Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If pctl blows past those levels it will be a suffle indicator coming from Brent that he recognizes the Dallas oil crowd in getting involved. That’s the inference I look forward to.
To many nickel dime flippers here. Why would one sell when we know the word is just getting out in the Dallis upper strata oil community? Especially when we know word is being circulated in trade journals and results to be announced Wed.
We should be promoting at these Confrence es
Emit if you scroll to the bottom of the link you posted you’ll find suggested reading’s or n nanotechnology.there may be a wealth of information in those articles. If you or anyone is a subscriber to that publication please copy and paste articles.
Mods sticky that post
Great posting…. Read the history long ago… great to read the updat
“ they are all "well connected" in the social and venture capital scene around Dallas, Texas among other hot spots. “
That’s exactly what it takes to get the right people interested…seems we have an in & our presence will shortly made known in the o&g industry:
Sounds like Nat rub’s shoulders with the high end of social spectrum. Getting involved with pctl helps her several ways. She knows pctl is going to be very profitable making many of us well off and become customers….. she’s wanting to become known as one who is in the know….. mutually advantageous. Think an announcement or article re pctl could make the pps explode as a result of exposure among that strata ( deep pockets)
Ok and he is? Something I missed?
Sent this to
mike@mountaintopmedia.net
What is the time line for the sale of the crystals? Given time for production equipment to be built, EPA approvals (or will that automatically apply as it is only a change in state of matter)
Has it been so long and I’ve forgotten. We still need to go before Casper and jury if we win Activson will appeal.
Correct. However if we continued in trial there was a punitive option of 1-2-3 x (or more).
Think the hold up is due to Comcast punitive damages.
“ 5% of 10.591B ~ $530,000,000
6% of 10.591B ~ $636,000,000
7% of 10.591B ~ $742,000,000 “
This is Zombie s neighborhood w/o Comcast…Comcast 742 + at least 2x
Perhaps judge Andrews allowed for 6 months or by end of year to settle such a complicated settlement… indemnification as one example.
Received response from pctl idea of going to conference going to be discussed.
I've sent this to IADC
https://www.iadc.org/conferences/upcoming/
"https://www.nanogastechnologies.com/municipal-water/
Disinfection?
For that fact check out the whole nanobubbe website.
https://www.nanogastechnologies.com/industries/
Check out the video's
https://www.nanogastechnologies.com/videos/
Will PCTL be going to any of these?https://www.iadc.org/conferences/upcoming/
I've asked pctl about this.
Spot on!
justus1 or anyone checked the fins of the public companies involved? Perhaps since the settlement was announced after the 3rd Q we will not be able to check the fins untill 4Q report comes out.
justus1 could you post that artical?
Here is a list of oil & gas publications it would be wise for us to send them a copy of DesertEaglels Most recient post & the most recient BUSINESS WIRE artical
“Just look at the results to date from the heavy (15 API Gravity) oil reservoir in Grassy Creek...
At the baseline figure of 99/01 WOR prior to any well treatment, a barrel of production translated to $0.798. At an average cost of $28.28 to produce, an operator would suffer substantial losses just to keep the wells on line.
At a post treatment figure 60/40 WOR using PCTL's Catholyte Free (not to be mistaken for the inferior product being produced by others), a barrel of production translates to $31.92. At that price, it is profitable to produce without additional facilities or infrastructure.
At a post treatment figure 48/52 WOR using the Patent Pending Nano Technology, a barrel of production translates to $41.49. That is a substantial increase for a producer sitting on a multi-million barrel reservoir that was previously dormant.”
[Suppressed Image]
AND
PCT LTD has Filed a Joint Patent Application with NanoGas Technologies’
(NGT) and David L. Holcumb on “Nanobubble Dispersions Generated in Electrochemically Activated Solutions” (PTSI- 11-04-21) https://www.nanogastechnologies.com/
November 05, 2021 03:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time
LITTLE RIVER, S.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--PCT LTD (“PCTL” OTC Pink) https://www.para-con.com/ is excited to introduce a new patent pending technology which utilizes the synergy obtained when electrochemically activated (ECA) anolyte or catholyte manufactured by PCT’s patented equipment is infused with 50 -200 nm spherical gas bubbles manufactured by NGT’s patented process and equipment. Gases such as nitrogen, oxygen, etc. are used to create more stable and efficacious dispersions in the ECA solutions. This technology adds the multiple mechanical and surface energy benefits of nanobubbles to the biocidal or sanitizing properties of anolyte (Hydrolyte™). The process will also provide for a more effective bacterial control in combating a variety of corrosive bacteria in the oilfield, particularly sulfate reducing bacteria and resultant hydrogen sulfide (H2S), a corrosive and toxic gas in sour oil & gas wells.
“We have been working for over nine months in laboratory and field testing to gather the necessary data and information to file this patent. We will post an in-depth report on the value of this new process to the markets, on our website on November 17, 2021”
Tweet this
In addition, the application of PCT’s Catholyte-Free™ infused with NGT’s nitrogen nanobubbles has been shown in laboratory studies to significantly improve oil recovery from porous or naturally fractured reservoirs using the combined surface energy and mechanical properties inherent to these nanobubble dispersions. Field trials being conducted in Southwest Missouri in the injectors and producers of an active waterflood project are showing similar results. Plans are being made for application on producing oil wells in Oklahoma and Texas. Continued lab and field testing is being conducted to further validate this technology and build a data base of information so this process can be packaged and marketed to the oil industry across the country.
“We have been working for over nine months in laboratory and field testing to gather the necessary data and information to file this patent. We will post an in-depth report on the value of this new process to the markets, on our website on November 17, 2021,” stated CEO Gary Grieco.
About PCT LTD:
PCT LTD ("PCTL") focuses its business on acquiring, developing and providing sustainable, environmentally safe disinfecting, cleaning and tracking technologies. The company acquires and holds rights to innovative products and technologies, which are commercialized through its wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Paradigm Convergence Technologies Corporation (PCT Corp). The Company established entry into its target markets with commercially viable products in the United States and now continues to gain market share in the U.S. and U.K.
https://www.ogj.com/drilling-production
https://www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/
https://ektinteractive.com/oil-and-gas-training/
https://www.spe.org/en/publications/
https://www.hartenergy.com/publications/oil-gas-investor-magazine
https://oilmanmagazine.com/
https://www.worldpumps.com/oil-gas/publications/
https://ogjresearch.com/pages/publications/oil-gas-publications.html
Top 80 Oil and Gas Blogs and Websites
https://blog.feedspot.com/oil_and_gas_blogs/
https://www.bizzuka.com/8-leading-oil-and-gas-industry-websites/
Oil & Gas 360 - Oil and Gas News, Analysis and Insights ...
https://www.oilandgas360.com
Oil & Gas News Home | RIGZONE
https://www.rigzone.com › news
Top Oil & Gas Websites - LinkedIn
https://www.linkedin.com › pulse › top-oil-gas-websites-ja...
LET’S GET THE ATTENTION
WE CAN DO OUR PART OF PROMOTING & PERHAPS THEY’LL INVEST
COULD ONLY DRIVE PPS UP
There are so many variables are we taking about Cox only, depends on where they settle between 27-1.06 .38-.40 has been discussed, will that number be applied to the remaining 12+ companies ( Comcast a whole different category as per willfulness factor, will this be taken internationally ( Whitman during this process joined an international firm…wonder why). For those reasons 600 m may be low but reasonable when compared to the history of IP suits and leavening out international probabilities ( theirs money to be made internationally that’s why Whitman joined that firm.
Great find! Hopefully someone will post. Y’all are going to see what Z & I heard…. Just how sloppy the defense attorneys were unprepared . The defense literally folded. Andrews had to ask the defense attorney ( note: not the main attorney but his second) the main attorney literally was embarrassed ( it was not going well & he knew it) he bolted. Andrews had to ask is the defense making a motion to settle?
Response… yes
Yes that’s true but my thinking is that it should be approved as it is the same substance in a different form ( state of matter) ie liquid to Solid.
That’s my guesstimate . Would have to take a look at how long it took to get the fluids approved by the government and then finally monetized. I believe it took 12 to 18 months for that to happen. I believe it will take that long for the crystals to go through the process. The most recent release referring to the crystals is a good thing however one must only take that as information and not speculate on it hitting the market immediately it will take 12 to 18 months for monetization. One might want to check the history of how long it took the fluids to be approved from the start of the application process to the monetization.
The counter to that is Bret can’t see until the pps reaches the following levels.10,.15,..20. When it does he’ll measurly sell and reinvest in pctl with the condition not to sell until those shares reach .25 then rings & repeat. Who then is paying for expansion? Late Investors who see the value in pctl thus driving demand for the shares.
“ Like a bad car accident. You can't look away. ” That’s true, and it’s called rubber necking. Dangerous as it causes additional accidents.So why don’t you move on? Your rubbernecking here is only slowing things down here. We know each well has it’s own geological characteristics. We also know the crystals will take 12-18 months to test & get government approval .
We can have a very positive impact on the pps by flooding the oil companies, twitter & Facebook with the post below & do it between now and the 17th......
PCT LTD has Filed a Joint Patent Application with NanoGas Technologies’(NGT) and David L. Holcomb on “Nanobubble Dispersions Generated in Electrochemically Activated Solutions” (PTSI- 11-04-21)
November 05, 2021 03:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time
LITTLE RIVER, S.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--PCT LTD (“PCTL” OTC Pink) is excited to introduce a new patent pending technology which utilizes the synergy obtained when electrochemically activated (ECA) anolyte or catholyte manufactured by PCT’s patented equipment is infused with 50 -200 nm spherical gas bubbles manufactured by NGT’s patented process and equipment. Gases such as nitrogen, oxygen, etc. are used to create more stable and efficacious dispersions in the ECA solutions. This technology adds the multiple mechanical and surface energy benefits of nanobubbles to the biocidal or sanitizing properties of anolyte (Hydrolyte™). The process will also provide for a more effective bacterial control in combating a variety of corrosive bacteria in the oilfield, particularly sulfate reducing bacteria and resultant hydrogen sulfide (H2S), a corrosive and toxic gas in sour oil & gas wells.
In addition, the application of PCT’s Catholyte-Free™ infused with NGT’s nitrogen nanobubbles has been shown in laboratory studies to significantly improve oil recovery from porous or naturally fractured reservoirs using the combined surface energy and mechanical properties inherent to these nanobubble dispersions. Field trials being conducted in Southwest Missouri in the injectors and producers of an active waterflood project are showing similar results. Plans are being made for application on producing oil wells in Oklahoma and Texas. Continued lab and field testing is being conducted to further validate this technology and build a data base of information so this process can be packaged and marketed to the oil industry across the country.
“We have been working for over nine months in laboratory and field testing to gather the necessary data and information to file this patent. We will post an in-depth report on the value of this new process to the markets, on our website on November 17, 2021 (see below for links),” stated CEO Gary Grieco.
About PCT LTD:
PCT LTD ("PCTL") focuses its business on acquiring, developing and providing sustainable, environmentally safe disinfecting, cleaning and tracking technologies. The company acquires and holds rights to innovative products and technologies, which are commercialized through its wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Paradigm Convergence Technologies Corporation (PCT Corp). The Company established entry into its target markets with commercially viable products in the United States and now continues to gain market share in the U.S. and U.K.
Forward-Looking Statements:
This press release contains "forward-looking statements" as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward-looking statements."
Such statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to: PCTL's ability to raise sufficient funds to satisfy its working capital requirements; the ability of PCTL to execute its business plan; the anticipated results of business contracts with regard to revenue; and any other effects resulting from the information disclosed above; risks and effects of legal and administrative proceedings and government regulation; future financial and operational results; competition; general economic conditions; and the ability to manage and continue growth. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes may vary materially from those indicated. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements PCTL makes in this press release include market conditions and those set forth in reports or documents it files from time to time with the SEC. PCTL undertakes no obligation to revise or update such statements to reflect current events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Contacts
Investor Relations Contact
Michael Iorlano
(760) 621-0062
Mike@MountaintopMedia.net
or
IR@para-con.com
www.para-con.com
www.pctcorphealth.com
Twitter: https://mobile.twitter.com/PCTL_
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211105005820/en/?fbclid=IwAR3U_3k3sfh37iyaYA11FP_LfHpgTIH25OxX79ZcsxLxQ7CV-Xc17AdQJLg
When all is said & done Judge Andrews has to approve the settlement. Perhaps it doesn’t matter what court one receives a negative judgment Andrews will take that into consideration and act accordingly
Believe Andrews at that time could exclude tainted parties and install a court appointed custodian to make decisions along with a newly appointed board of directors.
That artical so right on!
"Those proceeds are owned by the corporation and can be used to pay debt, of which a custodian's fee for dissolution of the corporation would apply."
First part agree. Second part "dissolution" why dissolve...let Whitman (at his new international firm)continue the fight by resurecting the firm for future licencing claims.
"Take it up with the author of this quote:
'odd, at Cox trial they called billy ralph jr. to the stand but not the other 5 shareholders in the courtroom ?
WHY IS THAT ?'"
Need link.
Was at the trial don’t recall Billy testifying. He was at the previous hearing but did not testify.
Havent posted for so long in the Long term Libary I've forgotten how to add info to the libary. Anyone? If I can't recall I'll call Ihub for help.
3.0 I stand corrected thanks. One should not assume but thay (cable companies) have done several up grades and may have found a work arround of the patents in there new equipment. That's not going to eliminate there exposure for when they were infringing, suggesting a work arround may be in place now.
Remember this? It's in the Long Term libary. Part of the reason all is so slow.
Long uoip
Re: NewbieDoobyDoo post# 78958
0.001
Post # of 80134
questions about insurance have come up various times, previous answers to indemnity queries.. .
(uoip shareholders are grateful for specialneeds background & expertise)
Specialneeds ~ The insurance companies for the manufacturers will force a settlement.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154793582
Remember that there is multiple years of significant insurance coverage. This will attach before their balance sheets are hit
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154263578
the mfgs are on the hook
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154260052
we have hired the high cost attorneys who told us we had a great case, spent a ton of money to be told right before trial that we had to settle. I’ve seen it over and over
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154259937
Contractual indemnifiers don’t give their counter parties a blank check to get hit with any jury award as a bill to pay. This is what I do for a living. The manufacturers will force this to settle.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154258831
Indemnification from the modem manufacturers would be at risk if they are not given control over this case. No indemnifier is going give an open checkbook to the counter party to go to court and get crushed then have to swallow the bill.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154015422
The insurance companies covering the box manufacturers are going to be running the litigation here since they will be indemnifying their customers for IP infringement. the indemnification agreements are not contingent on a jury outcome to be triggered. They never are written that way because the indemnifier will never give up control over their exposure.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=153918585
The thing that we have to keep in mind is that this case has third party risk transfer. Cisco and Arris have several years of insurance towers that will be hit. They act differently in that the insurance layers have to work in good faith toward each other or they risk bad faith judgements. This will have very serious settlement discussions in the insurance aspect of this.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=153888632
lean toward a global settlement with the 13 sometime before trial.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=153887617
the 13 are still required to act in “good faith” relative to their contractual counterparties(Cisco and others). They won’t just drive this thru trial to get a verdict that will be indemnified. They will be required to make a good faith attempt to settle this in coordination with those contractual partners
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=153723240
the issue is the valuation at this point. That discussion is going to be ongoing all the way to settlement just before trial. If there are any talks going on now they are about probing as to what Carter is willing to take. All settlement discussions start out this way
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=153465627
Keep in mind the doc 3.1 modem’s (only) are where are patents were applied. Comcast this year are switching out the older modems for the newer models don't believe the patents are in the newer models. Any estimate then would include just the 3.1 modem’s...and that was a lot. It was thought the 13 would be tried as a group but Judge Andrews found it was not practical to try the case as a group. He suggested and attorneys agreed the mid-size company (Cox) with 80B income should be the test case (as a private company they do not have to file Q reports thus we can't get a read on the settlement numbers.) Check out the public companies q reports. I do not know when going through discovery if Whitman only covered Cox or all 13.If discovery only covered Cox then what’s slowing the settlement down could be (if discovery looking into the other 12 companies) is permitted and/or has still to be done.
If we could at least find the number of modem’s Cox deployed & for how long they were deployed we could get a better handle on a $$$ guesstimate. Applying Teece range of .27-1.06.Then use Z figures of .38-.40/modem’s range. A very fair & non likely refuted amt that Andrews would accept as fair. As I understand it Andrews has to approve of the settlement.
Teece range was .27-1.06 (believe he gave a range for negotiating purposes)
.38-.40 was discussed in court as Z mentioned
Note: there lawyers just gave up…the lead attorney after making the cookies comment read the jury and soon after just summed up (saving face) and turned the case over to his second. His second made a few comments to which Andrews aske him are you moving for a settlement to which the second responded yes. Jury was dismissed at this time. Would suggest getting a transcript of the trial(if that has not already been done….think long uoip had that…no?
Note: Do you think Whitman after all this time let Carter fold…doubt it, as Whitman will loose also.
long uoip if you have the transcipt (havent checked the Long term Libary to see if I posted it)I'll post it in the Libary.
long uoip,Z,Scruffer chime in.
"Was Chanbond set up as a Delaware Corp?" suspect it is a Del Corp as this is where Whitman filed the case....no?
Maybe a little to hash.
That’s true.