Scott = Good mgr/ Peter Jacobs = A Joke...! PJ has done "nothing" past 6 years = zero revenue -- diluted stock -- heafty paychecks/options for being a horrible manager - misleds investors with false statments about product/revenue --missed timelines for everything -- no creditability...! Whitmore got dumped -- it's time for PJ to move on as he is the cancer that is killing this company...If "financing" does take place, shareholders still have to rely at least partially on PJ's decisions. We go nowhere with his direction...Peter Jacobs = Please step down and hand the reins to Scott for a new confidence & direction...

Stingray2 -- Must be tough carrying the sword/shield for SCMI/MMXT. Go slay those dragons = Kenco & Steh...Wish I had your time -- optimism and money...I'm cheering for you safely here at my desk...No blood shed until the sell order. Another day in sub penny paradise. My Best...

If I or anyone else reading this post -- preformed their job as Peter Jacobs has, they would of been fired years ago. I continue to call for Peter's resignation and have tried to pursuade others to do so....It seems however -- that we would rather bitch & moan on IHub or rely on hope rather than seriously address the Peter problem. As a public company, SCMI/MMXT is required to hold a shareholders meeting annually. They are waiting to announce good news & then hoping we forgive/forget -- announce a SH meeting. If PJ does not address the crowd, I will stand-up and request he come to the mic, asking him to explain a list of previous comments & public announcements that never came close to reality. Keep in mind that "if" there is a turn-a-round which I believe will happen with Scott -- PJ will eventually ruin the positive direction with his fantasy management style. History repeats itself as we have seen time & time again with SCMI...FYI = My opinion only.

This last announcement was nothing but "peripheral" jiberish. Peter Jacobs stuck-on-stupid mind doesn't understand the current hostel attitude of it's stuckholders. We're not appeased or fooled by another "selling agreement"....With Eric V. leaving for a real paycheck & thus becoming a consultant, does this company appear to be in turn-a-round mode...? No -- more like merry-go-round until Pinocchio Peter steps down but his ego prevents him from doing so. PJ has no credibility as the stock price reflects this despite latest "rumors" of multiple new products just about to hit the market....Com'on....Not many stuckholders are averaging down at these prices which is not a confidence builder...FYI: My opinion only. PS = PJ knows who I am as we have our personal differences, I've directly called for his resignation and am not hiding behind a handle what he doesn't know direct....

My Point: Until Peter Jacobs steps down/aside or rides his bike off into the sunset -- it's hard to believe given his ego -- management skills & veracity of truth that he will lead us into a real revenue producing company. Somebody out there tell me: When has anybody ever heard Peter Jacobs admit he was wrong and take full responsibility for the company's actions -- or lack of...? He submits excuse after excuse -- hides behind Renee to screen his calls and places blame where-ever/when-ever he can. Does anybody think this guy is creative...? Thank the Penny Stock Gods Scott is an honest hard working guy that's currently making progress. PJ should step down and allow forward progress -- he's in the way and has stayed long past his welcome....FYI: My opinion only.

Bottom Line: Peter Jacobs needs to resign/assume a consulting position allowing Scott to take lead management role. As long as PJ is preceived "top dog" -- there's a lack of creditability. Any start to a turn-a-round per SCMI/MMXT will be short lived as investors have endured years of Pinocchio Peter's ego--hyped statment's & a lack of follow through. Investor's want out -- not in as there's fear & distrust focused at the core of this company..... Again, without a mgt change any good news is lipstick on a pig....FYI: My opinion only.

Hello gregg99 -- Tell you what: You give me 50% of the legal costs of sueing Peter Jacobs and companies & I'll give you 80% of what you'll be able to "collect" and pocket after expenses. Not saying you're wrong at all per the legal basis of a lawsuit but currently there's not much in the kitty box to collect. If any decent attorney checks out SCMI you'll be required to put down a BIG retainer fee -- more $$$ going to waste towards the SCMI/MMXT cause. More than a year ago I checked on sueing SCMI and was advised against due to time & costs vs asset base. Nothing better I'd like to do than take down Pinocchio Peter. Currently I'm in a Federal lawsuit (the good guy)against a scam company and it's been 4 years and 6 digits in expenses. Think about this; If SCMI/MMXT does get hit with a lawsuit nothing prevents Eric V. and his tech group from packing up/moving on...The goal here is to boot Pinocchio while keeping the tech team happy. I'm hearing "solid" things about Scott S...? -- the new MediaMax temp President and hope Pinocchio keeps his nose out of the way....FYI = My Opinion Only...

Haven't read this message board in months...
I now remember why... Nothing Personal.... :)
Let's face it: Peter Jacobs has "ZERO" creditability and is in over his head = "Peter Principle." Talk about the technology pro/con all you want -- it's still PJ calling the shots. After 6 plus years -- hundreds of thousands or maybe even millions of dollars spent for nothing but excuses = it's time to find a new CEO & for PJ to step down....Otherwise it's groundhog day. For now -- like the rest of the SCMI/MMXT world, I'm a "stuckholder."

Thanks Mario -- Heard anything on the other half = SCMI & MMXT stock swap..? Even if it were at let's say for conversation sake =70% SCMI for MMXT = that would still elimate many shares in the secondary...

Anybody out there heard anything lately on the merger...? Last understood was hopes for year's end or first month 06. Not that I want to start a controversy -- "but" as I recall Peter mentioned (per last shareholders conference call) that it would be roughly/approx/??? = forgot exact verbage -- a 1:1 stock swap SCMI for MMXT. With MMXT fully reporting -- less outstanding shares -- trading at a higher share price --how does this make sense...? Think a few large MMXT holders are making some grumblings behind the scenes. Interesting to learn how this will unfold as we get closer to year's end. Pink SCMI is hurting the share price of MMXT. For the record I own both "but" more of MMXT...Best to All

Ms. Kenco -- Hope I haven't harmed your reputation here as an avid MVSN supporter. Thought most everyone knew you were their IHUB moderator. Personally like your input cause need someone to disagree with. Regarding Bill's compensation package = It's better to give him stock (I did not read the filing) than company cash. Hope Bill makes a ton of money for himself/family cause that means I do too....

In your own words: MMXT is basically a startup & hasn't contributed anything to the success of MediaMax.

Agreed...However, hasn't "yet" contributed to the success of Mediamax....It will....

1.) MMXT is unfortunately tied on a 1:1 per share basis with SCMI. Since pink SCMI stock is being manulipated -- so goes MMXT. MediaMax unfortunately trades to/with SCMI rather than separatly to determine a true market value...My bet was Peter/Bill thought SCMI SP would tail a stronger trading MMXT...This decision for a 1;1 shows Mgt lack of knowledge per the markets & marketing...BAD DECISION = my opinion.

2.) The "yet." MMXT is a fully reporting OTC:BB company. After the merger between MMXT & SCMI = One company -- fully reporting -- no more pinks -- named MediaMax. Hopefully off to the races per new investors -- name recognition -- dealing with a higher quality of financial player -- etc. Difficult -- time consuming and expensive for a pink to get to the next step. The merge solves this problem...Good Mgt decision.

Hearing the merger to be completed 4th Q this year. Frustrating as it can't come soon enough.

Keep keeping us on our toes....Appreciate & My Best....

Kenco -- As the moderator for IHub's MVSN chat board...Would you of felt more comfortable if Bill Whitmore accepted MVSN stock as bonus & compensation...? Just curious.....We need to rescue you from the dark side...

MACROVISION CORP (MVSN) /

Moderator: kenco
Assistants: None
Created: 12/9/2003 4:04:52 PM

The Undisputable World Leader and Gold Standard for Digital Rights Management and Protection Solutions.

Flydoc = Don't over think...Howdy = Take up golf...

Hi Howdy, Can't answer the second question of the secret sauce formula my friend used to "Sum" mize his thoughts about possible 50mm (or more) shorts. Guess I'll call him today & ask...Remember, I'm a skeptic on sizeable shorts. First Question: Cost for registering 144 stock = $150.00. If that's considered expensive as an owner of millions of shares -- that person owns the wrong stock...!!! The 144 paper process can take up to 6 weeks before a sale is authorized. I as"sum"me a holder of restricted stock would want to deal on an efficient timeline should certain events cause rapid stock appreciation....Just one patient man's huimble thoughts...

Steh -- Stingray & yes= Kenco, Thanks for the input. A "friend" that closely monitors trading activity of SCMI over the past couple years thinks the short position could exceed 50 million..? Again, I have doubts especially with business developments and near term posibilities. Why would anyone -- especially a MM subject themselves to a huge liability at under 5 cents..? STM Investments II is a misprint & should be JTM Investments II. I know as fact that this person is not a seller and has directed new buying at these levels. A 144 registration statement is good for 90 days giving the option to sell or not. Simple paper process to registar 144 stock and extend the filing after 90 days.....My Best....

Stehvestor -- I'm trying to get a handle on the significance of "shorts" naked or otherwise on SCMI..? My opinion is that this stock is being manulipated, however not convinced of a large short position = Peter/Bill feel otherwise. To me it's another place blame on the Boogie Man under the bed...After 5 plus years of dealing directly with both P/B (timelines --estimates & excuses)= I have reasons for doubt...Thoughts anyone...?

Not true Ms./Mr. Kenco -- Ever here of "private placements...?" Doesn't mean that insiders aren't buying stock -- just maybe not on the open market. You always try so hard to knock this company -- what's your point/goal...?

Gregg - PS = The filings you are curently refering to are from private placements a year ago. Remember that just because a person files 144 stock means they have to sell. There is a 90 day window in which you're allowed to liquidate. After this 90 day period your broker files an extension per your request....I have currently filed an extension & have not sold any shares because of underwater SP...Just keeping my options open.... My Best...

Hello Gregg -- I know that neither SCMI nor MMXT has placed stock within the past 6 months in which this same stock has come back onto the market. Agree with you that purchaseing a private placement (restricted not treasury stock) & holding for "1" year at these price levels doesn't make sense. The spread between the cost basis of the restricted vs current market price does not warrant purchasing private placements. I'd rather own free trading shares especially during the next 6 months allowing more financial flexibility. My point is this that the structure of the 90mm shares is "restricted" stock...If Peter/Bill do place any of this stock it'll hopefully be in friendly hands. I remind myself that SCMI (and now MMXT because of 1:1) is a pink/penny stock and it's being heavily manuiplated by unscrupulous MM's....Getting off the pink's is a priority for SCMI/MMXT which will allow them to move forward with their financial health. It's tough generating interest by outsider financial forces when you're a pink hairball trading a .04 cents. Although Peter/Bill do not want to either sell stock (unless forced) nor get bought out at current SP levels. It's a give-a-way compared with recent/near term business developments. So we hold -- hope & pray. Again = Next 6 months win or lose is what we've all been waiting for.....My opinion....

Restricted shares are restricted shares....If you purchase "treasury stock" directly from a company -- at a discount -- normally in the purchase contract it states a specific time period that prohibits you from selling this treasury stock ...(ie;60 days.) Treasury stock is stock owned by a company that is free and clear. Warrants are not necessarily attached to restricted stock -- that's a possible scenario if negotitated at time of purchase. I will hedge and say the rules for restricted stock are different for overseas hedge funds & institutions vs us common folk. Maybe someone knows but I'm not sure. What I am sure of is that I'm neither a fund--corporation or institution just a disgruntled restricted shareholder without warrants....The structure of the 90mm shares in question are supposed to be restricted -- not treasury stock. It would be interesting to learn how much of this stock has been given away at a discount to current market price. Don't mistake me as someone who loves this company -- I'm in it for the money & pissed that I have been misled...Next 6 months tells the whole story....

Assuming SCMI is selling some/all of the recently authorized 90mm shares -- they wouldn't be doing so on the open market. Why..? Because these shares are "restricted" and sold as private placements to what the SEC terms "sophisticated investors." Restricted stock is also given in exchage for services...legal or otherwise. After stock is privately placed the owner must hold onto his/her restricted stock for a period of "1" year before they can sell it under Reg 144 per the open market. After "2" years this same block of stock becomes free & clear trading -- requiring a certificate exchange with the transfer agent. These 90mm shares will not hit the market for at least "one" year from issue date. Remember too that Peter/Bill & employees have large positions in both SCMI/MMXT so your inflammatory statement about them not caring about SP is ignorant. A person such as yourself = "Yellowdog" might sleep better at night if you owned MVSN which is not a penny/pink sheet stock...

Stehvestor -- Getting caught-up. Don't know whether or not your question about "Why" was answered -- I'll take a shot. Trying to nurse along a pink sheet company to a fully reporting status/better exchange takes time -- patience & lots of capital. Much faster & cheaper to merge with an already fully reporting company (thus becoming fully reporting)than to struggle with "SEC filings." Eventual goals of a higher stock price/better exchange = AMEX (?) achieved quicker per this merger rather than on its own. Probably saves a year or so in time and big $$$$. Good move on Peter/Bill's part...Believe me I don't drink the koolaid and have had major differences/problems with some of their decisions. Agree stock is cheap risk vs reward but over extended as is....My Best

Purpose of CC was to inform/update SH. Not formatted for hr as only Q&A..Peter/Bill won't go into too much detail per timeframes - lawyers - contracts - "variables" currently play major roles. Open selves up to criticism = dammned if they do/don't. Idea that company on track - more product --international & in Black by 4th quarter = Good. Spoke with Bill in afternoon -- suggested future hr dedicated to only pre-submitted SH questions... Am cautiously optimistic but over extended on current MMXT/SCMI position....

Spenny - Am golfing today, however now in San Diego. Headed to Canada next Wed for a week of fishing. You get credit for the phrase "Dead Money" FYI....Frustrating stock to say the least. I'd think SCMI/MMXT would be drifting higher with current happenings except it's difficult to trust mgt per their next decision. We know the stock is cheap vs the potential -- I just can't get around mgt's next move. Am not worried so much about the outstanding float for the moment.

JR = Good post as I missed the SH meeting....You should forward that post to both Peter/Bill. As I stated a few months back; Current shareholder disappointment is not a self inflicted emotion. "We" have been led to believe by mgt certain expectations/standards that SCMI/MMXT have not lived up too. Peter/Bill have great bedside manners but I keep stepping in the bedpan....

Sahd3g, It's a split = I'll take credit for being brighter than you & Spenny gets credit for being luckier....After all Spenny's the one who sold his stock & made a few $$$ while my SCMI/MMXT position goes on ice. Do I get credit or debt for being the person who introduced Spenny to SCMI/MMXT...? Had a pleasant "chat" with Mario this morning and he agrees with your point of view. Tough job as a spokesperson for SCMI/MMXT but give him credit as he doesn't hide behind a handle. Off to hit an afternoon bucket of golf balls.

Hello Sahd3g -- "Pink Hairball" bring back any fond memories...? Stand by my statment = Not until merger goes through & completely off/association with the pinkie's. We're all expecting a forthcoming Apple announcement = context unknown. So.....if we're expecting good news and it's not announced per some Apple legal reason or falls short of expectations (ie = Universal) then shareholder disappointment results. After the Apple announcement -- who's going to buy...? This news won't catch anybody by surprise. Not institutions without current financials & a pink association. Mom/Pop retail is tapped out and at these levels I'd guess that = 85% of all shareholders are underwater. The majority of shareholders won't/don't average down. My hopes are that Apple gets me back to even. Poorly written announcements -- a stagnat SP & mom/pop retail aren't going to take this stock higher. Not picking on you as for the record am long & have been for a long time = 4+ years. Eventually this stock will pay off -- the hard part is patience/perseverence....Turn off your screen for a couple months and go hit some golfballs.

Remember this 1.5mm share registration represents an "opportunity" to sell. Sell or not it gives the holder financial flexibility/options over the next 90 days. After 90 days the registration expires and a new set of 144 papers are required. Penny stocks are not marginable with the vast majority of brokerage houses. This shareholder probably knows what's going on & I seriously doubt he/she intends to sell at these fire-sale prices.

Sahd3g -- If Howard Stern owned MMXT, then legally he would have to mention that fact on his show. I asked that same question of my attorney a few days ago -- hopeing to hear that disclaimer (in some form) from this board...Unfortunately not the case to date....As far as owning SCMI and promoting MMXT without the disclaimer..? No...It's public record that the 2 companies are heading for a 1:1 merge. Howard Stern is too smart--has too much money--and is surrounded by too many attorney's--to walk a thin line and play games with a company our size...

Glass half empty or half full...? Share price = empty
Fundamentals of MMXT/SCMI = half full. Have said over & over = Get 100% off pinks including no affiliation thereof and then let's see where a non-manulipated market takes us...

Until MMXT & SCMI merge any news or promotions are wasted. SCMI as a pink is hurting MMXT share price....Period.
My opinion & Have a nice day to all...

P.S. Is there a 12 Step recover program for frustrated MMXT/SCMI shareholders...?

You're right Cgibellino...As have been saying all along SCMI will trade like a (my coined pharse) "pink hairball" until it gets completely off the pink sheets. Unfortunately MMXT-- because of its association with SCMI on this 1:1 stock merger will trade down in the range of SCMI. In other words= SCMI is hindering the growth of MMXT because of the pink sheet status --- it's a bad marriage. Patience and revenue will eventually turn MMXT into a winner. For now Howard Stern or no HS -- it's not going to make a big difference. Am glad the company is trying but think the weak link is the public relations/marketing aspect getting this technology in front of new buyers...Again 90 plus % of Wall Street won't touch a pink -- MMXT is still associated with such and at current pennies many big buyers don't take the company seriously...My opinion..
P.S. = Does anybody please have the link to the majority group who own QTIG now MediaMax shares...? Thanks...

Flydoc -- I know. Blackmail -- arm twisting -- or political maneuvering -- by any means it doesn't sound good. Again, I'm disappointed in the leadership of Peter & Bill down the stretch before the shareholders meeting. Poor taste to hear from Mario about no dividend...Not shooting the messanger as Mario was in a "no-win" situation. With a big black magic maker I voted "NO" on my proxy & sent it in. This morning e mailed SCMI asking how to change my vote..? Just get me off the pink's as desire to move ahead--see a return and focus for benefit of (me) all. If I were a large shareholder of MMXT -- no way I'd want this merger... Unable to attend shareholders meeting as back in California helping sister move = That Weekend...Listen to Peter/Bill or carry furntiure upstairs...?

Hello Merlyn....Sorry as left my proxy at office and could use somebody's help = Sahd3g...But as I recall reading the complete proxy it mentioned that the 90mm voted shares were needed for expenses per this merger. Unfortunately no exact $$$ figures (estaimated or not) are listed per each cost. However the proxy did say without these extra shares the merger may not happen -- I'm not exact on verbage...Obviously this is very vague -- which is all the more frustrating trying to make an intelligent decision about my investment. Giving Peter and Bill credit, both have done an excellant job getting SCMI to this point on a nothing budget. Think of the unlimited resources available at MVSN and look where SCMI is in comparison. Although Peter & Bill haven't done a good job in communicating with shareholders = (politically correct statement), they have -- also giving credit to Eric V.-- have gotton shareholders to this point. If they need the extra shares -- "fine." Not happy about dilution but again -- want to stay focused on what's in my best interest through that I can control. To many squids whining about something they have no power over..."Don't be a squid...." Comment not directed at you Meryln...Grandma = ?

We should vote for the 90mm stock dilution.....I don't think the approval for 90mm shares is automatic. Previous post mentioned = "majority SCMI stock is currently being held by insiders--and this forthcoming vote is window dressing." Three years ago this was true---but each subsequent year more stock has been voted/issued and think this stock has moved through the trading pipeline...Over 50% of MMXT is tightly held by a group friendly to both SCMI/MMXT. This bodes well for upside potential of MMXT -- as most stock issued to this group is still restricted. Shares aren't free trading -- near to as many # issued by SCMI & can't/won't be shaken loose. MMXT is not a pink sheet-- is being mentioned by Howard Stern and is currently the hot topic within the music industry. Remember: 90% of Wall St. can't/won't buy pink sheet stocks no matter what...But this is not about owning MMXT vs SCMI..... Problem: If the 90mm dilution isn't passed by SCMI shareholders = then it's possible (stated in the proxy) that the merger may not take place at this time...Think of the consequences -- not good for SCMI but huge for MMXT. MediaMax stock wouldn't be taking on this 450mm 1 for 1 merger baggage. No extra shares combined with current puiblicity equals huge upside potential. However, if the diluation is approved it's almost a guarntee that the merger proceeds. If there are a significant # of shorts -- SCMI withdrws from the bastards at the DTC and the 1:1 merger follows -- SCMI is a layup. No approval of dilution ='s possibly no merger -- no way they'd withdraw from the DTC -- MMXT does well/SCMI lags...Sooooo, voting for this dilution is a big pill/no water but the only solution we SCMI shareholders have to ensure equality. You can bitch & moan all you want but this is what's on our plate--nothing else = period. "WE" shareholders do not control the variables = dividends--amount of diluated shares--timing of merger--price of either stocks -- we only control our eventual outcome. Frustrated -- but have changed my mind to vote "for" diluation....My Opinion...

I don't think the approval for dilution is automatic. Mentioned was that over 50% of SCMI stock is currently being held by insiders--and this forthcoming vote is just mass window dressing. I know 3 years ago this was the case---but each subsequent year more stock has been voted/issued and think this stock has moved through the trading pipeline...Over 50% MMXT is tightly held by a group friendly to both companies. This bodes well for possible upside MMXT SP as not many shares are free trading or will be shaken loose. Plus MMXT is not a pink sheet and is the hot topic being pushed by Howard Stern & music industry....Here's the problem: If the 90mm dilution isn't passed by SCMI shareholders = then it's possible (I believe stated in the proxy) that the merger may not take place at this time...Think of the consequences -- not good for SCMI but huge for MMXT. MediaMax stock wouldn't be taking on this 450mm 1 for 1 merger baggage. However, if there are a significant # of shorts I'd rather own SCMI. But, if the merger doesn't go through SCMI will probably not withdraw from the DTC because of the massive headaches/expenses to follow....Sooooo, voting one way or the other--this 90mm dilution is huge...Shareholders of both companies simply don't have enough information and can only speculate as to outcome....My Opinion....

Thanks for the post LongJohn...Here's a straight answer from Kinksweet records per my e mail this morning:


Why is it that Kinkysweet records has opted to drop copy protection -- namely MediaMax on it's CD's...? Did you experience problems with the copy protection technology...? Also -- where is Kinkysweet headquartered...? Thank you...XXX

Answer..................

John,

We never experienced any problems with Media Max. In fact they were always extremely responsive, and their customer service was excellent.

Most of our consumbers are 25 to 40 years old, and in a much higher than average income bracket. After much customer research we found that the majority of our consumers only copied the music for their own personal music players, or simply to have an extra CD for the car etc. With that in mind, it did not seem worthwhile for us to spend the time or money adding this software into our CDs.

If our market was primarily in the 15 to 25 year old range, we would probably continue to use the software.

Regards,

Jon Levy

Let Grandma & company have their fun...Makes for entertaining reading. I watched the "Discovery Channel" the other night where these panicked squids were getting nailed by hungry ferocious sharks...The squid gene pool got smaller but the vast strong majority survived...Reminds me to be patient -- remember why I bot SCMI in the first place -- and to stick with my goals/gameplan. We all have the same opportunities with SCMI--it boils down to decisions & discipline...Still a pink hairball until May. Don't be a weak squid...!

Personally, I would like an explaination from Peter or Bill as to why another dilution is necssary...? With all the supposedly positive that is forthcoming -- why the need now for more shares...? Better idea is to hold a "special" shareholders meeting (by proxy) 4th quarter 05 asking for these additional shares. With more time & clarification as to direction of MMXT -- I could possibly vote "yes" for this action. However -- after 4 plus years I'm struggling to break even @ .07 cents. Peter/Bill have asked me to be patient with my investment...Now I'm asking them to be patient with "again" diluting my investment....Particularly at current share price.
Sorry....now is not good timing....

The fundamental fact is that SCMI is being manulipated by a subterranean group om MM's that don't have an interest in seeing this stock do better...no matter the content of any announcement. Notice other than the DarkNoise headline nothing has come down the new news pipeline for quite some time-- despite many positive rumors..??? Any news released by SCMI before we know/understand details of the merge and how it affects the shorts won't have a long term affect on PPS. When SCMI finally gets off the pinks by merging on a 1:1 basis (no dividends) with MMXT that's when we open up to a whole new group of potential buyers = Institutions & retail. Remember: 90% plus of Wall Street can't/won't get involved with pinks. MMXT is still associated with SCMI as reflected in price. Still a "Pink Hairball" until certain conditions come into play. I'm long -- frustrated -- but understand the potential reward over the next 9 months. Wish I had more $$$ to pick up a few shares but am already a stretched long term buyer....

"Hairball" for now...SCMI goes nowhere until details of merge announced= Shake shorts...MMXT trades down around SCMI levels....Question to ask SH meeting....Marketing plan to bring support & institutional buyers as non-pinkie...? Ma & Pa Kettle are done full-up. Sahd3g -- Sell your 1996 Ford Windstar minivan but first vacum cherrios/gramcrackers as your the only one with liquid assets...

Me in the know...? I'm always the last to know...! :) As posted before -- I haven't spoken with Peter/Bill nor any employee of SCMI/QTIG in 6 months...Too frustrating with always new expectations. Opinion now is how to address the shorts (if any) in this merge....? Good news may help MMXT momentarily but think lost on SCMI. Because SCMI is being manulipated = Period....Eventually MMXT would trade off & back down to SCMI levels rather than SCMI drifting up to MMXT. Not enough solid MM'ers yet with MMXT and still affilated without clear direction with non-reporting pink. Address shorts otherwise with an electronic DTC transfer MMXT inherits SCMI problems...We saw that with SUNX & STEH. Although no longer a pink and subject to reg SHO plus other benefits--= We'll be like the Wells Fargo Stagecoach on payday with the badguys in hot pursuit... Short shares & cheap shots.