Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
HOw "comfy" are you asking these nonsense questions?
Who are you trying to fool with this cheap lye?
Jesse James, Hackman and Dolkart, is that the connection? LOL
These hundreds of anomalies have been filtered for elimination of farm equipment and steel buildings as a probable cause for such an impressive count of anomalies."
Thats it. It says that hundred of anomalies have been filtered for elimination of farm and steel buildings. My take: we have hundreds of anomalies after filtering.
That is the end for me.No more BS.
It says that in the same PR you were reading. LOL
Sorry, you are distorting the PR to serve your purposes. This is not what it says. You are lying. It says hundred of anomalies left AFTER filtering.
Sorry Chris, the numbers we were toying are for just ONE PIPE. If we hit a very large and rich pipe the numbers will be much better. Second, I expect CMKX holdings to yield many more productive pipes.There was a PR talking about hundreds of anomalies, after filtering. Just on the conservative side, if we have 5 or 6 very productive pipes, the PE and the pps will be significantly higher.
Nope. The cost of processing is about $118, and the possibility to process ore is about 6,000 tonnes a day. Now Do the math right.
I just want to say this:
WHOEVER THINKS THERE ARE NOT DIAMONDS IN CMKX HOLDINGS IS NUTS.
Actually the PR said hundreds of anomalies after filtering.
Gump, you are the expert. Care to educate us ignorant geologists. How long will it take to analyse and produce results from the samples collected at the new site? TIA
Excellent thinking dude.
Chris your assumptions are wrong
Here are some facts for the Diavik mine ( it calls for about 6,000 tonnes processed a DAY and 3.9 carats/tonne):
Estimated reserves – 27.1 million tonnes at 3.9 carats/tonne (diluted)
Four ore bodies named A154 South, A154 North, A418, and A21
Ore production – up to 2 million tonnes annually
Annual diamond production – peaks at approximately 8 million carats
Mine Life – estimated 16 to 22 years
Project capital cost – nearly C$1.3 billion
Total employment – approximately 700 workers
Annual mine purchasing – approximately C$100 million
Start of diamond production – January 2003
For details, see the Diavik Fact Book.
Arthur, meet Janice. Janice, meet Arthur.
Arthur no way Jose, this is a prank worth of Janice, not me.She is a prankster, check this board several hours earlier, you will see it cost an insurance company 27000 dollars to settle for a "joke" she made with two other fellows.
Just go to the link below, type her name and you will find out she is registered for the party.
Anybody can check it.
http://www.ourbusinessweb.com/cmkx/default.asp
"We got very good press" Are you an owner too of that outfit? Send them some "stuff" (you know what) about CMKX, and try to do a number like the one you did to the other guys. $27,000 will be cool money for CMKX. Then you will be an investor too. LOL
LOL. Janice's registration for the party, is worth 0.01 for CMKX shares. What a joke.
C'mon Janice, dont be shy! Nothing wrong with going to the party. Is it because you know the outcome? Perhaps you are a clairvoyant and expect CMKX to do well?
Janice Shell is registered for the party!!!!LOL
Janice Shell 8/14/2004 12:21:14 AM
Ask Janice, she is registered and supossedly going to the party. What are you going to celebrate there, Janice???
The disappearance -demise of CMKX, or share in the joy with others for your profits in this "scam"?
I cannot wait to see the faces of the participants when they see there. LOL
Janice congratulations!!!!
You are registered for the CMKX party in Las Vegas. I did not know you had shares, you sneaky one!!!!!
Main Page / Register / Check My Registration / Childrens Activities / Links / Contact Us
Search Below To Ensure You Are Registered
Click Here If you have not already registered!
Your Full Name
Registration Name
Eg. John Smith
Janice Shell 8/14/2004 12:21:14 AM
Euthy, I think you are trying to create a divertion. Certainly the CUSIP is originally assigned to a company by the CUSIP organization. Then when there is a transaction (buy or sell) the CUSIP number that identifies the company is attached to the shares sold or bought (so there is a single number that identifies all the shares of that company). So, the MM's are the ones who peg that number to the sold shares, NOT the CUSIP organization. In this way, by having JUST ONE CUSIP NUMBER, it is possible to disguise ALL SHARES illegitimate or legal. It is impossible to discern between them.
This is the beauty and tragedy of the system. Beauty, because it allows the MM's to issue (as I called figuratively "PRINTING", as in printing fake money in your printer); as many naked short shares as they please, and the tragedy of that, is that we, shareholders and companies, are the victims of fraude.
We end up paying for that.
Euthy, how about illegal naked shorted shares being assigned the same CUSIP number, the same as the legal ones (shorted or not)>
Posted today by Sterling. Just for your information.
By: stervc
12 Sep 2004, 09:58 AM EDT
Msg. 80274 of 80390
(This msg. is a reply to 80164 by Sugarpaw.)
Jump to msg. #
Sugarpaw, to piggyback on those thoughts...
I agree that the MMs will have to cover CMKX eventually or... they will be forced to keep funding each stock dividend Urban gives us.
This would like imagining a huge value of the short for CMKX being covered in little pieces through each stock dividend. The thought is that the MMs would eventually realize that after covering enough through the stock dividends, they would then see that all it does is delay the inevitable, covering CMKX.
Keep in mind, each stock certificate is monitored by a stock certificate number that is used for accountability.
What could be happening is that the MMs are routing through the same stock certificate number many times to trick the DTC into thinking that the shares are actual shares that electronically matches with what's in the database as an authorized certificate from their custodian of accounts who received their CMKX certificates from the Transfer Agent.
Since the amounts are listed in bulk, this could be done to mask the amount of CMKX shares being transacted which would explain why everyone has a certificate number on their shares as of today. This is nothing more than the MMs masking the short through sharing of stock certificate numbers as they are transacted through the DTC. Because of the vastness of the market, the DTC would not initially have the time to go back and monitor such transactions unless proof was made prevalent and brought to their attention.
Example: This would be like you buying 10 Million shares CMKX. Your 10 Million shares would be (hypothetically) listed under the cert number of 12345. Consider if the shares are shorted. Now consider if five other people wanted to buy 10 Million shares. What they would do is list it as being under the same 12345 cert number.
This means that 10 + 50 = 60 Million shares would be listed under the cert number of 12345. I think the MMs are banking on there never being a massive pulling of certs for anyone to verify this. These are only some quick thoughts that are only my opinions to consider as another option as to what might be happening too.
All is well!
http://www.sterlingsclass.com/
Sterling
Naked short selling is the work of thieves and crooks. CMKX is being naked short to death by crooks and thieves. They are being aided by MM's.
Matrix, go ahead, report me to the SEC for claiming that CMKX is been naked shorted to death. Ask them to sue me for libel. And when you do it, send me a copy to whom you send it, name, and telephone number. How is that?
Is CMKX the victim of Naked short selling, with Market Makers complicity? You bet. Here is how is done.
Is JEF involved in this? You bet they are. NITE, Schwab, Etrade and another ten MM's might be involved in the trillion shares short scam.
So how bad is this issue? (short selling). Here is the prove.
In 1999 the SEC went out for public comment on a concept release pertaining to Short Selling. One comment they received came from a Senior Member and Director of Compliance and Operations for an NASD Member firm. This ranking officer claims “market makers and broker/dealers have rigged the game so they can play by a different set of rules than the general public and, to date, this has been protected by the regulatory bodies”. This Officer then proceeds on by Stating “Every day, market pros short sell IPO's, short sell on downticks, and short sell without regard to the availability of certificates, all things done at the expense of individual investors, who do not have the right to do the same.” To this extent, the issues addressed in this memo exist to this very day unchanged.
http://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s72499/loverde1.txt
Skunk, I guess Jan is just posting here "funny" stories, like she usually does. She is not to be taken seriously. Besides, her past activities have often taken her into a collision course with the law.
Is Janice a prankster or a professional Hack? You be the judge.
Wednesday, Apr 28, 1999 12:08 PMRespond to of 3771
Dow Jones Newswires
Business Wire Sues Over April Fool's Day Hoax
By JOHANNA BENNETT
Dow Jones Newswires
NEW YORK -- A trio of pranksters is being sued for using a well known business wire service to help pull off an April Fool's Day spoof involving a make-believe Internet company.
Officials at Business Wire, a San Francisco company that distributes corporate press releases electronically, said the company filed suit in a California federal court. The lawsuit - which named Janice Shell, Jeff Mitchell and William Ulrich as defendants - comes more than three weeks after a spoof where a phony press release was issued over the wire service regarding a fake government contract for a non-existent company.
Shell, Mitchell and Ulrich, all members of a loosely affiliated group of online stock sleuths known as FBN Associates, have maintained that the gag was meant to educate small investors about Internet stock scams. But Business Wire isn't laughing.
The lawsuit, filed Monday, asks for an injunction against the pranksters, as well as financial damages for violation of state and federal trademark laws, fraud, breach of contract, defamation and conspiracy, said Cathy Baron Tamraz, executive vice president of Business Wire.
Additional details regarding the lawsuit were not immediately available.
"It isn't funny," said Tamraz. "No one thinks it is funny anymore."
FBN Associates has become well known among Internet investors for its efforts to investigate online investment scams, as well as the group's annual April Fool's Day prank. Last year, the group created a Web site, complete with humorous advertisements, dedicated to a fake Y2K company and posted a press release about it on an Internet message board.
This year's prank also involved a make-believe Web site dedicated to a non-existent company, known as WebNode.com. And in what was billed as a "real estate of the Internet" deal, the bogus company claimed it had received a contract from the government to raise $4 billion to set up a fiber-optic system for the Next Generation Internet.
The deal, which offered 40 million nodes - a point for data to travel along the Internet - for $100 each, was publicized on an Internet message board and in a Business Wire press release.
The punch line came the next day when the pranksters attached a message to the WebNode.com Web site revealing that the company and the deal were not real. But by then, just under 2,000 people had e-mailed inquiries to WebNode.com asking about investment opportunities. Also, Wired, a popular online news magazine, took the press release as truth and published a story.
"It is clearly explained that this is a joke," said Shell, a co-defendant.
Business Wire has claimed, among other things, that the prank damaged the wire service's reputation, adding that WebNode.com responded to inquiries from investors many of whom believed the press release information. The lawsuit also alleges that the defendants defamed Business Wire by making false assertions that Business Wire was involved in fraudulent investment schemes, according to a company press release.
Shell and Ulrich denied Business Wire's accusations.
Ulrich concedes that he has pointed out that Business Wire has run press releases in the past containing false information, but he says he has never accused the wire service of active involvement in fraud.
"Business Wire prefers to come after us for pointing it out, rather than going after companies that actually take money from people," Ulrich said.
Meanwhile, Shell said prank organizers never collected sensitive information from investors or responded to investors' inquiries.
"Why are they going after us?" Shell said. "Our purpose is to educate investors about scams hypes. Why aren't they going after some of the bad guys?"
Meanwhile, Bruce Methven, Ulrich's attorney, and Mitchell, a co-defendant, declined to comment about the lawsuit, adding that they have yet to see a copy of the court documents.
Business Wire serves about 15,000 clients who pay fees to run corporate press releases on their wire. A regular account was established for WebNode.com.
-Johanna Bennett; 201-938-5670
http://interactive.wsj.com/bin/login?Tag=/&URI=/archive/retr...
Paper game you said?
Oh right, the MM's are printing shares just on paper in their basement. A trillion naked short shares as a matter of fact.
Mad Clown does not own any shares in CMKX, why are you welcoming him to the mine of diamonds? Or perhaps is he getting "rewarded" for posting so many posts just because his "goodness of heart?" LOL
Bye the way, do you own any CMKX shares, or are you in the same line of "business" as Mad Clown?
Matrix
You expect Jeff, NITE and the others to admit to ilegal trading? Are you that naive? Oh my God.
Have you heard of any thief admit that he robbed you? Dont make me laugh.
So how bad is this issue? (short selling)
In 1999 the SEC went out for public comment on a concept release pertaining to Short Selling. One comment they received came from a Senior Member and Director of Compliance and Operations for an NASD Member firm. This ranking officer claims “market makers and broker/dealers have rigged the game so they can play by a different set of rules than the general public and, to date, this has been protected by the regulatory bodies”. This Officer then proceeds on by Stating “Every day, market pros short sell IPO's, short sell on downticks, and short sell without regard to the availability of certificates, all things done at the expense of individual investors, who do not have the right to do the same.” To this extent, the issues addressed in this memo exist to this very day unchanged.
http://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s72499/loverde1.txt
Chisox you forget to mention the near trillion short naked shares.Ask the Market Makers, they will tell you who is selling billions of shares and pocketing the money on ilegal shares printed in the basement of their offices. It is as if someone prints money in his copier and uses that in the supermarket, isnt it?
Horse, what are you taking right now?
Oh yes, I have my certs already. Not selling any shares since June, and I wont sell any until it reaches into the pennies.
Mad Clown, got any prove of your quote below? I would like to have a link to that.
"I've been watching it over the past year in amazement at how they've generated tens of millions of dollars through the sale of 500+ billion shares" Where you got this?
Dont have prove? Then dont say it. It is a waste of our time; not only you dont own any shares, you are just discrediting a company for nothing.
Horse just joking. You Dont really have to eat that.
Horse
eat what you leave behind.