pcb. it is stamped. second, to remove the stamp would mean cutting into the pcb. try again???

that's not how it works...

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=117224196

you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. the ul certified marking is on the pcb, but you think you're an engineer. so you already knew that...

dont take my word for it, do your own due diligence on your self. it only took me a minute to find all the answers by scouring the thousands of posts on this board

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=117224196

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=117224196

heh heh heh... looks like you were the one who claimed to be an engineer

actually, you had no idea what type of sensor is in the neurosync, until I showed everyone what was inside. the sensor alone costs 42$, that is the wholesale price. it is not the same sensor as in the neurosky mindwave

the mind wave has the 2011 revision of the tgam sensor

the neurosync has the latest revision of the tgam sensor

what seperates the two are the rf and emf filtering algorithms present in the latest revision tgam1 sensor

you think a company would sell a 42$ sensor for 9.99?

before I posted proof that the neurosync is in fact a bci device and works better than the mindwave, there were claims by dank that the results were fake

he claims to be an engineer, yet he was unable to take apart the device and analyze it. a task your average 12 year old would have no problem doing.

one day he got curious and attached a wire to the neurosync in hopes of proving that it doesn't work.

what he really did was create an rf antenna, a bci device senses electrical impulse and records them. by making it into an antenna all he did was prove how little he knew about engineering.

he actually proved the device worked better than expected.

so before we take your word on anything lets get some facts cleared up:

1 you stated the neurosync would never be released, and you were wrong

2 you stated there would be a reverse split by now and you were wrong

3 you stated that the neurosync did not work, and you were wrong

4 you stated that the neurosync is worth 9.99 and you were wrong

5 you stated the neurosync was the same as the mindwave, and you were wrong.

with everything you were wrong about, why should anyone believe a word out of your mouth?

so you're saying the mindwave is garbage to? doesn't the sensor hold a world record for heaviest object moved through a bci?

as likely as any other stock on the otc market.

you claimed to be an engineer. you claimed the neurosync doesn't work and was emulating eeg signals. I posted a video of the internals of the neurosync , inside was the latest revision neurosky mindwave sensor, newer than the one from 2011 that is in the current mindwave. that video proved that you were wrong. any engineer worth his salt would've opened it up as soon as they bought it. I wonder what else you are wrong about?...

they already did. it was 5000 units

that isn't true at all. you're making arbitrary statements as if you're at the trading desk putting these orders through

http://i.imgur.com/0cASC9k.jpg

dont take my word for it...

more buys coming in...

if everyone on earth bought one of these that would equal 940 billion gross. no way its hitting a dollar . on the other hand it hit close to a penny without a product...

lol , dd is big around here right? all of what you said is in the filings

people do a lot of things, that doesn't make it so.
I was referring to the volume after the sell off. id say over 100 million shares bought in less than 10 hours is pretty heavy volume for vois.

I haven't invested 50k in vois. why are the numbers so arbitrary around here?

then how do you explain the increase in volume after the huge sell off?

muahahahahahaha!!! after planning for years to scam invsetors out of their thousands, by raising millions in funding, researching and developing the worlds smallest bci device, the mad scientists at vois' plan has come to fruition /s. sounds like an Austin powers movie if you ask me. the more likely scenario is:

brent saw a market for a consumer based eeg. vois wanted to make it small as possible so it would be readily accepted. after a few years of r&d a prototype was developed, and later released on the market on alimited basis of 5000 units for a trial run. investors cashed out their shares and the price plummeted. still not at a no bid and the price has been almost this low before, the smart investors are not worried. rarely on the otc market is an actual product released. bashers are doing a great job of getting the share price low. I bought a ton at .0002 so thank you. I'm holding this till it hits my target exit point. if it fails it fails. you guys sound like a paper bag floating in the wind. any new potential investor coming on this board is going to read the stickies, the constant negativity , and think to themselves "why on earth are these posters still here? something else is going on, .0002 is a bargain, I think il drop $1000 and see where this goes" if anything you are encouraging people to buy. volume has never been higher. keep it up guys :)

btw... hows that neurosync antenna working out for you?

IM BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://i.imgur.com/0cASC9k.jpg

currently own 50,000,000 shares. feeling great. cannot wait to cash out. my only regret is I bought the bulk at .0013... then again you never know when a stock like this will hit a penny or more. worth the risk imho.

but I bought .0013. I'm keeping my shares, have a nice day :)

hey danklitebeausoldier...
I'm still here...
and I'm I still have my 27 m shares :)

for gaming, the emotive uses gestures and blinks. it reads brain waves slightly better than the neurosync. its also hundreds of dollars more. during the holiday season, is the average parent going to say I just bought jimmy a 400$ ps4, I guess another 400-500 wont hurt il get him an emotive, or will they see the neurosync and say it will help my hyperactive attention deficit disorder child concentrate and focus better for 100$. sounds cut and dry to me.

re-read my post, the ear is the best position or a single sensor, the neurosync has this, the emotive has several less expensive sensors , synergistically they work better than the neurosync, but not by much... the reason he emotive has been out for so long and hasn't taken off is the price tag, the reason the mindwave has been out for so long and hasn't taken off is... poor sensor placement and older rf filtering algorithms, the reason he neurosync is the best price for performance is... its hundreds of dollars less than the next best thing, and it works much better than the mindwave. game. set. match

the neurosync and the emotive both read brain waves well, the emotive does this slightly better, the eeg sensor in the neursync ear piece actually works better than any single emotive scalp sensor,

controlling a game with emotive is cumbersome, it does NOT use brain waves to do so, rather blinks and gestures, which are ineffective

that's not how it works, any engineer worth their salt can tell that the neurosync works just by looking at the pcb and cpu.

if you claim the neurosync doesn't work, you are by proxy claiming the neurosky device doesn't work, but guiness has the neuorsky mind wave as the record holder for “Heaviest machine moved using a brain control interface”

source: http://neurogadget.com/2011/04/12/neurosky-mindwave-sets-guinness-world-record-for-largest-object-moved-using-a-brain-computer-interface/1820

so by claiming the neurosync doesn't work, by proxy you are also claiming Guinness was incorrect. now that is highly unlikely, seeing as a 4 year old record that is potentially dubious would nto hold up to scrutiny from the scientific community, if in fact it did not work.

tldr: the mindwave was verified by guinness to work, it contains the earliest tgam1 sensor with the first series of rf interference filtering algorithms, the neuorsync contains the tgam1 sensor revision r2.9 and has the latest rf interference filtering algorithms.

mindwave<neurosync

but the emotive is 400$ more, and the is the latest edition of the neurosky eeg with the latest rf interference filtering algorithms,

the emotive can do more, yes, but it doesn't do more all that well, the gestures and blinking aren't useful or fast enough to be used for gaming and are highly inaccurate,

the emotive measures eeg activity well, so does the neurosync, the neurosync is 400$ less.

neurosync is clearly the winner.

tbh I was incredibly worried this week, even contemplated selling my shares at .001 ... thank god I didn't, the international market is going to make this bci huge and the development of further patents is encouraging. they said the device didn't exist, it was a scheme , a scam, then they said it would be delayed till next year, then they said it didn't work, then they said it had no app.

it exists, it was released 6 months before they nay sayers said it would, it is proven to WORK, it has EVERY app that neurosky has...

GO VOIS