Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Apple said that the problem is so big that they are lobbying for reform in Congress. Like you said, so what, right? Because it happens all the time! They are losing so much money settling suits or losing suits to patent trolls or companies that have never actually built their patent product ideas, that they're begging Congress for reform. That's a big deal for us. For months you and Wilma have been complaining about how unlikely it is that REVO can win a case against a big boy. Welp, I'm here to say that it happens all the time, even if your company has no products or assists, your ideas can and are worth millions in court, and you can win--even in those circumstances. Patent law is about ideas, not tangible products. Having a tangible product helps, but most patent cases are about people's ideas that were stolen before they were made by their original owners or infringed upon. So, no more lies.
I post this as proof that you're never too big to get sued for patent infringement and lose to the little guy, even if the little guy has never produced the product before. No more lies, Wilma. No more lies. Apple Ordered To Pay $533 Million For Patent Infringement - http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/25/us-ip-apple-verdict-idUSKBN0LT0E720150225
I'm beginning to think bashers are our mods, because everything that directly refutes them credibly gets taken down right away.
That's huge! And Stripe gas stations are also accepting bitcoin now. I pity the fools who sold low earlier today. https://stripe.com/bitcoin
I like this answer a lot. Thank you for sharing it. A R/S as a plan B sounds great, but definitely not as a rush for our next step. A shotgun R/S split after 20 days would risk alienating and destroying the overall market value And shareholder confidence of the longs who have held on loyally to.this stock so far. Even if the stock soared to 20 or 30 dollars a share on the Nasdaq, with a 1:15 or 1:40 R/S, we would barely break even (those of us who don't own hundreds of millions of shares). Announcing some major news to help let this stock soar for a couple of months before a R/S would help encourage retail investors and justify a higher IPO when it uplists to the Nasdaq.
I agree.
I completely agree. Soooooo many trolls have been trying their best to tank this stock to no avail. Stay strong SLTD. Curse of Claytrader be gone!
That IS unusual, not so much as a peep from him all day. It must be his day off.
I gotta hand it to market mark and his funky bunch of hustlers, it was a good shuck and jive for a panic sell push if I ever saw one--but I'm not interested, and am not biting. So much about this business has been transparent and honest, even the filings--despite the some of the panic people read into them regarding the convertible notes and derivatives. We don't need your supposedly saintly advice, when the only advice you bring to the discussion is why a stock that you don't own and that we do wasn't allegedly a sound investment afterall. If you really wanted to help anyone, you'd provide an alternative more sound investment to make to this current one on the board. So, as much as you were probably gunning for your images to be plastered on cheap religious candles at Walgreens by year's end--inor/marky the patron saints of panic trading, keep your salty and dangerously libelous opinions about this company to yourselves. ;)
Those allegations are completely libelous. The business is registered in Nevada, that's not a crime. Any business can choose any state it wants for tax advantages. That's why the state of Delaware has the largest percentage of corporations and LLCs registered in its state than any other state in the country. Delaware offers the best tax advantages for its corporations registered in their state. It's completely legal to forum shop in the United States. Similarly, if a business does business in any other state, it's still subject to tax liability for the business it conducts in that state. I don't say very much on Ihub very often, but enough is enough. There isn't anything sketchy going on with this company or its stock. It has a business, it has a product, it posted profits two consecutive quarters in a row, it files its financial reports on time, it takes risks to expand its operations, and it's grown its share price by over 300% over the last six months. It's a good stock, so leave our CEO and our stock in his business alone.
Have you ever raised chickens before? Ask anyone who has, a handful of chickens will bless you with more eggs than you can feed your family, friends, and neighbors with all year. Even if a fraction hatch, there's still more than enough for everyone. Look it up.
I have always wanted to say Krakenbooooomage, but here is such an occasion. Nice close!
I agree Skeet, why would Protect America cut Eyetalk a break? If they really had gone to town on our company, they could have moved for a summary judgment motion, and for sanctions against our lawyer for a frivolous suit, and further asked the court to end this with a dismissal with prejudice. Big boys don't pull punches. Big boys also know when it's time to make a deal. Eyetalk pulling it's punch was a sign of mercy. So no worries here man. I'm not selling my shares, because is something krusty said.
Yay! Thanks for the update sc300. I couldn't find that news anywhere else online.
Working a little overtime this weekend, on a Sunday? Nice job Elk. Fear never sleeps, you have shorts to make. The louder you shout, the more obvious it is that the fear campaign is losing out to reason.
Wow! It just blew up!
You're wrong. Unless the shares were purchased on margin, your broker cannot loan out your shares for shorting. Ask your broker.
I love how you stick with it sc300. Everyday, all day, several times a day, defending your wisdom here on ihub, to help protect the all the investors you care about from fraud with your faithful dd, and photographic memory of every corporation, 10k, 8k, that the master of deception dufort extracts upon all innocent investors. A candle bearing your likeness is well deserved for sale at Walgreen somewhere, and a prophetic chapter in the good lord's book headed with your hallowed name. 8)
Get ready for next Monday sc300! The five day doom and gloom forecast you have for this stock, just like the one you made for last week, is about to fall apart as this stock goes boom! Jazzy Jeff & the Fresh Prince Boom Shake the Room:
Any luck with those negative "4" casts being filled today? Nope? 8) sorry the boomage here left you chasing. IDGC Long and Strong. Life rewards the bold and spares the cautious.
Boom shake the room! Jazzy Jeff & the Fresh Prince Boom Shake the Room:
I finally listened to the conference call today, after reading all of Finale's and Apostle's negative commentary. I think the call went well. They were very sincere, rational, transparent, and honest about their strengths and shortcomings. I appreciated that. I also appreciate the fact that they made it clear that the calls would be held every two weeks. Which means that their goal is not to monopolize off of any pump that might implicitly accompany a cc perceived as a deceptive pr move; but rather, is evidence of a genuine effort on their part to keep their shareholders in the loop about their decision making. None of the other stocks I own extend this privilege to their shareholders, and I wish they would. So, can I live with a few reliably predictable scheduled conference calls not dropping ground breaking information about instant gains? Yes I'm ok with that. Let the shorties take what they need with their pessimism about this stock in its beginning stages, the long play will pay off in the end.
How are you and Kristi not getting slammed for defamation and libel? You do realize that in most jurisdictions when you publish defamatory statements about private figures you can be sued for libel, right? Even if you punctuate your comment with "IMO." You can't call people criminals when they've never been convicted of a crime, a civil suit is not the same. Your blantant disregard for legal etiquette and general libel law completely undermines any credibility you ask us to presume you have in corporate legal and financial compliance. Shame on both of you. You could've taken your ire out on the company, but have, instead, chosen to maliciously libel the people who created the company or who run it.