Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
interesting how the content of the conversations follow the change in the direction of PS
MB I hope your prediction is correct .0001 this week. Hundred makes a 10K with a small walk back up to .01.Can't find those odds any where else. That's if you can fill the order. I'll add at that price. GLTA
Perhaps the thickness of the film may be a factor in the speed or rate of production. Thinner may increase production out put but require additional application of coating. Cost would not be as important in an emergency setting when H2 is needed. The slower production rate, if this is the case, with a beefier coating but more cost effective would suit a less stressful setting ie. a civilian application. Next news release will be interesting if this info some how plays into the mix. Only speculation but interesting none the less.
after a little reading the share holder can request conversion of the restricted stock. the company can deny and an opinion letter will be needed. If the company issuing the stock is a shell thee is additional steps that may be required. Looks like this is a non issue and the restricted stock is not necessarily worth the cost of an opinion letter, unless you are the proud owner of millions of shares. More good news.
What ever happened to the preferred class E restricted stocks that were awarded last October, still in play? Anybody that may still be around that can shed light on subject.
the volume is what I enjoy the most 157 shares x .004 = $ 0.628 last of the big spenders. shake the tree any harder it will come down
It has been a few months since I have been back to this board to see what is being discussed. There seems to be no progress in the discussion. I am not a physicist, I did sell instrumentation to measure flow of materials in closed conduits about thirty years ago.
First it has been said that there was no base line numbers to work off of when the AOT was tested at TC. That tells me that TC was not measuring the amount of material flowing through their pipeline prior to the installation of the AOT. If they were measuring the amount of material flow, which we all know they were, they would more than likely use the same instrumentation to measure the flow after the installation of the AOT. This might put the AOT at a disadvantage with the needed piping configurations to place it next to the main line with the ability to divert the flow through the AOT and then back to the main line. These disadvantages could be mathematically removed from the equation when testing the AOT’s performance.
Secondly, I would think there are sensors down stream that measure the amount of material flowing at various locations. These sensors would be attached to a program that tells the pump to maintain a consistent quantity flow. Now you can determine the amount of power the pump needs to maintain that quantity flow. Next divert flow to the AOT and the program will give the pump the same instructions maintain flow at the same amount. Determine the amount of power needed to maintain the flow with the AOT incorporated in the piping configuration. The AOT either increased, decreased or was same with the amount of power to maintain a consistent flow.
No one has been able to produce that information confirming success or failure of the AOT as it happened on the TC line. When those hard facts are released then one can determine the performance of the commercial sized AOT device in a true real world application. Maybe the KM testing results will be released but until then its all speculation.
The final story is money, will the AOT save money on pumping cost or will it fail in that endeavor. One can debate about where the savings might be in quantity pumped or the cost of the actual pumping operation, that is what will cause this stock PPS to rise or fall in the final outcome.
I’m in till the TC or KM testing info or some other testing material that gives the real world story is released.
GLTA
all the drama with Sug makes for a good story but takes way to long to tell it.
somebody pulled 0.83 out of their retirement fund to invest in EVLI that's always a good sign
Tried to contact via email from website received note on screen
"FAILED TO SEND EMAIL TRY TO CONTACT BY ANOTHER METHOD" not a good sign at all. When the company does not want to talk with share holders this thing is DOA.
The news out holds significant information for the long term future for ETRM. This article points out a Paradigm shift in treatment of obesity. There are several chronic health issues that are related to obesity. In the next 6 months look for insurance companies to start covering effective treatment for obesity. Once THAT HAPPENS the PPS could easily be in the 10-15$ range
New Guidelines: Treat Obesity First
Monday, March 02, 2015 02:22 PM
Treat weight problems first, then deal with comorbidities like dyslipidemia, hypertension, and impaired glucose tolerance, a new guideline urges.
It's an entirely new approach to the treatment of disease, said the lead author of a new guideline for treating obesity with medications. "The old paradigm was to treat each comorbidity with medications ... then manage obesity, which caused most of the original problems in the first place," Apovian said during a press briefing. "The new paradigm is to manage the obesity first, with lifestyle change and medications, then manage the remainder of the comorbidities that have not responded."
The guideline focuses on medical management of obesity, a component left out of earlier guidelines released by the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the Obesity Society, since they were written before many of the new weight-loss drugs were approved.
Four new obesity drugs have been approved in the last few years, and many of these medications work by amplifying the effects of behavioral changes. They have the greatest effect when they're reinforced with face-to-face visits -- the literature says at least 16 visits per year, a figure that federal insurers reimburse for. "Adding the medications to a diet and lifestyle program leads to a greater enhancement of their effects," she said. "And we recommend that if you're going to treat weight management patients that you see them frequently."
The new guidelines are the first to mention specific obesity drugs and give some guidance on how to prescribe them. Patients should be put on the drugs for a 3-month trial period, starting at the lowest dose and titrating up, the guidelines state. If they don't lose at least 5% of their body weight in that time, they should be switched to another drug.
"You have to give your best guess as to which drug the patient should go on based on their lifestyle characteristics that make them amenable to that particular drug,” the author said. "Unless you have a very clear idea of what drug you think the patient will do best on, it's going to be trial and error."
The question remains whether insurance will cover these medications. "Many insurances do not want to pay for obesity drugs, and they're expensive. They can cost between $4,000 and $6,000 per year."
With more clinicians focused on the treatment of obesity as a disease -- which is what the American Medical Association called it in 2013 -- experts say that could change.
Source: http://www.medpagetoday.com/Endocrinology/Obesity/49587
The implant of this device will be more costly in the onset of treatment but there should be fewer if any significant negative symptomology associated with long term use of the device compared to pharmaceuticals. The future looks bright for ETRM. This device utilizes a biofeedback neurological loop from stomach to brain and back. One problem with significant weight loss is the body will burn or use protein (muscle) as food source and save the fat for emergency, starvation mode. If this device addresses that issue helping the body to burn the fat before the protein, things look even better.
Straight Out of Compton posted 56 million first weekend out. Too bad EVLI did not have money invested
Ladies and gentlemen lets stay on point and talk about the stock, it's future or lack there of. Everyone's view point is important and should be evaluated on it's merit.
Does his parole some how increase the PPS, I don't see it.
at this pace be lucky to hold .05 by Friday
Watching the paint dry almost dried out time for some news
if it doesn't hold at .70 support is in mid .60's or maybe back to low .40's like it did in March
Follow the trend the trend is your friend
Fit for Life or Myfatdog;
Are the restricted stocks issued before the split still in play? My etrade account still shows no value or PPS but still list the stock. There has been no change in the # of shares. I know we must hold shares in EVLI for at least 12 months after date of issue for the restricted stock to be converted.
I tried to send message, with same question, through Everlert contact us tab via email but it failed to send on three tries.
and a little more heat escapes from this hot air balloon
Round 5 2 knock down TKO the mighty Texan ( Kirkland ) wins another. EVLI will be clearly displayed as Kirkland dances around the ring with his hands raised.
I believe the real promo's will begin after the Mayweather VS Pacquiao. Then hold on for the ride.
Fit it looks like the squeeze to lose the weak hands and wait for the bounce, or this baby is going to tank. I'm in for the ride to the finish. I'm speculating some promo Thurs. Fri. or Mon. after hours let it run 3-4 days before the fight. It will be interesting.
myfatdog; I'M here with the six just trying to sell my position in another stock to free up some funds to increases my position in EVLI. If you are not in by middle April it will be too late you will miss the ride. I am comfortable with my investment, see you at the deposit window at the bank.
The only thing I think I might want to buy is a bus ticket to get out of here. Some thing positive needs to happen today or the price will be at presplit levels very soon. Any thoughts Fit For Life
My etrade acct shows same amount of stock today as 2/10/15 and pricing @ .0033 pps. The quote details show last pps @ .0748 and my watch list shows .0748 pps with + 26.47% for the day and total of 28,506 for the volume. I was informed, with an attempt to fill out sell slip, not trading online must call for assistance. That's the best info. for now. When I do the math 6000 @ .0033= $19.8 1/6 of 6000 = 1000 If same par value 19.8/1000 = .0198 pps yet the close shows .0748. that's about 370% increases, interesting. maybe I'm looking at this wrong any thoughts
Thanks for your thoughts, your scenario could certainly be the way this plays out. Once again wait and see.
now we know why 2 members names of mang. team were taken of list
Myfatdog & Fit For Life where is this going now, RS is very seldom a good thing. With some luck there will be a bounce after the split for a very short time and then wait for months for something to develop. Not the best scenario IMO. GLTA
this closes at .14 or higher next week will be fun could reach .20
perhaps news is released of up coming movie, SK's future may hold the success of the movie in the balance. makes for good reading and good discussion on TMZ. Any publicity is good pub. in Hollywood.
the spin on this news will be interesting, it could be an unexpected good news for PPS. IMO the positive aspect will be short lived.
TY Fit For Life. Looking forward to better days this will be a good Christmas present or maybe a great start to 2015 when PPS reaches its potential.
Log on t etrade this morning found strange numerical listing with no other information in my portfolio. Called etrade to question the listing was told this was a spin off from EVLI, no other information available. Must be related to dividend shares = 10% of original purchased shares. Is there any info out about reverse split, I can't find any filings relating to reverse split was there such a filing made several months ago perhaps I might have missed. Sent email to EVLI waiting for response.
Fit for Life - you are right nobody is trading, I am looking for a more comfortable exit. Today may be the best I can do. I have a hard time using my investment dollars to bail out some rap yahoo. There have been very few penny stocks that invest in entertainment become a worthy investment.
a quick look at the companies on the OTCQX about 75% are Canadian companies. Just a coincidence? This looks like a stronger relationship between TCPL and STWA then what is being revealed on the surface. I think this will be a good Christmas.
On Oct 15 - 25th does the NDA, which I believe is part of the lease, end or is the information about testing remain the property of TCPL?
Is STWA able to release information, that is of a general nature, regarding the testing results?
IMO this would improve and stabilize the PPS even without an immediate purchase order for AOT's. Orders would need to be placed in a reasonable amount of time after the release of the information.
Good luck on agreeing what a reasonable amount of tie is.
Seeking 25 million for investment capital how many shares will be released to help raise those funds. This will be a long ride before we get back to reasonable PPS. Oh well looks like I will be riding this stock until 2015.
I took a calculated risk and increased my share holdings in the last 30 days
Calculated risk; A chance taken after careful estimation of the probable outcome. This term uses calculated in the sense of “planned with forethought,”
Measured Risk ; Statistical measures that are historical predictors of investment risk and volatility and major components in modern portfolio theory (MPT). MPT is a standard financial and academic methodology for assessing the performance of a stock or a stock fund compared to its benchmark index.
I first thought I was taking measured risk but upon further thought I realized that Penny stocks don't necessarily follow historical investment predictors, and there is no real benchmark company or product to compare to. The are other indices that SWTA may fit into but this is still R&D stage.
By reading post on this board that are both positive and negative my decision "planned with forethought" was to increase my position.
Now that I have invested I am comfortable with my decision as I am sure most of those that own shares in SWTA are.
There appears to be multiple reasons why the PPS seems to be undervalued, just a thanks to those that help the price reach this level so I was able to increase my investment.
I hope this post is taken in the spirit it was written, not about any individual poster but about STWA and the bright future of the company and the investment potential
if closes at .08 or better on Friday next week should be exciting
Pump output is 50 gal min., @ present viscosity only pumps 25 gal per min. and uses set amt of energy. Reduce viscosity output should increase with same amt of energy( up to pumps max. of 50 gal/min) if nothing else changes. how the viscosity changes is irrelevant.