Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
NTEK is still on a downtrend on the daily, *and* the MACD is heading down, with quite a bit of room to go. The weekly downtrend is still kicking butt, but the MACD is pretty bottomed out, and looks like it could start curving up.
It looks to me like this is going to hit .0100-ish (at least) again on Monday. That's not bashing. That's just my analysis of the chart.
Everybody knows that the burdon of proof rests upon the person making the allegation, and everybody also knows that you can't prove a negative. You can't prove that invisible space unicorns aren't real, but that doesn't mean they are.
I guess I was dumb when I bought 3s, but smart when I sold 'em for 2.
I saw 9 million flash on the 3s for a second. Maybe that's what it is.
I think that's just a placeholder for an undisclosed amount.
What's with all the volume? I bought some of this today and I don't even know what it is!
Best Buy is part of the conspiracy, man... just like Samsung, SONY, and Vizio. This hoax is even bigger than the Apollo Moon landings!
Check out the fraudulent claims on SONY'S OWN WEBSITE!!!
"Also, UltraFlix is now available on Sony’s 2014 4K Ultra HDTVs and will be coming soon to our 2015 4K Ultra HDTVs. UltraFlix offers a huge library of 4K content, including up to 300 hours of stunning 4K travel and nature documentaries and a wide selection of action/thriller, comedy, drama and family movies as well as breath-taking extreme sports videos, concerts, TV shows and moving murals. In its latest 4K offerings, UltraFlix will bring the award-winning epic 'INTERSTELLAR' to UltraFlix™, NanoTech’s streaming network, beginning April 1."
http://blog.sony.com/2015/04/new-exclusive-4k-content-coming-to-sony-4k-ultra-hdtvs/
... and you think SONY, Samsung, and Vizio are just too stupid to realize what a scam Nanotech Entertainment is?
NTEK insiders also hacked the Sony website and put the UltraFlix logo on there. They're diabolical, but I have to give them credit for their 1337 h4xx0r skillz.
Looks like NTEK needs some coffee...
I think I found the Tunkmeister:
http://www.amaizeingenergy.com/contact.html
The deadlock is getting boring...
4 million on the bid... nice!
Someone's loading up...
lol... someone spent $12 to bring the price down to .0012. Probably the same person with the 2 million share bid at .0012.
1 million share bid at .0013.
It looks like we've got some decent volume so far today. I noticed (the other day) that there was a nice monster bid at .0012. I don't have L2, but I bet it's still there. That's why I bought back in. There's more of a floor here than a ceiling, so I think we hit the bottom.
I'm back in this POS. I don't think it can get any worse from here, lol.
Good morning, CJTF. Let's see some action today!
Well... this is interesting.
I'm still holding, but it will probably be a while before the MMs can no longer hold this down, and that's about all I can say without violating any rules.
Anyone care to tell me why my NTEK stock had such a nice day? I've been too busy to pay attention...
They can always post stuff to otcmarkets.com if they want to save money. I own a stock that does that.
The TRUTH about ore estimates:
By now everybody has seen the ore estimates by Jenson and Erickson.
http://www.goldandsilvermining.com/docs/Properties_110613.pdf
What does GSMN say about these estimates? Well... they refer to them as "historical information", and they cite them as ONE of the reasons those properties were "selected" (acquired by GSMN):
"The chart below shows some of the historical information regarding tonnage and grade of the ore located at Asset #26."
"The chart below shows some of the historical information regarding tonnage and grade of the ore located at Asset #27."
So... these are NOT GSMN's estimates. It's simply past information that happens to be available. They can't do anything at all to make it better or worse. It is what it is.
Does GSMN claim these estimates are accurate/reliable? NO, they don't. Here's what they ACTUALLY claim.
Regarding Asset #26, they say (in their geological summary):
"At this time, the drilling has confirmed the existence of the mineralization to a depth of at least 600 feet but more data will be required to pin down total tonnage estimates."
Regarding Asset #27, they say:
"Existing mine workings on the property require geological mapping and
sampling. The Battle Mountain/Eureka, Ruby Hill and Prospect Mountain trends merit detailed examination. Mine dumps should also be sampled."
http://www.goldandsilvermining.com/docs/About_2013-14.pdf
So... is GSMN making "fraudulent ore estimates"? No. They're simply explaining why they think these properties have potential and merit further exploration.
There are, of course, other reasons (that I didn't mentioned here) why GSMN likes those properties. The point of this post however, was simply to address accusations of "fraudulent ore estimates". I now feel confident that I've shown these accusations to be patently false, both in this post, and my prior posts regarding SEC Industry Guide 7.
This information is blatantly false.
I don't have a lot of time ATM, but...
Industry Guide 7 is a list of things that "REGISTRANTS" must "furnish" (provide) to the SEC.
A "registrant" is a company that registers with the SEC (files Form S-1). This is also known as a "reporting company".
A "non-reporting company" is a company that does NOT register with the SEC. A non-reporting company is NOT a "registrant".
If a non-reporting company was required to "furnish" all the things that a reporting company had to "furnish" (file), there would be no such thing as a non-reporting company (which OBVIOUSLY isn't true).
If you look at the MOST RECENT version of Industry Guide 7 that's ON THE SEC WEBSITE, this is what it says:
"The following definitions apply to registrants engaged or to be engaged in significant mining operations:"
https://www.sec.gov/about/forms/industryguides.pdf
There is also an OUTDATED version (with a disconnected phone number for the SEC on it) floating around the internet as well. It's probably from 1992 or something. It is NOT on the SEC website, but it says this:
"The definitions and disclosure instructions contained in this Guide apply to all public mining entities and their public disclosures pursuant to the rules of Regulation S-K."
Even if it was still 1992, and the SEC was still using this version, look at the definition of a non-reporting company:
"A company that is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act"
http://us.practicallaw.com/9-382-3651
Industry Guide 7 does NOT APPLY to CJTF (non-reporting companies). If it did, there would be NO DIFFERENCE between a reporting company and a non-reporting company.
That is FALSE.
Those disclosure requirements APPLY TO SEC FILINGS.
Securities on the OTC Pink marketplaces may trade without being registered with the SEC.
When a company registers with the SEC (by filing form S-1), they THEN become subject to the reporting requirements set forth by Regulation S-K under the US Securities Act of 1933.
If CJTF decides to file with the SEC, their filings WILL have to meet the SEC's standards and requirements. Until then, those requirements DO NOT APPLY.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/learn/otc-company-reporting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_S-K
Just to make it clear: SEC disclosure requirements (what a company is required to put in their SEC filings) ARE NOT APPLICABLE to "non-reporting" companies, so there is NOTHING that CJTF is "in violation" of with regard to the SEC.
There's NO SUCH THING as a non-reporting company getting "shut down" for not meeting the filing requirements that apply to reporting companies.
Go CJTF!
I've NEVER seen ANY evidence that any of CJTF's estimates are bogus. Maybe they are. Maybe they aren't. That remains to be seen. If there is any actual evidence out there, I'd love to see it. If there are regulations dictating how estimates must be arrived at, I'd love to read them. If there is scientific literature specifically addressing that issue, I'd like to read that. Until then...
Also... CJTF was NOT touted, pumped, or dumped, just like there was no poop and scoop campaign prior to that. Those things are just silly conspiracy theories. There's no such thing as people who do such things, and since such people don't exist, I'm clearly not talking about anybody (either directly or indirectly).
Most of the time, the beneficiaries are the promoters themselves. For example, a promoter can find what's essentially a dead stock, front load it, and then pump it with a bunch of email blasts and whatnot. This is extremely common. And look at the poop and scoops... why would a company bash it's own stock? Every day there are pump and bash crews working stocks. They move from one stock to another. Stock manipulation does NOT require insiders. Scams that do are more sophisticated and thus probably more rare.
There's a lot of truth to this, but you can't assume that the pumping and dumping is done by people connected to the company. I think it's more common for the companies to have nothing to do with it. I also think poop & scoops are just as common as pump & dumps, but those hardly get any attention. Lots of people won't even admit they exist, even though they're totally common and obvious.
I remember several notable financial analysts referring to Facebook as a pump & dump, and as a means to rob pension plans or something. Financial scams happen at every level of finance. It wasn't too long ago that credit default swaps, collateralized debt obligations, etc. brought the whole U.S. economy down...
Is that in regular years, or Stephen Tunks years (which would be, like, 10 years from now)? ;)
Ever notice that Steve was CFO back when ETEK was pump & dumped? I know that most of the time, the company itself isn't responsible for the P&D, but Steve told me that they used "stock promotion" back in 2013, but he made it sound like it was the prior management. Was anyone here around back then?
http://www.pennystockresearch.com/etek-pump-and-dump-alert-july-19-2013/
They never even fixed this page, which they said in a PR would take a couple of days. That was months ago.
http://affordabledisclosure.com/ir/etek/
Has Steve done ANYTHING he said he was going to do?
I agree. Whatever the problem was, it was bad enough that he didn't want to tell anyone about it.
It's all good. No worries...
My suspicion is that that got an "adverse opinion" from the auditor, meaning that their accounting practices weren't up to snuff, and if that's the case, they'd have to go back to the drawing board, and would also have trouble filing it with the SEC even if they eventually got an auditor to sign off on it.
Anyone's guess is as good as mine though.
Not at all. I'm just saying that no one would confuse those things unintentionally. Every business wants to know how much they've taken in *and* how much they're owed.
I would have thought that financial filings would be pretty standardized in terms of format, what they must included, etc., but I've never looked into that (or had to do that).
If I was kind of a dick there, I'm sorry, but I get slightly peeved when people get kind of bullshitty with me, and claiming to have "established" something, when all you actually did was make something up, is "kind of bullshitty".
I ain't madatchu or anything...