Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I mean the amount of shares- hmm
If only they'd....
No, because MJNA, looks like their biggest market will be in other countries.
Also, if that collective advising and support is true then they'll be able to make plenty of money off of that as time goes on.
We're no doubt going to see more of a separation and contrast between medical and recreational marijuana and differences and separations in the parts of and cannabis plant and how it's treated as well I'd imagine.
Let's face it- we're up against a government who has truly believed all parts of the marijuana plant are simply marijuana and that marijuana can be used as both a drug for medicinal purposes in serious illnesses, BUT somehow can be smoked on a back porch after a long hard day or at johnnys barbecue after church also. That's not easy, and if I didn't know better that would sound like condoning a drug epidemic in the making to me as well.
I think MJNA is a good company to ease the road to understand for people. But those shares---hmmm
...That one says any controlled substance containing cannabidiol- with a prescription....
Looks like cannabidiols gonna be federally legal in some way shape or form pretty soon here.
Bill to reschedule cannabidiol to take effect immediately- California https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB845/2017
Hehe, I think that's fake news, but that's okay.
Australia fast tracks cannabidiol into country to treat pediatric epilepsy
https://www.anonsworldwide.com/australia-fast-tracks-cannabidiol-into-country-to-treat-epileptic-children/
Oh yeah and they want to reschedule cannabidiol to the schedule 4 drug list
https://legiscan.com/SD/text/SB95/2017
Looks like from the links I posted anyway- they're looking to legalize medical grade cannabidiol nationally by taking away its association to the cannabis/marijuana plant.
Makes sense- if they do that maybe people will FINALLY figure out that cannabidiol is completely different from THC.
I guess that's the medical marijuana in marijuana for now....
Summary
Cannabidiol. Defines "cannabidiol", and provides an affirmative defense to possession of cannabidiol if the person or the person's child has been diagnosed with certain medical conditions, the cannabidiol contains not more than 0.3% THC and at least 10% cannabidiol, and other specified conditions are met.
https://legiscan.com/IN/bill/HB1148
Bill Title: Add cannabidiol to the list of Schedule IV controlled substances and to exclude it from the definition of marijuana https://legiscan.com/SD/text/SB95/2017
That ones a bill to authorize medical cannabidiol as a medication under federal law.
'Summary
A bill for an act relating to the medical use of cannabidiol including the rescheduling of a cannabidiol investigational product approved as a prescription drug medication under federal law and including effective date provisions.'
https://legiscan.com/IA/bill/HSB164
'Section 1. (NEW) (Effective July 1, 2017) If a cannabidiol investigational product is newly approved or rescheduled by the federal Food and Drug Administration, as a prescription medication, as defined in section 17b-499 of the general statutes, such investigational product shall be deemed approved as a prescription medication in this state.'
https://legiscan.com/CT/text/SB00866/2017
Yeah some one went through all the trouble of paying for a clinical trial and...oh yeah, what about AXm in the process of waiting for permission to start a clinical trial with health Canada on The study of cannabis and mental illness, that's a helluva pump and dump there...
Lol. Yeah, sure.
Not to mention no patent on cannabis delivery, no clinical trial...and more than 4 times as many share....yeah, sure.
Someone came up with the idea to dream a company they thought might be bigger than AX!m
Sure, this company has 4 times as many shares.
Bigger than GWPH- lol, yeah. And with more than 4 times as many shares, and a product that exists where? lol- GWPH...haha.
Something stinks- I really can't see why so much selling today. Right from the bell pretty much.
I'm not holding any shares- just curious.
Not on my daily- my dailys only showing 45-50
So why the drop? RSI wasn't even high-
Exactly- this company wouldn't be affected by the recent statements made by congress.
In fact this company is one of the safest investments in my opinion.
I mean c'mon- medical grade cannabidiol to help children, adolescents and adults with illnesses and diseases that currently have no known cures and current available treatments haven't worked in the past- the Trump administration may be proposing to do many things that are being seen as radical but I don't see them ever taking away a chance at a cure for some of our children's daily major disabling illnesses- that cannabidiol oil seems to be the only proven highly effective cure.
Aye, was just either a typo or autocorrect- one of the two.
The company is MGC under the ASX exchange.
There's a company already out with this companies same products in Australia- another up and coming medical marijuana monster.
Why would this company be more important? They haven't even released their products yet, have they?
They said marijuana, I can't see Sessions or Spicer liking it in any form, but you might be onto something- I can't see them COMPLETELY doing away with recreational cannabis at all.
Here's some news from last week: more positive results from CBD oil and seizures trials http://www.pedneur.com/retrieve/pii/S088789941730053X
More eyes than ever on cannabidiol for adolescent and children's seizure disorders.
Yeah, I agree. That would be a smart way. Things look like they could he setting up that way...
I'd like recreational edibles though. But that's easy enough to fix.
And okay they're 'okay' with medical marijuana, but what is their definition of medical marijuana?
I really doubt their definition of medical marijuana is going to a 'dr' and paying 30 or more dollars for a card then going to a dispensary and buying what you want.
I'd say their definition of medical marijuana would be something along the lines of staunch testing and doctor prescriptions- they bore and piss me off in every sense/ these people in office-
'seems designed to irk everyone and satisfy no one'
That's a quote from TIME magazine about most things Trump had proposed last night.
It's the same way with what they said about recreational legalization. No details- just a comment about how federal government will be cracking down. They'll probably come after it eventually- but when?
Gut* says no...
I agree with 'it's a subliminal way to force congress and law makers to change it.'
Well put.
If they did make recreational possession of marijuana federally legal though they could and would I imagine, still make a cradle: law of the land to accompany it.
They could say 'okay, it's still up to the states, but you have to do this- or you have to do that'
Maybe that's what they'll do....hard to say...or not. My guy says no, not happening.
It's a control thing with the GOP. I don't think it's so much they don't want recreational marijuana because it's bad for people- they don't want it to be up to the states because they don't have as much control that way.
They also don't have as much control if people are happy and just smoking away- eating away, whatever. It's like that time Bloomberg was trying to regulate the size of soft drinks served in NYC because he was worried about obesity getting out of control.
100$ at .01 was worth $30,000 at $3.
If ever there's a time to buy these damn stocks it's now in my opinion.
Yes, very true. And then they say marijuana is a gateway drug. I would think alcohol would be a road to bad things much more than marijuana.
Maybe they themselves- Trump and cabinet- are looking to take hold of the recreational market. Wouldn't it be easier for them to make it federally legal if they took away the state to state policy?
I don't think that's the case though- they might be planning a move, but maybe they don't even know what yet.
I agree-
As far as who came up with the stats it just said 'a panel of experts'
My impression is that it might be a softening of a blow to come- but yeah, who knows. I really can't see them putting a squash to it all....ridiculous.
These people- the FDA, the powers that govern- they all seem to do everything so damn ass- backwards.
They said using marijuana more than 10 times a month can lead to memory impairment and ability to plan especially in teens, and that they feel that with lax attitudes of late and due to availability, it is more of a threat to teens now than in the past'
On news now - excerpt- 'experts saying recreational marijuana use is bad for teens'