Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The unjust enrichment claim was against VPLM and the award was $84,000 dollars to Plaintiff TK,
Trust VPLM to report the truth, nope, false statement.
VPLM is really good about putting out bogus pr’s. Emil Malyucyuck is pleased about the board members of VPLM’s breach of fiduciary duty verdict and unjust enrichment for VPLM.
Very
Pleased
Loser
Malak
Very pleased he lost a lawsuit and the board have to pay half a million dollars+
Amen to that! A Locksmith win is a win!!
However it is worded it is still a loss for VPLM and a win for Locksmith.
VPLM is in breach of fiduciary duty
And lost on all bogus counts to Locksmith
And the jury awarded a monetary verdict to Locksmith.
Shareholders should be aware of the facts.
Locksmith won the lawsuit. VPLM lost on all their bogus claims. The jury found the BOD “in breach of fiduciary duty” and awarded Locksmith a monetary settlement plus interest.
A win for Locksmith is a loss for VPLM.
In an imaginary world it might be otherwise but in the Nevada courts it’s filed as a win for Locksmith .
Judgement posted at
www.locksmithfinancial.com
Passed
What sham loan? The alleged sham loan that never was , that was not proven in court, VPLM ALLEGED claims that were never proven in court, VPLM was awarded nothing for all their lies and deceit.
That’s because VPLM lost on all their claims, ,the court did not rule in favor of VPLM, they LOST on all their claims
Shares not going back LMAO
LMAO, shares aren’t coming back ever
This narrative of crying and screaming is pure bs, manufactured by VPLM as is their imaginary win.
The board do not have directors insurance.
It’s in the jury verdict , the STELLAR BOD were found “IN BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY.
All the alleged claims had no merit.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, That Judgment be entered in favor of
having heard and considered the testimony, evidence, proof and arguments offered by the respective parties and the cause then having been submitted to the Jury for decision, the Jury being fully advised in the premises; and having duly rendered its verdict, in favor of the above-named Plaintiff Locksmith
13
Plaintiff Locksmith · Financial Corporation and against Defendants Emil Malak, Dennis Chang,
14
Thomas Sawyer, Colin Tucker, Edwin Candy, and Mike Waggett, on the claim of Breach of Fiduciary 15
Duty, in the amount of $355,000.00, plus pre-judgment interest from May 21 , 2015 in the amount of 16
$91 .306.17 (calculation attached as "Exhibit 1"). 17
Can anyone explain to me “on the breach of fiduciary duty “ pertaining to all the members of the BOD.
“They got rid of one scam artist”
The person you are referring to financed VPLM to the tune of $1.8 million dollars and was vindicated by the jury verdict .
All the false allegations by Malak and the BOD were found to be untrue.
Locksmith won the lawsuit, VPLM lost .
The jury did not find any truth in the false allegations levied against Locksmith and TK.
Apparently the jury didn’t find any impropriety by Locksmith, VPLM LOST all counterclaims against Locksmith , the jury awarded $355,000 to Locksmith and VPLM GOT NOTHING. Their claims were basically dismissed. The stock is not going back to treasury they lost the case, their claims were not found to be TRUE. The jury has written their verdict , undeniably Locksmith Win ,
VPLM Lost
Vplm lost in all their claims, the court case is Concluded, VPLM gets nothing awarded by the jury, their claims and counterclaims were not proven in a court of law, it’s OVER for VPLM , VPLM LOST , LOCKSMITH and TK for the WIN, did I sat WIN, I did say Locksmith for the WIN
And VPLM LOST ON ALL THEIR CLAIMS THEY WERE AWRDED NOTHING, NADA, ZIP, ZERO, ZILCH
VPLM CLAIMS WERE NOT PROVEN AND THEY RECEIVED NOTHING
VPLM LOST PERIOD
To set the record straight, public records show.
Locksmith sued VPLM first
Instead of answering the civil suit brought by Locksmith, VoIP-pal filed suit against Locksmith in federal court. That suit was dismissed. Locksmith filed first that is why the Locksmith v VoIP-pal suit went forward with a win for Locksmith and a total loss for VoIP-pal. VoIP-pal did not win anything .Not one counter claim , nothing nada, period.
Considering VPLM lost the court case and Locksmith WON.
Vplm afraid to post the verdict as decided by the jury, the verdict shows the TRUTH, LOCKSMITH, RK AND TK WON
VPLM lost the trial and they are hiding something by not posting the complete verdict.
For under a buck you can get a spin of bullshit
Vplm will have to post or it will show up somewhere, it will be found eventually
Locksmith/ RK FOR THE WIN
BPLM / VOIPPAL LOST
TRUTH WILL PREVAIL
PATIENCE IS A HURT YOU
Got that right, VPLM LOST, and they are not posting the jury verdict, hiding something perhaps!
If you have access to the jury verdict , print it please.
VoIP pal should post the jury verdict in its entirety as written by the jury, not their interpretation.
Wrong
Locksmith sued first in Nevada state court, VoIP pal responded by a lawsuit in federal court. The Voippal federal suit was stayed and eventually dismissed. Locksmith for the win , VoIP-pal lost.
Yes, LOSS FOR VPLM, WIN FOR LOCKSMITH AND TK
08/19/2019
Verdict (Judicial Officer: Delaney, Kathleen E.)
Debtors: Thomas E Sawyer (Defendant), Emil Malak (Defendant), Colin Tucker (Defendant), Edwin Candy (Defendant), Dennis Chang (Defendant), Mike Waggett (Defendant)
Creditors: Locksmith Financial Corporation (Plaintiff)
Judgment: 08/19/2019, Docketed: 08/22/2019
Total Judgment: 355,000.00
Debtors: VOIP-Pal.Com Inc (Third Party Defendant)
Creditors: TK Investment (Third Party Plaintiff)
Judgment: 08/19/2019, Docketed: 08/22/2019
In plain English
The “Debtors”are the Defendants-and they have to pay the “Creditor”Locksmith $355000 total judgement awarded by the jury.
It does not say anywhere Locksmith has to pay anything.
Searching for suckers, I got the email! Next breakout stock! Really!!
Emil thinks he’s worth it, too bad he doesn’t believe in VPLM, he hasn’t invested his own money.
781,000,000 shares owned by Emil Malak acquired by his greed
He acquired more shares than most
Fortune 500 CEO’s ever earn
For companies with revenue
Check out this unjust enrichment lawsuit, no where near what Emil Malak has unjustly given himself, without a single dime of his own money invested. How about a shareholders meeting with the board?
https://www.courthousenews.com/delaware-supreme-court-gives-new-life-to-investors-bancorp-shareholder-suit/
Disturbing is a CEO ,Emil Malak, that runs VPLM like his own private piggy bank. Dilution , stock for gifts,
No personal investment on his behalf into VPLM. Just taking other people’s money and lining his own pockets. Pays himself more than any Fortune 500 CEO. Bonuses for what? Bonuses should be returned to treasury.
NEXT AGM ?
Shareholders have a responsibility to oversee the proper management of the company. They have a duty to call the organizational management and board of directors to account for the performance of the company. Shareholders may ask questions, seek clarifications and even raise objections to the actions and decisions of the management. Shareholders usually address management during the annual general meeting but they can convene extraordinary and special meetings to discuss specific agenda relating to the management of the company.
Paid to the slime ball Emil Malaka
V-P-L-M. V-P-L-M
VERY. VERY
PROBABLE. PROBABLE
LOSE. LEGAL
MONEY. MESS
TAKE YOUR PICK
Because he is a megalomaniac?
Just saying