Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Very hard to know since there was no mention of to whom the convertible note was issued. Oh wait, maybe we missed the 8K.
I checked again, no 8K for the 150K convertible note issued in April.
Right in line with no factual PO's.
But man, it sure would be nice to lend someone 10K for all those shares then be able to turn around in quick fashion and have 93K plus in your pocket.
I didn't even come close to that with my high speed metal tubing forays, only doubled five times for way more investment, recently just like a virgin. But gosh, that took almost two and a half years. This crap here took maybe a month or less. How does that happen?
For factual (fact based) clarity, this "company" holds no trademarks to anything, "products", services or otherwise.
Yes, I understood the BS part about $150 in "product".
The $150K is the convertible note they entered into and forgot to inform the shareholders, through a filing. Like when they issue stock to insiders as debt conversion.
Filings like when the "company" enters into convertible note debt agreements. Those filings?
When in August? Can we pick other names or are we held to just those 4?
Wow, 0.0031 per share in August and at today's price, wow. Bet some of those were sold. Maybe the "company should have waited until "approximately" today to convert that debt. Fewer free trading shares anyhow. Any idea what those $10K in shares were worth at close today? To the insiders, $93.5K. I'm pretty sure they don't mind selling shares at today's closing prices.
The insiders are thanking the blind sheep investing and chasing this higher.
Is this part of that $150K and its now $140K?
So confusing.
Enough already.
Has anyone factually seen a purchase order from Four Link or Amazon? Anyone even been able to contact Four Link?
Contacting 7-11 and Shop Rite is easy, and they communicate rather quickly. Would Amazon the company factually submit a purchase order or is it some phantom unnamed entity with an Amazon Vendor Express account that allegedly submitted a purchase order.
This successful ruse allegedly occurred on 09-16-2016, yet there was no alleged "product" being advertised, displayed or sold anywhere.
We were told new name, new ticker, new symbol, new "product", new whatever, and here we are. Same old non-existent everything.
Is there is a raw materials network? Is there is a production site somewhere? Is there is a shipping department?
The only thing new appears to be more debt.
I would seriously question who the person or entity who would have lent $150K to begin with, but more importantly, this allegedly occurred in April, and we found out about it on 09-12-2016. And yet, still no disclosure of the entity.
If that doesn't raise red flags, I don't know what would. Anyone purposely ignoring facts and yet investing their hard earned money and encouraging others to do the same on nothing more the public relations propaganda for the benefit of select insiders should expect no sympathy.
Insider enrichment seems to be progressing as planned by the select few.
False.
Claims through misleading PRs are for entertainment only and have not been factually founded. Alleged corporate HQ of claimed points of sale have no idea of product or alleged "vendor", which remains without any contact information. I'm supposing 7-11 and Shop Rite are looking into this.
No factual foundation any "product" exists at all.
Debt exists. Founded well after the fact. Undisclosed note holder. But some savvy investors could probably figure out who in three guesses or less.
Don't be too hasty. The amended 10Q Report will come out soon and all will be well. Or not.
Keep in mind the TM for the alleged existing and not new "product" as promised was abandoned for failure to respond on 03-30-2016 (USPTO 8661934). The new alleged TMs for the new alleged "product" have not been registered as 86963372 requires additional information and 86954240 has been denied.
Also suggest savvy investors might want to check corporate HQ regarding these alleged sales sites in the northeast. They didn't seem to know what I was inquiring about and provided some interesting insight regarding sales of hemp infused products in their corporate controlled stores. Wakefern Food Corporation (Shop Rite) and Southland Corporation (7-11) in case anyone cares to do their own duly diligent background.
That box of alleged "product" that was sold last quarter sure seems to have been making the rounds lately.
They do like the use of the word "approximate".
How does that translate when the alleged "PO", which by the way no one has seen, "approximates" the alleged order without "approximating" the alleged results.
So basically in a nutshell (pun intended):
This single employee "company" sells shares. And nothing else.
Misleading press releases claiming false information (most notably trademark claims), consistently late filings (the calendar never changes), failure to file a notice of late filings (see calendar), misrepresentative filings regarding events after the fact (most notably issuance of notes and payments); are not "products" or "services". Those are ideas and/or forward looking hopes.
Interest in a supposed energy shot or drink containing an undisclosed amount or squirt of hemp based something or another doesn't seem to be worth anyone's effort. Not even the big boys that already have known products and facilities.
Nothing here but paper.
Hope everyone enjoys the last part of the summer. Off for another adventure. I'll check in again next month.
ROCK, out.
But, I read somewhere here that a lot of NASDAQ companies don't file extensions and file reports late. I may have read that incorrectly.
Disagree with your opinion.
Unless there is an offer of factual proof, none of that physically exists.
No new symbol. No new name. No distribution. No product. No product on shelves.
Those are the facts.
Unless and until otherwise proven, with substantiated verifiable facts, none of that exists.
You are entitled to your opinion.
It's just a reclamation paint job. Do you think it was brush, roller or spray.
"Sooooo, let me get this straight. There is no product? GASP!"
Well, apparently there is some type of "product" somewhere. Most of us just have not been able to find it, because we're just not looking in the correct stores on the correct shelves. Maybe we're just unfamiliar with the "new product" and its packaging and have been staring right at it all along.
We could all get together and make a map of where the alleged "product" is not, so we don't repeat fruitless efforts.
No one seems to want to divulge where we all may see it, touch it, maybe purchase it. Except, well, it just doesn't exist.
This, of course, is just my simple, honest and humble opinion. I may be wrong. But then again, no one can prove something exists simply because most of us can only say it doesn't where we've looked. At least that I can find. Maybe someone can correct me. I've been wrong before.
That appears to be a very good response to a very good question.
Like the secret convertibles being entered into without stockholder knowledge considered to be good. Wonder how many more secret convertibles are out there to which stockholders have no knowledge.
This is a dead stick.
"company" seems to have a lot of secrets
You got that right !
Quote:
______________________________________________________
$FBEC...run
______________________________________________________
I fail to see the excitement
Don't forget to add in yet another convertible debt agreement no stockholders knew about until today. A 40K convertible sometime in February, but curiously no day given. In addition to the 25K convertible no stockholders knew about until the 10K, sometime in March, but again curiously no day given.
Curious.
Looks like "sales" fell off.
Oh, and "Wolfshot" was never "trademarked".
"Healthy Hemp" is not trademarked.
Pump and dump. Buy the news sell the rumor, or vis-versa.
"How much longer till the pinks?"
Apparently, that would be today. However long that was.
Links?
Same as false and misleading information being provided to induce buying.
Its the OTC.
Thought this was interesting:
Full Article on DOJ MM Investigation With Summary Below
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0Y11CJ
Exclusive: U.S. investigates market-making operations of Citadel, KCG
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Federal authorities are investigating the market-making arms of Citadel LLC and KCG Holdings Inc, looking into the possibility that the two giants of electronic trading are giving small investors a poor deal when executing stock transactions on their behalf.
The Justice Department has subpoenaed information from Citadel and KCG (KCG.N) related to the firms' execution of stock trades on behalf of clients, according to people familiar with the investigation.
Authorities are examining internal data concerning the firms’ routing of customer stock orders through exchanges and other trading systems, to see whether they are giving customers unfavorable prices on trades in order to capture more profit on the transactions, according to the people familiar with the inquiry. Under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, U.S. brokers are legally required to seek the “best execution reasonably available” on orders, a standard meant to ensure that all customers get a favorable price and a swift trade.
The Justice Department has looked at a number of high-speed trading firms that pay retail brokerages to sell them their flow of customer orders for stock trades. This segment of the industry is known as wholesale market making.
From social media:
"Remuda Capital Group ?@RemudaCapital · May 2
Regarding $FBEC, It appears the stock fell after concerns the 10K wouldn't be filed on time. We have until Monday so let's see what happens"
Which Monday? This was posted on May 2, a Monday.
Different rules for different fools I guess.
Its not that the K is actually filed. That shouldn't be regarded as some high achievement by any standard. Its late, whatever "excuse" is used.
Its late in part because someone has to figure out the old "CEO's" self-served 50K Christmas bonus on 12-24-2015. In part because some "accounting firm" has to deal with that issue. Won't know about the "dealing with it" part, which occurred on 04-19-2016, until the Q for the second quarter, which of course we were into the second quarter when it was "dealt with". So that Q wont be available until mid August, if then. Still don't know what method was used to "deal with it".
Its what information the K contains that matters, and how that information is factually analyzed that matters most. Unaudited, of course.
Of course the "company" may now have an "accounting firm" on board. Who knows.
re:"Where's the friggin 10K?"
Good question. Greene may be trademarking that as well.
Same question for the OTCQB Certification. Last updated 07-22-2015.
Confusing.
So yesterday we paid off a 50K Convertible Redeemable 8% Note issued by Union Capital, LLC on 12-24-2015 for 140%.
This is supposedly good news for a note that doesn't come due until 12-24-2017. Not sure why some think that spending 71K plus was such a great piece of news.
Curious where the "company" came up with 71K plus. Hopefully we find out sooner rather than later.
I guess I did not realize the "company" took out yet another Convertible Redeemable Note.
Must have missed the 8K or 10Q or some other filing that came out letting shareholders know.
Still waiting on that alleged e-mail between Hammans and the "company".
Thank you for the response and clarifying my reading abilities and comprehension.
Not sure why the "savvy investors" did not pick up on that or have chosen to ignore it. Oh wait, I answered that myself.
Truly amazing.
Have a good day.
I don't mean to butt into your conversation, but can you please explain something to me.
I see the link for the convertible note, I get that part.
However, where did you find the link and how would an investor know this convertible note existed. I looked back through filings and I must have missed an 8K or a 10Q or 10QA where it would have been filed as an attachment maybe, during that period of time.
Sorry, just confused. I don't recall this being one of the conversions anyone had really addressed. And why since it was set to convert in December 2017 unless other issues arose. Which have.
I'm just curious how investors would have known. If I missed it, then I guess I need to check my reading skills.
I thought this to be an odd post a while back.
Since this matter hasn't gone away and continues to fester, I thought I would look this post up and re-read it.
"I have an email from Darren Hamans to Randy Goulding admitting the 5 million share offer he rejected. Darren thought he was worth millions more...I bet he wishes he accepted that offer now."
If you actually have the e-mail, then post it so we may lay this matter to rest. Otherwise; well, then maybe some here may be led to believe it might not have existed. Not sure why e-mails are being passed around to some but not all. Could have addressed and potentially settled this issue months ago.
Issue seems to be deflecting interest from more important matters.
Maybe we will find out how and how much legal counsel is being paid. If it was in an 8K and I missed it then I apologize. I just don't recall any filings on that service provider listed on the profile.
FBEC SEC Status Delinquent a/o 04-18-2016
Also Inaccurate and Misleading
From the Remuda Pump:
"Last week the market was informed about Healthy Hemp™ being approved for Trade Mark and it leads us to speculate where the name could lead the company."
The "market" was informed by who that the "Trade Mark" was "approved" by whom?
"Approved", "registered", "acquired". Very misleading choice of words.
Of course it would lead to speculation.
Exactly what we're selling here. Speculation.
Inaccurate and Misleading
Just for reference, at USPTO:
Wolfshot 86661934 abandoned 02-22-2016
Healthy Hemp 86963372 new application filed 04-04-2016, live by
Jeffrey Greene
Healthy Hemp 86954240 new application filed 03-26-2016, live by Jeffrey Greene
Healthy Hemp 86648682 live, not registered, other company
Healthy Hemp 86243820 live, not registered, not by this "company"
The PR stated the trademark was "acquired" and "registered" instead of "filed" or "applied for".
Don't know about all that. Don't know that I care. Just would appreciate "news" being presented accurately. I would have been attentive to a PR stating have "applied for" and "intend to register" rather than the misleading way it was written. Others have attempted that trademark with no success. And this new "launch" when there already existed some effort with the other joint venture "product" is announced 45 days out. Why has it not happened already and why is it going to take another 45 days.
Nothing new here. Just different names.
Sorry, "exclusive US agent", not exclusive marketer. I stand self-corrected.
Not to be a dark cloud, but:
Not sure if all this is continuing rumor, misleading news or just hype.
Isn't a 1Q coming due as well. First quarter 2016 just completed. Potentially around May 15, 2016 or after. Right around the time this latest "launch" is set to occur with DuBe's exclusive marketer (www.mpkmarketing.com). Those are the numbers I hope to see. January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016. Should see some sales, expenditures, etc. Hopefully some chipping away at the debt.
Just for reference, at USPTO:
Wolfshot 86661934 abandoned 02-22-2016
Healthy Hemp 86963372 new application filed 04-04-2016, live by
Jeffrey Greene
Healthy Hemp 86954240 new application filed 03-26-2016, live by Jeffrey Greene
Healthy Hemp 86648682 live, not registered, other company
Healthy Hemp 86243820 live, not registered, not by this "company"
The PR stated the trademark was "acquired" and "registered" instead of "filed" or "applied for".
If this marketer is exclusive for DuBe, and there exists a joint venture with DuBe, then why is this just now being undertaken.
019 X 020
What news?
I get confused down here. Is this the pre-pump or the pre-dump? I think I have them backwards. Not sure.
Disagree.
More of the same.
Should have simply said the "company" was attempting to register a trademark. A trademark that hasn't shown much, if any, success in the past. That would have been accurate.
More forward looking nothingness about yet another "product" entering an already oversaturated market. Just putting a drop or less of hemp juice into an energy drink consisting of the exact same ingredients of most other energy drinks isn't going to do much of anything.
If there is an argument over a drop or less of hemp juice, then provide the strength (saturation) and quantity actually in each bottle.