Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm sorry you interpreted my comment as ripping the company and I did NOT say or imply GDVM is a "shell". My bad if I wasn't clear but I can't help being honest. I simply "tried" to say the following:
1) The company profile/description has not changed. They updated 1 thing to say "they have merged", from "seeking a merger". The primary objective remains the same, which is good.
2) They have previously declared 25 employees. "If" this is new to the OTCM profile, fine, but it has been declared in other otc filings. And as I said, the number makes sense considering 4 locations.
3) Finally, the shell "RISK", not "shell". The "No Shell" as been declared by Melvin since day 1. Obviously OTCM doesn't take anyone's word alone. The subject has been discussed many times here, perhaps while you were on sabbatical? The concensus is an annual audit will be required to remove the shell risk tag. I think many are expecting, or at least hoping an audit will be included with annual report, likely to come mid-April.
I knew OTC labeled it as a shell risk when I first bought shares in May. I am not the one calling it a shell, OTCM is calling it shell risk. I was hoping it would have been resolved before year end but accepted the need to wait. I'm sure I don't hold as many shares as most here claim but I have only added since May.
Would you not agree the stock can/will do so much better when that label is removed? Again, sorry I poked you. Hope this post is more clear?
Thanks for keeping it real...
1) Ok, "seeking a merger" to "merged". Should have said that a year ago, right? The rest is unchanged.
2) I'm certain I've seen "25 employees" months ago. Perhaps on the VeeMost website? At the time I thought "seems a bit of a stretch", but when you factor in 4 locations, it's reasonable. The number is simply a correction. If anyone really thinks they just QUINTUBBLED their workforce, clearly a PR is a day or 2 away, agree?
3) SHELL RISK = NO is a deja vu topic and Melvin has declared this since day 1. The issue is he can "say" whatever he wants, but obviously it needs to be proven!
I'm not bashing! At least the profile is being looked at and corrected but I see no "fundamental changes".
Peace out
Timing of your reply was missed by me, sorry, wasn't looking to "push you". Did you look at the company description in the GDVM "main notes, dd, links" area? (The stuff that "mods post")
Did you see my post 5 minutes ago?
The profile was simply "re-verified" by Melvin. The company description is exactly the same (look at it on the iHub DD/notes/links area), 25 employees is the same, as is his claim to "no shell". Nothing has changed...
You recognize humor 😄. Glad I didn't need to post the "next chart" I prepared just in case there was a "dump", uptrend is way more fun...
We're acquiring Nvidia! That's awesome!
Nobody's made a political post since Dolphins' respectful post regarding the matter about a day & a half ago. So keeping up with the latest standard of name-calling, whose being the idiots now?
Happy Presidents Day! Let's get to the "root causes" of the shell risk like Kamala Harris did to solve the immigration disaster!
"Pink disclosure annual report" along with an audit or whatever is needed to remove the shell risk. Sorry for mix-up...
No, currently in YAWN cycle...
Bro, I thought we covered this, like yesterday. So when you say "soon", do you mean like "Elon Musk will colonize Mars soon", like in the next 100 years? Or, like "if I don't find a bathroom soon, I'm gonna shit my pants"?
The next report, not "Q4", but "annual 10K", shouldn't be expected until mid APRIL.
Quote:
I think clowns are the ones who invest in a company then trash talk it. Sell the stock, or average down. It’s simple.
Well, that's your opinion, which is valid, and since this is an "opinion board", you're free to express it. I have averaged down from .055-.06 'ish to about .035. I don't have unlimited funds & there haven't really been opportunities for me to take any "profits". I also did the "smack the ask" thing recently at .019. You know, the thing that gets the momo going. How's that working for me?
My whiney, negative posts come after I read stuff like "very bullish", "great earnings coming soon", "Cisco Gold imminent", etc. I'm sorry but that makes me lose it!
Are you a sports fan by any chance? Suppose your NFL team is 2-10, your 5 year veteran quarterback sucks & just threw his 4th interception of the game. Do you yell at the people giving him shit & complaining, tell them to be patient and then go buy another of his jerseys & say "give him more time"? Or do you say "man, this guy sucks" & "the coach sucks too, replace them"?
PS, I don't plan on going anywhere until the 10K which better include an audit & remove the shell risk.
Cheers
Tothe, thanks for that and I agree with your opinion regarding the "OTC". However, I don't think a statement simply saying "we're not a shell" is acceptable. The super 8k includes an annual audit. The other post here was referring to an OTC company that issued one. I would also add the super 8k rules are a bit confusing, at least to me.
Cheers
My chart says we closed at .015 today so once again we are in a FART pattern heading for a POOP, but your chart is indeed prettier than mine.
Not sure if you intended to post that here, but the interesting thing is you said a "super 8k" was issued within 30 days of their RM.
Super 8k's are used for things like "removing a SHELL RISK", or a ticker change, & stuff like that. Wow...
Yeah, only 2 more months.
WWJKD?
Like other charts, my charts are also excellent at predicting past stock performance. The following is a recap analysis:
As we know, a BARF signal appeared beginning in early August when the PPS started to decline from .062 on 8-8, and continued into late October teetering around .02 cents.
At this point, a YAWN indicator flashed. Since the PPS basically did nothing and hovered at the 2 cent level for 2 months, the YAWN was confirmed thru November 28. On 11-29, it appeared a POOP formation may take hold due to sequential hefty declines.
Some chartists believe a POOP wave may have formed, or to a lesser degree a FART, fortunately, the POOP could not be completed and appears to have reversed and we are currently back at YAWN range. We'll need to wait a few weeks to see where we go from here.
We do know right now, the BAR is open, but that typically changes around 2:00AM, or due to VOLUME.
As a reminder to those in Chuck's DIY charts class, if the PPS goes "UP", draw an ascending line proportionate to "how much" it went up. Conversely, if the PPS goes "DOWN", draw your line "descending" in a proportionate manner. Remember to use as many colors as possible and lots of acronyms!
Based on the chart, looking at forward predictions of what could happen and general wisdom, remember:
Man who go thru airport turnstile sideways, going to Bangkok.
I already started loading the plethora of variables into my proprietary algorithm which now includes exponential smoothing routines. Once it starts, the program will likely need to run all weekend. I should have an updated chart available Monday, maybe sooner?
Until then, have a good weekend...
Everyone should just shut up and be like Melvin! Let's say nothing (like Melvin), do nothing (like Melvin), and just wait for the 750 Million Dollar Pipedream to flow. C'mon people!
Sign me up!
Hitting the Mega Millions jackpot on Friday and the the Powerball jackpot on Saturday is "doable" too. But a 10% gain 90 consecutive trades in a row, 10%, no losses, would be quite the accomplishment.
If you started with $1,000 & had a 10% gain that you reinvested, 90 times IN A ROW, you'd end up with $5.3 MILLION DOLLARS! Seriously?
I would consider 90 successful consecutive trades more "optimistic" than "realistic".
...90 days compounded at 3% would be more a realistic target price, right?
Cheers
I'd sign up for a 4.3% "guaranteed gain" per week in a heartbeat. But based on the actual trades, commission & crappy volume, it would be impossible. Remember, people bought around the .0144 level and sold around .0138.
You're also assuming a 4ish % weekly gain is a "trend" that will continue. Maybe for the past month or so, but we know where the PPS was a few months earlier...
Good afternoon. I happen to be excellent at analyzing charts so I got this:
GDVM "opened" Monday 1/22 at .0138 cents per share
GDVM "closed" Friday 1/26 at .0144 cents per share
This means GDVM went "up" by .0006 cents per share for the "week"
(insert squiggly lines & stuff here)
The Chuck Indicator translation says the stock didn't do dick.
Total volume for the week was about 1.58 million.
This translates to nobody gives a shit about GDVM right now.
Have a great week, glad I could help & I'll check back with an updated chart next week.
You mean the "attempted RM". The clock hasn't started yet...
Think like George Costanza, "it's a stock about nothing"...
Yeah, it's like a loved one is run over by a truck. You get a call that they're on life support in the ICU, you rush to the hospital and ask the doctor "how's he doing?"
The doctor says "his cholesterol numbers are pretty good" and then walks away...
Here too. The wind is really blowing & the ocean is nasty from the storm in SC. what are you looking at?
Busy weekend, tried to PM you but I'm blocked & buzzed right now. I'll get back to you...
Fair enough, peace...
Thank you for a reasonable reply. The reason for my lengthy post and obvious frustration comes from posts that imply Cisco gold is "imminent", like any day now. And then others take it as "fact" or "official news" like the original post I replied to that said "great news to see that Cisco gold is not far away".
And again, you repeated "they have met the requirements..." with a slight twist. So I need to repeat "they obviously have not met all the requirements". Kind of like someone who wants to be a pilot who passed all the written tests, has never been in an airplane for the hands on tests, and says "hey, I'm gonna be a pilot"! Maybe...
I disagree with your assumption the denial is based on revenue or sales as well. Melvin told us what the issue was:
Our final internal review of the Cisco gold partnership revealed that achieving this partnership level is not something that can be accomplished without the necessary automation to handle the workload that is sure to accompany it.
Remember, it took 9 MONTHS for him to figure this out! How is this possible? This doesn't bother you even a bit? And now they need to design, test, & implement a new, automated system where he gave a 7 to 10 month target from November 30.
I'm not saying they won't get there, but IMO it is not a "given" and almost certainly not "imminent".
Because I'm a shareholder with an opinion, not a very positive one right now. Why wouldn't I be here?
PS I don't have a girlfriend, been happily married for 43-plus years and I noticed your post is about "me" and nothing to dispute the facts of my post.
There's something to be said about people who jump to personal attacks. Sometimes the aggressive person is the one struggling? For now, I'll just take it as an opportunity to further explain the situation.
Isn't it obvious that the specializations they hold are nowhere close enough to achieve "gold status"? It should be clear that more, likely much more is needed for this level.
I don't agree with your "6 Month" comment so here's a timeline.
On Feb 27, 2023 Melvin Tweeted the following:
VeeMost has met all the requirements for Cisco Gold Certification and we have just applied for the certification. We will keep you informed.
.
.
#veemost #cisco #gold_certification
9:31 AM · Feb 27, 2023
·
40.8K Views
*
On November 30th 2023, 276 DAYS LATER, (A FULL 9 MONTHS), we got an update:
Update on Cisco Gold Certification
Our final internal review of the Cisco gold partnership revealed that achieving this partnership level is not something that can be accomplished without the necessary automation to handle the workload that is sure to accompany it. Therefore, we set a goal to ensure we have the people, processes, and tools needed to leverage this partner status successfully. Our target date for completing the Cisco gold partnership process is Q3 2024.
So basically it took Melvin 9 F'in months to figure out post-it notes and "manual" procedures weren't going to cut it so they'll start from scratch and create an automated system? Repeat: He thought they met all the requirements on Feb 27, 2023!
As for the "new target date RANGE" of Q3 2024, July 1st is 7 FULL MONTHS from the 11/30/23 and September 30 is 10 FULL MONTHS.
I would think people would understand why some have lost confidence in Melvin's ability to get this or just about anything else accomplished, but let's assume he succeeds by mid Q3, 8/15/24. That would be just under a YEAR & 1/2 from when he first said "we have met all the requirements"! WTF
So lifetime? Yeah, in the IT world/public company arena it sure can be. Another fun analogy would be from the first "we meet everything" date of 2/27 to the 11/30 update (9 months), a couple could have made a baby! But wait, there's more! And then from the 11/30 update to 8/31/24 (well within the Q3 target) ANOTHER BABY could be made and born!
So I'm comfortable saying "Cisco gold soon" is a bit misleading, maybe even "pump-ish"?
"NO", they haven't met the requirements. If they did, they would be gold and Q3 2024 is a lifetime away.
This is not "new", they've had these certifications for at least a year. In fact, they expire in a few weeks (Jan 24th). "Yes", these are very good but definitely not "gold". I'm not holding my breath for "if" they achieve gold, but I'm sure Melvin will keep us updated (sarcasm).
Great news? May I ask where you get your "news" from? Also not sure what Cisco Gold "not far away" means, unless you mean like Elon Musk is "not far away" from colonizing Mars?